| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
501
|
Gloryhole Swallow
(0)
|
Reply of
Laptopbs's Comment
Hey there - welcome to the site. This is an excellent comment - with a little expansion and technical details about downloads (resolution, file type etc) it could become a full review, then you'd start earning some raffle tickets.
I hope you stick around and give us some full reviews, and welcome to my Trust List!
|
01-12-13 06:13am
|
Reply
502
|
Gloryhole Swallow
(0)
|
Reply of
DaveG's Reply
Do you make it clear before someone joins the site that the cap exists?
|
10-22-12 02:00pm
|
Comment
503
|
Grey Fox Lounge
(0)
|
|
09-23-16 11:56am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
504
|
Groping Hands
(0)
|
|
01-24-13 12:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
505
|
Groping Hands
(0)
|
|
12-28-12 01:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
506
|
Groping Hands
(0)
|
|
11-15-12 07:43am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
507
|
Guys Get Fucked
(0)
|
Reply of
Kelon's Comment
It's awful when a site claims to update regularly and then doesn't. It's an odd business decision because once you join an non-updating site and have downloaded and looked at all you want, there's simply no reason to remain a member long-term.
|
09-11-11 04:16pm
|
Reply
508
|
Hardcore Youth
(0)
|
Reply of
joekramer08's Review
Excellent review - amazed they're using a male actor who struggles to get hard! Surely they could find someone who can - isn't that the no. 1 requirement for a male porn star?! Haven't they heard of Viagra? I feel for the guy but porn is clearly not his career!
|
01-18-12 06:12pm
|
Reply
509
|
Harsh Handjobs
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
Sounds an interesting site, there really is a site for almost every possible taste now isn't there! It sounds a little repetitive and focused on one theme for me, but it's certainly quite an interesting concept - might take a look. Thanks for the review, which is excellent.
|
09-22-11 11:20pm
|
Reply
510
|
Hayley's Secrets
(0)
|
Reply of
Jason123's Review
Welcome to Porn Users! Glad you found us and hope you keep posting reviews to help the site grow. Your review is good for a first time - give a little more detail perhaps in future.
|
11-20-11 05:32pm
|
Reply
511
|
Haze Him
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Comment
Yes their own previews put me off here - completely fake and not even well done so you can suspend belief and enjoy it.
|
10-11-11 03:29pm
|
Reply
512
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
tboy's Review
Welcome to PU, this is a very good first review, keep em coming!
|
09-15-11 09:53am
|
Reply
513
|
Helix Studios.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Ambition's Review
Another excellent review - glad to see you've added a bit more detail this time!
So nice to have another gay reviewer on board - hopefully you'll win some dough in the raffle too.
How about updating your profile with some info so we can get to know you a bit better?
|
09-19-12 04:18am
|
Comment
514
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
|
|
09-20-16 07:46am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
515
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
|
|
02-01-14 02:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
516
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
|
|
03-26-13 10:22am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
517
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
|
|
03-20-13 11:11am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
518
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Thanks will check it out!
|
03-07-13 09:45am
|
Reply
519
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Thanks.... incidentally, did the guys in the videos wear masks? Because that's one good thing about this site I forgot to mention - have to add it to my review - most of the guys do show their faces, though a couple are filmed so you can't.
Whilst I can understand it, I think it ruins a scene when the face isn't shown.
|
03-07-13 06:16am
|
Reply
520
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Heh there's certainly every kind of porn out there you can imagine isn't there? I found this site more of a novelty but I am kind of into humiliation so it kind of turned me on watching some of the guys! I might have to try and find the site you mentioned now!
|
03-07-13 06:12am
|
Review
521
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Unique concept and content, well done
+ Good quality videos
+ No DRM
+ Free access to two other sites
+ Bills with CCBill
+ Excellent forum which takes suggestions for scenes
+ Regular, dated updates
+ Full photosets including a zip file for each scene |
| Cons: |
- Photos are small in size
- Later updates move away from original concept
- I found streaming slow
- Slightly confusing video options - some higher-resolution files are WMV only, some lower-resolutuon are MP4 only
- Same male models are reused over and over, and some aren't really that small |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one hell of an unusual site, and I appreciate it's not really aimed at me - though I'm not entirely sure who it is aimed at! Sheer curiosity made me subscribe!
It's basically a kind mild femdom site, in that it focuses on women humiliating men who have a small penis. There's also a CFNM (Clothed Female, Naked Male) element to the majority of the scenes. It's certainly a very specialist niche. I guess it's aimed at anyone who likes to see men humiliated, and perhaps at men who have small penises who enjoy being humiliated.
I have always had a fetish for humiliation, so although I am gay there is not equivalent gay site, and CFNM-type sites, which tend to feature more ordinary-looking straight guys being humiliated by ladies who keep their clothes on, is therefore an interesting niche for me.
Most of the videos are themed around two or three women who get a guy naked on some pretext, then laugh and mock his small cock. They usually masturbate the guy till his comes then laugh at him all the more. The women mainly remained clothed, though often in skimpy outfits, and sometimes flash themselves or get completely naked to turn the guy on. There is the occasional bit of BDSM - the guy might get his balls kicked or his cock abused - but it's fairly mild and infrequent. Occasionally a guy with a larger cock is brought on to humiliate the small-cocked guy further.
The female models, whilst not in my area of expertise, do seem attractive and are mostly in their twenties and slender, though there is a sprinkling of older ladies too. Some remain clothed, some get naked or near-naked.
Later videos though in the last few weeks seem to be moving away from this concept, and feature solo female models who strip off and talk to the male viewer, mocking him for having a tiny penis. Occasionally she might have sex with a man with a big penis and tell the viewer he's a real man and he'd have no chance with her. Obviously this is aimed at heterosexual men who like to be humiliated, but I'm not sure how effective that would be - I've seen similar "humiliate the viewer" style porn myself and it never quite convinces for me. These are all recent videos and reflect a big depature for the site, as all previous videos featured a male model being mocked. Obviously these later videos are of no interest to me, and mean the site is heading in a new direction which may or may not work for you.
This brings me on to a weakness of the site - the repeated use of the same male models. Obviously finding models who are willing to be humiliated on a site like this is not easy - so the same model is often used repeatedly in several scenes. This is great if they have a model you like, but obviously not if you don't like one. The male models vary greatly - some young and cute, but more often in their 30s and 40s, with some quite overweight and not necessarily attractive - though again this kind of goes with the theme of the site. Some of the earlier models actually had quite average or even fairly large dicks, so it kind of didn't work on the realism side, though I still enjoyed them.
Acting is incredibly good - the women are great at dishing out the abuse and most of the male models are great at acting surprised, hurt, turned on etc. though some just kind of sit there a little dazed!
Video is a bit of a mixed bag. You can choose between WMV or MP4 for every scene, which is good, but sometimes the quality is different.
In later videos it seems both types are 1280x720, but one WMV version I tried had a bitrate around 10,000 and 23fps, the MP4 had 30,000 bitrate and 25fps. However, in older videos the MP4 version was the lower-quality, with a 856x480 size, and the WMV tended to be better quality, with a bitrate around 3,000 to the MP4s 1,500. So you'd have to download different file types to get the best quality depending on how old the video is. Quality did seem decent whatever I tried though, and it's all very professionally shot - well-lit and clear.
I found the streaming pretty slow - downloads were about average speed.
Each video has a full photoset, which is good, and a zip file for the photos, but the photos themselves are nothing special at 800x534, and are watermarked.
There is a forum where you can ask questions and even suggest scenes - they say if you suggest one and enough people like it they'll make it for you - I didn't read all the posts so I can't say for sure this does happen, but the administrator does seem to often reply to suggestions.
Overall this is an interesting site which I would recommend if anything about femdom/CFNM/humiliation does it for you - but be aware it is going in a new direction now. |
|
03-04-13 04:53pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
522
|
Hey Little Dick
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Comment
I think you're right!!
|
03-04-13 03:01pm
|
Comment
523
|
Homo Gay Sex
(0)
|
|
09-12-12 01:58am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
524
|
Homo Punk
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Review
Excellent review - I was very curious about this site and waiting for your review of it since you mentioned it a while ago. Sounds like a typically British amateur production - hot concept badly executed.
The mainly non-downloadable videos is the main deal-breaker for me, and the way you can't tell if it's video or pics until you click, then seemingly only getting a slideshow if they felt like doing it for that particular set - so typical of this type of site!
Another great concept ruined by lazy webmasters I guess!
Was curious you mentioned regional billing as a plus - I thought it was generally seen as a bad thing on this site, a way of charging one region more - have I got that wrong?
|
08-06-11 02:07pm
|
Reply
525
|
Homo Punk
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Comment
Certainly looks a unique and different site but I couldn't quite get a handle on it from the site tour... is it just photos?
If you do rejoin I'd be fascinated to read a review on it as it looks like no other gay site I've seen!
|
07-22-11 08:46am
|
