| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Hi apoctom,
Bear in mind that one PU reviewer recently mentioned that the trial at Eighteen18 is now very limited: no vids and only five pics per set. Eighteen18 is part of the Score group, so who knows, perhaps this new limited trial access is all across the board. I say new because I had trials at both Eighteen18 and Scoreland which granted virtually full-access. In fact, there were no limitations at all at Eighteen18 when I went for the trial there. At Scoreland, the trial was limited only that some of the magazine archives allowed you to download the first page of pics only. As far as I could tell, you had access to all the main Scoreland pics and videos.
|
01-24-08 01:03am
|
Comment
227
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
|
01-06-08 08:03pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
228
|
Seriously Big Tits
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Nope, just making some observations from the welcome page. I may join in the future, however.
|
11-25-09 08:30pm
|
Reply
229
|
Seriously Big Tits
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Four of the models on the welcome page are featured at Boob Study, Alina, Katya, Raylenne, and Cherry. Cherry goes by Petra at Boob Study, Michaela at Boobs.pl, and Petra M at Busty Cafe. She's one of my all-time favorite booby models. A few of the other models look familiar. Content is probably not exclusive but the site is tempting, even though they've only got one vid of my honey, Petra (Cherry).
|
11-19-09 11:17am
|
Reply
230
|
Sexxxy Celeste
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I know these are old comments, but I'm shopping around for a good NN site and saw this. I agree, Denner. It should be general practice just to avoid sites that won't give any stats as to the volume of material they have or the quality thereof, or specs for pics and vids. If they can't do that there is probably something they are hiding, like a lack of quantity and/or quality.
If you have high quantity, you'll use it as a selling point; if you have high quality, you'll use it as a selling point; if you have both, obviously you'll let us know.
|
04-22-08 07:51pm
|
Comment
231
|
Smother.de
(0)
|
|
11-20-07 09:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
232
|
Sneaky Peeks
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Nifty idea.
- Zip files for pics, which is the only way to go with these kind of pics.
- Videos are of good quality.
- Updated regularly. |
| Cons: |
- Small amount of content for the price.
- Vids stick to the core idea but are repetitive and tend to be boring.
- BACK OF SOME GUY'S HEAD IN A LOT OF THE PICS.
- Minimal acting and/or improvisational skills.
- Some REALLY bad boob-jobs. |
| Bottom Line: |
I enjoyed two of this company's other sites, Panty Maniacs and Panty Amateurs, and so I thought I'd give this a try. It's not nearly as good as those other sites, but it has potential.
The picture sets are shot in a frame-by-frame style which unfortunately means most of the pics are redundant. They have the look and feel of high-quality vid-caps. Only voyeur and/or panty afficianados need apply. There is some nudity but not much. And too many implants.
Someone had the "brilliant" idea of placing some guy's noggin in many of the photos, which is supposed to enhance the voyeuristic feel of the sets. This is a gigantically BAD idea. Since when did peeping become a team sport? I don't want to look over another guy's shoulder to get a glimpse of some cutie in her unmentionables, nor do I wish to have said unmentionables obscured by a large male cranium which always makes me think of Shaun of the Dead. Tell Shaun to take a hike and I'll hold the cyber door open, thanks.
As for the vids: the quality is very good and looks decent full-screen on my 22 inch monitor. But, I wish these girls would have something to do in the bathroom rather than stand around gazing into the mirror or off into space. I don't mean watersports or anything like that, I mean, give them a task. Let them do something. Most of the time the girls look bored and are overly conscious of the camera. I wind up embarrassed for THEM when I'm supposed to be ashamed of MYSELF.
Some good fun here regardless. |
|
09-01-07 08:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
233
|
Snot Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
I've seen ads for this kind of stuff in Japanese TGPs. Nothing surprises me anymore. I visit a clips for sale site frequently and I've seen some strange stuff. Girls chewing gum and blowing bubbles, girls posing among balloons. I can understand a lot of the bodily function fetishes, since those deal with the naughty bits. But snot? None for me, thanks.
|
01-11-09 08:38pm
|
Review
234
|
Sonia Dane
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Very faithful to the lingerie niche.
- Very classy, adult site.
- Lots of content with Lingerie Pass membership.
- Sonia is a classy, elegant, attractive, mature lady who obviously enjoys what she does.
- Many pics will make old-school undy lovers happy. |
| Cons: |
- Video section is a mess in many ways, see bottom line.
- Pics are small: 480x640 to 1024x737.
- Downloads speeds were consistently slow, averaging 160k per sec.
- Pic sets are arranged all on one page, and it takes a while to load. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have mixed feelings about this site. One one hand, it's extremely classy and mature all around, with nothing tacky or sleezy about it, and for an old-school panty/lingerie fan like me, it is sometimes the best in that genre; on the other hand, I can't help wondering why the physical quality of the content is not up to 2008 standards, why, in fact, it is barely up to 2003 standards; and why, after being online so long, are there all of 16 video clips available, and why, oh why, is the quality of these clips so dismal?
Sonia has a hair over 200 sets up, and with older sets you are looking at pics as small as 480x640, Newer sets offer bigger pics, but still not great, at 1024x737. These people are obviously not hard-up for money, so why continue to sell low-to-moderate quality content when upgrades are almost certainly possible?
Vids: I counted 16 video clips, ranging from 2 to 8 minutes in length, on Sonia's site proper. The newer clips are stream-only and cannot be downloaded. Older clips can be downloaded, but there is no reason why you should bother. One vid I checked was WMV 320x240, 889k; another was a Quick Time vid which was absolutely unwatchable because the quality was so bad. Additionally, I had many problems waiting for the vid page to load. I have a fast connection and all other sites hum along fine, but Sonia's site is slow in general, and excruciantingly slow in regard to the vid page.
A definite plus here is Sonia's guest model section, which now includes 46 models, each with her own little sub-site. Some of these models have upwards of 70 sets, but a good deal have only a handful. By and large there is some excellent, tasteful stuff on offer, but, as with Sonia's site, the pics are small, small, small. Some of the guest models have vids, but these are relatively few.
This site, meaning Sonia's in particular, has the potential to be one of the very best in the panty/lingerie niche, and in fact it's quite ubiquitous in the lingerie/panty newsgroups and is generally highly regarded; but the site itself doesn't live up to its implicit reputation. To go from merely average to exceptional, all this place needs is some serious improvement in the *physical* quality of its content. The strictly aesthetic quality of the content, mind you, is absolutely tops.
Final thought on the vids: either offer something worthwhile or drop them entirely, please. There's nothing wrong with being a picture site. |
|
08-29-08 08:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
235
|
Spanking Teen Brandi
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
It's amazing how long some internet models remain teens, aint it? How long was Tawny Stone eighteen? Six or seven years? Was she caught in some kind of Einsteinian time warp or what?
|
11-09-09 09:11pm
|
Reply
236
|
Suicide Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Reply
I just might join again soon, Mr Fountain.
I'm not generally a fan of tats or piercings, but I very clearly remember being impressed by many of the girls at SG. A good deal of them were so sexy I forgot about the tats and piercings.
Besides, in my experience, some of the girls who have that kind of SG fashion sense are flat-out sweethearts on the inside. And smart as all hell.
|
11-13-08 12:31am
|
Reply
237
|
Suicide Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Comment
I agree, Mr Fountain. I was a member here a few years back and even then it was a good site, and virtually a steal for the 10.00 USD it cost me at that time. Been meaning to re-join.
|
11-11-08 03:04pm
|
Comment
238
|
Sweet N Soft
(0)
|
|
09-13-07 08:38pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
239
|
Swimsuit Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
alan19851's Reply
How sad! Don't you think that your interaction with the models would be increased by being allowed to hear the sounds they make? Another question - what possible benefit is there to having a music track on a video intended for sexual titillation? Can a music track actually improve the erotic response a person has to seeing beautiful women cavort about? If so, how exactly? I'd really like to know.
|
09-17-15 08:35pm
|
Reply
240
|
Swimsuit Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
alan19851's Review
Need to ask one question. Do the videos have music tracks to them? If the sample vid is what I'm in for ear-wise, I'll save my money on this one.
|
09-14-15 10:15pm
|
Reply
241
|
Swimsuit Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
alan19851's Review
Sounds like my cuppa, Alan. Thanks for the review.
|
09-14-15 10:11pm
|
Reply
242
|
Tawnee Stone
(0)
|
Reply of
silver's Review
I've been wanting to join Lightspeed World for some time, as I'm an avid pic collector and am mainly into softcore, with emphasis on soft; but 800x600 is just too small. The bigger your monitor gets, the higher res your screen gets, and consequently, 800x600 looks puny.
|
06-03-08 10:22pm
|
Review
243
|
Teen Charms
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Gorgeous, often downright stunning, models.
- Lots of content: nearly 100,000 pics and over 300 vids (but see BL re vids).
- High quality pics on newer sets.
- Zips
- A few vid DL options.
- Easy to navigate.
- Very tasteful site. |
| Cons: |
- Site has been dead since 3/07, but the homepage hasn't come to terms with this. What happened? Why do this?
- Video is negligible, unfortunately, since these models deserve better. No sound on any of them, though they say all vids have sound. Could be on my end.
- All zip files simply named "images". Creates work, particularly for those of us with no short term memory. Did I mention I have no short-term memory?
- Way softcore. This is in the con section for those who might be expecting sterner stuff. |
| Bottom Line: |
I ransacked Teenstars and am about half-way through Teencharms. I got a two-fer deal and am not disappointed, except for the crappy videos. Lucky for me I'm a pic collector, or I'd be very diappointed indeed. Some of these vids show a bit-rate of 450 or so Kbps. Now how useless is that in 2008?
I don't understand why they put up two sites instead of just one, except as a means of drumming up revenue. There is no difference at all, thematically or technically, between the two. Not that they share content. They don't.
Basically (and don't you hate people who start a sentence with that word?) this site has value in that there are over a hundred drop-dead gorgeous girls presented in tasteful, often artistic, picture sets of good to excellent quality. Some girls might not be Vogue material as far as their faces go, but I have yet to see one who wasn't a masterpiece from the neck down. Bear in mind, these are mostly 18 year olds, and they've got plenty of time to fill out. I like a full-bodied woman as much as the next guy, but I also love slender young ladies. I can't help it, I just do.
Thing is: these people need to re-do their homepages and take down the false advertising. And they should have offered good videos or simply stuck to being a picture site. Teencharms is a high-quality picture archive and not much more. The girls and the photographers get a 99.9999999, but the webmasters and the negligible vids draw the score way down.
Recommended for the pics. |
|
05-16-08 10:25pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
244
|
Teen Flood
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
I've been at TF twice, and both times I felt that I wasn't getting anywhere near maximum use of the site because of navigation issues. It IS a shame, because there is a ton of content and many, many lovely young ladies.
Also, the pics have this drab, washed-out look all the time. They need some color!
|
11-27-09 08:21pm
|
Reply
245
|
Teen Stars Magazine
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
Agreed. The vids are useless but the pictures are top-notch, and the girls are beautiful. A good pic archive.
|
11-05-08 09:32pm
|
Review
246
|
Teen Stars Magazine
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Beautiful models
- Good to excellent picture quality
- Models are proffessional, or at least appear so to me, and are very good at what they do.
- Lots of material up.
- Zips for all pic sets.
- Very tasteful over-all.
- Ethel and Martine: practically worth the money just for these two beauties. |
| Cons: |
- Site has not updated since mid 2007.
- Video quality is pretty bad, and there is no sound in any of the vids I downloaded.
- Vids come in one minute to minute and a half snippets, making them next to worthless.
- Several models stay fully clothed. Not even a kini or panty-shot from them.
- For the casual browser or for the guy who doesn't want entire sets, each pic opens in a new window, causing more work. All hail the back button. |
| Bottom Line: |
I got Teen Stars and Teen Charms in a two-fer deal for 29.99, but I've been busy with Teen Stars thus far to the exclusion of the other site, which I'll look at in the future. I want to say first off that these are some of the most beautiful girls going. If you have a thing for young-looking, skinny, leggy, drop-dead-gorgeous girls, this place is ace. It's neck & neck with Nubiles in that respect. But-
The site is dead, and the video on offer is negligible, so what we have here is basically a large picture archive. If you're not a pic collector, and if you're not into softcore - at times extremely soft - then don't bother. I'm having a pretty good time because I'm a pic collector and the scarcity of tats, toys, penises, hair, and flab keeps all my neurons firing happily away.
Pics range from smallish, from 2003, to very large: 3500 on the big end. You don't get the kind of clarity you do with other places, and the emphasis on the portrait-format makes me wonder what the point of having a huge picture really is. Note to webmasters in this niche: landscape, landscape, landscape. While the site is mostly softcore with an artsy bent and a touch of glamour, plus cute in spades, there is some total nudity (pink), and toys, but not much.
I wouldn't call the site a rip-off, but they should either downplay the presence of vids or offer better ones. Since the site is dead, maybe they should just remove the vids, lower the price, and continue as a good picture archive. |
|
04-14-08 04:40pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
247
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
ksauz's Comment
Sorry, I should have read the reviews first. Info is given there.
|
04-22-08 07:00pm
|
Reply
248
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
ksauz's Comment
Thanks for the comment, ksauz. What size are the pics, on average?
|
04-22-08 06:59pm
|
Reply
249
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
I had to laugh at this, jd. It's 2008 now, and some of these sites will just have to come clean about how old their models are. At some major sites you can see models' ages at anywhere between 19 and 23 who've had pics all over the net since the late nineties.
Tawny Stone should be in the World Record's book for staying 18 longer than any other human in history. A biological miracle!
|
01-06-08 07:20pm
|
Reply
250
|
Teens From Tokyo
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Comment
I agree with your two main points.
Japanese women, AV models in particular, are simply some of the most beautiful women I've ever seen. I also don't care for what you describe as the "truly submissive" style in Japanese hardcore. I haven't seen that much of it, but I've surfed Japanese TGPs and have seen so many vidcaps from videos where it looks like the girl is being molested, often by serveral guys, poked and prodded and groped and treated like a lab rat. The girls don't seem to be enjoying themselves. I could never get off watching stuff like that. Of course it's not just the Japanese. Max(nolink) Hardcore is a sick fuck if I ever saw one.
On the other hand the Japanese do some stuff better than anyone. Their softcore/panty/teaser photography is amazing. One of the things I like hardcore-wise (and I don't like much hardcore) is the reverse gang-bang: one lucky dope and several women. The Japanese go all-out with that. I saw a few vids featuring one guy with more than ten women. Not one at a time: they all hover over him like happy vultures and laugh as they administer their playful "torture". And I imagine they PAY the guy for it.
I need a new line of work.
|
12-24-07 10:00pm
|
|
