| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1076
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm a big fan of this genre. I like the public element of it though admittedly it is often poorly shot due to space constraints.
|
01-07-17 11:29am
|
Comment
1077
|
Granddadz
(0)
|
|
01-04-17 05:43pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
1078
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
I agree that this is a great fetish network. I wish some of the dormant sites would become active again. This network covers a broad range of fetishes.
|
01-04-17 05:40pm
|
Reply
1079
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Review
I like the genres they cover but I find some of their scene setups to be repetitive. The scenes seem to follow a set pattern.
If you're still a member there can you see if Brutal Pickups has updated recently please? I was a member there recently and the most recent update was May 2016. I like the public element of those scenes and would consider rejoining if they had new stuff.
|
01-03-17 04:57pm
|
Reply
1080
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Yeah, I hadn't thought of Legal Porno. As you say, it is expensive but worth it. Evil Angel can come close but there is no substitute for LP stuff.
|
01-03-17 04:54pm
|
Reply
1081
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
It depends on the criteria. If the award is open to any site then I'd probably choose Evil Angel. They crank out a lot of amazing porn and seem to have hit on a business model that works. And the site isn't pricey either so that helps.
But, if the criteria is a new site in 2016 then I'd have to vote for Holed. It's no coincidence that my favourite scene from 2016 also comes from there.
|
01-02-17 06:24am
|
Reply
1082
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Cameron Diaz does it for me.
|
12-29-16 05:38am
|
Reply
1083
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Femanon's Comment
Ah, our good friends at Centrobill strike again. I had the same problem a few months ago and a member here had posted an email address that actually works. This is too late now for you to cancel your trial membership but it if still recurs this should do it. The email is linked in this thread on the forum:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=4680
And don't feel bad about getting burned by not doing all the research that you should. It's happened to a lot of us...
|
12-27-16 05:28am
|
Reply
1084
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I rarely listen to music at home so there is no need for me to invest in equipment. My wife and I have such different tastes in music that whatever each of us plays annoys the other. She prefers top-40 stuff and I have a broad range of preferred music styles from traditional bluegrass, through 'classic' country and into 70's rock. The only common theme in my music collection is that with rare exceptions not much is newer than the late 1970s.
|
12-27-16 05:23am
|
Reply
1085
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
One thing that continues to impress me about PU is how civil everyone has remained, even with new members joining all the time. The bar was set high and has stayed that way. I can't imagine a more civil forum on any topic exists on the internet.
|
12-24-16 05:00am
|
Reply
1086
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Having a counterpoint to mostly positive reviews is good though. PU is invaluable for that reason.
|
12-24-16 04:58am
|
Reply
1087
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Part of me wants to strangle you for writing bad things about Tushy, but the bigger part of me has to admit that you’re right. Objectively, Tushy is a bit dull. They strive for a certain look in every scene and that includes the models they cast. While the scenes aren't formulaic they do stick within some narrow boundaries. And you’re right, ethnicity, age and body type are among those boundaries.
I think it’s great for anyone reading PU reviews to see that there is a counter-view to the glowing reviews that some of us wrote.
This is still a favourite site of mine and will likely remain so for a long time but I can appreciate and understand your counterpoints. I like the model types the select and I like how the scenes are shot and edited, even if they are a bit stilted. But the big thing I really like about the site is that the formula they use (probably it’s just a big wad of cash!) obviously appeals to models who don’t normally do anal scenes. One the big draws to this site for me is the first and rare anals that they shoot.
But your points are definitely valid and will add a lot of credibility to how PU members review the site. Even if you're wrong... :-)
|
12-21-16 02:55pm
|
Reply
1088
|
Gangbang Creampie
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Not to mention that I need to write more reviews or you'll be taking over the #2 spot here soon! :-)
|
12-17-16 05:24am
|
Reply
1089
|
N/A
|
Reply of
superjank's Poll
Nothing other than online stuff. My collection has been entirely online stuff for probably close to a decade now. It's so much easier to manage and store that way.
|
12-17-16 04:59am
|
Reply
1090
|
Gangbang Creampie
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
This sounds like a site I'd like and I wasn't aware it existed. Based on your review I think I might join.
|
12-17-16 04:58am
|
Reply
1091
|
N/A
|
Reply of
superjank's Poll
I agree with merc77.
|
12-09-16 09:29am
|
Reply
1092
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
I tend to hoard porn and not delete it but a vast majority of it will only be watched a few times. When I find a video I really like I'll flag it and any of those videos could be watched often. Occasionally I'll go through my entire collection and thin out some stuff that I don't watch but the favorites will never get deleted, even if some of them are from the mid-90s and have terrible video quality.
|
12-07-16 02:29pm
|
Reply
1093
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Agreed. I'd be lying if I said I never joined a site through an email offer or through Idealgasm, but the offer has to be far better than what TBP/PU offers, and that doesn't happen often. I find that most offers I get are matched here at TBP and I'll always join through here to ensure that the primary funding source is alive and well.
Two other things about Idealgasm that are worth noting:
1) they offer deals on the same sites, over and over. It seems rare that a new discount is offered, unlike here at TBP/PU where new discounts are always being added;
2) Idealgasm offers no way for users to comment on the deals and potentially warn other users of possible problems. I joined a network through Idealgasm a few weeks ago and the deal was sold as full access but it actually only gave access to two of the network sites. If that happened here at TBP/PU a member would have made a comment and warned other potential subscribers away and the TBP/PU staff would have found out what was going on.
All that to say that I completely agree with you.
|
11-29-16 02:11pm
|
Reply
1094
|
Hookup Hotshot
(0)
|
Reply of
Divinx's Reply
Yes. Bryan Gozzling, the site owner, recently responded to member requests and allows a more generous download package. This will probably make the site more attractive to members.
|
11-22-16 05:15pm
|
Reply
1095
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
When I retired from the military I promised myself that I'd become a lazy, couch-dwelling, long-haired-hippy pothead. So far none of that has come to pass, but my primary exercise is lots of walking.
|
11-07-16 04:44pm
|
Reply
1096
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for the link. I have a couple of index sites bookmarked but I was looking for one that tracked by website. I guess I'm stuck in the Dark Ages with IAFD, though, to be fair, they are listing websites now.
|
11-07-16 04:42pm
|
Reply
1097
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
You're right... I have been a member there. It's a great site too but I like to follow specific models and Russian models change their names so often they don't make that easy. I guess I'll just have to be happy with the flood of old/young videos studios are putting out as stepdaughter /stepfather.
|
11-07-16 03:47pm
|
Reply
1098
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Very thorough review. Thanks for posting it.
It's disappointing that Jurassic Cock no longer updates as it was among the best old/young sites on the 'net when it was active. I know it isn't a niche that most people are interested in but old/young sites that feature top U.S. talent are few and far between.
|
11-06-16 06:15am
|
Reply
1099
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Wait... you mean that some people use 'dirty old man' as something other than a compliment?
|
11-06-16 06:12am
|
Reply
1100
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Agreed. I wish other new sites would price their memberships to account for the small size they start out with.
|
10-25-16 05:03pm
|
