| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1301
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
I had a nasty email from a webmaster once saying that I had distributed my password and allowed others to download illegally. A brief search of here and other sites revealed that the site was notoriously easy to crack and hack. Once I pointed out this information to the webmaster he conceded that it did happen a lot and that it was more likely that my password was stolen than given away.
Guess how many times I've rejoined that site?
|
08-12-14 01:22pm
|
Reply
1302
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
ghosty's Reply
That's really odd. I've checked again and the only thing I have in the upper right is an email icon and a link for 'my account.'
|
08-10-14 12:24pm
|
Comment
1303
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
|
08-10-14 06:55am
Replies (6)
|
Comment
1304
|
Anal Acrobats
(0)
|
|
08-10-14 06:48am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1305
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
In Canada it is sort of legal for women to go topless. Back in '91 a woman was charged for committing an indecent act (a criminal offence) and was convicted. The Ontario Court of Appeal overturned that conviction saying it wasn't an indecent act but not weighing in on the unconstitutional inequality that the law brought. Other similar charges in other provinces applied the Ontario case and acquitted women who went topless. The matter has never been to the Supreme Court so it still isn't settled but since most women won't go topless anyway it may be a moot point.
Honestly though, as a 48 year old male I suspect that it should be illegal for me to go topless anywhere too.
|
08-09-14 10:34am
|
Reply
1306
|
Nuru Massage
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I know what you mean about how it can get repetitive. I noted that in my earlier review. My way of dealing with that is to watch something else and come back to the massage stuff again later. I do like the scene set-ups in most scenes as it creates a sexy atmosphere.
I did have some trouble with the site in IE but once I started using Chrome I was fine.
|
08-07-14 04:23pm
|
Reply
1307
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
It's critically important to me and it can make or break a scene for me. That doesn't mean I like plot-based porn, because I don't, but I also don't like scenes where the director says "This is Jane and this is John and now they'll fuck." I like scenes where some sexual tension is developed.
|
08-07-14 04:20pm
|
Review
1308
|
Nuru Massage
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Massage-themed network with American models
- Six distinct sites
- Network and sites well organized
- Five sites update weekly
- Lots of viewing options
- TBP discount
- Supports download managers |
| Cons: |
- Very little actual sex
- No independent biller |
| Bottom Line: |
This is my second time visiting this network and most of what I wrote in my 2012 review of Nuru Massage still applies.
The biggest difference with this network now is how it is branded. Back in 2012 I don’t recall there being an overall name to the site. If you joined one massage-themed site you got access to the others. While the access part remains the same, the difference is that the network now has a name: Fantasy Massage.
Most of the sites are the same as the last time I reviewed this network, but one has stopped updating and there are two new sites now. The originals are:
All Girl Massage – 219 scenes, adds one scene per week
Nuru Massage – 273 scenes, adds one scene per week
Soapy Massage – 242 scenes, no new scenes added since April 2012
Massage Parlor – 319 scenes, adds one scene per week
The two new sites are Milking Table and Tricky Spa.
Tricky Spa is the newest with only ten scenes uploaded. A new scene is added weekly. The theme here is a little harder edged and more sinister than the other sites. With this site the premise of the scene is that the woman is tricked or coerced into giving the male masseur oral sex and there is some reluctance. I’m not sure how long this site will continue to grow since the user votes and comments are far more negative than positive. Not that I can summarize how other members feel about the site, but given the play on coercion it really doesn’t fit in well with all the other massage-themed sites here where the interaction is both fun and sexy.
The other new site is Milking Table. It has 59 scenes and updates weekly. The premise of this site is a lot like the others, with a male customer and a female masseuse. The quirk of this site is that the massage table has a hole cut in it where when the male customer lies on his stomach his penis sticks through the hole and the female masseuse gets under the table to ‘milk’ him.’ While it does seem a bit odd to watch a woman suck a disembodied cock, an advantage that it does have is that it does away with the lead up to so many cumshots in porn these days where the last of the scene is the male model jerking off for a few minutes before coming on the female model. Here the table requires that the female model be a finisher. It’s a quirky site, but I subjectively I like it.
Most of the technical aspects of the network remain the same, and since it was well done before there’s nothing wrong with that. The network is logically laid out, the sites are logically laid out, there is a model search page (for individual sites or the full network), there is a search function and there are tags too. The one difference I noticed is there are no longer any WMV files offered. The only file type now offered is MP4 and those are available in 160, 240, 360, 480, 540, 720 and 1080 resolutions. Streaming is also available in those same resolutions. I downloaded the 720p files and they come in at 1280x720, 4500kb/s and 29fps. Subjectively they look great on a 24” monitor and look fine on a 50” TV.
The site supports using download managers and I had no problem using one. The download speeds were what I usually see on porn sites.
Some miscellaneous observations:
• As before there is a lot more oral action here than vaginal sex.
• Anal sex is very rare.
• The last time I was a member here it seemed that they were more Asian themed but that has changed too. Asians are certainly represented but the Caucasian models now outnumber them.
• The scenes usually feature some of the better known U.S. A-list models working today. Many other massage sites feature Russian or European models so this is a good source to see your favorite American models in this niche.
• For other dinosaurs like me out there the network acts a bit wonky with Internet Explorer so be prepared for some minor annoyances or use a different browser.
• As with all other sites that are part of the Fame group of site, save your confirmation email as it will provide details on how to cancel. It isn’t that they make it hard, but they sure don’t make it as quick and easy as using a CC biller.
The bottom line is that this network continues to offer a great value. For the low discount price offered through TBP you get access to hundreds of massage-themed porn scenes with some of the hottest models in the business. The sites are well organized and offer lots of choice for both streaming and downloads. I highly recommend joining if you like this porn niche. |
|
08-05-14 05:42pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
1309
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Pretty much all of the above for me. But since I found TBP/PU my purchases have been a lot less risky.
|
08-05-14 03:35pm
|
Comment
1310
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
|
08-03-14 12:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1311
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Agreed. Another annoying choice is how he splits material between Jules Jordan and The Ass Factory and expects $30 for each of those memberships.
|
08-03-14 10:04am
|
Reply
1312
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
Reply of
Clownpuncher's Review
I just rejoined this site and it appears that the issue is that the links time out very quickly. I didn't have any problem with downloads failing but I couldn't queue up scenes in my download manager like I used to be able to here and still do with most sites. It means more work to get the scenes you want and it is annoying but it's still some great porn for those of us who like hardcore with a harder edge.
|
08-03-14 09:43am
|
Comment
1313
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
|
08-03-14 09:40am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
1314
|
Jules Jordan
(0)
|
|
08-03-14 09:39am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1315
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Dave H's Reply
The issue about having the 24 hour wait for me is that if I get cut off at 9PM one night then I may not have time to go on that late the next day so my wait time becomes much longer than 24 hours. Download limits really bug me...
|
08-03-14 05:53am
|
Reply
1316
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
oldfart's Reply
Thanks for this tip. I use IDM too and will make that change when I have a membership at this site.
Thanks also for the comments and rating.
|
08-03-14 05:51am
|
Reply
1317
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Dave H's Comment
To make matters worse, their download limit seems to be arbitrarily imposed and can even change from day to day and user to user. This is counter-intuitive, but when you download HD files you can download more. I was often able to download up to 40GB per day the last time I was there as long as I stuck to HD files. The problem is that there often isn't any consistency so what I experienced a few months ago may not be the case now. But try the HD if you have the capacity and you may find you can download more.
|
07-16-14 05:16pm
|
Review
1318
|
Tiny 4K
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A small collection of scenes featuring some of the most petite U.S.-based models working today
- Ultra HD for those who want it
- TBP Discount
- Supports download managers
- Options for downloads
- Simple and effective site layout
- Photos available (single and zip) |
| Cons: |
- ‘Tiny’ doesn’t just describe the models
- 4K may be the answer to a question few are asking
- Updates are irregular
- Could / should be bundled with other sites until it grows |
| Bottom Line: |
I’ll get this out of the way first: I have no need for 4K videos so I didn’t download any to keep. I view most of my porn on a 24” monitor so going that large just doesn’t give me any advantage. When you factor in the file size the negligible benefit for me in viewing is offset by the extra space needed on a hard drive. For those who are interested though, the 4K files come in at 4096x2160, 10,000kb/s and 23fps.
And I’ll get the site’s main drawback out of the way now too: ‘tiny’ doesn’t just describe the models on the site. There are currently only 12 videos uploaded as I write this. A secondary drawback is that the update schedule is irregular so I can’t give any indication of how quickly the site will grow. The site started in early May and by the end of May eight scenes were available. No scenes were uploaded in June and they have since added four scenes in July (as of the 15th). But since the site is affiliated with a large online porn company I suspect that they will continue to grow.
The scenes they do have are very well shot and presented with excellent production values. The models are all mainstream porn models and they’re a who’s who of petite models working today. These are: Ava Taylor, Chloe Amour, Chloe Foster, Dakota Skye, Dillion Harper, Emma Stoned, Jenna J Ross, Kacey Jordan and Kacy Lane. Eleven of the scenes are b/g and one is b/g/g.
All of the scenes are vaginal only. I’m not sure what constitutes couples porn, but it is fair to say that these are not rough scenes where the model endures some hard sex, though some may see it this way since the site does flaunt petite models with large men, so it isn’t true artcore either. The scenes range from approximately 20 minutes to about 35 minutes.
The site is simple and effective, which it should be since it is this small. There are search functions which may prove useful as the site grows. Each scene opens into a separate page where a trailer is available, as are screencaps and photos. The photos are available as a zip but the screencaps aren’t. There is streaming available in SD and HD, and downloads are available in MP4 format (4K, 1080p, 720p and 480p), in 480p MPG1 and as WMV in 720p. There is some way to view the scenes that will satisfy most users. I downloaded the 720p MP4 which aren’t exactly that. They come in at 1280x674 and 23fps. Oddly, the bitrates vary widely from scene to scene with some being as low as 3,000 kb/s and some being as high as 10,000. Subjectively they look great even though the numbers are a bit lower than competitor sites.
The site supports download managers and I had no issue with links timing out in an unreasonably short time.
The site offers a TBP discount which is a good thing because until it grows it would be a poor value at the full price. The same company has 61 other sites listed here (Casting Couch X being the only one I’m familiar with) and it would be a good idea to bundle it with other company sites until it grows.
The bottom line is that at $18 for 12 scenes (with more to be added, presumably) the site likely isn’t a good enough value for the casual user. I think it represents fair value at the discounted price since this is a niche I like and many of the models here are those who are on my list of current favorites. I think the real measure of value here will be how quickly the site grows and how close they are able to stick to their premise of petite models while growing the site at a reasonable pace. |
|
07-15-14 05:59pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1319
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Gnoman's Review
I'm surprised at your comment that there is a lot of anal stuff and ATM there now. I was a member earlier this year and don't remember there being much anal. But as an anal fan I may not notice it as much as someone who doesn't like it.
|
07-14-14 04:06pm
|
Comment
1320
|
Bikini Dream
(0)
|
|
07-01-14 05:05am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1321
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I selected yes, but for me price is only one element of value. If a site charges more than average but offers a lot of exclusive content with high production values, then that will be part of the comments I make in the review. I always try to give some objective reasons why I think a site is good value even if it does have a high price.
|
06-25-14 05:16pm
|
Review
1322
|
Stripper Facials
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- You’re only out $9.95 on joining
- Videos and photos
- Some attractive unknown models
- It is updating |
| Cons: |
- Streaming only
- Small site
- Old, old, old videos
- Some unattractive unknown models
- Photos but no zips |
| Bottom Line: |
Two things came to my mind not long after logging into this site for the first time. First, if I were to create a website it would definitely look a lot like this. Seriously, I have no knowledge or skills in creating website nor do I have access to anything decent to put on such website, so it would look terrible and have almost nothing to offer. Second, as Warren Buffet said, it’s good to learn from your mistakes but it’s better to learn from other people’s mistakes. That’s the real value of Pornusers: no one else needs to make the same mistake I did in joining this site.
This site says that it’s affiliated with Mike South, a man-about-porn for many years. He’s in all of the videos (and if you want some creepy insight into this site, for whatever reason he seems to be wearing the same underwear in all the scenes).
In the interests of being fair I’ll address the positive aspects of this site first: a couple of the scenes feature beautiful women in sexual situations. There are facials in every scene. Unfortunately, the good news ends here.
Now for the bad news:
• I may have assumed too much, but with a site called “Stripper Facials” I expected some element of stripping (pole dancing, lap dancing) and facials. There is only one scene I can find with any of that. The rest of the scenes are billed as strippers getting facials. The problem with that is that this is conceptually no different from waitresses or nurses getting facials. It still looks like standard porn. For someone looking for stripper themed porn, this isn’t it.
• The preview pages are misleading. A prospective member is told there are three different file resolutions: “Hi Def, Standard Def and Dial up sized full length videos.” Sounds good. But once inside only one video is offered in anything close to HD. For the other scenes, the HD and SD both come in at 720x480 but the bitrate is higher for the “HD” file (2500 vs 900).
• How long ago was 720x480 at 2500 kb/s considered HD? While the site boasts of regular updates, most of those updates appear to have been shot in the last millennium when 720x480 might have been HD. Seriously, given the looks of the models and the video quality these videos were likely shot a long time ago.
• Many of the models are just marginally attractive. Part of this is that so many of them have the typical big hair, heavy makeup look of the 1990s, but part of it is also that many of the models aren’t all that attractive.
• There are currently only 30 scenes uploaded but two of those have broken links.
• The videos are streaming only.
• There are photos, but no zips
The site does promise updates and it does deliver. There have been several updates since I joined but unfortunately those updates are videos that are like the others that are here: they have a distinct look of having been recorded as long as twenty years ago. For the ‘new’ uploads, there is no improvement in video resolution.
The site itself is laid out in a simple way, which I’ll never fault, but the overall look harkens back to the days when we all suffered with dial-up and site design was necessarily simple. Simple is one thing, outdated is another. This look is outdated.
The bottom line here? Even at a low monthly price of $9.95 this is far from a good value. The overall concept is one which could be done so well but it isn’t here. If the site doesn’t plan to shoot new stripper facial scenes with modern equipment and offer them in true HD (with downloads) then the least they could do is provide a time machine to take the members back in time to when this could have been a great site. My estimate is somewhere around 1999 would be about right. But hey, consider that you could get filthy rich selling Y2K fears. |
|
06-25-14 05:13pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1323
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I'm glad I could help you out. I do think that VB passed its prime a long time ago. I think the only reason they can offer such low prices is that they upload crap and only in low resolutions by today's standards.
Like you, I'll celebrate if Kink ever offers some kind of network access.
|
06-25-14 05:12pm
|
Reply
1324
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I wish I had the answer on costs for you, but in all the comments and reviews it seems no one, including myself, ever noted that. But some of the more recent information there does suggest that the pro-rated pricing for the add-ons is still in effect, which means that you can control what you pay provided you cancel your main membership after a month. If you're confident that you can get all the Kink scenes you want in a few days then sign up to Kink with three or four days left on your VB membership and you'll only be charged for those few days remaining. But if you forget to cancel you'll be charged full price for both VB and the add-on at the start of the next monthly billing cycle.
I don't remember what the file resolutions were either, but I can say that I have since deleted all of them. I'm guessing 540x480 or somewhere around there.
I agree with you that it would be a great idea for Kink to offer some 'buffet' kind of membership where a member could access a specific number of scenes across all their sites for a set fee. One thing about Kink though, is that if you join one site you get a discounted price to the others. But that's still an expensive proposition. Kink does offer some form of pay-per-scene but I don't know how much it is per scene. If you're really only interested in a few scenes that may be a cost-effective way to get HD scenes at a reasonable price.
|
06-24-14 01:14pm
|
Reply
1325
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I don't have the answer for you, but the last time I was a member there the add-on 'channels' were pro-rated to the remaining length of your first month. So if you joined VB on July 1 and also joined the Kink channel on July 1 you paid the full price. But if you waited and joined Kink on July 20 you were only charged for the one-third of the month that you used. That was valuable if you were only staying a month. Subsequent months you'd be billed full cost for both VB and the Kink channel.
One major caveat, VB really seems to have changed their business model. They don't seem as transparent as they once were and they could have changed the billing practices for the channels.
One advantage though is that the Kink channel gives you access to shoots from several different Kink sites so you can get samples from a lot for a lot less money. The biggest disadvantage is that the file resolutions on the Kink channel are far lower than what you can get on an actual Kink site.
I hope this helps.
|
06-23-14 05:32pm
|
