| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
576
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
No that's helpful to know that they haven't taken all the videos down or given up on videos, so thank you, I didn't mean to sound ungrateful, just to keep the question open for any other members. Thanks!
|
11-07-11 10:21am
|
Reply
577
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Hey thank you! It's good to know they do at least still have videos. I was wondering if they are still producing new ones though or if their latest stories are pics only. Thank you.
|
11-07-11 10:11am
|
Comment
578
|
CFNM.net
(0)
|
|
11-07-11 08:45am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
579
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
I've joined VideoBox Men and agree it has lots of content but not necessarily the quality. Must post my review of that soon. Good review!
|
11-06-11 12:31pm
|
Reply
580
|
Ben Dover
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
Looked at the previews - looks like a typical British "cheeky", funny site - I enjoy that kind of porn! It's the sort of site even I would enjoy!
|
11-06-11 11:11am
|
Reply
581
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'd say most times yes as I like to see the full facial expression on the model. Obviously though in some types of porn such as voyeur stuff, the model is supposed to be unobserved. It can be sexy when they forget the camera and really go for it too!
|
11-06-11 07:26am
|
Reply
582
|
Mary Alicia
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Interesting review of an interesting site - I think I'd find it too frustrating if a model showed me nearly all but not quite, but I guess it does add to the mystery!
|
11-05-11 05:23pm
|
Reply
583
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
None of the above, so had to pick "other".
I'm quite satisfied with my own hand if I can't find someone else to help me!
|
11-04-11 08:19am
|
Reply
584
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I once read somewhere that it was very pleasurable if you applied Deep Heat cream (a hot muscle rub) to your penis.
It is not.
That is all.
|
10-27-11 03:59am
|
Reply
585
|
Katie K Official
(0)
|
Reply of
picdude's Review
Excellent review, glad to have you on board on the site! Welcome to my Trust group.
|
10-25-11 08:00am
|
Reply
586
|
Amateur Violations
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
A funny review of a funny site it made me chuckle! Well-written as always, your review gives a good flavour of an odd-sounding site!
|
10-25-11 07:52am
|
Reply
587
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
None of the above - I don't use/drink any of them - and porno is quite exciting enough for me without needing other stimulants!
|
10-23-11 11:01am
|
Reply
588
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Penis!
|
10-21-11 06:29pm
|
Reply
589
|
Juicy Boys
(0)
|
Reply of
adamz's Reply
Hi Adam, many thanks for your comprehensive reply... I appreciate it very much and I am glad you're taking some of my suggestions on board.
I did state that I would hsve given the site a much higher rating but I felt that your site tour is misleading, and I still do; it's not something you've addressed specifically except to say that you can't offer all of the videos for downloads or the site would be economic.
On reflection I do accept that - I understand you have to make a profit. However, your preview simply states "unlimited downloads" - I accept that this means you don't place a limit on how many scenes can be be downloaded per month. However, it simply isn't clear before you join the site that many of the videos are not downloadable to keep. If you would say in the preview that only selected DVDs can be downloaded, then nobody will be surprised when they join.
Videobox Men, of which I am a member and joined before your site, offers all of its videos for download without exception and so with yours being a similar type of site and with no indication to the contrary, I assumed your policy was the same. As you say your other site men.com can offer all their videos for download, so if that one of your sites can offer it, why can't Juicy Boys?
Had the made the policy clear I would have known and could have made an informed decision about whether to join or not, this was my main concern.
I did not realise that I could still access purchased videos after my subscription was over - I am very happy to hear I can but again this is not made clear and it's not the standard way such sites operate - usually once your membership runs out you can't access the site.
I also rated the site down due to the disapponting chat facility which as you see from my review, was unreliable. There is a notice on your site acknowledging this and suggesting contact via an international phone number which would be prohibitively expensive to call.
I did try and rate your site fairly - I pointed out that I initially felt like giving you an awful review and a low rating but decided to wait and explore it first which improved my opinion somewhat - and I have listed the positive points. I've also explained that but for the problems outlined, I'd have given you an extremely high mark, so I do give you credit where it's due and give people enough information to make up their own minds.
Thank you for your reply though - if you could make the changes suggested and make it clearer in your preview what you do and do not get, I would be happy to amend my review and would consider re-subscribing.
|
10-20-11 01:20pm
|
Reply
590
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
Yes, always as they're useful in letting me know what I could improve.
|
10-15-11 12:45am
|
Reply
591
|
Assassinate That Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Hmmm seems very odd not to accept Visa! As CCBill do for most sites, I would assume that declining to accept Visa is something a site owner would do - perhaps Visa have slightly higher charges for transactions than MasterCard? Then the site owner might only want to accept a card which took less of their profit.
Or perhaps they've had trouble with Visa before - maybe they're too quick to take a cardholders site in the event of a dispute? No idea if these two are true, trying to understand why a site owner wouldn't take it. It can't be a CCBill policy or they wouldn't accept it for any site.
Otherwise I can't see why a site owner would refuse to accept Visa.
|
10-13-11 08:19am
|
Reply
592
|
Assassinate That Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
pornfalls's Comment
Are you sure? I've joined loads of CCBill sites and I only have a Visa card - it's been accepted on all of them! I'd double-check and if you're still have difficulty give CCBill support an e-mail.
|
10-13-11 04:59am
|
Reply
593
|
Haze Him
(0)
|
Reply of
manholelover's Comment
Yes their own previews put me off here - completely fake and not even well done so you can suspend belief and enjoy it.
|
10-11-11 03:29pm
|
Reply
594
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
They're lazy.
|
10-11-11 03:25pm
|
Reply
595
|
Meow 34JJ
(0)
|
Reply of
Watson's Review
Excellent review with plenty of detail, thank you.
|
10-09-11 11:16am
|
Reply
596
|
Bella 1010
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
I agree too. $29.95 seems to be a fairly standard price for porn and I think a ot of sites figure that's the going rate and so that's what they'll charge, but you've got to look at what you're offering individually and what the other sites are offering and decide on a fair price.
There's sites offering literally thousands of scenes out there charging the same or less than this!
|
10-08-11 02:03pm
|
Reply
597
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
Yes I agree - I don't like to see ordinary passers-by reactions, it's not fair to them and certainly not sexy. If you're doing exhibitionism, then the exhibitionists should be surrounded by voyeurs who want to be there and find it sexy.
|
10-08-11 01:59pm
|
Reply
598
|
Boob Study
(0)
|
Reply of
wanker28's Review
Love your username by the way - honest and very down to earth!
|
10-08-11 01:53pm
|
Reply
599
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Excellent review - you sound a little in love! I agree about her being called "skinny", that's not a compliment to me. Though I think in today's world some women do see it a compliment! I'd prefer the word "slender" or as you suggest "petite".
I tend not to do one-model sites as I prefer variety, but I have had a bit of a passion for the odd model in my time and I wouldn't probably join their site as part of a network as you suggest.
|
10-08-11 01:52pm
|
Reply
600
|
Boob Study
(0)
|
Reply of
wanker28's Review
Brushing their teeth?! That's a new one on me! Is this some new fetish I haven't heard about?! Sounds like an odd site!
|
10-08-11 08:06am
|
