| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1776
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
FuzzyBunny's Review
Interesting review. Like you, the emphasis on big breasts (fake or real) means that I'd likely not consider joining. But since your review made that clear you may have saved me some money!
|
08-02-13 08:12am
|
Comment
1777
|
Dirt Pipe Divas
(0)
|
|
08-02-13 08:09am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1778
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
Four for me, but that's sort of unusual. Two is usually it at any one time for me.
I'm surprised that as I'm writing this 41% of respondents say they have no active memberships. I'd have guessed that number would be much lower for the members here.
|
08-02-13 08:05am
|
Reply
1779
|
Dirt Pipe Divas
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Reply
It bills through a biller I'm not familiar with (Zombaio) and I'd guess that this was a cost issue for the site. I checked the cancellation link and it seems straightforward and just like other billers so I'm not anticipating any problems. If I do have a problem I'll let the gang here know, but my silence on the issue will mean there is no problem.
If I do encounter a problem I'd email the webmaster though. He's prompt, courteous and customer oriented so I suspect he could resolve any problem that came up.
|
08-02-13 08:03am
|
Reply
1780
|
Let's Try Anal
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I noticed the same thing and wondered if it was acting or real.
|
07-27-13 10:04am
|
Reply
1781
|
Let's Try Anal
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
I'm no fan of those either, but at least with TBP you get a warning. That's an industry practice that I'd like to see the end of.
|
07-27-13 10:04am
|
Reply
1782
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Comment
I'm with you on being a big fan of EA (and their related 'network' of sites - see Mike Adriano, for example). These sites represent some of the best value on the 'net. Some (perhaps you too) join in spite of the anal, I join because of it. Also, their HD quality is exceptional. I'm downloading 1920x1280 stuff from other sites that doesn't have the same crispness and clarity that EA has.
One point of disagreement, while it may seem like a month that streaming is the only option, it is probably closer to a week. I just wrapped up memberships to EA and the related network and it might even be as low as four or five days. It may depend on the scene too, I don't know. It is frustrating, but only REALLY frustrating when your one month membership is set to expire in three days and they upload a scene you really, really want and you know it won't be downloadable until after your membership expires. But that's likely their point anyway.
For me, EA is the new Videobox. I used to join VB every six months but now EA is the site I join over and over and over. Keep an eye on your email because there will be offers for other great sites from them too.
|
07-24-13 03:47am
|
Reply
1783
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Most of the time I don't, but that's subjective. And I think part of it comes from getting used to a model the way I first see her. When I first became a Chelsie Rae fan she was blonde, so I still prefer her that way. Likewise with Zoe Voss. She was a redhead when I first saw her and I prefer her that way even though it appears that she's naturally a brunette. (The case with Zoe may be influenced by my love of redheads though...)
|
07-24-13 03:40am
|
Reply
1784
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
I know this is odd, but I like watersports but not squirting.
|
07-22-13 02:13pm
|
Reply
1785
|
Mike Adriano
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
I hope that I didn't mislead you on the streaming thing. It only lasts a few days and then they open the scene up for downloads. It is a little annoying when its a scene you really want, but you can watch it and then come back in a few days and download it. Honestly, it is just a minor annoyance and I wouldn't let it stop you from joining. It really is just a blip on an otherwise great site.
Thanks for taking the time to comment on my review.
|
07-21-13 06:20pm
|
Reply
1786
|
GF Revenge
(0)
|
Reply of
taken4granted's Review
This is another example of TBP / PU saving me money. I was seriously thinking of joining this site until I read your review. The preview pages make no mention that the site is streaming only and that's a deal breaker for me. Thanks for the review and warning. You definitely saved me some money and disappointment.
|
07-21-13 08:25am
|
Reply
1787
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
To their credit, it is mentioned clearly in the Terms of Service. But 15 downloads per month??? That's insane. It looks like another attempt to foil pirates that only hurts legitimate paying customers.
|
07-21-13 08:13am
|
Reply
1788
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Damn! To make matters worse, I see they have pics of Sasha on the preview pages both before and after her implants. That sort of highlights the issue. At least they aren't cartoonishly big, but she looked almost perfect before them and didn't need new breasts.
|
07-21-13 08:11am
|
Reply
1789
|
Girls Next Door Club
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
This site looks pretty good. I hope it continues to grow. Thanks for posting the review.
|
07-21-13 08:08am
|
Reply
1790
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Comment
The inability to preview anything is a big flaw and whoever made that decision at VB should be tarred and feathered. I always used VB as an example of how to make a site user-friendly and allow a prospective customer to see everything that was available. This is bad news.
|
07-19-13 12:04pm
|
Reply
1791
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've taken my computer in before but I don't really have much porn on it. I keep everything on removable drives. Now if they checked my browsing history then that might be a bit embarrassing... But I'm sure they've seen worse.
|
07-19-13 11:59am
|
Reply
1792
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Thanks for the kind words, graymane. I hear ya about being jealous of all the young lasses that Pierre gets to work with!
|
07-16-13 06:02pm
|
Reply
1793
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Thanks for the comments. It was pricey, but I think it is worth it too considering that it is exclusive stuff. Both the Casting and WUNF sites are great and I'd recommend both if you ever change your mind.
|
07-16-13 06:00pm
|
Reply
1794
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for that tip. I checked that out and it seems that she is pretty messed up. It was weird that Pierre kept mentioning he wanted to set her up for a gangbang. I figured he would have a bit more compassion...
|
07-16-13 05:59pm
|
Reply
1795
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I did notice the addition of WUNF scenes to the Casting site but I figured I was seeing those since I had a membership to both. I hope he isn't running out of material.
As an aside, there is some stuff that he probably should have not uploaded. Today I downloaded and watched a scene with a German model with a strikingly beautiful face. She says her name is Mika or Mikki or something like that but she listed as "Leylou." She does a scene with no hardcore and while she's likely too thin for most people she might even be too thin for me. But when she undresses there is something that I've never seen in porn and I've seen a lot of porn. Her arms are covered, and I mean COVERED in scar tissue from where she has obviously been cutting herself for years. I like rough porn, I like 'dirty' porn, but this made me uncomfortable. I suspect the last thing this beautiful young woman needed in her life was a porn career. This is her only scene on the site, so I'm guessing Woodman didn't use her for anything else. It might have been best if this scene never saw the light of day.
|
07-11-13 06:04pm
|
Reply
1796
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
I agree, but having the 'amateur' feel to it does add to the overall heat of the site. I suspect that a director of Woodman's ability and resources could use a full crew if he wanted, so I wonder if the amateur feel he creates in intentional. I suspect that it might be.
Thanks for the comment on the review.
|
07-11-13 05:55pm
|
Reply
1797
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Cons can be hardest for me since I spend some time researching the site using TBP and here and know what I'm getting. Most times I don't like a site it is for subjective reasons and I try not to let those creep into a review.
|
07-10-13 03:46pm
|
Reply
1798
|
Anal Pantyhose
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for the information. I'll browse that network.
|
07-03-13 05:52pm
|
Reply
1799
|
Anal Pantyhose
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
This sounds like an interesting niche site pat. But pantyhose are one thing I've never been interested in. I don't know if that's because I associate them with grandmotherly types, but I just don't find them sexy. I'm not saying I don't understand the interest, I just don't share it. Good review, BTW.
|
07-02-13 06:30pm
|
Reply
1800
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
taken4granted's Comment
Look at the bright side though, if law enforcement raids your house for porn usage all the rest of us PU members will be in jail too. It'll be like a Pornusers convention!
Seriously though, I'm glad to hear you got your access back. Met Art seem to be a reputable site so anything less would be troubling.
|
06-19-13 05:32pm
|
