Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Jessica is a hot talent with enough experience (MILF) that she knows how to make
- Part of the Spizoo network (10 sites)
- For a solo site there's a little bit of everything: soft and hardcore. Girl-girl; multip partners, kink/costumes, light BDSM, gonzo.
- Billing by Epoch and CC
- multiple file size available (.mp4) for me I find 780p is the perfect balance between size and quality. These files are about 1 GB and 1280X720 5.2 mbps
- 1080 files are about 2.75 GB 1920X1080 12.1 mbps.
- I don't have a 4K monitor so I didn't download anything that size.
- comments on videos allowed (although doesn't seem to be widely used)
- Scoring system with favorites and likes (again either isn't widely used or there are very few members here. I see a lot of great videos that have under a dozen likes)
- Decent tagging system (could be made better with more options or even user suggested ones)
- Good organization. Viewing can be arranged by date, popularity, title, or category (sort of a "tag").
Cons:
PROS CONT.
- Search works well even though there are a lot of videos I was able to locate something I'd found earlier with relative ease.
- Exclusive scenes
- There are just under 650 videos as of September 15, 2019
- Great costars like Aaliyah Hadid, Anna Bell Peaks, Gabby Quineros, CHERIE DEVILLE (I'm a big fan!), Nikki Benz, and others.
- Back catalog goes back to 2008!
- Good handling of photos. You can download .zips of the screenshots (about 100 pix) and the photoshoots (about 300 pix)
CONS:
- The update schedule is slow: These days about 1/month
- Adds behind the paywall, constant drumbeat of "buy more"
- .wmv only available in 480p format
- Only 15 videos load/page. I know this seems like a small complaint but it's like I'm constantly loading a new page.
Bottom Line:
Bottom Line:
There is a lot of creativity here - despite being a one-woman site there's plenty of other top name talents that work with Jessica so you never feel like there's a lack of variety. Also, Jessica does a great job of providing different sets, props, setups, camera angles. There's more variety here than I think any other one-woman site I can think of.
So with so many pros how did the score end up in the mid-80s? Here's the problem there's no personality. There's no fan connection. Jessica makes great porn and there's plenty here for the price. But when you sell a solo site you sell to fans of that person. To be in the 90s I'd want to see some way fans can be part of a community.
They run a very attractive year-long membership price. I think it's very fair and a good value. Definitely a good value.
Thanks. That was a really clear answer. I knew it was important for banking websites but couldn’t think of why it mattered for my entertainment sites. Seeing how that extra information would be passed along is a great point and one I wasn’t aware of.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Membership includes access to all New Sensations network (26 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- I thought the shoots from Veruca James, Charlotte O’Ryan, Emma Evins, Madelyn Monroe, Abella Danger were really good and worth checking out. Along with lots of stars who have since left the business especially KATSUMI, and beauties like Samantha Sin
- The catalog goes back to 2004 and obviously, that has lower quality
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- About 750 scenes dating back to 2006
Cons:
- NO LONGER UPDATING
- The extensive back catelog can't make up for the fact that they haven't updated in years. Really they should fold this site and just put it into the main site's catelog.
- The organization is terrible! You can only find things by model or date
- No download managers
- Ads behind pay wall
- I don't think any of the scene offer trailers so figuring out if you want to download/save a scene is nearly impossible
Bottom Line:
They bring a lot to the table: good video quality, star quality, good sound and lighting. It's a solid site and if it's what you're into you should grab a membership. The back catelog is solid. Other than the theme there's nothing I have a big complaint with. The only thing that held their score down with me was the lack of updates and organization. A problem only made worse by the fact that so much fits into this genre that it's hard to seperate the good from the average.
All in all this is a main stream general site. I hate to ever call porn borning. But there just isn't anything remarkable here. It covers all the bases but doesn't really stand out in any way. There's no "character"
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Julia Ann is a crazy hot MILF (I love MILFs) on top of that she's had a legendary career in porn so it's great to see so much of her content in one place!
- The strength of this site and network is it's cam shows there are several each day and it seems to be where they have their energy
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. - I don't think that's 4K but it looks great on my 30" monitor.
- Searching is good (but not great). You can search across the network or just this site.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- About 320 videos
- Good range of content: BTS, girl/girl, 3-somes, orgies, studio content, cams, hardcore, interracial, fetish, anal. Can't think of a niche that isn't filled.
- Some of the content is exclusive to only this site (not every video is exclusive)
- pictures available as zips- 43 sites included in the network
Cons:
PRO CONT:
- 43 sites included in the network I'm especially excited for Lauren Phillips (no surprise there - I'm a huge fan!), itscleo, Siri, Penny Pax, Sophie Dee (who doesn't love the accent?), Maggie Green (just found here recently - love her too), Sandra Fay (she is dirty with a capital D), and Kendra James (while she does mostly girl-girl, which isn't my fav - her solo stuff is top-notch!)
- Over 16,000 cam archives. I'm not much of a cam guy but I'm enjoying exploring.
- Cam shows are for members (so you don't have the talent waiting until she hits her minimum to start)
CONS
- limited downloading options (mobile or desktop versions)
- Still updating but slow 1/month is typical
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago.
- older content is 640X480 0.9 mbps (it looks like some of that is being remastered for better quality).
- Cam archive is poorly organized
- Cam shows can sometimes be slow to get to the action (not a bad thing sometimes)
Bottom Line:
I've been meaning hit up this network because they have Lauren Phillips here and I LOVE Lauren Phillips. They also have Cleo and some other amateur talent that I've been meaning to catch up on. That PLUS Pornusers has a points bonus for this site, AND there's a special Covid price of 20/month made this a no brainer.
Like I said in the pros this site is driven by their network - both camming and other stars. A lot of these models have had earlier big porn careers and are now repurposing that content here (and adding some more). Based on just how much talent you get for your dollar this site/network is a BUY.
As far as Julia Ann herself she is the full package. She's hot (well endowed - I'm guessing implants). She has enough acting chops to deliver lines with good effect (that means she's great at the dirty talk) and she's got plenty of softer stuff (solo/girl-girl) while still nasty enough for hardcore (anal, gangbangs, threesomes)
The only two complaints I have with this site are it's lack of updates (which is mitigated by its deep catalog) and it's lack of 4K videos (which since I myself haven't upgraded to 4K is hardly a fault).
I decided to keep with this network for another month, and none of the bloom has come of the rose. There's about 5 sites across the network and I'm still finding things to enjoy on Julia's site.
Tonight she's camming. Lot of fan interaction. Very comfortable model with a nice sense of humor. (also plenty of action - in the 2nd half of the hour long slot)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Super hot talent. Julia's been in plenty of top quality productions so she brings professional level performance to her site.
- pix available in zip format
- about 200 photo shoots with typical shoot having 100+ pix
- most scenes has a small description
- great curvy body. Amazing :) Winner AVN MILF of the year
- blond bush (don't know why I thought to mention the carpet matches the drapes - but hey there it is)
- About 110 video shoots (I don't include BTS in that count)
- As a non- Julia fan going in; this has been a great place to collect a lot of her wicked work. PLUS get her weekly cam show (there's 3-5 models on a night!)
- .mp4 and .wmv format available
- newest material seems to be in "true HD" format - but there's not too much of that.
Cons:
- lack of organization: pix are sorted into - Julia, friends, BTS, Wicked (as in Wicked Entertainment inc), and a very limited "bondage years". For videos it's only full scenes, BTS, and Wicked
- As noted above non-exclusive content
- video selection area plays gifs of content which slowed my 6 year old laptop down quite a bit (I know I need to upgrade)
- boob job (not a problem for me, but I know some will not like it).
- 1280 video at 1.1-2.0 mbps looks like it was upcoded rather than shot originally.
- older content is 640X480 0.9 mbps
- It seems these stats are for .mp4 format. The .wmv seem to all be at a higher bit rate and look much better. I'm not going to go back to redownload everything again but the 1280X720 3 mbps test I did looked great. - Still a bummer if you were looking to put these files onto an iPad or something.
Bottom Line:
Julia Ann is a true pro and a great performer. She brings enthusiasm and energy to each scene.
Buy or not?
Julia is one of the hottest MILFs around. If you like MILFs (and don't mind boob jobs) this is a sure buy. Shandra Fay (of filtycuteonline), Gabby Quinteros, Puma Swede, Deauxma, Charlee Chase, Francesca, Sunny Lane, Bobbi Eden, Carmen Valentine, Vickyathome, Angelina Castro, Nikki Benz are all included with membership, as well as the cam shows I mentioned above.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Katie is beautiful. She has a petit frame with large implants that were very well done (minimum scaring)
- Katie does plenty of BTS shooting it's clear she has a sense of humor and enjoys making her content. This is always a big plus for me
- Max video quality is great: 4K 1920X1080 7.7 mb/s. Other options available for those of us on older systems and those with limited hard drive space
- Picture sets really shine zips are available and photos are very high quality 4000X2662, 72 pixel/inch, 2mb file size
- about 50 pictures a set
- Just about 420 pix sets
- 555 video updates as of January 31, 2020
- Update schedule: 1/week (sometimes more!)
- Includes access to belle network; 14 sites (including BRYCI.com is especially good)
- camming is partnered with chaturbate I think that means extra charges. I'm not a camming guy so I have no interest.
Cons:
PROS CONT:
- Good organization though tagging/keywords and member ratings
- Comments available on videos, I find this very helpful in sorting what's download worthy.
- Well priced
- Some exhibitionism content (big plus for me)
- For a solo site more anal action than I expected
- Some light girl/girl action (rare)
- Fair mix of boy/girl and solo
- Videos are 10-20 minutes
- Varied setups and interesting mini plots
CONS:
- more use of dildo instead of real thing than I would have gone with
- Pix sets can sometime be repetitive. There sets sometimes include 5-6 of the same pose with only a facial expression or head tilt of difference. I guess everyone likes something different.
Bottom Line:
This is one of the real gems of this network. I thought about staying around longer and will definitely keep this in my rotation. There's a lot of good stuff. If you're of glamour (well put together outfits/make-up) big breasted solo sites this one is worth the money. It has a good size library and the rest of the network is solid. I rate it a solid buy.
One other point of distinction: I would call this a solo site and not an amateur site. The difference being an amateur site might have fun "day in the life/look at me without my make-up" content. This is more produced, Katie does behind the scenes but the bread and butter of this site is well put together fun shoots. They seem to go through just about every popular culture reference and motif. I really like it
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,000 videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 640X480 3.2 mbps (more of a con)
- Katie is cute. She has that Barbie's little sister look to her. She hits the Teen market to a tee.
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- mobile site
- all content is exclusive
- The organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network. Organization done by date, category, model, and most popular. I tried the keyword searching and it worked well.
- All interracial.
- Katie is marketed as Spring Thomas' sister. So her thing is she's going to out slut her slutty sister.
- Some FFM content along with plenty of gangbangs, MMF.
- Katie is awesome at dirty talk. She makes the line between acting and enjoying disappear.
Cons:
PRO Cont:
- Kelly Wells is one of my favorites from way back when. Katie does a scene with her that knocked my socks off! This alone was worth a month's membership
- Other shinning scenes costars: Audrey Elson, Cuntree Pipes & Tone Capone, Candi Summers, Riley Shy, Ruby Flame,
CONS:
-NO LONGER updating. Which is really confusing because they keep pushing out old scenes but don't remaster them at all. I don't understand what the motivation for that is.
- I can't tell how long ago they started but they max resolution is 640X480 3.2 mbps. That's ancient quality by today's standards.
- Just over 100 shoots. Katie leaves me wanting more
- Basic setups and lacks originality. It's either: I'm so horny today lets fuck, my girlfriend thinks she's a slut - I'll show her (most of these are FFM), or they think I can't do this: I'll show them! (some real gems with all that - but it can feel like you're watching the same thing over and over).
- no behind the scenes available
Bottom Line:
I can't tell how far back the site started since they seem to repost videos (without remastering them 🤔). But it's been around since at least 2009.
The site was first spun as being Spring Thomas' younger sister and the early videos are the two of them together. It goes without saying these are SUPER HOT!
This is the only network I've ever seen Katie on - if anyone knows of other work she's done please hit me up and let me know!
Despite all the positives this site has I wish I could recommend this site - but I can't. But unless you're smitten with Katie. I don't think there's enough reason to get a multi-month pass to this site. (Maye a quick one month in you find it on sale?).
The problem, as I'm sure you've guessed, is the lack of updates. If I'm spending $30 for a site I want to see the latest and greatest. Both in terms of new stuff and high-quality footage.
While the rest of dogfart has that- this corner of their empire does not.
Maybe one day the porn gods will find an unearthed vault of Katie - but in the meantime I'd say grab a month's pass and enjoy - then move on.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Kendra James is a long time favorite of mine. I have a soft (or is it a hard 🤔) spot for redheads. She does a lot of fetish work and has a great dom persona. She seems to favor girl-girl action which is too bad cause I love her male-female work.
- STILL updating (1-2/week typically)
- The strength of this site is her cosplay. Kendra does a Poison Ivy that just kills. She's also got a couple of hot cuckold videos. There's plenty of femdom, pegging, foot fetish, Latex, and especially strap-on work.
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. - I don't think that's 4K but it looks great on my 30" monitor.
- Searching is good (but not great). You can search across the network or just this site.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- About 160 videos (perhaps that should be moved to con?)
Cons:
Pros Cont:
- pictures available as zips
- 43 sites included in the network I'm especially excited for Lauren Phillips (no surprise there - I'm a huge fan! and look at that she's also a redhead), itscleo, Penny Pax (another hot redhead), Sophie Dee (who doesn't love the accent?), Sandra Fay (sometimes a redhead),
- Over 16,000 cam archives. I'm not much of a cam guy but I'm enjoying exploring. Cams include Lelu from LeluLove.com. That's the site I never quit, so I was stoked to find an easy search for her stuff here.
- Cam shows are for members (so you don't have the talent waiting until she hits her minimum to start)
CONS:
- limited downloading options (mobile or desktop versions)
- Still updating but slow 1/month is typical
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago.
- older content is 640X480 0.9 mbps (it looks like some of that is being remastered for better quality).
- Cam archive is poorly organized
Bottom Line:
Cons Cont:
- Cam shows can sometimes be slow to get to the action (not a bad thing sometimes)
I know these days everyone's a superhero fan. But I'm an old school comic collection fan. So to me, this site earned a buy just with the cosplay action. Batgirl, Wonder Woman, Poison Ivy, etc. Many of these fall into Hypno or damsel in distress genres. The result is humors while still being erotic. In other words, Kendra can act.
I can say a little more as a bottom line but that right there is the most important thing: Kendra is a hot as hell redhead with a killer body, acting chops, and playfulness. To me, the only thing keeping the score down is the heavy lean into girl-girl content and the lack of catalog (something that will work out over time)
If you think you might just try out a little Kendra some of these videos seem to be posted on her clips4sale.com page.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Kimber is a good looking young lady. Large natural breasts. Focus is on solo shooting
- Weekly cam show with Kimber. Across the included cam network there are about 3 shows/day.
- 43 site network: Shandra Fay, Julia Ann, Puma Swede, Deauxma, Charlee Chase, Francesca, Carmen Valentine, Angelina Castro, Maggie Green, Nikki Benz are all included as part of the network.
- updates normally 1X/week
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. - I don't think that's 4K but it looks great on my 30" monitor.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- pictures available as zips
Cons:
Cons:
- performances are underwhelming.
- About 271 video
- No search capability, despite the fact that other sites on the network have it.
- The organization is only done by category - this made it very hard to find what I was most interested in
- only 6 videos load per page. This means lots of search time wasted with page loads.
- Ads on the member side
- limited downloading options (mobile or desktop versions)
- Still updating but slow 1/month is typical
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago.
- Cam archive is poorly organized
Bottom Line:
Seemed to have everything right. Hot girl, fun flirty personality, decent camera work. Despite all those pluses, I found Kimber Lee to be flat and without personality. It seems like she's taking suggestions for content - but doesn't really get into them so the performances come off as wooden and fake. In short, it doesn't seem like she likes what she does.
The 1st time I logged in I downloaded a bunch of videos without doing much of a preview. I thought I was set cause she looked so perfect. I probably downloaded 30 files, but then when I started reviewing them for filing I found they were mostly underwhelming. There just isn't anything remarkable. If you like watching a pretty girl masturbate or screw you'll proably be fine. But if you want role-play/plot/set-ups/kinky or spontaneous there's little of that here.
As you might guess. I give this site a skip. Even if you go in for the network - I don't think there are too many gems in this one.
Thank you very much for the kind words. I was relucted to write reviews for gay sites feeling like I was on someone else's turf. Thank you for making me feel welcome
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
***** Note I'm a straight man trying to give an objective review to a site included with the kink.com network. I did not reduce their score just because it's a gay porn site.*******
- Includes access to 24 sites each with its own focus. (8 gay sites)
- Over 1,500 videos
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Great production value. Lighting/sound/talent is all top notch.
- Exclusive content.
- Robust community. Pretty much every shoot has a lengthy set of comments. You can really get a good sense of the content from the comment sheet.
- Updates at least once a week (average is 2-3).
- .zip files of screenshots available
- Kink is known for shooting with top-notch female talent. I'm not as versed in the gay porn side - I'm assuming the same is true here. I do recognize some of the names as shooting straight porn and have wasn't disappointed.
Cons:
- The organization is horrible. You can filter by the amount of circumcised or uncircumcised hair - but can't filter searches.
- Rather pricey - but this may be one of those times that you get what you pay for. I guess what I'm saying is: yes this is more than most sites, but most sites (maybe no other site?) has this high of quality and this many shoots.
- Little model diversity. Most are straight out of central casting.
- With a top-notch site like kink, there really aren't too many downsides.
- This site is the catch-all for all their gay porn (see comments below)
Bottom Line:
This site does not post content under its own. Instead this is a collection of all the gay porn on kink.com. It may help with the organization, but it's not the same as having a dedicated site (to be fair; Kink.com does NOT try to pad their network by claiming this as a separate site).
Again I'm doing this from the perspective of a straight man. I didn't watch many videos just dipped in and out so I could give a fair review. I've reviewed almost the entire network at kink.com so I feel I can give an accurate assessment of this site as well; even though I'm not the target audience.
Kink has high standards for production so there's never a bad scene
An all-around great site for kink/BDSM material. Much of the material is too extreme for some so check out the previews before you buy.
Files are available in multiple quality levels so you can strike the right balance between size and quality.
While they may be pricey you can't beat the production value. talent, catalog, depth. They do what they do very well.
You get 5 previews a day. That gives you enough to explore and see if this is for you
Kink.com is running a promotion. You get a free scene this month for joining their newsletter. Defiantly worth it. There are sales pitches sent to you're email - but kink is certainly no spammer
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus
- Updates about 1 a week
- Close to 120 videos each video about an hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Allows download managers
- Search bar (although limited navigation tools). If you know what you want you can find it pretty easily. If you're looking to browse there are very few tools to help.
- Content is meant to be educational - but that doesn't mean it isn't hot as hell. While I've learned some interesting techniques I've also found lots of excitement
- Sessions include a wide variety, more than I could possibly categorize. Here's some of the diversity: Sex swings, Sex in cars, humiliation, Fisting, 3 comes, seduction, Oral, pegging, impact played so much more.
- More model diversity than is typical in a network site. There are a variety of body types and ethnicities.
Cons:
- No way to "favorite" scenes you'd like to revisit.
- Navigation is sub par for a site that has so many resources and such a long history. They've had plenty of time to get this right. I'm really disappointed that they haven't
- Expensive. If it wasn't part of such a huge network it would not be worth the price.
- No photo sets available. (Probably not a huge minus for this site, but if you were hoping for it within the network it's lacking)
- Some of the sessions we're way off from what I find arousing - this is probably the result of trying to service a wide variety of kinks, so I list this as a con with empathy.
Bottom Line:
This is one of my favorite sites inside the Kink.com network. They know they are exciting and education at the same time and do a good job of performing both tasks simultaneously. I feel like the education piece is conducted with respect - by that I mean I didn't feel talked down to.
While there are only about 100 scenes in this site - I only found about 15 that really interest me. While I'm really digging those 15 - I'm not sure that is enough bang for my buck. Like I said above, I'm not sure if they could do it any better given they are trying to hit a wide variety of kinks.
I'm not aware of any other site doing what Kink U is doing. For that I give them great credit for their originality and exclusivity. It's also really hard to be erotic and educational at the same time, and they really hit the mark here. As this site grows I'm sure it's going to be one of my top spots.
I give this site a solid recommendation. Kink allows 5 previews a day, so after checking it out to see that it has your thing - you can join knowing you won't be disappointed.
I have to hand it to kink.com they are adaptable. During quarantine, they're continuing to be an industry leader. In addition to doing what most sites are doing (adding content swaps and remastering old content) - kink launched a new site: Kinky Bites
I'm rather enjoying it (while they can be very hit or miss) there's enough good here for me to add it to a favorite site. The basic idea is simple they hire a model to shoot from her own home on a theme (JOI, Cucking, Ass worships, etc). Most of the content is solo model but there have been a couple of couples that they've managed.
It's not the production value that we typically see from kink - but it's something new and on brand. While I'm eager to see regular production resume - it's good to see they're keeping the creative juices flowing.
Great review. I love kink.com I had a membership for a long time and let it go to focus on other stuff. Your review reminded me to go back to my hard drive archieves and find some of the best gems in the biz.
I may have to reup my membership. Damn I forgot just how good they are!
I had a membership a while ago (maybe a year or so ago?). At the time I was frustrated with the search features. Could you add some details about that? Have there been any improvements?
I think this is a great comment Pyrenees. While I'm still enjoying the new updates, I agree much of the older content was superior. I might rejoin every few month to check out what's new. But I don't think Kink is going to be able to hold me into a long term commitment.
Thanks for the reply. I've been so caught up in the back catalog and weeding through all the content - I hadn't noticed the lack of money shots. I wonder what's motivating that? I would think if it was a censorship law it would be effect others too.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
