| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1626
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I suspect that given the ethnic makeup of most porn-consuming countries that there isn't enough diversity, but I'm also not willing to suppose that this is some conspiracy.
|
08-21-13 05:12pm
|
Reply
1627
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
I didn't know that. I thought I had read that Pay Pal refused to work with adult websites. I might be looking into a Pay Pal account soon...
|
08-21-13 05:10pm
|
Reply
1628
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It makes a big difference for me. I do use lesser known sites and even sites that bill directly, but if TBP or PU makes any mention of billing trouble I stay away.
Two weeks ago I decided to buy a pre-paid credit card. I've used it for two memberships so far and it has worked great - and I have peace of mind knowing there is a limit to my liability. The only problem is that the one I bought has no ability to be re-loaded so when I have less money on it than the cost of a membership I'll need to use it on a smaller purchase somewhere else.
|
08-19-13 06:03pm
|
Reply
1629
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
I don't know for sure, but I've read that Pay Pal refuses to do business with adult sites. Maybe others can confirm.
|
08-19-13 05:56pm
|
Reply
1630
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Do a Google search for the pdf manual I suggested and give it a quick read. I suspect that will give you a good idea of the changes in the software and how easy it is to adapt. I'm not tech savvy and I had no trouble adapting from XP, which was a big leap forward.
|
08-19-13 05:53pm
|
Reply
1631
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I thought the same thing and tried to find a computer with Windows 7 when I had to buy a new one, but nothing was available. Windows 8 does have some drawbacks but I can assure you that it is nowhere near as bad as what so many are saying. I skip the new-look Windows start screen with the big tiles by clicking the tile that takes me to a more traditional, Windows 7-looking, desktop. From there, things are pretty much the same as the old way. There is still no 'start' button, but I got over that pretty quickly.
Dell and Microsoft commissioned a "Windows 8 for Dummies" book in pdf form that is available on the 'net for free. You do have to register but I had no issue after registering. That book shows a lot of useful tips and took away a lot of the worries that I had. Those worries, as fueled by complaints online, were really unwarranted.
Don't let Windows 8 prevent you from buying a new computer or laptop.
|
08-18-13 05:58pm
|
Reply
1632
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I chose other mostly because I have no idea. I think one trend to watch for is that even though they represent a minority in both countries, the religious zealots in both the U.S. and Russia have a lot of political power and politicians are willing to exploit that. Porn may become riskier to make, and therefore harder to get. Couple that with the silly pandering of the U.K. to attempt to limit porn (an idea also floated by a Canadian conservative politician) to block porn* and the future may not be so rosy.
(* I have to admit that as silly as this idea is, I support it - as long as I'm the one who gets to define what porn is. Someone has to have the job so it might as well be me. You'll be able to access websites where one or more consenting adults engage in all manner of sexual activity because that is normal and natural. What you'll need to register to see is the truly offensive stuff, like sites that tell you that there is an old man who lives in the sky who hates gays and women and demands you do too.)
|
08-13-13 04:50am
|
Reply
1633
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
metem's Review
Great review. Thanks for posting it. I usually prefer rougher hardcore sites, but I seem to also be drawn to 'heartcore.' I wasn't aware of this site and I might consider joining. If I do, at least I'll know where the flaws are.
|
08-13-13 04:42am
|
Reply
1634
|
Flashing Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
doodoo's Comment
Thanks for this comment. I'm a big fan of public flashing and nudity and likely would have joined this site and I would have been disappointed. You saved me some money and disappointment.
|
08-13-13 04:40am
|
Reply
1635
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Thanks for the comment. I tried to differentiate my review from yours but since we seems to share a high opinion of the site that wasn't really possible. This is certainly a great site.
|
08-13-13 04:38am
|
Review
1636
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Large site
- Mostly unknown models
- Models very good looking
- Lots of opportunity to see the model’s personality
- Includes two other sites
- Supports download managers
- No obvious time-outs
- Scenes are available as a single download or as clips |
| Cons: |
- Could offer more HD
- Could offer niche tags |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is a recipe for disaster in many ways: it is simplistic, formulaic, mostly POV-based and uses only one male talent. But in this case the site is much greater than the sum of its parts. The simple layout works in this case since the site is based around the female talent, the formula may be the same in every scene but I found that formula added to the heat in the scenes. While POV can be annoying, the male talent here must have some serious practice because this is some of the best POV work I’ve ever seen, and finally, that male talent doesn’t fall into the trap that so many other one-man-shows do – he doesn’t ever lose site of the fact that members are joining to see the girls, not him.
The glue that holds this site together is the quality of models that get recruited. While there isn’t a lot of variety, the choice of model is something that aims for the biggest chunk of the market: young, fit, petite, and usually Caucasian. I’m one of those people who like the site’s choice of models and I really like what the site has to offer. To further the appeal, the models are never caked with heavy makeup and dressed in slutty clothes. The site accentuates each model’s natural beauty rather than covering it.
A sharp contrast between this site and the sites I normally join is that the sites I normally join use the better known porn models working at the time. I have little experience with amateur sites but with very rare exceptions these are models I’ve never seen before or since. I have no idea how the site recruits the models, but whatever they’re doing they should keep doing it because it works.
The scenes all have a common theme: a ‘college girl’ is enticed to dip her toes into the world of porn. The girl’s youth and appearance certainly lends credibility to the overall theme. A viewer could really get lost in the fantasy that this is an otherwise innocent college student who is about to do something nasty for our viewing pleasure.
Many of the scenes start with the cameraman / male talent picking the model up. As they drive an interview in conducted which is usually pretty interesting. In many of these scenes the interview progresses to some nudity in the car and is often followed by some road head. In rare cases the girl will actually ride the guy while he drives. Sure, it’s dangerous, but it’s great to watch!
Other scenes begin in a hotel room but there is still an interview process.
The scenes then transition to some posing, usually some oral on the girl, oral on the guy, sex in multiple positions and finally a money shot, usually on the face. Most of the scenes then have some footage shot after the scene, which is also interesting to watch.
The site layout is simple, but simple works here. The scenes all have the same theme so the biggest difference is the model herself. I do wish that there were some tags offered, though there really wouldn’t be many. A tag for anal scenes (there are a few) would be great, and maybe even a tag to sort by the model’s age would be a good addition.
One feature that I like a lot is that while a lot of the camera work is POV, there are also two or three fixed cameras set up too. That’s good to provide some variety but the site uses split-screens to capture two views at once. Half the screen might be a shot of the model getting fucked in the doggy position while the other half is a close-up of her face. This is a great effect and really works well.
I’m not sure if this is a pro or a con, but many of the older shoots aren’t edited to vary the shots between POV and the fixed camera. Instead, they offer the full scene from either viewpoint. I’m glad they dropped this practice and started editing, but it does offer an option for viewers who prefer one or the other.
The site is large, offering about 320 scenes and it updates with one scene being added per week. Each scene is available as a single download or in clips if you’re only interested in a segment. The site supports download managers with no obvious time-outs.
Download resolutions vary. The best is 1280x720, 3000kb/s, many are 768x432 at 1800kb/s and the lowest are 640x360 at 1800. All are 30 fps. The older scenes don’t look great by today’s standards, but they aren’t bad. The medium resolution looks pretty good even though the specs would suggest otherwise. I think the biggest flaw is that the site could offer higher resolutions. Also, WMVs are pretty much all that are available.
Photos are available as singles or zips. I didn’t download much, but what I saw was relatively low resolution at 1400x788.
The bottom line is that this site could have been a total mess if any part of it was badly done, but since all the elements are well done the site is very good on the technical bits. Once you factor in the newness and apparent innocence of the models this is an amazing site that I both highly recommend and have already added to my list of sites to come back to regularly. |
|
08-12-13 04:28pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1637
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm a big fan of BTS stuff and usually download and watch whatever is available. I like getting a glimpse behind the curtain.
|
08-11-13 05:41am
|
Reply
1638
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Seriously???? Why would I want those? I have plenty of my own underwear and they wouldn't fit me anyway. I don't get it...
;-)
|
08-07-13 05:27pm
|
Reply
1639
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks pat.
|
08-06-13 06:02pm
|
Reply
1640
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Excellent review pat. I'm a big fan of this 'network' but I haven't joined in a while as they seemed to be changing the membership frequently. If that's settled down now I might join this again soon.
A possible explanation for there only being photos or videos but not both is that Diesel puts the photos on one site and the videos on another (like Wow Girls or another Diesel network). I noticed that the last time I had multiple memberships to these sites.
Are there many scenes where Gloria (of Skinny Super Girl fame) does girl/girl? When I first joined I contacted the webmaster to ask if she'd be doing any g/g or even b/g hardcore. He said she wouldn't be doing b/g but that some g/g was in the works. I've since seen a g/g scene at Wow Girls and was hoping for more. Is there any? Any chance that she broke her b/g hardcore embargo?
|
08-05-13 08:08am
|
Reply
1641
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Very important for me. I often watch the scene set up only and skip the sex.
|
08-05-13 08:02am
|
Reply
1642
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
W4B is always a site that was on my list of sites to join but always got bumped by other sites. When you say that they're joining Met0art do you know if that means a membership to one will now include the other?
|
08-04-13 07:59am
|
Reply
1643
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
It may have been temporary. I tried it both on my iPad and computer and the link comes up fast.
|
08-04-13 07:52am
|
Reply
1644
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Reply
Thanks for adding that clarification on the photos. I don't normally download photos so I checked a few to give the specs for the review and must have hit all ones that offered the higher resolution.
Like you, I think one of the draws of the site is that a lot of the models aren't found anywhere else. I also like, as I noted in my review, that some who get a start here go on to be big-name porn stars and we get to see them at the beginning of their careers when they're still innocent. I suspect that since the site is primarily a softcore site and seems to treat the models well is one of the main reasons that they're able to attract so many first-timers.
|
08-04-13 07:51am
|
Review
1645
|
FTV Girls
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Huge site with exclusive videos
- Site well laid out
- High production values
- Beautiful models
- Lots of public nudity
- Lots of solo masturbation
- Some girl/girl
- Some (but not a lot) hardcore
- A chance to see some A-listers before they were stars
- Supports download managers
- Excellent video quality
- Downlaod options available
- Early adopters of HD
- High resolution photos available
- Photos available in zips |
| Cons: |
- If you don’t like the typical FTV model then you’ll likely not like the site |
| Bottom Line: |
Some may disagree with me on this assessment, but I see FTV Girls as serving two completely different niches within one site. They focus on public nudity and on solo girl masturbation. There are other niches (some girl/girl and some rare hardcore) but the majority of the scenes contain the two main niches that the site serves. There is a limitation to my review in that while I’m a huge fan of public nudity I’m not a big fan of solo girl stuff, so most of what I downloaded was the public stuff. I think it’s reasonable to assume that if the public stuff is of such high quality that a prospective member who likes solo masturbation scenes would be equally happy with a membership.
The site has been around for 10 years now and continues to offer high quality exclusive scenes. Right from day one this site had high production values with good lighting, camera work and editing. The site now has 839 scenes uploaded and updates with one (sometimes two) scenes being added per week. Some may say that the update rate isn’t enough, but when you consider the effort that goes into these scenes I think the once-a-week update is pretty impressive.
The site itself is well laid out and simple to use. The scenes are laid out 30 per page and each scene opens into a separate page. On that scene’s page there are links for the videos (two or more) and the photos. Each of those opens into a separate page with the download options. On newer scenes there are obviously more options with the scenes being HD in both WMV and mp4, in SD in either format and in two formats for mobile devices. The file size is shown too. I downloaded the HD mp4 videos and they come in at 1920x1080, 12,000kb/s and 30fps. The older HD videos have the same specs except the bitrate is about 8,000kb/s.
You can also sort by model and there is a search function and extensive use of tags. (One great advantage of the tags is that it allows the member to do some pre-sorting. I was here for public nudity and there was a tag for that.)
The site was an early adopter of HD video bringing it in in December 2007. The SD videos offered before that come in at 720x480, 1,200kb/s and 25fps.
One thing I liked about the layout was that when you opened the page for a specific video there are thumbnails of the photos on the same page which allows a bit of a preview to help you decide if you want the scene or not.
Photos are available and look great. Obviously the photo size has grown over the years with the latest being offered as either 1600 or 4000 pixel downloads. Zips are available.
An interesting facet of the site is that since it is so high quality and has been around so long it affords an opportunity to see A-list stars before they were stars, and in many cases under different names. Amia Miley appears as Ileana, for example. Christie Lee and Kelly Wells make early appearances. There are quite a few big models who appeared here early in their careers. Something that may be unique is the 2006 shoot of Brianna Love (as Brianna) when she is 8 months pregnant.
I joined specifically for the public nudity. In my opinion, public nudity is either very good or very bad. When done wrong all the heat is removed. FTV does it right: the public parts of their shoots are really well done. I use Teasers VOD as the gold standard of public nudity due to its high risk and intense heat. FTV isn’t up to that standard but it is still excellent and any fan of the genre won’t be disappointed. I should also point out the flaw in comparing this site to Teasers: Teasers was so risky that the City of L.A. shut them down. I’ll accept the less in-your-face public scenes in FTV as a trade-off for more scenes being shot.
Notwithstanding the above, this is NOT just a public nudity site. Most videos have some public nudity and that’s followed by an indoor scene with masturbation. While I normally prefer the option to download an entire video, the fact that the shoot is broken into segments really fits well here. I just want the public stuff and that’s in a stand-alone video. Same with the solo stuff. I liked that the scenes are not sterile. The model’s personality is allowed to shine through. Some may not like that the cameraman interacts with the model in the scene, but I think it adds to the heat.
There is a lot of “BTS” material available too for those of us who like that. It’s located under the “Extras” tab.
Download managers work on the site and I had no problem with using one.
If there is a downside to FTV it is likely that some people who like variety in their models may not be satisfied. The models are almost exclusively Caucasian, 18-22 and slim. Don’t join looking for 30+ BBW black women. I like what they offer, and I’m a satisfied customer.
The bottom line is that this is an excellent site that does a great job of offering material for different interests. The material is great and it is easy to access. I recommend a membership. |
|
08-03-13 07:32am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1646
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
FuzzyBunny's Reply
I'm purely and A and B man myself, but I certainly understand liking REAL large breasts.
|
08-03-13 05:57am
|
Reply
1647
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
loverboy69's Review
Welcome to Pornusers! I hope you post more reviews and hang out in the forum. I'm a big fan of X-art too, which is sort of odd for me. My usual sites are the rougher edges of hardcore and a strong emphasis on anal sex but when I joined this site I was impressed. They do everything well and the models are stunning.
|
08-02-13 08:14am
|
Reply
1648
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
FuzzyBunny's Review
Interesting review. Like you, the emphasis on big breasts (fake or real) means that I'd likely not consider joining. But since your review made that clear you may have saved me some money!
|
08-02-13 08:12am
|
Comment
1649
|
Dirt Pipe Divas
(0)
|
|
08-02-13 08:09am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1650
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
Four for me, but that's sort of unusual. Two is usually it at any one time for me.
I'm surprised that as I'm writing this 41% of respondents say they have no active memberships. I'd have guessed that number would be much lower for the members here.
|
08-02-13 08:05am
|
