| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1176
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
What Jay G said.
|
02-15-16 01:39pm
|
Reply
1177
|
Wake Up N Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
I ran out of space in my review and forgot to mention a few key details:
- There are 178 scenes here
- The site updates regularly
- Some newer scenes have 4K as the top resolution. File sizes are over 10GB so I haven’t downloaded any of those. (These file sizes make the need for a 720p option more acute.)
|
02-13-16 05:08am
|
Reply
1178
|
Wank Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
Enjoy it! It isn't a great network but if you know that going in you'll find lots to like.
|
02-11-16 04:50pm
|
Reply
1179
|
Wank Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
I wish I could help but femdom isn't something I even consider when I'm on a site. Sorry, my friend...
|
02-10-16 05:12pm
|
Reply
1180
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Review
Your review perfectly encapsulates the real value of Pornusers - that someone with the knowledge of a site's history can weigh in and give an objective view of a site. I could have joined this site and reviewed it but my review would have none of the weight that yours does.
On a semi-related note, I have no idea why a site would remove older material. I can accept that older stuff will be lower quality resolution but I appreciate that it remains available. If the site puts a date on the older stuff then it becomes self-explanatory as to why it is lower quality.
|
02-07-16 05:42am
|
Reply
1181
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Review
Excellent review. When I saw your review uploaded I read it hoping that you might see some signs of improvement but you've noted the same flaws I did. They offer some decent porn but they really need to step up several notches on the technical stuff to even match their competitors.
|
02-06-16 10:07am
|
Comment
1182
|
My Babysitters Club
(0)
|
|
02-06-16 10:00am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1183
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I've joined some specialty BDSM sites that are quite expensive. I think Infernal Restraints is probably the most expensive. For me, price is only one part of my decision process. If the site is expensive but offers great value then I'll still be likely to join.
|
02-05-16 01:09pm
|
Reply
1184
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Reply
Thanks for taking the time to comment on my review. I appreciate your feedback.
I tend to ignore user ratings mostly because they can be so subjective. For all I know someone might give a low or high rating simply because they like or dislike a specific model. I often, but not always, read comments and they sometimes influence whether I'd download a scene or not. For example, I like seeing facials and a comment may say that the scene has an amazing facial. That comment would influence my decision.
And I agree with your general comment on Team Skeet: it had been about a year since I had been a member and this time is seems so much better - and I really liked it all the other times I've been a member there. It's good to hear that I'm not alone in this assessment.
|
02-05-16 01:01pm
|
Reply
1185
|
Teens Love Anal
(0)
|
Reply of
rooka's Reply
Thanks for your comment Sir. I appreciate the feedback.
I'm a big fan of Woodman Casting too. It's on my list of sites that I join regularly though I only join it once per year or so because it is fairly expensive. The price is higher for me simply because I always buy a membership to Woodman's other site called Wake Up 'n Fuck. https://www.wakeupnfuck.com/ WUNF isn't listed here so there is no review. It's getting near the time when I should be thinking about rejoining Woodman Casting and WUNF so maybe I'll see of TBP can list WUNF so I can put up a review. Pierre Woodman makes some amazing porn for those of us into anal stuff, and while this is a personal preference, I prefer WUNF to Woodman Casting. But I always buy a membership to both...
I haven't joined WUNF in over a year so I can't say for that this is still the case, but Woodman had a lot more American porn stars on that site and he had a lot of first and rare anals too. The last time I joined WUNF it was specifically to get Asphyxia Noir's first anal scene - and one of only a handful she did.
Sorry to ramble there...
|
02-05-16 12:56pm
|
Reply
1186
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks for posting this review. Reading it made me wonder why I haven't rejoined it in over two years because when I was last a member there I really liked it too. And with the TBP discount it is a great value. (Though the main 21 Sextury site doesn't list the discount I did go in through one of the sub-sites and it does appear to still be offered.)
So thanks for posting the review and thanks for refreshing my memory of a great site.
|
02-01-16 05:19pm
|
Reply
1187
|
Dark X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I think you're 100% right.
|
01-31-16 07:31am
|
Reply
1188
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
papermarvin's Reply
Thanks for taking the time to comment on my review. I've been a big fan of your site for several years but this most recent time I joined was even better.
|
01-31-16 07:30am
|
Reply
1189
|
Dark X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I think the allure of IR is that it is perceived by some as still being taboo. I have no idea why that is, but it is. Consider all the threads on other forums about which starlets will and won't do IR. It's a major fascination these days for some. I can't fault Mason for wanting in on the craze. If Dark X's success helps fund more Tushy.com scenes then I'm a fan too! Bring on more first anals on Tushy!
|
01-23-16 07:14am
|
Reply
1190
|
Dark X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
More good points...
You're probably right that the TBP discount influenced my decision a bit and that if I had to pay full price I might not have been so generous.
Your contrast of Dark X with Hard X and Tushy is correct too. I paid full price for Tushy because of the three sites that was (is) the one that offers something distinct and valuable. They offer a lot of first anals and I'm willing to pay to collect those.
But Hard and Dark are really much more mainstream and could really be rolled together. I do think that for whatever reason "IR" is popular so Mason wanted to take advantage of that.
|
01-22-16 08:50am
|
Reply
1191
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
rooka's Reply
Thanks for taking the time to say that. I get a lot of value out of the TBP and PU reviews so I'm glad to learn that I'm giving other people the same kind of information.
|
01-22-16 08:45am
|
Reply
1192
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jake88's Review
Carefully consider any decision to add Evil Angel as a premium to VB. It may be that it works for you, but it might not. I know that with a monthly membership the Premium channels are pro-rated so they can be inexpensive if you wait to add them on until later in your monthly membership but I don't know how it works when you have an annual subscription.
The other thing to consider is video quality. I was a VB member a couple of months ago and added Elegant Angel. While it is true that the Premium channels offer 'HD' you can do much better on the actual studio site. It may not make a difference to you, but I'd join Evil Angel at the TBP discount and get true HD instead of adding the EA Premium channel at VB.
I should add that Evil Angel is among my top three favorite studio sites so that may influence my decision too. Your choice may be different, but think about quality and not just price.
|
01-21-16 01:56pm
|
Reply
1193
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I prefer street clothes that reveal some skin and curves. For some reason I'm also drawn to women in ball caps.
My preference with street clothes peaked at the time when low-cut jeans and crop tops were in fashion. God I miss those days! I hope to live long enough to see that trend come around again. There was nothing better than a beautiful woman dressed like that with her jeans just above her pubic area and a flat stomach for all to see.
I'd better go now before I drool on my keyboard thinking about this.
|
01-20-16 02:44pm
|
Reply
1194
|
Dark X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I agree 100% that the material for this site could just as easily be uploaded to either Hard X or Erotica X depending on the scene. I gave the site the benefit of the doubt because times are tough in the porn business and if a producer/director can spin off a separate site to generate more earnings then I can live with that - as long as the quality is good, and it is very good on all of Mason's sites.
|
01-20-16 02:40pm
|
Reply
1195
|
Porn Mastermind
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Interesting group of sites. I was a member of one of the sites a few years back but I don't remember it being part of a network. If that's new I might need to take another look at this. Access to some select bonus scenes is a big plus too. Thanks for pointing this out.
|
01-16-16 10:11am
|
Reply
1196
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Bummsi's Comment
Welcome to Pornusers!
I'm also not able to answer you specific question, but I'm confident that Wittyguy is right. I'm in Canada where the obscenity laws are definitely tighter than in the US and I never have any worries about the sites listed here causing me any problems.
If you join Teen Mega World I think you'll enjoy it. Please be sure to post a review too!
|
01-12-16 05:36pm
|
Reply
1197
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
I'm not usually into solo girl peeing, but I'd make an exception for Riley Reid! Let me know if you rejoin and find the scene.
Riley has her own site now and she seems to be doing a lot of stuff that she doesn't do in mainstream DVDs - like more anal. Maybe she'll do some peeing scenes on her own site.
|
01-12-16 05:32pm
|
Reply
1198
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I write most reviews off-line and then copy-and-paste them into the site. My first drafts of a review always exceed the limits and there are times I think they're too low. But... I think the limits are just fine. They force me to edit my reviews more than I would if I had no limits and I think those edits keep the review more on point and readable.
My vote is to keep the current limits.
|
01-12-16 05:28pm
|
Reply
1199
|
Pissing.com
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Reply
Amen to CC processors losing some of their clout. It bugs me when sites are compelled to self-censor to appease the bankers.
On a semi-related note, I really like finding peeing in scenes where it is unexpected. Last Year Maddy O'Reilly had an incredibly hot scene at Brazzers (http://www.brazzers.com/tour4/scenes/vie.../8361/sex-on-wheels/). The scene was hot anyway but at the end the guy pees on Maddy. I wasn't expecting that and that scene will be a favourite of mine until I can't watch porn any more. I've read that Maddy has since developed a bit of a pee fetish. I should see if I can find more of that.
|
01-10-16 08:46am
|
Reply
1200
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I pretty much stick to what I like. I have a bunch of sites that I rejoin on a regular basis so I know what I'm getting. I do occasionally join some sites that are beyond my normal interests. Like BDSM sites at Kink, for example.
|
01-10-16 08:37am
|
