| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1676
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
taken4granted's Comment
Look at the bright side though, if law enforcement raids your house for porn usage all the rest of us PU members will be in jail too. It'll be like a Pornusers convention!
Seriously though, I'm glad to hear you got your access back. Met Art seem to be a reputable site so anything less would be troubling.
|
06-19-13 05:32pm
|
Reply
1677
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm not sure of the exact number (which might say something there) but if you count primary drives (those that only require a USB plug) I have probably 19 or 20. Most of those are 1TB drives, with a few older being 500GB and 750GB and at least three 2TB at the newer end. Then, if you want to count in my backup drives (those that require both a USB and AC plug) I have nine or 10 of those. One of the oldest is only 320GB but there are at least three and maybe four that are 3TB.
The good news is that I've decided to purge the collection this summer.
|
06-18-13 05:04pm
|
Reply
1678
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I agree that there seems to be a significant drop in activity. I hope that's only temporary.
|
06-16-13 05:30pm
|
Reply
1679
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Not that this is necessarily related, but I feel bad that I haven't been contributing much lately and that just happened to coincide with the end of $200 Tuesdays. I've undertaken a massive project to rebuild my porn collection and delete low res files and delete stuff I'll never watch. I'm also joining sites that I've been to recently just to download HD versions of everything I want so the bottom line is that with noting new to contribute I'm not writing reviews. But it has nothing to do with the end of the raffle.
|
06-16-13 05:29pm
|
Reply
1680
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
scharrukin's Comment
That's insane. I had an email offer from them last week and thought of joining but then I remembered the download limit. I'm not entirely opposed to limits, but a 5GB limit in 2013 with HD files isn't acceptable. I'd like to rejoin, but not under these conditions. Thanks for the heads up.
|
06-11-13 02:13pm
|
Reply
1681
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
BenW's Reply
Too bad the site isn't better on the technical stuff. No matter how great the porn is, if the members can't access it that makes the membership a bit pointless.
|
06-09-13 08:53am
|
Reply
1682
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
BenW's Comment
Thanks for the warnings. Too bad about that because it looks like a decent site otherwise. Is there any b/g hardcore or is it all solo and g/g?
|
06-09-13 07:14am
|
Reply
1683
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
I far prefer normal 'street' clothes to start. I really don't like the tarted-up look with stripper clothes and heavy makeup.
|
06-09-13 07:11am
|
Reply
1684
|
Dare Dorm
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
Great review. I was looking forward to joining this site a while back when I first read about it, but the lack of downloads killed that idea for me. I know that webmasters want to combat piracy but it bugs me that they have to do it at the expense of paying customers.
|
06-05-13 04:52pm
|
Review
1685
|
Sweet Sinner
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Decent sized site
- Four bonus sites
- Lots of well-known A-listers
- Softer hardcore (may be good for couples)
- Good mix of model ages ranging from 18 to MILF
- Story-driven scenes (without a plot connecting all the scenes)
- Supports download managers
- Part of the Fame Digital family of sites
- Many of the models sport pubic hair |
| Cons: |
- Very little anal
- If you don’t like some niches you may be disappointed in the number of DVDs with that niche |
| Bottom Line: |
I’m a big fan of studio sites but I had never heard of Sweet Sinner Studio until I had an email offer recently with an offer that I couldn’t refuse. If forced to describe what their niche is I’d say it is like the love child of Evil Angel and Wicked Pictures. They have high quality production values with ‘soft’ hardcore. You won’t find a lot of rough sex here. The scenes aren’t gonzo in that they have a plot for each scene even though there is no overall plot running through most of the DVDs. The models are almost exclusively Caucasian but there is a good mix of ages. I prefer younger models (think Chastity Lynn) but someone who prefers older models would be equally happy with the site. If there is one (subjective) thing about the site I don’t like it’s the lack of anal scenes. Those are very rare.
Another interesting feature that seems rare in porn is that a lot of the models (even the A-listers) have unshaven pubic hair. Many are trimmed, and there are many still bare, but there is a lot more pubic hair on this site then I’ve seen in a long time. I prefer bare or trimmed on the younger models I like, but I know many PU members like older women and also like public hair so this may be a good reason for you to join this site.
The site currently has 85 DVDs uploaded. Most DVDs have between four and six scenes available. The first scenes were uploaded in December 2011 and the site continues to update by adding a new scene every four days. The practice seems to be to have two DVDs updating so if you’re waiting for a new scene in a new DVD you might be waiting at least eight days for it.
The site is part of the Fame Digital family of sites, which is mostly positive. Fame offers high quality porn at great prices. The sites (including this one) use simple and effective navigation tools. You can sort by DVD, by scene, by star and by niche. Like all newer material uploaded in the Fame network this site offers a huge variety of ways to access the material. I can’t imagine anyone being disappointed. Streaming is available at resolutions of 160, 240, 360, 480, 540, 720 and 1080. Downloads are also available in those resolutions but if you want 540, 720 or 1080 you’ll be limited to mp4. The lower res downloads are available as wmvs or mp4. They even offer a wide range of resolutions for mobile devices, up to and including 1080.
I downloaded only the 1080 stuff and it looks great. It comes in at 1920x1080 at 6800kb/s and 29fps. File sizes range from approx. 1GB to 2.5GB (for the 1080p files).
One drawback to any Fame site had always been that even though they supported download managers, the scene links timed out very quickly. In the past I’d guess that timeouts of about 10 minutes were common – if not less. I’ve noticed that this issue seems to have been fixed so I purposely tried to find a timeout here. There is one, but it seems to be about an hour, which is far more reasonable now.
Photos are available but I can see no way to download zips. This really isn’t a photo site though.
Membership also gives you access to Couples Seeking Teens, Doghouse Digital, Reality Junkies and Sweet Heart Video. I’m not planning to review any of those so here are some brief stats:
• Couples Seeking Teens: 12 DVDs of the Reality Junkies series by the same name. Updating.
• Doghouse Digital: 121 Doghouse Digital DVDs. Updating. Mix of standard porn, MILF, cuckold scenes, some lesbian, and some pegging
• Reality Junkies: 91 Reality Junkies DVDs (including those on Couples Seeking Teens). Mix of standard porn with a lot of MILF material.
• Sweet Heart Video: 119 videos from the studio of that name. All-girl material. Updating
A common complaint that I’ve read recently about any Fame site is that cancelling is more difficult than with CC Bill or other billers. While it isn’t as simple to cancel as other billers, it is still relatively easy. Confirmation emails give the Famecare name and a quick search brings you to their page where the membership is easy to cancel.
This is an excellent site and adding in the bonus sites makes it an even better value. The studios here all have high production values and the scenes all feature beautiful models. The models cover a broad spectrum of tastes and preferences and range in age from 18 to MILF. This is a site that tries to appeal to a wide range of people and it succeeds in that attempt. I’d definitely recommend this site. |
|
06-05-13 04:50pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1686
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
For me porn is all about the fantasy, and for me specifically that involves women of a certain age range and body type. Anything outside that range really isn't part of my fantasy so I don't download it. I'm not homophobic, but that just isn't part of my fantasy so I wouldn't be interested. The same goes for MILFs or BBWs. I can appreciate that there are viewers who like gay stuff, MILF stuff and BBW stuff, but it isn't for me.
|
06-05-13 04:43pm
|
Reply
1687
|
Brick Yates
(0)
|
Reply of
Jackthecommon's Review
Interesting site and a good review of it. From the preview pages it does seem that some of this is just what it says it is.
Welcome to Pornusers too. This is a great network and I hope to see more of your reviews in the future.
|
05-29-13 05:01pm
|
Reply
1688
|
Teen Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Good point, especially with a site that produces exclusive material. I'll skip the trial and with a full membership I should be able to get everything I want even with a 10GB daily limit.
|
05-29-13 02:32pm
|
Reply
1689
|
Teen Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Holy crap! Exclusive HD scenes with stars like Chastity Lynn, Trinity St Claire, Sierra Day and Riley Reid! And a three-day trial too? Count me in! Thanks for reviewing this site. I'm adding it to my favourites for a join in the near future.
One question though - the TBP page says that there may be a 10GB daily limit. Are you able to confirm that?
|
05-28-13 05:17pm
|
Reply
1690
|
Sexually Broken
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Great review. I currently have a membership to a sister-site, Infernal Restraints and really like that but I wish it had more sex. Because of that I figured I'd join Sexually Broken but not I'm not so sure. You may have saved me $30. I like Sex and Submission and will probably head back there instead. One beef that I have with this company's sites is that Sexually Broken uses pretty much the same sets as Infernal Restraints, and the same models (from what I can see on the SB preview pages), yet Infernal Restraints is likely among the most expensive sites on the web at $65/month. I have no idea why they charge less than half that for a similar site that actually has more sex.
|
05-28-13 05:09pm
|
Reply
1691
|
Wicked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for the info.
|
05-28-13 04:55pm
|
Reply
1692
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'm pretty anal with my porn. Go figure...
I start by creating a folder for the specific site and or DVD and then download files into those after having renamed the files using the name of the female star. After that the next step is copying the folder and file names into a (now massive) Word document. The final step is backing the files up on a second external drive.
So for me I guess it is fair to say that I organize as I download and afterwards too.
|
05-28-13 04:55pm
|
Reply
1693
|
Wicked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
That could be it for the models, but I wonder why they won't let a prospective customer at least see the DVDs they have to offer. That makes no sense from a marketing perspective.
|
05-26-13 10:19am
|
Reply
1694
|
Wicked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
My hope is that since this is a 'reputable' studio then the site might be okay. How's that for rationalization??? I usually find studio sites disappointing, with rare exceptions like Evil Angel and Elegant Angel.
|
05-26-13 10:18am
|
Comment
1695
|
Wicked.com
(0)
|
|
05-26-13 09:17am
Replies (10)
|
Comment
1696
|
HD Porn
(0)
|
|
05-26-13 08:52am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1697
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
Thanks. I read in your review that the video aspect ratios are screwed up. I suspect I'll try the trial soon.
|
05-25-13 05:04pm
|
Review
1698
|
Nuru Network
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Excellent massage-themed site
- Large site (875 scenes)
- Regular updates
- Supports download managers
- TBP discount
- HD available on all scenes uploaded after August 2008
- Hot scenes with great scene set-up
- Good mix of models (lots of Asian models, variation on age and breast size too) |
| Cons: |
- Can’t sort by theme
- A few too many larger-breasted models for my personal taste |
| Bottom Line: |
I’m a big fan of massage-themed sites; when they’re done well they are great. The good news is that this site is very well done. I have no idea what the relationship is between this site and the other Nuru Massage site (which includes All Girl Massage, Soapy Massage and Massage Parlor) but there is one since this site has all the same scenes on it. When I reviewed Nuru Massage I guessed that it was somehow related to the Fame family of sites and that is now confirmed. I had intended to rejoin Nuru Massage but instead ended up here. I’m not sure whether I was redirected here or whether I just made an error. No big deal though, since this “network” has all the same scenes and continues to update.
Since the scenes here are the same as the other network, they fall into four broad categories. You have your regular massage, a soapy massage, a nuru massage and girl-girl massages. (Hmmm… that started to sound like a car wash menu. I should see if my local carwash offers girl-girl too…) This is subjective, but I like to watch the scene set-up almost as much as the scene itself and these scenes all follow a similar script which permits a great (though admittedly repetitive) set-up. The guy arrives and is greeted, there is a conversation about the services offered, they move to the massage room where the girl undresses the guy and then herself, they usually shower together and then the massage begins. With very rare exceptions, the scenes have oral on the guy with a happy ending. A few scenes (maybe 20-ish) have actual intercourse. I only saw one anal scene. (Frankly, if I ever get a nuru massage I’ll damn well expect anal.)
This is subjective, but the female models are all attractive, with most being A and B list porn stars. The people who book the talent appear to like bigger breasts than I do since I found most of the models have bigger breasts than I prefer. There are some small boobies though, so there is something for everyone. There are a lot of Asian models (maybe close to half), with the remainder mostly Caucasian. Models of color are there, but rare.
Currently there are 875 scenes posted with a new scene being added every two days (three sometimes. Maybe weekends?) As with all Fame sites the videos are offered in a wide range of sizes. Streaming is available at resolutions of 160, 240, 360, 480, 540, 720 and 1080. Downloads are available in WMV or mp4 format in resolutions of 160, 240, 360 and 480. The mp4s are also offered in higher resolutions of 540, 720 and 1080. The first scenes on the site date from August 2007 and this site jumped on the HD bandwagon early and started offering 1080p a year later in August 2008. Since then every scene is available in 720 and 1080. I used to exclusively download WMV format but have since decided that life is too short for low-res porn so I’ve switched to mp4s in the highest resolution available. The 1080p files are 1920x1080 at 6500kb/s and 29fps. Subjectively they look great on both a monitor and large-screen TV.
Photos are available, but since this is clearly a video site I didn’t check them out much. They do open in a unique viewer and I couldn’t find a zip download. They are also just screencaps.
A constant complaint that I’ve always had with any Fame site is that the download links time out very quickly. Fame seems to have improved this (confirmed on other Fame sites too) because I didn’t experience any time outs at all. That’s not to say that there isn’t still a limit, but if there is one it is much more reasonable. The site allows download managers and if there is a daily download limit I didn’t hit it and I downloaded almost 200GB in one day.
Navigation is simple but effective. There are 15 scenes per page and those scenes open into a separate page with the download and viewing options. You can also sort by star. The only complaint I have is admittedly trivial, and would possibly be solved had I actually joined through Nuru Massage. This site doesn’t break the scenes down by the four broad themes. So if you really want only the girl-girl stuff you have to scour the large thumbnails for each scene. The only differentiation is when you actually play the video and the site name is shown. I do wish there was a way to sort by theme.
I highly recommend this site to anyone who like massage-themed porn. The models are hot, the production values are high, the site is large (and expanding), well laid-out, the scenes are easy to download and the scenes are offered in ways that will satisfy most subscribers. This is a great site. |
|
05-25-13 11:52am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1699
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
Thanks! I'll take you up on that. Did you try the trial? If so, does it still work? Subjectively, how do you like the video quality.
And I should add that what will likely tip me in favour of joining is hearing that Sarah is uploading blowjob scenes now.
|
05-25-13 09:39am
|
Reply
1700
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
Interesting review. I've always been a fan of her stuff when I saw her on ALS Scan and wondered about joining her site. Based on your review I can at least go in knowing what the flaws are.
|
05-25-13 08:07am
|
