| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1876
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Maybe it is time I figure out what I really have... This weekend I'll check all my drives and add them up. If you guys don't hear from me again it likely means I went into cardiac arrest.
|
12-05-12 01:16pm
|
Reply
1877
|
N/A
|
Reply of
oldfizzywig's Reply
Yeah... sometimes I wonder if the size of my collection should be a source of pride or shame!
|
12-05-12 04:01am
|
Reply
1878
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
I'm always interested to read other PU's reviews of my favourite Kink sites like this one. I'm always a little concerned when I score them high that others will think I'm being subjective so when I see other members scoring high I know I'm not too far off the mark.
Like you, I think this is one of the best sites that Kink offers, and I think Kink is a great network too. This may be just me rationalizing it, but Kink's production values are so high (and therefore there costs must be very high) that I don't see the price as a problem. But... like you I look for email discounts and once you're a member of one Kink site you can join the others at discounted prices. Still, it would be nice to have some bundling option.
Anyway, great review!
BTW - some (like me) see the 'failed scenes' as a pro since they add to the realism. I wish there were more of them.
|
12-04-12 02:26pm
|
Reply
1879
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've always been a video collector unless the technology meant pictures were the only thing reasonably available. For example, I collected magazines until the price of VCRs was reasonable enough to afford and then I jumped with both feet. When the internet started I downloaded only pics because of slow download speeds and the horrible quality of early vidoes. Once I had access to high speed internet and video quality improved I pretty much said goodby to pics.
I'm not opposed to pics and do still collect them, but of the probably almost 20 TB of porn I have I'd guess that less that a few hundred GB are pics.
|
12-04-12 02:19pm
|
Reply
1880
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gggfan's Poll
Tough question.
I still think the US of A is still in the lead, but Hungary and the Czech Republic are nipping at their heels. There must be something in their drinking water over there that causes a greater proportion of their girls to grow into stunningly beautiful women.
|
12-03-12 02:32pm
|
Reply
1881
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Great review, exotics, as usual.
I joined this site in 2009 and was amazed at how great it was then. One of the things I really enjoyed about the site then was that they did so much public nudity. I know the site doesn't market itself as a public nudity site but they could have given the volume of it that they had. Apart from the public stuff I didn't download all the segments for each model as I'm just not that into solo stuff. I don't think I've rejoined since 2009 but maybe I'll head back and have a look.
Quick question: does the stuff posted after in 2010 and newer have much public nudity in it? Back in 2009 the webmaster wrote that the number of security cameras being used now was making public stuff a dying breed.
Thanks!
|
12-03-12 02:30pm
|
Reply
1882
|
Tricky Masseur
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I did see your review and I intended to comment on it before I posted my review. I think they work well together.
I can't remember who it was - it may have been you - warned me to join Teen Mega World instead and I followed that advice and did. I'm glad I did because it is a great network and I still get access to the massage scenes.
|
12-03-12 02:17pm
|
Review
1883
|
Tricky Masseur
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Part of the large Teen Mega World network
- 93 scenes available
- Beautiful Russian and Eastern European models
- Allows download managers
- Bills through Epoch
- TBP / PU discount |
| Cons: |
- Updates infrequently
- Language reduces heat
- Slower than average download speeds
- Limited options for video download |
| Bottom Line: |
I’m a big fan of the massage niche and will usually try a site at least once to get access to new material, as I did here. One advantage with this site is that is that it gives you access to the entire Teen Mega World network. The name of the network should be an indication that the network and the sites within it aren’t for everyone: the site owners take the teen theme seriously so the only models here are beautiful young (18-20) Russian and Eastern European models. If your tastes are for older women, you probably won’t like this site or the network. (But for those of us who do prefer younger and more petite models, this site and the network are great.)
The site currently has 93 scenes available. The scenes follow the usual setup used in the massage niche: model walks in to get a massage from a male masseur, she undresses and gets on the table under a sheet or towel, the massage begins with the masseur slowly exposing more of the model as he massages her, eventually she’s naked and the fun begins. While this can be repetitive it can also increase the heat of the scene if it is done right. The right chemistry between the models and the right amount of tease can make for a great scene.
But… here’s where TM has a bit of a problem. I realize that this is very subjective and is beyond the control of the site so I won’t say this is a negative and I didn’t consider it when assessing a score. The problem is that in most massage scenes a lot of the heat is built by the interaction between the male and female models. But since this site uses Russian and Eastern European models they don’t speak English so the viewer loses a key element of that interaction. The site does use subtitles which certainly helps, but it doesn’t generate the tease and heat of a site that uses English-speaking models. The language issue is partly offset by the female models though, as most of them are incredibly beautiful.
The site layout is simple and easy to use. Each page has ten scenes listed with basic information about that scene. Clicking on a scene opens a new page where you can stream or download the scene. I didn’t try the streaming so I can’t comment on that. The scenes are available as one complete file or in parts. I only downloaded the complete scene so I can’t comment on the scene in parts either.
When it comes to downloading the scenes the site has made a choice that seems a bit odd. I don’t know enough technical stuff to understand why they’d do it this way, but I’m assuming that there is a reason. On most sites there are multiple file formats and sizes available. So, for example, you might prefer WMV files and those are available in two or three resolutions. If you prefer mp4 files, those are available too and in multiple resolutions. Here the choices are a bit different: there are multiple file sizes available but each one uses a different format: the high resolution is a WMV, there is a medium resolution in either MKV or FLV format and a resolution for mobile devices that comes as an mp4. So if you prefer WMV format but don’t want a 1GB file you’re out of luck.
I’m fine with WMV so I downloaded the highest resolution available which is in that format. Even the oldest scenes on the site (which aren’t that old – the first scene was uploaded on November 28, 2010) come in at 1280x720 at 4800+kb/s and 25fps. They use WMV Codec 9. Subjectively they look great. I can’t speak for the lower resolution files as I didn’t download them.
The site permits download managers (I use IDM) and I had no issue with links timing out. One issue that I did experience is that the download speeds could fluctuate. With IDM I’m used to seeing downloads near 7MB/s on most sites. With this site there were times when I could see those speeds but those times weren’t frequent or sustained. I could regularly see speeds well below 2MB/s. On average, I’d say that I got 4 to 4.5MB/s. Still not bad, but less than I normally get. The slower speeds also seemed to correspond with peak download times in Eastern Europe so I could often improve my downloads by waiting until those members were less likely to be downloading porn.
The site appears to be still active though updates are now infrequent. There was an update on November 24, 2012 but the next most recent was in April. As recently as March 2012 they were adding four or five scenes per month.
One factor that some potential members may be interested to know (and it could be a pro or a con depending on your preferences) is that while there are a good proportion of anal scenes on the other sites in the network, Tricky Masseur has no anal scenes.
The bottom line is that this is a pretty good massage site. The models are incredibly beautiful, young and petite and make for some great porn. If you like massage porn I’d recommend giving the site a try and as an added bonus you get access to a huge network and you get a TBP / PU discount too. |
|
12-03-12 03:59am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1884
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Reply
Yes! I hope that the ALS guys will read this and other comments and realize how many people like those. Those shoots were amazing!
|
12-01-12 07:42pm
|
Reply
1885
|
Burning Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Definitely not. Too bad too because so many of the models are really beautiful.
|
12-01-12 07:41pm
|
Reply
1886
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
I've got a long list of sites I want to join so I think I will wait a bit. I'd be happy to get network access without a discount too. We used to be able to get network access for $20 but I'd happily pay $30 for the quality they offer.
I didn't weigh in on the debate over exclusivity because I don't normally join Russian and Easter European sites so the models were all new to me anyway.
I can understand dieselman being protective of his sites, but I just hope he realizes we're his friends not his enemies.
|
11-27-12 01:23pm
|
Reply
1887
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Not that this will help you, but when I joined back in July I was billed through CCBill so cancelling was easy. It appears that they've changed billers. That's too bad since getting burned once I've vowed to only take memberships to sites that use reputable billers. (But I sometimes break my own rules...)
Good luck with this.
|
11-25-12 05:31pm
|
Reply
1888
|
Burning Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
You and I have a lot of similar tastes so my guess is that you'd like this site too. There is a lot of Joanna Angel stuff on the network. She also does a lot of anal here too.
|
11-25-12 05:28pm
|
Reply
1889
|
Burning Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Nope... the next thing might be acceptance of boob jobs. I was watching a Madison Scott scene earlier today and found myself okay with her massive pump-up - from A to DD. But I don't think that I'll be heading off to any big-breast sites (real or fake) any time soon. The tattooed models that I like are still young and petite.
|
11-25-12 05:27pm
|
Comment
1890
|
Punk Porn
(0)
|
|
11-24-12 10:08am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
1891
|
Heavy Metal Pussy Party
(0)
|
|
11-24-12 10:07am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
1892
|
POV Punx
(0)
|
|
11-24-12 10:06am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
1893
|
Punk School Girls
(0)
|
|
11-24-12 10:06am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
1894
|
Fuck Me In The Bathroom
(0)
|
|
11-24-12 10:06am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
1895
|
Joanna Angel
(0)
|
|
11-24-12 10:05am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
1896
|
Cum On My Tattoo
(0)
|
|
11-24-12 10:03am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
1897
|
Big Boobs Are Cool
(0)
|
|
11-24-12 10:03am
Replies (0)
|
Review
1898
|
Burning Angel
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- There is a cross-sell on the sign up page but it isn’t pre-checked
- Bills through CCBill
- Great chance to see some new models
- Many familiar porn models appear
- Many download options for newer videos
- Supports download managers |
| Cons: |
- No zips on pics
- Pics relatively low resolution
- No search function
- No specific tags |
| Bottom Line: |
I have to confess that I never expected to be writing a review of a site featuring models with tattoos and piercings, Goth models, punk models and others along that theme. I’m as anti-tattoo as the next guy, except that it turns out I’m not. I’m still anti-tattoo and piercing unless the model goes all the way.
The biggest surprise for me was how conventional the porn here actually is. I don’t know what I was expecting, but whatever it was I was wrong. This is a typical porn network that just happens to showcase models with a look that is slightly out of mainstream.
The main page is laid out as you’d expect with any network: there are tabs for going to pictures, videos, the individual sites, or sorting by model. One choice conspicuous by its absence is a search function. If it exists on the network I haven’t found it yet. (This lack of search is further worsened by the lack of scene tags. Tags exist, but are too broad to be of a lot of use in specific searches.)
The network is made up of eight individual sites. (Cum on My Tattoo, Fuck me in the Bathroom, Heavy Metal Pussy Party, Joanna Angel, POV Punx, Punk Porn, Punk Schoolgirls and Big Boobs are Cool – I’ll post some stats as a comment on each site’s PU page.) While several of the sites have a reason for being stand-alone, several others could just as easily be grouped together. This is neither positive or negative, it’s just a fact.
Each site is laid out in the same way: the site opens into a page where there are thumbnails for 20 scenes per page. Under each thumbnail is some basic information about the scene, including a scene name, the genre (girl/boy, solo, etc.), the running length, user ratings and the female star.
When you select a scene you get a larger thumbnail and four small thumbnails to give you some idea of what’s in store. Each scene has multiple options for downloads. You can download a trailer, the full scene or the full scene broken down into parts. I have to question the value of offering the scene in parts in 2012, but maybe there are still people with slow internet connections. For each of those options there are usually some choices for file type and resolution. MPEGs are offered (in resolutions up to 1400x800 – 5000kb/s and 24fps – depending on the upload date, of course), as are WMVs in high and low resolutions and a mobile version. These options decrease as you get into older files. Prior to 2010 MPEGs weren’t offered but Quicktime files were. The oldest scenes on the network, which date back to 2007, are often only available in one resolution and only in WMV. The resolution on the oldest scenes is low at 480x360, 1800kb/s and 30fps.
This is being a bit picky, but the way the download options are laid out with the trailer as the first option made it too easy to select that instead of the full scene. It didn’t happen to me, but it required that I pay more attention than I’d normally do when just downloading porn. Even having a trailer as a download option seems odd to me, but at least they could put it lower in the option list.
The site supports download managers and I had no problem with the links timing out.
The network bills through CCBill so you have confidence in that. There is a cross-sell, but it isn’t pre-checked.
If the site has a major flaw it is how they provide pictures. I don’t normally download photos but in this case I was looking forward to doing so. I had flagged several models that I really liked that are rare on more mainstream sites and wanted photos too. I was disappointed to see that zips aren’t available and that even if they were, the resolution isn’t great. The newest photos are 1080x720. I know that isn’t bad, but they could be better. Older photos are obviously a lower resolution. I gave up on getting photos since having to save each one individually seems like too much work for porn. The lack of zips really needs to be addressed.
I know this is highly subjective, but I found most of the models on the site to be very attractive. I do question why some models appear on the site though. Katie St. Ives has a few scenes here and I’d not normally think of her when I think tattoos, piercings, Goth or punk. Don’t get me wrong, I’ll take any of Katie’s scenes when I can get them, but it just doesn’t seem to be a good fit.
Dracken posted a comment back in ’09 that the network appeared to be a ‘community’ site for people who like the Goth / Punk / etc. look and lifestyle. That is true. There are blogs and forums for the look, the music and the life. I’m only interested in the naked chicks so I really can’t comment on the non-porn parts of the network.
The bottom line is that this is an excellent network. It is well laid out, easy to use and offers some great porn. If you’re like me and want to push your porn boundaries a bit then I’d highly recommend starting with Burning Angel. The models are beautiful and the scenes are hot. |
|
11-24-12 10:01am
Replies (9)
|
Reply
1899
|
Creampie Ronja
(0)
|
Reply of
DQ Melb's Review
Excellent review DQ. Thanks for adding it. You'll probably save some people some money.
Welcome to PU. I hope you hang around and continue to contribute. This is a great forum and unlike so many other porn forums this one in very civil.
|
11-24-12 06:02am
|
Reply
1900
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm a huge fan of BDSM. Kink.com does it best, but there are many other sites that also do it well.
I don't, however, consider abuse sites to be BDSM. Abuse is just abuse.
|
11-24-12 06:00am
|
