Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : marcdc1 (0)  

Feedback:   All (1013)  |   Reviews (264)  |   Comments (156)  |   Replies (593)

Other:   Replies Received (375)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 451-475 of 1048 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
451
Visit Faith 69

Faith 69
(0)
Reply of Pyrenees's Reply

Hi Pyrennees,

Thanks for the challenge - it's good to keep me honest.

I have to confess I'm an easy grader. To me truth in advertising is the most important quality, to me. Faith's preview section let's you know she is a "curvy" girl in her mid-to-late 30s. If my memory serves she was born in '78. So I don't knock a site for being what it is. She's has a "housewife vibe" - but never tricks you into thinking she's something else. I'm ok with that.

The newer material is at HD rate. Again I'm judging the site based on what it says to be, she's selling amateur porn, made by her, so I don't knock her for not having a camera that costs 1,000s of dollars. I get that as a couple doing this on their own, they can't afford to upgrade their camera every 6 months when something new comes out on the market.

To sum up. I'm all about being what you are. If you give a customer an expectation and then deliver on it, we should "reward" you with a good review. If you try to take my money by selling me something you're not. I will flame you.

You mentioned my working being "unique" that makes me think you found an error. Is there something that need to be fix? Thanks for reaching out to me


03-01-15  03:56pm

Review
452
Visit Faith 69

Faith 69
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Great Amateur Site. Older stuff is poorly light, but as things progress the content is pro-am. With good lighting and sound
- Faith is a real woman. In her words she is "curvy" Less so in her younger pictures/videos.
- Diversity of content. I love the flashing material. There is also interracial, girl-girl, gangbang, plenty of blow jobs, solo material, hardcore, anal. The preview section does a good job of showing off all that is inside.
- Lots of Content. Over 100 videos (Sorry I didn't count), and nearly 150 picture sets. Each picture set is approx. 25 images.
- Adequate video/picture quality.
- Most video is 960X540 2.5 mb/s. Newest material is 1280X720 6.6 mb/s. Older stuff 360X240 .7 mb/s
- Image quality is good at 1024X680 pixels.
- Regular updates. After years online Faith is still adding content.
- Network. Faith is part of the Dreamnet.com network. There are 14 active women (mostly MILFs) and another 50 inactive sites included.
Cons: - Older content is in .wmv, newer in .mp4. Usually there is not a choice of format.
- I'm running a mac, and for some reason as soon as I download content using safari, my cpu goes crazy and climbs to over 100%. However switching to chrome doesn't trigger this problem. I don't hold faith responsible for this, just wanted to let you know if you join and have the same problem - switch your browser.
- Organization is a little lacking, there's nothing to help you - each set is added chronologically. I love her flashing stuff and wish I could search or sort to get to it more easily.
- Limited interactions. Faith does a cam show once a week, and you can email her but that's not the experience she's selling. She does offer a blog and does maintain fan interaction via the blog.
Bottom Line: I'm enjoying Faith's site. I've wanted to check it out for a while and I'm glad I finally got around to it.

I like that Faith is not afraid to get naughty and nasty. I particularly enjoy her public hijinks and her dirty talk. Her site is definitely worth the price of admission and you get a lot of bang for your buck.

Other than adding an organizational structure I have no complaints. I'd like to see more fan interaction (maybe a forum?), but that's being nit picky.

Faith delivers everything she promises and that's a lot of delivery.

03-01-15  02:32pm

Replies (5)
Reply
453
Visit Faith 69

Faith 69
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Thanks Pat!

09-14-12  04:02pm

Comment
454
Visit Faith 69

Faith 69
(0)

Looks fun

Anyone know anything about faith. I'd love to see if she's active on twitter or anything about her. Site's been on my radar for a little while now, but I'v been busy with so many other sites, I just haven't gotten around to it yet,

Anyone have some info?

09-13-12  06:24pm

Replies (2)
Review
455
Visit Family XXX

Family XXX
(0)

96.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Membership includes access to all New Sensations networks (27 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive (to the best of my knowledge)
- Storylines are elaborate and believable? (see my note in Bottom line.) Problem is that means you've got to have talent that can act. This site seems better than most at booking believable talent with fantasy-rich settings. They don't spoil it by being too campy.
- The talent separates this site from competitors. Krissy Lynn, Gabbie Carter, Leah Gotti, Siri, and especially: LENA PAUL, Brandi Love, CORY CHASE, & LAUREN PHILLIPS. Cory is a particular stand-out in this genre she's been making content on this theme longer than anyone I know of.
- STILL UPDATING
- Decent search (some tags but too limited), search bar
Cons: PRO CONT:
- Just under 750 videos - *beware* that also includes BTS/Interviews. I found most of these boring and not worth the time
- Male talent: I don't think I've ever made an entry about male talent, but I feel compelled to this time. Steve Holmes and James Dean do a great job of playing their parts. Holmes especially does the creep yet charming bit perfectly.
- Star rating system
- updates about 1X/week
- somewhat diverse casting. While all the body shapes are typical pornstar bodys, there is an ok (not good) mix of ethnicity.

CONS:
- No user forum/comments available
- No previews available either download it or stream it to see if it's what you're looking for
- Ads behind paywall (seems like everyone is doing it these days)
- BTS interviews. I'm listing this as a con because pretty much any I've ever checked out was a waste of time (also noted above).
Bottom Line: I know taboo/family content is all the rage now (well if Pornhub.com's starts are to be believed anyway). But I don't get the appeal of this fantasy. All porn is a fantasy and I'm not kink-shaming - ya like what you like. More than anything I want to acknowledge my bias. While I think I reviewed fairly and honestly - you should know that as you read.

How'd they get the score they got. Other than the fact that their set-up storylines don't appeal to me, there's nothing wrong with this site. Good update schedule, great talent, better writing than most. If this is your jam - I don't think you could find a better site for it. I really wish they would allow more fan interaction and make previews available. But in the grand scheme of things those are minor points.

08-23-21  07:22am

Replies (0)
Review
456
Visit Fast Times at NAU

Fast Times at NAU
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the Naughty America Network which includes over 25 sites
- About 150 shoots in this site, more than 5,050 across the network.
- Aggressive update schedule. This site updates 2-3 times a month, and within the network there's usually 2-3 updates EVERYDAY.
- Navigation is awesome. It's easy to find what you're looking for or case a wide net for a serendipitous adventure.
- The preview section is generous enough to let you know what you'll get as a member without giving away the farm
- 1080p available. Anything from post mid-2007 is in "DVD Quality". And anything older than that is decent 480 2k quality (good for the time it was shot)
- pix are available in zip format - over 150 pix per shoot.
- .wmv and .mp4 formats available.
- 5 minute preview available to let you know if the whole scene is worth it for you or not. It's nice as a highlight roll
Cons: - My biggest complaint is they discontinued the live shows that they did a few years ago. There now available as achieves, but it's not the same
- With each log in you have to go past annoying full screen ads.
- de-select sign up cross sales :(
- most girls have implants (no problem for me but I know some object).
- Almost ever shoot ends in a facial. Nice to see more variety instead.
Bottom Line: This site has a fun premise and enough lee-way to mix up the scenes. The talent is top totch and the directors have been better in the more recent shoots (within the last 10 months or so)

They routinely offer discounts and there's so much here you really can't go wrong. If you've never been a member you should check them out. If you have been a member, not much has changed, maybe look to see if some of you favorites have done shoots. It may be with a discount membership to pick up some of the girls you really like.

11-20-12  02:00pm

Replies (1)
Comment
457
Visit Filthy Cute Online

Filthy Cute Online
(0)

Very Satified

I took advantage of a multi-month membership a few month ago, and am still finding little gems I trucked away on my hard drive.

What a great site. I definitely have to go back!

05-20-13  06:52pm

Replies (0)
Reply
458
Visit Filthy Cute Online

Filthy Cute Online
(0)
Reply of marcdc1's Comment

I guess they're still working on the redesign, so I went ahead with my review based on what it is at the moment.

02-21-13  07:21pm

Review
459
Visit Filthy Cute Online

Filthy Cute Online
(0)

97.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Exclusive Content
1280X720 about 3 mbps. For Husband wife team, video looks great (see note in cons)
Over 225 videos
- Weekly cam show, with archived shows in flash format
- Big network: you also get Nikki Benz, Gabby Quinteros,Puma Swede, Deauxma, Angelina Castro, Francesca, Sunny Lane, Julia Ann, Carmen Valentine, Vickyathome, Bobbie Eden, Charlee Chase
Good variety: pegging (a rare find, especially in the pro-am segment), anal, lots of BJs, Hardcore and tit fucking, feet, lots of boy and girl ass play.
- pix are available in zip format. Over 200 sets.
- fun extras like a blog and wall paper
Cam network has as many as 6 girls on a day! Gotta love that
Cons: Boob job (not a down side for me, but not everyone is me).
Husband/wife team, most shooting is tripod based
- many scenes are missing a description so you need to download to see if you like it.
Back catalog is poorly encoded, they really should re-encode
Organization is hurting. There are no tools at all just chronological setup. (pix organization isn’t much better with few categories to guide you (ie: friends, panties, outside)
The earliest videos are true amateur with loud music and 480X360 1.33 mbps quality (don’t worry things get better fast)
According to TBP, daily limit is 5 gigs. With modern file sizes pushing 700 mb, it’s very easy to hit that cap when you’re checking out content across the network. I know they need to fight piracy, but perhaps a better balance needs to be struck. (2/23: 10 gig limit - no warning when you get close :( )
- no g/g action (that I noticed anyway). I don't object (really not my favorite anyway) but I know some highly value that content.
Bottom Line: Shandra is not afraid to get dirty, and I love that about her! She does talk in a bit of a high pitch some might say “little girl” voice. Some might love that, I’m rather indifferent and prefer genuine above all else.

That said if you’re looking for a hot, big titted (recently even bigger) MILF, this is the site for that. She has enough production value that you will be happy with the quality (especially the newer stuff), while still filling that Amateur) niche. I joined this network largely for Filthycuteonline, and stayed due to all the other great content. Shandra Fay is a real gem her. Great work. I highly recommend.

Shandra Fay has a great combination. She is dirty (as if the pegging and public flashing wasn’t enough to show that)! She as great personality that shines through. She has posted a number of “joke” videos and keeps a comedy section. She’s one of those people that has a contagious laugh and energy. The kind of person you can’t help wishing the best things find her.

02-21-13  07:20pm

Replies (1)
Comment
460
Visit Filthy Cute Online

Filthy Cute Online
(0)

Joined and redesign

I see on twitter Shandra announced her site will be undergoing a redesign. So I joined ahead of time hoping to compare the before and after.

At first blush, I'm loving this site - and agree it needs a redesign. I can't wait to see the new digs!

01-03-13  02:00pm

Replies (1)
Reply
461
Visit Filthy Cute Online

Filthy Cute Online
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Pat, thank you. Your counsel is always wise and appreciated.

08-17-12  05:16am

Reply
462
Visit Filthy Cute Online

Filthy Cute Online
(0)
Reply of FM Financial In's Reply

Thanks for helping me out FM.

I see Curious Gabby is included in the network, so I think this is going to be my next site purchase. Thanks!

I can't wait to see all the naughtiness inside.


08-17-12  05:15am

Reply
463
Visit Filthy Cute Online

Filthy Cute Online
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Thanks Pat!

Looking at the network it didn't look that strong to me. Who else in the network is strong, in your opinion.

Thanks again!


08-16-12  11:40am

Comment
464
Visit Filthy Cute Online

Filthy Cute Online
(0)

Is she has hot and dirty as she seems?

Site looks great, but the preview area is very skimpy (always a warning for me). Can anyone vouch for the site before I dive in?

Thanks.

08-16-12  05:21am

Replies (7)
Reply
465
Visit Finishes The Job

Finishes The Job
(0)
Reply of Homegirl's Reply

I believe a site that accomplishes what in intends is doing a good job. So often I find niche sites that over promise and underdelivers. To me Manojob is one of the few sites that exceed expectations. They deliver dirty talk better than any site I can think of.

I know the score of 100 is controversial. But I always hated those teachers that said: No one is perfect so no one can get a 100. Well, this site does what it says and than some, so why not reward that?


05-17-20  02:55pm

Review
466
Visit Finishes The Job

Finishes The Job
(0)

100.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: - Access to network: manojob.com (hand job site) and Cheici Fox (solo site)Dick Suckers(oral/facial site), MrPOV (hardcore site)
- POV (duh 🙄) pretty standard set up: intro interview, BJ, couple of positition sex, Facial with plenty of dirty talk. I think this family of sites does the BEST job of dirty talk. Just about every video ends in a facial. They then roll camera for another minute or two with the girl looking right into the camera and begging you to pop off too. As a fan of dirty talking, I don't think ANY SITE does a better job then this network
- Consistant theme. Despite that they manage to be rather creative in setups and scenarios. (most involve some idea of meet a nympho)
- "Ok" performer diversity. Casting look like most of porn, but they seem better than most at diversit
- Max quality 1080p (1920X1080). approx 5.2 mbps.
- 4K being rolled out: 4 K format h.264 3840X2160 59.94 fps 29.4 Mbps
- Smaller sizing available
- Model interviews/just pop shot available
Cons: Pros:
- videos run about 15 minutes.
- Excellent costomer service. I had a day where I was on great broadband so I took advantage to download a bunch. Of course that triggered their piracy alarm. It took a fast email to get me back up and running
- Responsive: I requested they book Alex Coal - a couple of month later there she was! I'm sure they can't always do that, but they tried
- They have great bookings so I'll limit to just a couple of favs: Lauren Phillips, Cherie Deville, Sarah Shevon, Ashley Fires, Larkin Love, Aria Alexander, Alex Coal (in 4K), Jessica Ryan
- STILL UPDATING. Everyday there's an update (sometimes upgrade of old video - most days it's something brand new)
- as of March 16, 2020 over 1,300 videos
- Great organization. You can favorite content, grade content on a 5 point scale, use tag

Cons:
- 4K just started, there aren't many videos available in that quality, yet.
- No PU discout
Bottom Line: I know it's controversial to throw down a 100 - but I always hated those teachers that said "a 100 is for perfect work and no one is perfect." To me the 100 is for a site accomplishing it's own goals and I think finishes the job perfectly does what it's trying to do.

The network's focus is on hot girls doing great dirty talk. The typical shoot starts with the performer talking to the camera giving a bit of a warm-up (this is not a get to know you interview, this is dirty fun 😊). Next is typically male talent hand job/blow job (if Mr.POV It then moves to penetration sex, good amount of anal content). Lastly- pop shot with followup dirty talk. The previews give a good estimation of the videos inside. Unlike when you go to the movies the previews don't have all the good parts 🤣.

03-16-20  12:20pm

Replies (3)
Review
467
Visit First Class POV

First Class POV
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - multiple file size available (.mp4) for me I find 780p is the perfect balance between size and quality. These files are about 1 GB and 1280X720 5.2 mbps
- 1080 files are about 2.75 GB 1920X1080 12.1 mbps.
- I don't have a 4K monitor so I didn't download anything that size.
- comments on videos allowed (although doesn't seem to be widely used)
- Scoring system with favorites and likes (again either isn't widely used or there are very few members here. I see a lot of great videos that have under a dozen likes)
- Decent tagging system (could be made better with more options or even user suggested ones)
- Plenty of great talent some of my favorites: LAUREN PHILLIPS, CHERIE DEVILLE, Sonia Harcourt, Natashia Nice, Julia Ann (ok I fall for the MILFs, what can I say!?), Emma Hix, Saya Song.
- about 465 videos as of August 2, 2019
- updates about 1X per week.
- Good handling of photos. You can download .zips of the screenshots (about 100 pix) and the photoshoots (about 300 pix)
Cons: PROS CONT:
- Part of the Spizoo network
- Good organization. Viewing can be arranged by: date, popularity, title, or category (sort of a "tag"). Tags well done; for example there's a tag for Japanese instead of just "Asian"
- Search works well even though there are a lot of videos I was able to locate something I'd found earlier with relative ease.
- Exclusive scenes
- More diversity than most sites (in terms of ethnicity, not body type)
CONS:
- Adds behind the paywall, constant drumbeat of "buy more"
- .wmv only available in 480p format
- No unique "hook". This is cookie-cutter porn. I like sites that have more of a personality and niche.
- If you're gonna be an "also-ran" run of the mill network you've got to have a lot of content. They're not there yet
- Very few scenes have plot most is just straight to the action with no explanation. (I know I'm old fashioned.)
- Only 15 videos load/page. I know this seems like a small complaint but it's like I'm constantly loading a new page
Bottom Line: This site is definitely a buy if you're looking for a good basic porn site. You can probably pick up a multi-month membership for a very reasonable price.

There's enough of a back catelog and plenty of big-name stars (along with plenty that I was only introduced to here). I've had a really good time exploring all the content. And there's plenty of that given that the typical shoot is over 20 minutes.

The most serious draw back is there's not a lot of personality here. Sure the girls are hot and do a great job but there's no real niche. This is serving the porn mass market (nothing wrong with that but sometimes I want something interesting - something that has more creativity).

The POV style is done well. The lighting and sound are good. The production value is high. Like I said the talent is top-notch.

To say it all in one sentence: Great porn - nothing novel/unusual. It hit all the marks. I'd score it as a solid "B" the only thing that moves it to the "B+" "A-" range is that it's not particularly creative - but it is well priced.

08-02-19  06:52pm

Replies (0)
Review
468
Visit Foot Worship

Foot Worship
(0)

83.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Unique focus. I know there are foot fetish sites out there but most are amateur sites that don't bring all the weight kink.com can bring.
- Lots of model diversity: Pregnancy, interracial, female-female, male-female.
- great imagination: everything for kinky nuns to squirting strippers. I like the unpredictability of what the next update might have brought.
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Lots of my favorite fetish models have shot here - plus a good mix of up and comers. Penny Paz and Christy Mack were smoking hot.
- Allows download managers
Cons: - Defunct site. Last update was March of 2015
- Just over 100 scenes
- Foot insertions were a turn off for me. But I can't complain too much it's a foot fetish site.
- Organization is hurting. Shoots are uploaded chronologically, while there are keywords they're misapplied and overly broad (bare pussy for example). You can search by model but if you don't know what you're looking for you have a hard time finding it.
No way to "favorite" things for future viewing
Bottom Line: I'm not a foot fetish guy but there was still enough her for me to enjoy. Lots of different set-ups and model types kept things interesting. Part of what kept it's score down was the lack of content, no longer updating, and being too far out of the mainstream for me (I wrestled with that after all it is a foot site in a network named kink - but all the foot insertions were too much for me)

Had the site kept updating and had they been a little more sparing with the insertions I probably would have scored this site closer to a 90.

Streaming and multiple formats keep things simple.

The price is too high for just this site. That said if you are into kinky stuff this network is a gold mine. There's so much here it's certainly worth a months membership to explore. I intended to join for just a month but stayed longer and will return later now that my membership has lapsed

04-10-17  07:35am

Replies (0)
Review
469
Visit Four Finger Club

Four Finger Club
(0)

83.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Membership includes access to all New Sensations networks (27 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive (to the best of my knowledge)
- 4K videos available (no extra charge)
- There's PLOT. I like the action has an explanation. Nothing is stale they mix in plenty of plot devices so each scene feels fresh
- Mix of MILF and new talent.
- Great talent including LAUREN PHILLIPS. Mercedes Carrera, Lexi Belle, Riley Nixon, Brett Rossi, Cherie DeVille. I discovered plenty of new (to me) talent here to (I'm guessing many new stars start out with girl-girl)
- Decent search (some tags but too limited), search bar
- Approx 500 scenes (warning! includes BTS/interviews) - that's a big back catalog for a site like this
Cons: - Star rating system
- excellent production lighting/set/talent everything looks great
- Symbian and Hitachi are used so much they should be sponsors (LOL!)

CONS:
- No longer updating(?) The last update was 2/21
- When they were updating it was spotty 2X/month and then nothing for a while. Then 4 times in a month
- off theme. While they probably have 100+ "stretching" focused 4-finger banging shoots. There's a LOT (A LOT, A LOT) of other girl-gril action cross-posted here from other parts of the network.
- little diversity (unless you count hair color and trimming regiment). There are very few women of size (most are porn valley clones - the MILFs tend to be an exception). Hardly any ethnic diversity. (unlike the rest of the network were they seem to be putting in real effort
- No user forum/comments available
- No previews available either download it or stream it to see if it's what you're looking for
- Ads behind a paywall (seems like everyone is doing it these days)
Bottom Line: I like the more extreme stretching theme. I wish they had more consistency. Basically, before you're gonna go extreme like that you have to build a really hot scene so I think those shoots are some of the best girl-girl porn shoots.

So despite all fourfingerclub.com has going for it I can't go any higher with the score. It seems like they're giving up on updates and they mix in a ton of off-brand content.

I have to give it to them they do a lot of stuff right but to move into the A range they've got to give us fans more.

Buy or Pass. Because of the strength of the network, I think you have to give this a buy. But don't put it at the top of your list.

09-15-21  03:15pm

Replies (0)
Review
470
Visit Four Finger Club

Four Finger Club
(0)

80.0
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Membership includes access to all New Sensations network (26 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- plenty of hot talent. Some of the standouts were: Amber Rayne, Zoe Holloway, Christie Lee, Avy Lee Roth, Kelly Wells(!), Janet Mason
- Pretty much every scene is F/F. Usually with toys. More anal play then I was expecting
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
Cons: - The last update was in October 2013 - doesn't look like they update at all anymore.
- Less than 100 updates dating from 2007 (older content is lower quality than newer)
- Lack of organization is a problem. With this much content, you really need more search capability than star/Date/"popularity"
- Trailers are not available so separating the good from the bad is tough
- I couldn't get my download manager to work.
- Ads behind paywall
- Most movies have little or no plot (I know I'm old-fashioned)
Bottom Line: To be direct I wasn't thrilled with this site. First off just girl/girl action doesn't scratch my itch (so take the rest of this with a grain of salt).

It's fine the New Sensations Network has a site dedicated to lesbian interests. But this site is too dull to be a standout. There's not enough plot or kink to make this site anything but an also-ran.

This site is fine for the price if you're looking for the network. If you are looking for a hot girl/girl site - you should look somewhere else. The Brazzer Network or Naughty America would probably be a better fit.

07-30-18  03:16pm

Replies (0)
Comment
471
Visit Francesca Live

Francesca Live
(0)

Great MILF; Great enthusiasm

Really good site for MILF lovers. Has a lot of pluses going for it. Francesca is hot and gives great performances. There's a wide varity of niches covered, and with a strong cam and content network behind it there's something new every day.

01-23-13  01:58pm

Replies (0)
Review
472
Visit Francesca Live

Francesca Live
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Bunch of different fetish content. There's at least one of the following: spanking, super hero, lite bdsm, prostate milking, pegging, anal, interracial, group sex, lots of good stuff :)
- Shandra Fay (of filtycuteonline), Julia Ann, Puma Swede, Deauxma, Charlee Chase, Sara Jay, Curious Gabby, Bobbi Eden, Carmen Valentine, Vickyathome, Angelina Castro, Nikki Benz are all included as part of the network. The whole network is in the MILF genre -so if you're a fan this is the place.
- There are about 160 vids (I'm not including BTS shoots).
- lots of excitement in videos. Some performers don't have energy that's not Fancesca.
- The focus of the site is the live shows - but there's so much more here. Across the network there's about 3 shows a day.
- pix available in zip format
- she also has guest stars so there's really a lot of diversity between the guests and the network.
- each vid has an accompanying description for those of use who still enjoy some plot with our porn.
Cons: - organization needs a reset. The video section is arranged chronologically within the categories: BTS, G/G, B/G, and fighting.
- video quality ranges from 8450X480 4.1 mbps, 740X480 1.3 mbps to 640X480 1.5. At this point I really expect at least newest content to have an HD option.
- I'm sure she's had a boob job - but I think it looks good and not over done (don't mean to erupt a debate on whether a boob job can EVER be over done).
- much of the content (maybe all of it for all I know), is non-exclusive. A good amount is directly from other DVDs
Bottom Line: Francesca is smokin' hot. While in that MILF category she has that young soccer mom look down! Great boobs, nice smile. She's a stunning woman.

The amount of kink and variety is way above most solo sites. There's a lot of guest stars, I'm really surpirsied for a site that's billed as a solo more than 1/4 of the videos have other performers in them!


Bottom Bottom Line: I gotta call this one a buy. Francesca is smokin hot. There's good personality and diversity in the shoots. There's enough on the site to warrant a month's membership free - and I think more than a month when you look at the whole network.

01-14-13  06:07pm

Replies (0)
Review
473
Visit Fresh Outta High School

Fresh Outta High School
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Membership includes access to all New Sensations network (26 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- Plenty of hot new stars: ARIA ALEXANDER (she's amazing!), Samantha Hayes, Riley Reid (a few good ones), Sadie Kennedy.
- The catalog goes back to 2004 and obviously, that has lower quality
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- About 75 scenes dating back to 2008 - STILL UPDATING
- A lot of anal action if that's important to you
- Now that I have a long-term membership I'm appreciating the ability to save and like scenes for better organization
Theme consistency. I'm not a fan of the so young theme - I've reached that age where MILF are more attractive. But they stay true to their intentions.
Cons: - Lack of organization is a problem. With this much content, you really need more search capability than star/Date/"popularity"
- Some scenes offer trailers most do not
- Erratic updates. Sometimes 4 in a month, other times a month with nothing. (good thing its part of a network
- I couldn't get my download manager to work.
- Ads behind paywall
- Most movies have little or no plot
Bottom Line: This is a solid site. It scatches the itch it's trying to get at. There's decent plot (which I like) rather than just jumping into action.

The only 2 serious dings on this site are lack of frequent updates and not much of a back catalogue.

There's enough content to satisfy. The quality is good. the talent is great. And with the strength of the NS network, there's no reason to hold back from this site. I don't think you'll have enough here to keep you for a long term. But it's a very enjoyable site.

08-10-18  07:03am

Replies (0)
Reply
474
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(0)
Reply of exotics4me's Reply

Thank you for the very thoughtful reply I appreciate it.

I'm in complete agreement about 100s, and participated in a forum discussion a few years ago making the same points you present here.

My thinking is I've just got to check out FTV for myself. I think I may have a long time ago but now my tastes have changed (as I get older the MILF category is really where I'm at), and I agree MILF are not in pig tales. To me the hottest MILFs in the biz right now are Cherie DeVille and Lauren Phillips. If there's a scene with either of them in it - I'm on it LOL.

Thanks for the help I really appreciate it. I'm going to look at Only All Sites too but when you say "best" - I know I can take that to the bank!

Best wishes to you


08-19-21  07:05am

Reply
475
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(0)
Reply of exotics4me's Reply

Agree with will Congrats on a well-earned stat.

Quick question if you don't mind. I see you have a review of Zishy in which you also rated it as a 100. If you had to pick between FTV and Zishy who would you choose?

I've had a membership at Zishy for over a year now (it's so cheap it's hard to let it go). I keep looking at the MILF FTV site, but it seems expensive.

What are your thoughts?

Thanks for any wisdom you have.


08-18-21  08:27am


Shown : 451-475 of 1048 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.42 seconds.