Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lots of hot pornstars featured on this site, including Shy Love and Sharon Wild
- Exclusive videos with a "strip club audition" theme
- Most models have an audition dance and then a "club owner" sex scene.
- Scenes can be downloaded in one big clip or in parts
- No DRM
- Pic galleries available for most scenes
- Good download speeds (about 800 kbit/sec)
Cons:
- No updates: site stopped updating prior to January 2007
- Only about 40 unique scenes. All of the scenes are uploaded in clips and then uploaded again as a complete scene, so I only count unique scenes (each girl typically has 2 scenes)
- Pic galleries do not have zip file option
- Tons of ads on the member page
- Videos are very grainy. Perhaps this was to give it an amateur appearance, but it can be distracting
Bottom Line:
All in all, this is not a bad site. The setup is unique for a website: videotape strip club auditions. However, since the site features only pornstars, you can't really believe that the premise is real.
Given that, I wish that they had used a better camera during filming. First, filming inside of a strip club (low lighting, lots of background music, etc.) makes for some difficult to watch videos. On top of that, the video is very grainy and blurry. While not a huge negative, it takes away from the scenes.
The worst problem is the lack of updates. Unfortunately, the site stopped updating after about 40 scenes. There are no dates on the updates, but the network updates listing doesn't show any updates for this site since before January 2007. As with many other PervNetwork sites, it was just abandoned.
I would not recommend this site alone. However, given its inclusion with the PervNetwork, it might be a good enough value to justify. The content is definitely unique.
I answered this poll question from the perspective of "do the scores typically match the reviews?" Like exotics, I am reticent to tell someone whether their opinion is right or wrong. However, if you are rating a site with a 95, it had better be a darn good site and you should be able to defend that score in your review. Conversely, if a site is so terrible that it scores in the 50's, you should be able to explain that, too.
I have found that the reviews are very useful and, for the most part, reflective of the point scores that the reviewer gave out. Like Jay, I also really appreciate the warnings for sites, especially the marginal sites that I'm not sure about joining.
Since there are so many different ways to intrepret it, I look forward to seeing more replies to this poll.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Exclusive pornstar scenes featuring lots of anal.
- Separate section of DVD movie rips with more pornstar anal.
- All scenes can be downloaded in multiple formats: wmv, mpg, and rm.
- No DRM.
- Access to PervNetwork of 20+ sites.
- Excellent download speeds (about 1.5MB/sec).
Cons:
- Including the DVD section, only 59 scenes.
- No updates since January 2007. I don't expect any more updates for this site.
- Scenes can only be downloaded in parts. As with other PervNetwork sites, 6 parts per scene.
- Video quality leaves much to be desired.
- Price is very high for a site with no updates.
- Scenes are very poorly organized. Lots of scenes have the wrong actress name or just a number. Each scene opens a separate pop-up window.
Bottom Line:
This is one of 3 sites on PervNetwork that features hardcore anal videos. Of the three, it is probably the weakest. It only has low quality videos, lacks updates, and scenes can only be downloaded in parts. (Note: Rectal Rooter got a higher score than She Gapes due to the fact that She Gapes inappropriately claimed that it has exclusive content.)
Video quality is pretty bad. The highest quality level is only 400x300 resolution wmv files. This is the same for all of the scenes, whether exclusive or DVD rip. The scenes are washed out and look more like VHS transfers than DVD rips.
This site has not updated in over 6 months. As I have expressed before, PervNetwork should combine this site with one of the other anal-themed websites on the network. However, because these scenes are such low quality, it would be incredibly obvious that this content was just tacked on to another higher-quality site.
If you couldn't tell by now, I don't recommend this site. The poor quality and lack of updates makes this site a terrible waste of time. Had I known about the video quality issues, I would not have included this as a reason to join PervNetwork.
Good details. I would have considered it, given its relatively low price, until I saw that it is lacking in video content and is completely non-nude. Those two facts turned me off from this site completely.
I know what you mean! Can't stand trials unless they are full access. My only suggestion is to check the TBP or PU reviews first. I've saved myself the headache a couple of times that way.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Exclusive interracial scenes featuring white porn starlets and big black guys.
- Almost all of the models are recognizable porn actresses.
- All scenes can be downloaded in multiple formats: wmv, mpg, (for all) and rm (for some).
- No DRM.
- There is a separate photo gallery for most scenes that includes a zip file option.
- Access to PervNetwork of 20+ sites.
- Excellent download speeds (about 1.5MB/sec) with my download manager.
Cons:
- Only 21 scenes!
- No updates since January 2007. I don't expect any more updates for this site.
- Older scenes can only be downloaded in parts. Some links for newer scenes are broken (404 error).
- Price is very high for a site with no updates.
- Lots of banner and text ads throughout the member section. It is the most ads I have seen yet on a PervNetwork site.
Bottom Line:
This site features lots of pretty white girls with big black guys. It features mostly pornstars who have done interracial scenes elsewhere. However, the scenes on the site appear to be exclusive.
Video quality is mediocre as the highest quality level is only 768k and only 400x300 resolution. After downloading the movies, I was disappointed in the poor quality, even for the newest vids.
Most troublesome is the fact that the site has not been updated in over 6 months. I doubt that this site will grow anymore. As one of a couple of the PervNetwork sites that feature interracial, I believe that the webmasters' focus has shifted to the other site. I wish they would consolidate this material to the other site rather than leave it hanging out here unattended.
In the end, I cannot recommend this site. The lack of updates and the small content library don't justify spending $30 a month. When evaluating PervNetwork, this site should just be included with the other interracial site and not counted separately.
I used to burn archive content, but like Boobs, I could never find what I had archived. Now, with hard drives being so cheap, I either buy a new drive or start deleting the marginal scenes that I kept.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Exclusive scenes of Brazilian girls.
- Most of the women are convinced to take it up the butt which is a definite plus in my book.
- All of the models appear to be amateurs.
- There is a separate photo gallery that features vidcaps for most of the scenes.
- All scenes can be downloaded in multiple formats: wmv (up to 2100k), mpg, mov, and mp4.
- No DRM!
- Access to PervNetwork of 20+ sites.
- Good download speeds (about 650KB/sec) with my download manager.
Cons:
- Only 28 scenes! No site growth, either!
- Updates were added pretty regularly up through March 2007. Since then, there have been no new updates.
- No zip file option for pictures.
- Lots of banner and text ads throughout the member section. It is the most ads I have seen yet on a PervNetwork site.
Bottom Line:
This site features very attractive Brazilian babes having hardcore sex. The biggest plus for me is that most of the women are convinced to have anal sex, too. More than half of the scenes feature anal. Other genres featured include girl/girl and threesomes.
The site offers multiple download options, including a DVD-quality wmv download. Even though the file quality is very high, the videos themselves are a bit grainy and washed out. The scenes are around 20-25 minutes long each.
My biggest complaint is the failure to update and the small number of scenes available on the site. Considering that it is a niche site that has been around for more than 6 months, I expected more content. While the movies that they have feature very beautiful teens, I would have liked to see more, especially for the price that I am being charged.
I won't join any sites that charge more than $30/month. On top of that, they use this tiered pricing to suck you in for $40/month if you want access to the whole network. If they dropped the price for the whole network down to $30, I would consider it, but at its current pricing, there is no way that I will join this site.
While the site looks very interesting, I am a bit disappointed with the length of the scenes. Per the tour listing of updates, most of the videos are between 6 and 10 minutes. That seems like too short a time to accomplish the "training" that the site advertises. I mean, they state that their models are tied up and forced to have multiple orgasms. To me, 6 minutes makes that seem unlikely. Does anyone know if this is right?
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- About 100 different exclusive scenes with beautiful amateurs. The vids are very well shot and each lasts between 10 and 20 minutes
- Content includes b/g, g/g, g-solo, and, of course, 3- and 4-way orgies, including a few anal scenes
- Melissa (webmaster) has over 30 scenes and responds personally to user e-mails and comments
- Complete scenes are available in wmv and mpg
- No DRM
- TBP discount!
- Multiple updates per week
- Very fast downloads (over 1.5MB/s) with download manager
Cons:
- The site design and navigation could use some updating. Currently, all videos are organized by model, but each model's page is just a listing of scenes (with 1 vidcap per scene).
- Scene descriptions could be expanded with information such as run-time or background info like who came up with the scene idea or date filmed.
Bottom Line:
I normally don't join amateur websites because often the content is poor or low quality or too soft for my tastes. Made2Order Videos is definitely not in that mold. As I stated in my comment, I found hardcore movies and great models. If you join, I recommend checking out Melissa's video from October 7th. I don't want to ruin the surprise, but WOW!
I have also corresponded with the webmaster (the aforementioned Melissa) and she has responded quickly to any of my questions regarding the site. It is great customer service. It's also why I became a member this month.
The site isn't perfect: First, the navigation is simple, but should be updated. The videos are just listed down a webpage without any organization other than by model. With this many scenes, it takes a while to load and is kind of unwieldy.
Second, add pictures of the models on the member homepage. It'd be nice to have a headshot of each of the models next to the link to her scenes.
Lastly, it's just my personal taste, but I would love to see more anal scenes added (boy/girl or girl/girl).
This is probably the only amateur website that I would join. The TBP discount, combined with the fact that there are a few featured amateurs makes this site a great bargain. But don't let the low price fool you: the content is hot and the quality is great. I don't normally renew memberships month after month, but I will for this site as I want to see what new ideas and new girls Melissa is able to find and film.
Sorry to harp on this point, but a no-trust vote with a comment is less than optimal.
Not to make this too personal, but I received an anonymous no-trust vote with a comment that I had reviewed too many sites too quickly and that something was fishy with the fact that I could review 20 sites in 2 weeks.
This could be a fair criticism except for the fact that almost all of the sites that I have reviewed belong to the same network, a network which is not reviewed on TBP or PU (PervNetwork). I mentioned this in all of my reviews for the sites, so the person voting no-trust obviously did not read the actual reviews, but simply saw that I was a relative newcomer with a lot of reviews. This is reflective of the last point that I made in my earlier post: anonymous reviews like this can influence honest people to stop coming back to PornUsers or to stop contributing reviews, either of which kills the community. Is discouraging enthusiasm for this site really a good idea for helping it grow?
Furthermore, only allowing 150 characters to respond to those types of criticisms is too few. I couldn't respond fully to the anonymous comment by pointing out that, of the sites not in the network, most were reviewed after I stopped being a member, but within the 6 month window for reviews.
I don't think that the admins can or should moderate the trust comments. There are too many and trust is too personal. However, I think that it would be helpful for other users to know who was making uninformed trust comments because those comments reflect on the person who made them just as much as on the person who is being rated.
Not to put too fine a point on it but anonymity is great unless you can use that anonymity to destroy other people's reputations with impunity.
Honestly, this is the first time that it has happened to me. I'm usually very careful to check the TBP review about streaming vids or DRM, but there were no reviews, TBP or PU, for this site. I guess that someone had to be first and bite the bullet.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very large archive of movies.
- Searching for movies or pornstars is very straightforward.
- Trial offers full access to the site. (3 days for $4.95)
- Picture sets available for most movies. I think they are the same photo galleries available on the DVDs.
Cons:
- Buyer Beware 1: ALL MOVIES HAVE DRM!
- Buyer Beware 2: Most movies are available only in streaming flv format. Even at "full-screen" these streaming vids are of mediocre quality.
- Very limited number of movies are available for download & have DRM.
- Normal monthly price is very high for primarily streaming-only content.
- Navigation is not user-friendly.
- Photo galleries have no zip option and only show 8 thumbnails at a time. Lots of clicking "Next."
- "Bonus sites" are really ads.
Bottom Line:
I really enjoy Red Light District movies. I thought that I would enjoy the site, too. The tour clearly states "Download Our Entire Archive!!!" However, the vast majority of the archive, particularly newest and oldest DVDs are only available as streaming videos. Additionally, the DVDs that are available for download are loaded with DRM. Unfortunately, the terms of service are so convoluted that I couldn't find a reference to DRM, even though I scanned through the entire ToS.
DRM alone is a deal-breaker. Combine that with the fact that most of the scenes are streaming only and I wouldn't have joined the site. On top of that, add false advertising claiming that you can download the entire archive of DVDs and I just had to keep dropping the score. 56 instead of 50 is because of the number of DVDs available for viewing.
I joined this site because of the full trial option and to see what movies were available online. I'm glad that I only wasted $5 instead of $30 for a full month's membership. This site should be avoided at all costs!
The price for 3-day trial has now increased to $4.95. It is still a full-access trial.
This site is the same as Club Red Light. If you visit this site, it automatically redirects you to Club Red Light. These two review pages should be merged.
In my opinion, there shouldn't be any anonymous trust ratings.
First off, the trust ratings help to create community. You create trust networks where two people trust each other and find that they also trust people in common. Anonymous reviews prevent (or at least slow) that from happening.
Second, a no-trust vote with an explanation can lead to dialog, especially if it something that can be fixed. Plus, trust votes can be changed if the issue is addressed.
Third, a no-trust vote with no comment is really indicative of a lazy person. If they can't take the time to explain why they are bad-mouthing someone, they probably deserve a no-trust vote themselves. Even yes-trust votes should have a comment, if only so that the person being reviewed knows what they are doing well.
Finally, I feel that a number of reviewers have been hit with anonymous no trust votes with no comments and that has caused them to stop being active members of PU. That, too, is killing the community of users that is trying to survive here.
I agree with SnowDude: this is not an easy thing to administer. I guess you can tell that my choice would be to do away with anonymous trust ratings entirely.
Thanks for the info about the download size and speed. I don't subscribe to any sites with DRM, but it is something I should probably also mention in my reviews, too.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Features some cute college-age chicks getting a little crazy.
- Over 60 different scenes. Updates come every 10 days or so.
- A few different download options (wmv for newer vids, mpg for older)
- Scenes come with a vidcap photo gallery.
- Access to PervNetwork, although the navigation makes it really hard to find the PN links.
Cons:
- Site navigation is terrible!
- Videos are only availabe in clips. Max bitrate is only 700k, compared to 2100k on other network sites.
- Content is incredibly amatuerish.
- Ads and links to 3rd party content are everywhere on the member page, causing some of the site navigation problems.
- Most of the content comes for 3rd party plug-in feeds which are very low quality.
Bottom Line:
I was really hoping that this could be the amateur-college girl website that College Fuck Fest failed to be on PervNetwork. Unfortunately, I really disliked this site almost from the moment I opened it. Unlike most of the other PervNetwork sites, this site features really cluttered menus and lots of off-site links. It took me a while just to find the link to the prior updates from the homepage.
While navigation may seem like a minor squabble, when it detracts from the ability to view the content, it becomes an issue. The content is poorly organized and difficult to find and view. The content is also of mediocre quality, particularly the older scenes. The combination of low quality and frustrating navigation served to turn me off from this site.
Unless you like being frustrated by poor site design and low quality movies, I can't recommend NCC. I wouldn't even consider it a part of the network since it looks nothing like the other sites. I would not become a member just to view this site.
Wow! 8+ TB. I can only imagine the electric bill and the amount of heat that all those drives generate! How many drives are you using to get that capacity? My PC only has room for 4 internal HDs and I've got just over 2TB (2x750GB and 2x320GB) in it.
I always need more space since I do video editing, but part of the reason that I am running out of space to begin with is my porn collecting. I've bought multiple hard drives (internal and external) plus lots of blank CDs and DVDs to try and manage my ever-growing collection.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
