| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1076
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
Oh yeah!
|
08-15-15 10:49am
|
Reply
1077
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
Glad to do it. If you're into first anals like I am then this Monday will be a big day. Riley Reid's first anal will be uploaded on Tushy.com on Monday.
|
08-15-15 08:45am
|
Reply
1078
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
I’m not sure what you mean by your next two questions. They seem to be asking the same thing. My all-time favorites? Three??? Man, that’s cruel to ask me that! You’ll notice that these three scenes date back quite far. Since we’re roughly the same age I’ll presume that you were into porn back then too and may know some of these videos and models.
• Inari Vachs in Whack attack: Butt Fucking Frenzy. This video dates from 1998 and it still ranks as my favorite scene of all time. Inari is amazing here: she looks stunning and has a playful attitude.
• Tammi Ann in The Hitchhiker (the Max Hardcore one). This was before Max started doing all sorts of crazy crap so it’s pretty normal. This was the first Tammi Ann scene I ever saw and it immediately started an obsession. She looks incredible here.
• The third might be Aurora Snow and Gauge in Trained Teens 1. Both of these porn superstars were at their prime and brought their A-games to this scene.
Now that I think of it, I started a thread in the forum a while back with favorite scenes that I hoped might generate some discussion. It didn’t. Not all the scenes in that list (there are two parts to the post) are anal, but given my tastes most of them are. Check it out if you want: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=4166
Thanks for asking. I could talk about favorite anal scenes for days…
|
08-10-15 05:40pm
|
Reply
1079
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
Interesting questions. But I’ll have to warn you, asking me questions about anal scenes may cause me to drone on and on…
And apologies to the new mods, but I’ll have to answer this over two posts since I can’t fit it all in one.
Painful first anals isn't something that I actively scout out but when the model isn't an experienced anal queen there’s a good chance that she will experience some discomfort so my collection of first anals does have some with this attribute.
• I’d have to say that my favorite first anal where the models is less than comfortable is Maryjane Johnson (billed as Maggie here) on Exploited College Girls. She does two anal scenes here and as far as I know these are the only anal scenes she’s ever done. The first one is in a car and so we can’t really see much. If the scene is truthful, even the guy filming the POV didn’t expect anal. He told her to sit her ass down on his cock and she took that literally. The next scene she does on the site is a full-on anal and she isn't terribly happy.
• The second would likely be Asphyxia Noir on the Pierre Woodman site called Wake Up ‘n Fuck. It isn't listed here at PU. Woodman has a reputation of being a bit rough and since this is Asphyxia’s first on-screen anal scene that roughness causes her some problems.
• The third might be an obscure model who only did a handful of scenes. She goes by Missy Misfit and she did three scenes with Max Hardcore. Two of those scenes are anal (the third is a peeing only scene) and in one of them the scene is shot in the back seat of Max’s Suburban in a parking garage and Missy seems to be doubting her career choice. She only did six scenes in total and I wonder if she had worked with anyone other than Max if she would have stuck around longer. She was really petite and hot.
• Here’s a bonus scene but I’m not sure if this counts since she has gone on to be an anal queen. Gina Gerson has an early scene with Pierre Woodman on either Woodman Casting or Wake Up ‘n Fuck. I’m 90% sure it’s on WUNF. She really doesn’t look to be having a good time in this scene. But I’m glad she stuck it out because she is definitely one of my favorite Russian models.
|
08-10-15 05:40pm
|
Review
1080
|
Drone Hunter
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Part of the Mofos network
- Innovative and unique concept
- Most scenes have an outdoor theme
- TBP discount
- Supports download managers |
| Cons: |
- Small site
- Hasn’t updated in four months
- Typical Mofos / Brazzers model look
- Site will log you off after an hour |
| Bottom Line: |
I suppose that with the popularity of drones it was only a matter of time before someone started using them in porn. The concept is unique and it does add to the scenes but for whatever reason the concept seems to have died since the site hasn’t added a new scene since April 2015.
In all of the scenes the drone footage is just edited into footage shot by a regular camera. The one possible exception to that is the one lesbian scene which may be all drone footage. In all of the scenes the drone is played up as being surreptitious video that the female model doesn’t know of.
The most common scene setup is where the male talent is bringing a girl back to his place and he contacts the ‘drone hunter’ to shoot some secret video of them having sex. There is usually some fake communication between the male talent and the drone operator. A few of the scenes use the scenario where neither the male or female talent know they’re being viewed by the drone.
The site is quite small with only nine videos uploaded and it looks like it will stay small because it hasn’t updated in months. Given that each scene has to be set up to allow access for the drone there is an outdoor or voyeur element to each scene. Perhaps that part of it caused some problems in filming. It seems reasonable to think that a drone hovering over a rooftop patio or looking in a hotel window might attract some unwanted attention. On the other hand, if you like outdoor or public scenes this site certainly has that.
The biggest advantage to the site is the fact that it’s part of the Mofos network so you’ll have access to a lot of other sites. Also, because Mofos is one of the leading porn sites you can expect their level of quality in the site. There are tags on the scenes but with only nine scenes that really doesn’t add anything.
The downside to this being part of the Mofos network is that many of the scenes feature models with the signature Mofos/Brazzers look: big breasts (often fake) and other body mods. One of the models had enough collagen injected into her lips that she looked pretty silly, and to my eyes anyway, not very sexy.
The scenes can be streamed and downloaded. The streaming is available in three resolutions (up to 1080p) and there are six options for downloads: 272p, 368p, 480p, 720p and 1080p in MP4 format and a 480p in WMV. I downloaded the 720p and those come in at 1280x720 at 8000kb/s and 29fps. With those specs you’d expect them to look good and they do, on both a 24” monitor and a 50” TV.
I used Internet Download Manager and didn’t have any issues with the links timing out. If they do time-out that happens after a reasonable delay. One annoyance is that the site itself will kick you out approximately once per hour and require that you sign in again.
I can’t say that I’d recommend this site unless you really have a thing for drones because it’s just too small and looks to have gone dormant already. But if you’re interested in the site and you join the network to get it then the real value is in the network itself which has over 2000 videos available. When you consider that you get 2000 scenes for the low TBP discount price of $15USD it really is a good deal. |
|
08-10-15 11:10am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1081
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm sorry, but don't understand the question. is 'too much anal' actually a phrase in the English language? ;-)
|
08-10-15 10:59am
|
Reply
1082
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
This isn't a big improvement, but at least now you can pay double the price right upfront and get full access immediately. I didn't pay double upfront but did quickly to get access to the BTS stuff but that turned out to be a dud. I'm glad I joined but likely won't join again.
|
08-08-15 08:03am
|
Review
1083
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- True amateurs
- Many stunning young models
- Nearly 300 scenes
- Multiple viewing options
- Fast downloads
- Bill through reputable billers |
| Cons: |
- Terrible site design
- Expensive if you want HD
- No model names or info
- No unique identifiers for scenes
- Site defaults back to page one
- Better porn options are available |
| Bottom Line: |
GDP is a site that reviewers either love or hate. It’s a site that has squandered its potential. The problem with the site is that it has some beautiful amateurs in some pretty good porn let down by one of the worst site layouts on the internet. If anyone can learn anything from this site it’s how not to design a webpage.
The real value of the site is in the models themselves: they are true amateurs and most of them are really quite beautiful. That depends on a bit of a subjective assessment of course since most of the models are Caucasian, young (18-22) and fairly petite. The porn itself is very good, if somewhat formulaic. Most of the scenes follow the same formula of interview, blowjob with the model clothed, some sex in specific positions, more oral, usually more sex and finally finishing with the guy jerking off on the model’s face as she kneels in front of him.
There are currently close to 300 scenes available and the site does update. I can’t be specific about the update schedule because the scenes aren't dated but it appears that at least one new scene is added per week.
The scenes are available in streaming at resolutions called high, medium, low and mobile. The downloads are available in 720x405, 1280x720 and mobile. Paying for a premium membership adds downloads in 1920x1280 and 4K on the newer scenes. I downloaded the 1280x720 versions and they come in at 6000 kb/s and 29fps. They look good on a 24” monitor and 50” TV.
Where things start to fall apart for the site is the site design itself. Describing the issues that the site has seems a bit overwhelming because there are just so many but I’ll hit the highlights:
• The models aren't named and there is no biography given
• The scenes have no unique identifier at all. I’ve read on other forums where members will refer to a scene by a shoot number but I’ve never seen any unique information for a scene.
• Scenes can’t be opened in a new tab so you have to open them in your main browser window, but when you click to go back you get taken to the first page again and have to re-select the page you were on. To make matters worse, when you do finally get back to the page you just left the eight thumbnails are all in different order. I ended up downloading several scenes more than once.
• Only eight anal scenes.
The membership options aren't simple either. In the past you were required to stay for a second month to download HD files but now you can just pay to get the additional access immediately. I opted for the base membership because I’m happy with the 1280x720 files but to access the behind-the-scenes and ‘deleted’ scenes you need pay the additional amount. I figured it would be worth it but there are only 38 BTS scenes and five deleted scenes.
The site bills through Epoch or CC Bill so you can join with confidence that your information will be secure and you can cancel easily.
The site had some of the fastest download speeds that I’ve seen from porn sites. It was rare for me to see less that 20MB/s and most times I was seeing 25MB/s. I downloaded a lot in my first few days and if there is a download limit (which I don’t think there is) it’s high enough that only a serious porn glutton would hit it.
So is it worth joining or not? The site itself is deeply flawed and could be easily improved; the improvements would be like picking low-hanging fruit so that leads me to the conclusion that the site owners aren't really interested in improving things. To be fair to the site owners though, they might be putting their efforts into recruiting the models. The models are really the true value of this site: most of them are true amateurs and are really good looking. They appear to be having fun too. So when I balance the good and the bad I have to give this site a cautious recommendation: the porn is very good but the site is very bad. But, if you go into the deal with your eyes open armed with knowledge of the flaws you’ll be okay. Unless you absolutely must have HD or 4K or have a big thing for BTS or deleted scenes you can save yourself some money and take only the basic membership. So the recommendation is a definite maybe. I likely won’t rejoin and here’s something I’ve never done in a review before; I’ll suggest a better alternative: you can get very similar porn on a much better site at Exploited College Girls. |
|
08-03-15 06:00am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1084
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Poll
I tag my favorite scenes and go back to them frequently.
|
08-03-15 04:57am
|
Reply
1085
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Poll
A petite body is always the hook for me.
|
08-02-15 10:45am
|
Reply
1086
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Comment
One of the reasons I like Pornusers so much is that it's an opportunity to share information like this. This might make the difference from someone liking or not liking the site. I've joined several sites that had major flaws but thanks to other PU members I knew about them beforehand so I went in with that knowledge. Devil's Film is on my list of sites to regularly rejoin but the update schedule is such that it only merits a rejoin once a year.
|
07-24-15 03:50am
|
Reply
1087
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with Pyrenees that is usually isn't worth giving feedback because it's ignored. I can see how this would happen with a mega site, and especially one where the site managers don't speak English very well, but it annoys me a bit when it is a small niche site. Every time I join my favourite site I send them some feedback and ask that they consider a reduced rate for recurring memberships. They always ignore that question.
|
07-19-15 08:31am
|
Reply
1088
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
100% agree...
|
07-14-15 01:31pm
|
Reply
1089
|
Swallow Salon
(0)
|
Reply of
Cum Play John's Reply
Thanks for your comments. I understand you wanting to maintain the camera on the girl's face, but I'm okay with the ass shots - I just wish they'd get naked!
|
07-13-15 11:15am
|
Reply
1090
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I agree with you on both counts: I'll rejoin when there are more scenes and I really wish they'd bundle Blacked and Tushy. Or at least offer a decent discount to the other site if you have a membership to one.
|
07-10-15 09:32am
|
Reply
1091
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
They do in Canada after a woman challenged the constitutionality of the law banning it. That was over a decade ago and every day you see hundreds of beautiful women walking around topless up here.
Okay, I made up that last bit! I've never seen a woman go topless even with the law changed.
On a related note, it really pisses me off when some fucking prude complains of a woman breastfeeding her baby in public. Fuck the fuck off!
|
07-10-15 09:30am
|
Review
1092
|
Brand New Amateurs
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- True amateur site
- Inexpensive full trial
- Fast downloads
- Many different ages and body types
- Broad range of scene types
- Simple layout
- Extensive use of niche tags
- No download limits
- Reputable biller |
| Cons: |
- Many different ages and body types
- No known update schedule |
| Bottom Line: |
I’ve had mixed experiences with amateur sites. This may sound hypocritical but my favorite amateur sites are often those that use models who are in some form of the adult business – like cam shows – and are getting into videos. These sites (like Exploited College Girls) tend to be less amateurish. Brand New Amateurs falls into the class of being more of a true amateur site. I’m still browsing through the scenes and the only recognizable model I’ve seen is Halle Von.
This can be a pro or a con depending on your personal tastes, but sites that fall closer to the true amateur site tend to have a broad range of model ages and body types. This is great if you have interests that run the range from petite models in their late teens though BBW models to MILFs. This isn’t so great if you’re like me and have a narrow range of likes. But since the site many scenes there should be something for everyone.
I can’t give a definitive answer on the update schedule as the scenes aren’t dated but judging by the dates on the scene comments by members it looks like there is at least one new scene per week.
The site also offers a broad range of scene types which I think is a pro no matter how you slice it. There are solo scenes, some with toys, there are girl/girl scenes, there are boy/girl oral scenes, b/g/g scenes, some rimming scenes and even some anal scenes. And there are several scenes in the rare niche of white male/black female scenes too. Again, something for everyone.
The site has a very simple layout in that there is only one long page with a large thumbnail for each scene. Clicking on the thumbnail opens a new page where you can download the scene or get photos. The site has a limited search function but this is offset by being able to sort by model and the extensive use of niche tags.
Video downloads are only available as MP4s and only in one resolution per scene, but that resolution is high. Most of the scenes are 1920x1280 at around 6,000kb/s and 29fps. There are some lower at 1280x720 with bitrates ranging from 1,500-2,500kb/s and 29fps. The downside to having only one file size is that people with slower internet connections may wish for a smaller file size. The scenes look good with no pixilation but the downside is that since these are shot in someone’s home the production values are what you’d see in a more professional site. Lighting, for example, is sometimes a bit too dark. But it can also be argued that these ‘flaws’ add to the amateur appeal.
The site supports download managers but I can’t really say if there is a problem with links timing out. I use Internet Download Manager and have a relatively fast connection but the download speeds I saw here were probably the best I’ve ever seen. I’d see a sustained 25MB/sec download most of the time. I’ve seen other sites only allow 20% of that speed.
One advantage to this site is that they offer a full trial. My worry was that I’d trigger a download limit but I didn’t find one. In one afternoon I downloaded all the scenes I wanted and never saw a limit or had my download speeds throttled. I downloaded 50GB of data in less than three hours so if there is a limit it is very generous.
The bottom line is that this is a good site in the true amateur niche. When you factor in the availability of a full trial at a low cost there is almost no risk to someone joining the site. Given that the site bills through CC Bill the only risk is the membership fee itself, and I’m confident that most new members could easily find lots of porn to make at least the trial membership a good value. |
|
07-08-15 05:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1093
|
Rylsky Art
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Great review. I'm more of a video fan and I agree that Met Art videos are a bit dull. I thought it might just be me because I prefer harder-edged hardcore, but I guess not.
|
07-08-15 03:43pm
|
Reply
1094
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I 100% agree with your agreement with pat and your comments. These are great days for those of us who buy porn. Even a new site with just a handful of excellent scenes for a $30 monthly fee is still a good value when measured up with how you described life before the internet. I could rent three titles for $10 and if I was lucky there were four or five scenes on those tapes or DVDs that were worth watching.
And consider storage: I have what would likely fill an entire large porn shop and it's all discretely stashed in a locked briefcase.
|
07-08-15 03:33pm
|
Reply
1095
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
I had to give you credit for pointing out that connection. Both Blacked and Tushy are amazing sites. I hope they do really well.
|
07-07-15 04:49pm
|
Review
1096
|
Tushy.com
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Rare plot-based, softer-edged anal site
- Excellent quality scenes
- Updates weekly
- A-list porn models
- Several scenes listed as first anals
- Multiple download options
- Supports download managers
- Photos as singles or zips |
| Cons: |
- New and still small
- Expensive for the current size of the site
- Some issues with download managers
- Site won’t remember username / password |
| Bottom Line: |
Tushy.com is a rare site that features anal sex in plot-based scenes that border on having couples appeal. The site is clearly aiming for a different market from many other anal sex sites where the goal there is more to turn the event into an endurance test for the model. Here there is a short scene set-up followed by some sex where there is some chemistry between the models that just happens to have some anal sex thrown in for good measure.
As another PU member has pointed out, this site looks a lot like another site in quality and feel. Tushy.com is run by Greg Lansky who is also behind Blacked. For those who don’t know Blacked, it is a site that offers high quality, plot-based interracial porn. The fact that Lansky is behind this new site gives me a lot of hope that it will be as good as Blacked. (The only worry that I have is that has Lansky stretched himself too far in opening another site? Will Blacked be lower quality and will Tushy not hit the lofty mark set by its sister site? I hope that both remain excellent quality.)
Because the site is new it is still quite small with only 12 scenes uploaded. The site does update with the addition of a new scene each week. The site still charges the full rate even though they’re new and small. (I prefer the model used by Swallow Salon where the price is lower presumably in part to reflect the small size. I also understand that the porn that Tushy.com produces – anal and expensive production costs – is far higher than oral scenes on one set.)
As with all good porn sites, this one offers some choice in how members can access the scenes. Scenes are only available in MP4 format and in various resolutions: 1080p, 720p, 480p, 480p mobile, 360p mobile and 270p mobile. Streaming is also available in RESOLUTION. I downloaded the 720p scenes as they were the best compromise between size and quality and those come in at a high bitrate of over 8,000kb/s and a framerate of 29fps. Subjectively they look great and I’d recommend testing a few of the 1280p scenes before you immediately go for a higher resolution.
Streaming is also available but I can’t tell the resolution. It looks to be HD though. Trailers are available for each scene too.
Photos are available too. They look more like stand-alone photos rather than screencaps, which is what I’d expect of a site that pushes quality. The photos are available as singles and zips and the zipped photos come in at 3000x2000.
The site supports download managers but I did encounter a problem initially. When you click to download a scene a pop-up with the download options comes up. Selecting the resolution started the download outside my manager. I wasn’t a big deal to get it to download with the DM and then cancel the other download. This only happened on the first day I was a member and that issue hasn’t recurred since.
Several of the scenes are listed as being first anals. As a collector of that specific niche it’s great that this site may be offering more of that.
While all the scenes look like they’re exclusive to this site I can’t say for sure. The two most recent updates have the word ‘Exclusive’ splashed across the thumbnail leaving me to think that the others may not be exclusive. I buy a lot of porn, and specifically a lot of anal porn and I’ve never seen these scenes before.
I mentioned that most of the scenes have a softer feel to them than in a lot of other anal sites. The exception to this is the one scene I joined to get access to, and that’s a very rare anal scene from Kacey Jordan. I’m only aware of one other anal scene she’s done (for Dirt Pipe Divas) so no one is going to call her an anal queen. Maybe she’s playing this as part of the role in the scene, but she doesn’t look too comfortable throughout the lengthy anal sex part of the scene. But most, if not all of the other scenes are like this.
The bottom line is that with the current size of the site it’s hard to argue that it offers good value for the monthly fee of $30 but the value equation has to take into consideration the quality of what’s offered here too, and it’s fair to say that this is excellent quality porn. It’s also worth noting that the site continues to grow. I know that not everyone will agree with me, but I think value is more about quality than quantity. If you like softer anal scenes you really should check out this site. |
|
07-06-15 05:12pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
1097
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with Monahan.
|
07-06-15 04:27pm
|
Review
1098
|
Swallow Salon
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Affiliated with Amateur Allure
- Inexpensive
- Beautiful models giving incredible blowjobs
- Updates with one scene per week |
| Cons: |
- Very small site
- Not enough female nudity
- Only one video choice |
| Bottom Line: |
I know Amateur Allure has attracted some very different reviews. I fall solidly in the fan group as AA is likely my favorite adult site on the internet. So when AA posted an update on that site that had a slightly different look and had a watermark for Swallow Salon I immediately headed over there and joined too. I can’t say for certain, but it looks like Swallow Salon is affiliated with Amateur Allure and done by the same guys.
Like AA, SS is formula-driven. Some people really dislike this but I think that if you have a good formula why mess with it? The premise is that the male talent is visiting a salon where beautiful women give amazing blowjobs and swallow cum. Also like AA, SS uses just one set – in this case it’s an enclosed small space with thin opaque coverings and there are multi-colored lights outside to create an interesting effect. The male talent is usually seated for most of the BJ with the model kneeling in front of him. They usually swap to him standing at some point before the cumshot. Like AA, SS features some of the most beautiful models in porn (who are usually just beginning their careers so they’re still fresh) giving some amazing blowjobs. Most of these blowjobs transcend the ordinary and are closer to cock worship with lots of licking and good use of the tongue. There is lots of eye contact too. Every blowjob ends with a cumshot in the mouth and the model playing with it for a few seconds before swallowing it.
The biggest negative for the site now is its small size. There are only nine scenes available now. The site is growing slowly with a new scene being added every week. To be fair to the site, they do compensate for the small size by offering a low membership fee of $16 USD. I like the site enough that I’ll just keep a recurring membership at that price.
Two subjective complaints I have about the scenes are that the models wear a short and sexy white smock that you might see in a place that gives blowjobs, but in most scenes we never really get to see the model without it. Yes, they will hike the short smock when on their knees, but with the stunning looks of the models here they really need to have the remove the smock for the latter part of the scene. The second subjective complaint is that unlike AA where the blowjob transitions to sex before going back to the blowjob for the finish, SS only has sex in one scene. That isn't too bad given the quality of the blowjobs, but personally I’d like to see some sex too. With the model naked.
There is only one option for downloading each scene. The scenes are all MP4s with most of them at a relatively low resolution of 960x540. The bitrate is fairly high (pushing 7,000kb/s) though and the framerate is 29fps so those scenes still look very good. The most recent update was in 1920x1080 with the same bitrate and framerate so maybe all future scenes will be at that higher resolution.
I know many readers might question my score, but given the high quality of the scene offered here I think it’s justified. The low price offsets the small size and I hope the site continues to grow. I’m usually willing to put my money where my mouth is and say that if I like a site I’ll add it to my list of sites I rejoin regularly, but I’ll go one step further here: I like this site (and the low fee) enough that I’ll just stay a member. If you like sensual blowjob sites with beautiful women this is definitely worth subscribing to. |
|
07-05-15 07:27am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1099
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
skippy's Review
Great review! I suspect that the site is a little conservative for my tastes but it will be exactly what some other readers are looking for.
|
07-05-15 07:25am
|
Reply
1100
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I prefer no condoms but it isn't a deal breaker for me.
|
07-05-15 07:23am
|
