I'm a fan of this site, and while I scored it much higher I do agree with a lot of what you wrote. It can get a bit repetitive, but that can occur in any niche, and usually does where there is one type of scene. I also agree that while some models thrive without direction, others could use more.
I'm a fan of exhibitionist stuff and FTV does that well. In most cases, I won't join a site that only offers the scenes as smaller clips, but here it works for them. I have no interest in the solo masturbation part of the scene so I don't need to download it. Likewise, if someone doesn't like the exhibitionist stuff they can avoid that.
Overall, what carries the site is the quality of the models they hire.
Thanks for commenting. I recently got hooked on casting sites even though I know it is still acting. At least most of the models there don't have dozens of titles, so that still works for the amateur fantasy. But with GS, many of the models I like don't seem to have done much of anything else. The realism definitely makes this site unique.
They don't look so much better than what VB offers to justify the membership unless you're going for the three day trial. Even then, you may be better off with a VB membership because you have access to more of Seymore's stuff - and you get a lot of Shane's stuff on VB too from after she and Seymore parted company. You'd need a separate membership for Shane's titles if you joined SB.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 195 exclusive scenes
- Many true amateurs
- Among the most realistic sites around
- Great site for fans of oral, cum play and swallowing
- Simple and effective layout
- Multiple download options
- Supports download managers
- No download limits
- Broad range of models
- Excellent camerawork and lighting given the conditions
- Excellent choices in editing
- Updates weekly
Cons:
- Limited thumbnails of model
- Broad range of models means you’ll see some you don’t like
Bottom Line:
I look for objectivity in a review, and I strive to provide the same when I write reviews, but sometimes a site comes along that makes it tough for me to do that. ‘Heat’ in a scene is definitely subjective, and in this case, for me, the heat isn’t just turned up to eleven, it’s turned up to ‘insane.’ I think my monitor was about to catch fire.
I wouldn’t normally join a gloryhole site, but I’ve been trying to collect as many scenes by a beautiful young and relatively obscure model named Claire. She’s not done much, and she looks like a pretty girl-next-door type, so I was surprised to see her doing something like this. She has four scenes on the site and at least one of them is already a favorite. But to my surprise, I was hooked on this site after watching a few scenes.
For me, the heat comes from the realism. I recently started joining casting sites, where the premise that an unsuspecting model comes in for some information on the adult business and ends up trying out. Obviously, in a world with legal requirements for ID these scenes are staged. But here, while they are still staged, there is an element of realism that I’ve never seen before. While the female obviously needs to be properly documented, the males can be a lot more anonymous. It doesn’t strain credibility to think that a model could be brought into a video booth and guys would stick their dicks in for some oral. To add to the chances that these aren’t fully staged, the site’s FAQ page has contact information for anyone who’d like to have their penis star in a video.
Some scenes have a bit of a setup with an interview, but others don’t. The action takes place inside a booth where the model services between five and ten men, sometimes more. In most scenes there is cum-play and swallowing. Some scenes have vaginal sex, a few have some anal, and several have two girls. The average length of the scenes is around 35 minutes, but some last over an hour.
Speaking of the girls, there is a broad range of looks. There are some that are young and beautiful, some heavily tattooed and pierced, some BBW, some MILF. The upside is that there is likely some here for every taste. The downside is that you might see some models that you don’t like. Unlike most casting sites, I can’t find much information on many of these models, which may means they’re true amateurs.
With a video booth as your set it would be easy to have poorly shot videos. That doesn’t happen here: the videos are well lighted and shot. The cameraman obviously knows what he’s doing.
With scenes like these the editor might be tempted to cut lots of dead air out and keep the action flowing. That doesn’t happen here. First, there isn’t a lot of dead air, and second, the editor’s choices keep the realism and heat up. Bad editing could ruin the site, but the good editing they have adds a lot to it.
There are currently 195 scenes uploaded, but maybe 20 of those are two-part scenes so that reduces the number a bit. The site updates with one new scene added per week. All the scenes offer some choice in how you view it. Streaming is available, but only at a fairly low res. Downloads are MP4 only and usually offer 480x270, 960x540 and 1920x1080. I downloaded the 1080 when they were available and those come in at that resolution with a bitrate around 5000 kb/s and 29fps. They look good. On some videos the highest is 960x540 but those are rare.
Others here have reported a daily limit. I downloaded a lot in a few days and never hit any limit, so that may be gone. I used a download manager to queue scenes and had no issues with that. The download speed was always the maximum that my manager will allow.
The site has a simple design, but since it focuses on one niche it doesn’t need to be more complex. You can sort by update and model, there is a search function and each scene has tags. One minor flaw is that there are limited thumbnails of the models so you can’t really tell if you want the scene. That’s not a big deal since you can open the photos and see more.
There are photos, but I can’t speak to them. This really is a video site.
One innovation in most scenes is an unobtrusive ‘cumshot counter” in the lower left of the screen that counts off a running total of satisfied customers. I like it and miss it on the scenes where it isn’t used.
As with any niche site, there’s no sense in joining if you don’t like the niche. But here there are several covered: oral, cum-play, swallowing and multiple shots. If you like any of those, you might like this site. If you do join you’ll get a lot of unique and exclusive scenes on a simple but effective site and those scenes are well shot and edited. You’ll get all this for a very fair price making this a great value. Not only do I recommend it, I’ll be a regular there myself.
Thanks pat. This site does have two advantages though: the file resolution is better (though I haven't been to VB in a long time and they may have improved) and with a decent internet connection and a lazy day you can get everything you want in a day.
It is disappointing though to know that so many good titles and scenes have been left out.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Unique porn from a great producer/director/actor
- Some unique female models
- 192 videos from approximately 50 DVDs
- Videos in MP4 format
- Videos look good considering their age
- Offers a full trial
- Bills through a reputable biller
- Supports download managers
Cons:
- Last update was seven months ago
- Not organized by DVD title, though that’s how it was produced
- Site is poorly designed, even for such a small site
- Many of the videos are available elsewhere
- No options for downloading – one format, one size
- No ‘tour’ pages for prospective members
Bottom Line:
I’m a big fan of Seymore Butts’ movies. He was one of the best and most prolific producer/directors in the business for a while and his movies were unique. He offered a true gonzo style that was fun to watch, he focussed heavily on anal sex and ass play, and he had some hot women who worked almost exclusively for/with him. The porn business was better for his contributions.
This is purely speculative, but I don’t think that this site has any actual affiliation with Adam Glasser, aka Seymore Butts. I think this because Glasser seemed to take a lot of pride in his work, and justifiably so, and, excuse the pun, was anal about his work. This was demonstrated in the series about his business titled “Family Business” that aired on Showtime. There is nothing about this site that shows Glasser’s quest for high quality.
The really odd thing about this site is that while SB was all DVD-based porn, the site isn’t arranged by DVD title, it’s arranged by scenes only. There are a dozen scene thumbnails per page with a brief description of the scene but you’ll need to open the link to a scene before you can see what DVD it’s from. And even then the DVD title isn’t a clickable link to the other scenes in the title and there appears to be no way to search or sort by title. Maybe this will annoy only me, since I prefer to put the scenes from a DVD in a folder with the DVD title.
There are currently 192 scenes on the site, though saying ‘currently’ might be misleading as it implies that the site is updating. The last scene uploaded was about seven months ago, so while I can’t say for certain that the site isn’t updating, it sure looks like it isn’t. And with only about one-third of SB titles uploaded it isn’t like they’ve already run out of material.
It appears that the site had a major renovation between the time when RustyJ reviewed it 14 months ago. Rusty reported the downloaded files were in WMV format and were all large. There are no download options offered: there is one link labelled ‘download’ and you take what you’re given. I downloaded 116 scenes and all of them are in MP4 format. While there are a few files that come in slightly over 1 GB, the average file size is about 300-400 MB. The files I downloaded are all 1280x720, 3000 kb/s and 29fps. Those aren’t bad specs for scenes which are at least a decade old and in a lot of cases may be much older than that. Subjectively they look good.
The site itself could also have benefitted from a renovation. While I’m a proponent of keeping things simple, this site might be too simple. The layout is basic with not a lot of options to search. The ‘pornstar’ tab only lists 12 models, to give you an example of how weak the site design is. But with less than 200 scenes offered, the weak site design isn’t a big issue.
Streaming is available, though I didn’t try it, and there appeared to be no streaming options.
I used a download manager to queue scenes for download and had no problems. Download speeds were what I usually get with other sites. I downloaded a lot in a day and never encountered any kind of limit or throttling.
The site offers four membership options: two trials (three and seven day), one month and an annual membership. I wouldn’t normally offer advice here, but I think it is sound advice to say that no one should consider an annual membership given the size of the site and the fact that there’s been nothing added in seven months. I opted for the seven day trial but in hindsight I should have gone for the three day trial instead, but without any kind of a tour available to prospective members I didn’t know what to expect. More advice – learn from my mistake. As Warren Buffet once said, it’s great to learn from your mistakes, but its better learn from other people’s mistakes. The seven day trial was full access and TBP reports that the three day trial is too, but I can’t confirm that.
The site bills through Segpay so you can be assured that your membership will be fairly easy to cancel. One thing I didn’t try so can’t confirm, is whether your access is cut off after you cancel the trial membership.
While SB videos are offered elsewhere, such as Videobox, the file specs here are better, so if you’re a SB fan and looking for some of his stuff, this may be what you’re looking for.
The bottom line is that if you’re a SB fan this can be a good value if you opt for a trial. The downside is that if you’re a SB fan looking to add some titles you don’t have there is no way to see which titles are offered here, and once you are a member there is no way to easily find the titles you’re looking for in the site. The upside is that for such ‘ancient’ porn as this, it’s been encoded in a way that makes it look good despite much of it having been shot on videotape. I’d recommend a trial membership, but make sure you go in with your eyes open.
I find that a lot of sites have repetitive scenes. It just seems to be a common thing on porn sites. I download a lot - I'm sort of a porn 'hoarder' - and I find that what I do to avoid having the porn get stale I switch it up and watch different stuff. One huge advantage that downloading has, and I'm assuming that you download too, is that with this stuff in the collection it'll be something I'll come back to over and over. There are many reasons why I'll always choose downloads over streaming, and one of them is that if you have a membership at one site where the material is repetitive then you'd get bored pretty quickly. I find that even with my favorite sites and niches I get bored if I don't change my viewing habits occasionally.
The site shutting you out for 'suspicious activity' is very annoying. I'm glad I used a short username and password that was easy to re-enter over and over and over and over...
Willard, I mean no disrespect by this, as I suspect that English is not your first language, but the way you both wrote and formatted that comment made it very poetic. I think this was one of the best posts we've had in a long time!
I agree. It might be worth the risk is you were an anime fan, there was a full trial AND it billed through a reputable biller. But failing any one of those (and it fails all three for me), it is likely too risky.
"Organic and natural." That's a phrase the exactly describes what I was trying to say. If there's a 'problem,' and obviously it isn't really a problem, is that you may be trying to bring the high standards of Nubiles' main site to this one, where the casting niche really does better as a more natural scene. It's like an extended BTS scene. I think bad or no editing can ruin a scene, but in some cases less editing might be a better choice and the casting niche is likely one of those kinds of sites.
I'm looking forward to seeing your site grow. The casting niche is small, but most of the sites offer some great material. Your site brings an interesting twist to the genre.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 24 videos
- 6 of the videos are casting interviews lasting just a few minutes
- Updates with a new full scene added per week (interviews aren’t counted as updates)
- Unique take on a relatively rare niche
- Beautiful models
- Great productions
- All scenes offered in six different resolutions
- Allows download managers
- Excellent use of tags
- Photos available (as singles or zips)
Cons:
- I’m not a big fan of the editing style
Bottom Line:
I’m a big fan of the casting niche; I find that when it’s well done it can be exceptionally hot. Yes, I know the models are acting, but when they are relatively new to the business and seem a bit nervous it adds to the heat.
Most casting sites follow a fairly simple formula: the model arrives, is told about the business and is then asked to strip and eventually to perform for the camera. That’s present here, but the site adds a twist that I’ve not seen elsewhere: there is a ‘casting director’ who is behind the camera and he’s assisted by a beautiful model who is also trying out for a casting director position.
There are two broad categories of scene here: interviews with the prospective female casting agents, and then the scenes where new models are put through their paces. There are currently six interview scenes and these are fun to watch and involve some nudity. They’re pretty short though, at less than five minutes long each.
As of today there are 18 actual casting videos. Those range from 15 minutes long to just under and hour, with the average around 35-40 minutes. Like most casting sites, they follow a bit of a formula, and that’s not a bad thing. The prospective model arrives and there is some talk between her and the female casting agent, the model is talked out of her clothes and photographed and videoed by the female agent. The female agent gets partially nude, a male model is brought in and the female agent directs the action. (I should add, just to be clear, that the female agent is a porn star too and also very beautiful. All the models fit the Nubiles mold for beauty.)
This is purely subjective, but I see casting videos as a bit of a hybrid between hardcore and behind-the-scenes stuff. I find the editing style here leaves too much out. This is just a preference, but I’d like to see more of the set-up and the move to different positions rather than an edit. I suspect that at least some of the motivation is to maintain the high standards that Nubiles has.
Two things that these videos really have going for them over standard casting videos is that the interaction with the female agent really adds a unique twist, and I really like the fact that the scenes ‘break the fourth wall’ and we see the female agent taking photos and videos. The added bonus of this is that we also get two different camera angles.
Each scene is offered in five MP4 resolutions and one WMV. MP4s are 1920x1080, 1280x720, 960x540, 640x360 and 480x270 and the lone WMV is 1280x720. I downloaded the 1280x720 MP4 files figuring that they’d be a good compromise between quality and size. Bitrates vary, ranging from under 4,000 kb/s to over 10,000 kb/s. Frame rates also vary, with a few scenes at 23fps, some at 59 and the majority at 29. I won’t pretend to understand why the site made these choices, but I can report that whatever the site does, it does it well: these scenes all look sharp and crisp with no pixilation with movement.
This is, admittedly, nit-picky, but for those who prefer a specific file type there is an issue you’ll want to be aware of. My choice was to download the 1280 MP4 files. When I went to each scene the download choices are listed at the bottom in relatively small font. The problem is that the placement of the links for the 1280 MP4 and WMV files are swapped in at least six videos. All you need to do is pay attention, but if you’re like me and don’t notice it until later you’ll wonder how you managed to click on the same place for each scene and get two different file types. Clicking on the second-from the left file option is usually the MP4, but in some scenes it’s the WMV.
The site updates with a new scene added each week. The interviews are short and don’t count as an uploaded scene.
Like the main Nubiles site, this one uses tags to select for certain things you might be looking for in a scene. It may seem like overkill now as the site is small, but as it grows these tags will become a real advantage. The main Nubiles site does a lot of things well, but their use of tags sets a high bar and I’m glad to see them use it here too.
I don’t collect photos, but it appears that this site follows the same high standards for the main Nubiles site. Photos are available as singles or zips in three resolutions: 5600x3700, 2000x1333 and 1200x800.
The bottom line is that this is a small and growing site with a unique take on the casting niche. The price may seem high, but for the fee you get access to the full Nubiles site too, which is certainly a great value. The models are stunning, the production values are great, the site is well laid out and the scenes are hot. I’d recommend the site and it is one that I’ll rejoin once it grows more.
I bought Internet Download Manager when Free Download Manger stopped working. I find IDM stable and fast but the one drawback it has when compared to FDM is that IDM takes a longer time to stitch together all the bits of the file it downloaded.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Kink.com family of sites
- 480+ scenes
- Updates weekly
- Standard-setting production values
- Many viewing / downloading options
- Many A-list models
- Rare niche (bondage AND sex)
- Supports download managers
- Clear model consent
- Excellent value
- Photos available as singles and zips
Cons:
- None
Bottom Line:
For those who know Kink.com’s sites, Sex and Submission needs no introduction. S+S is one of their older sites and dates back nine years. All Kink’s sites focus on consensual BDSM play with each site adding a twist. Here the twist is sex. That may seem self-evident, but many of Kink’s sites don’t have a lot of actual sex and when they do it is secondary to the specific niche. Here the sex is front and center. The sex isn’t plain vanilla though, as there is always an element of D/s play and sex while in bondage or restraint. Kink.com is, in my opinion, the best BDSM company operating today.
For those unfamiliar with Kink, don’t confuse them with “Abuse” sites. Those sites seem to revel in making the model miserable. Kink is the opposite: the models get to explore this facet of their sexuality in a controlled environment and it is clearly all about their pleasure. It’s hard to explain, but this isn’t misogynistic BDSM.
As with other Kink sites, this one goes out of its way to ensure that the model fully consents to the play. There is an interview in each one where the scene is discussed and the safe word is made known. I know there are some who reject this approach and think that the consent itself is forced, but there is no evidence to support that position. One factor that, in my opinion, speaks well for Kink’s professionalism are the numbers of A-list stars who shoot scenes here, and many of them shoot multiple scenes. I suspect that if Kink coerced the models that no A-list star would work for them, let alone shoot multiple scenes. Adding to this position is the fact that many of the A-listers are definitely not fetish models.
The site currently has 480 scenes. Older scenes start with an interview and jump right into the action. Newer scenes are scenario-based which can add to the heat. There is bondage in several positions, with sex in most of them. If the model does anal, there is usually some anal. The scenes close with an interview which can be interesting to watch to see what the model liked about the shoot. The average length of the scenes is a little over an hour. The scenes can’t be said to meet usual standards in that Kink.com sets those standards. Set creation and production values are the best there are. For scenes that strive have a dark feel about them, they succeed but they don’t look actually dark. They are all well light, shot and edited.
The site updates with one new scene being added per week.
As with all Kink sites there are a lot of options to watch the scenes. (Obviously the older scenes have fewer options) There is streaming in four available resolutions. Downloads are available for portable devices, in WMV and MP4 formats. Each of those offers a choice of resolutions. I opt for the highest quality MP4s and those come in at 1280x720, 5000kb/s and 29fps. My experience with the next largest is that they are 960x540 at 1500kb/s. A few of the older scenes appear to have been remastered to a higher quality, but some haven’t. The highest resolution for some of the older scenes is 640x480 at 825 kb/s, but keep in mind that these were shot in 2005 so they were up to standard then..
Another difference exists between the oldest and newer scenes on the site. When Kink first started the scenes were relatively simple: ropes, chains, spreader bars, etc. were common implements. As Kink matured the scenes became a lot more innovative in the means to bind the models. Kink clearly has some creative minds at work. A majority of the scenes are innovative and very interesting.
Photos are available, though this is really a video site so those are secondary. I don’t collect those so I have no information on them.
Download managers work for queuing scenes. I found the links timed out at about an hour, which is reasonable.
Kink.com isn’t a network so each site requires a membership. The good news is that when you’re a member to one site you get a discounted price for the others. I usually take advantage of this by joining the cheapest site I want at the full price and then get the discounted price on the others. I’m on their mailing list but haven’t seen an offer in several years.
The bottom line on this site is simple: if you have any interest in this niche you should seriously consider joining. For the price, you get access to almost 500 scenes, regular updates and many big-name porn stars doing some interesting fetish work for the best company in the BDSM business. The scenes look great, the bondage gear is innovative and the models really seem to enjoy the play. This is an excellent value and I highly recommend it.
You're making me blush, sir! Thanks for the kind comments. And this is definitely one of the more unusual sites that I've ever joined. But I was compelled to just to get a scene from one lass I rather like.
I was a member there until just a week ago and was a bit surprised to read some of the problems you wrote about in your review.
When I reviewed the site I did note that a lot of the videos are 1920x1080, and they are. But when I went digging around in the site it appears that I missed something. It looks like that back in June 2013 the site stopped uploading the 1920 videos and went with a lower 1280 resolution. In terms of numbers though, I downloaded about 280 scenes and of those 235 were in 1920 resolution and only 32 were in 1280. You wrote that you’ve only downloaded around 20 scenes, so if you’re working your way back into the catalogue you wouldn’t have hit the 1920 scenes yet. Try going back to the “Veronica” scene that was uploaded on June 7 and I think you’ll find that’s around when they stopped uploading the 1920.
I don’t know what to say about the download speeds you experienced because I didn’t experience that at all. My download manager is maxed out at 11MB/s and that’s what I saw consistently.
As for the music, I’ve watched 40 to 50 of the scenes and never noticed it at all. I checked again and it is there, but it’s pretty faint in the few scenes where I listened for it. Maybe in some of the newer scenes that you have they’ve turned up the volume on that. If so, I’m with you: loud background music is a mood killer.
I also agree that the models faces can be washed out with too much lighting on the close ups. That doesn’t happen in every scene, but it does detract when it is there.
I can’t dispute some of your other concerns because we just have different opinions. I don’t consider the male talent to be below standard, but then the only thing I look for in male talent is the understanding that their job is to show off the female. To me, male talent is part of the set. On that measure, the guys here pass the test. The stroking is annoying, but it’s so common in porn that I’ve just learned to accept it. I wish I didn’t, and you obviously feel that way too.
I think everyone agrees that the scenes are repetitive. There is a strict formula and it gets followed in 95% of the scenes. That’s something else I’ve learned to live with in porn. I like massage and BDSM sites and they’re pretty repetitive too. I deal with that by avoiding watching a bunch in a row.
Finally, as for the lack of amateur talent, most of these women have done a few other scenes, but mot many, so I’m okay with that. The few big-name porn stars that appear at the peak of their career are listed as such so the site isn’t trying to pull a fast one. Most of the other stars who appear here look to be very early in their careers. I find that a positive to get an early scene of a girl I like.
I’m glad you added your review to give another side to some of the glowing reviews. No one will ever complain about having too much information before deciding to buy a membership.
Thanks for taking the time to reply to my review. 'Value' and 'heat' are two things that are so subjective that they really can't be quantified. I respect that your opinion on value is different from mine. I think the value of having both of those opinions here is that someone else can join or not join based on some different interpretations.
On 'heat,' there is no difference of opinion: these are some incredible scenes, and like you, I'm impressed with the volume of anal scenes.
Check out Teen Mega World if you haven't already. They have many of the same models and also offer a discount if you link through here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 9 videos, 7 picture sets
- Unique niche
- $20 membership
- Videos in three resolutions
- Photos in zips or singles
- Photos in two resolutions
- High-res photos look amazing
- Supports download managers for queuing files
- Definitely all exclusive
Cons:
- Small site
- No obvious update schedule
- Music replaces sound
- Would be much better value packaged as part of a network
Bottom Line:
Leave it to the folks at The Best Porn to expose me to a niche I neither knew existed or liked it: girls getting naked while working out. There is really only one reason why I joined, and that’s to get access to a scene by a model I like who has only done a small amount of stuff. The fact that the site isn’t terribly expensive at $20 and billed through CC Bill sealed the deal.
The site is very small, with only nine videos and seven photo sets offered. While that’s definitely small, you need to keep in mind that many of the scenes are well over an hour long and one falls just short of two hours.
The site has a very narrow (and unique) focus: girls at a gym, solo, who begin a workout, strip off their clothes while working out and complete the workout while naked. There is little variation: there is one scene with two girls with some sex, and one scene is shot outdoors, but other than that it follows the same formula. Consider this more a nudist site than a sex site.
The scenes are undated so I can’t determine what update schedule, if any, exists. The site allows member comments on the scenes and the most recent scene has comments. Yesterday when I checked the comments the most recent said it was posted three months ago. Today it says it was posted on December 2, but doesn’t give a year. I think it is safe to assume that if the site is updating there is no set schedule beyond glacial.
The site offers videos in three resolutions: 1920x1080 (9000 kb/s), 1080x720 and 640x360. While I found most of the video to be crisp and clear, I did find in some of the videos that where there is fast movement the edges become slightly pixilated. I don’t understand the tech side of this so I don’t know if this is something the site could even avoid.
A unique feature is that you can download an ISO version that can be burned to a DVD to watch on TV.
The site permits download managers for queuing scenes and zips.
The photos are available as singles or zips and in two resolutions: 3744x5616 and 1200x800. The high-res pics look incredibly good. If you’re a photo collector these might be worth joining to get. Photo sets range from 100+ photos to 800+ photos.
My biggest complaint about the scenes may be subjective, but I suspect that many others will agree with me. I’ll let any potential members decide on their own. The site has chosen to overdub the sounds of the workout with music. This isn’t that there is music playing over top of the sounds; the sounds are gone and completely replaced by music. To make matters worse, in my opinion, is that the music is that techno-shit that seems to be overplayed in gyms. You might be able to convince me that this crappy music belongs in a gym (but don’t bet on it) but you’ll never convince me that it belongs in a porn video. Even a solo video where the intention may be to create a sort of gym atmosphere. I’d rather hear the interaction with the crew than the music.
This site is one of ten that was added to TBP recently from a company called David Weisenbarger (David Nudes, HD Studio Nudes and more). I do not have memberships at any other of these sites but it appears that they are all relatively small (though some are fairly big), that they feature mostly solo models with rare g/g sex. My role in the porn biz is as a customer, and as a customer I am unlikely to join any of their other sites simply because they aren’t a good value at $20 to $25 per site. (And keep in mind that production costs here are at the low end of the spectrum: no expensive locations, solo nude, no sex, no masturbation.) All the sites added together would make a fair-sized network and by charging a fair price they’d probably generate exponentially more business. This has nothing to do with the review, and I’m obviously only speculating.
The bottom line? the site is small, but it is relatively inexpensive at $20. It bills through CC Bill so you can join in confidence. If this is a niche you like or there is a model here that you want to see then you may be willing to spend the $20 to join. For everyone else, the site is too small with no predictable growth to make this a good choice. As it stands now, and with no obvious changes coming, this site isn’t a good value. If this site ever becomes part of a network or package deal I’d reconsider my opinion.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
