| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
451
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Arrgh this drives me nuts! Why the hell do we have to pay an extra $5 all the time? I can't see any justification for it at all on the internet with zero shipping costs, no difference in sales taxes etc. The currency conversation takes care of any cost there so the starting US dollar price should be the same. I really am going to have start boycotting sites that do this.
|
06-02-12 01:52pm
|
Reply
452
|
Rob And Jill
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks Khan appreciate it. I'll update or post a new comment when the second issue with CCBill is sorted out too.
|
06-02-12 08:10am
|
Reply
453
|
Top Heavy Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Review
Excellent review, it's good to read reviews warning people off poor quality sites and as TBP has yet to review it, yours is particularly helpful.
|
06-02-12 07:56am
|
Comment
454
|
Rob And Jill
(0)
|
|
06-02-12 07:38am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
455
|
Rob And Jill
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Comment
Be careful - there's a notice on the site saying you're not supposed to use download managers at all and if you do they can cancel your membership and report you to CCBill.
That may be why you're having problems?
|
06-02-12 07:34am
|
Reply
456
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'd say it's a fantasy thing - I can see things I probably wouldn't in my real sex life, and I enjoy being a voyeur legally and safely!
|
05-30-12 12:20pm
|
Reply
457
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Review
Superb review, welcome to the site!
|
05-27-12 06:53pm
|
Reply
458
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
What's GGG?!
|
05-27-12 06:49pm
|
Reply
459
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Reply
To be fair ergo from a safer sex point of view, if she manages to stop it going in her eyes and her skin is unbroken, it's probably safer than intercourse without a condom, which seems to be standard in straight porn and still shocks me.
It is degrading I guess but no more than S&M type stuff.
|
05-26-12 01:30pm
|
Reply
460
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Love it but I find I am not attracted to Asian men, and it's difficult to find gay bukkake at all - the main gay bukkake site is Asian guys.
|
05-26-12 01:28pm
|
Reply
461
|
Mom Loves Mom
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I think adult websites think their customers are too embarrassed about their purchase to complain - the service can be awful.
I am disppointed in Epoch - I thought they were trustworthy but this puts me off using them as a biller.
Maybe PU should have a section where we can review billing providers too!
|
05-25-12 05:46pm
|
Comment
462
|
Gay Sugar Daddy
(0)
|
|
05-25-12 10:30am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
463
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Reasonably fast, though I'd love it to be even faster! I'm satisfied though.
|
05-24-12 04:57pm
|
Reply
464
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Nope, it didn't really occur to me! I tend not to go in for big stars when it comes to porn anyway - I like the more "guy next door" kind!
I can't stand Twitter and Facebook anyway.
|
05-22-12 05:30am
|
Reply
465
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Another top-quality review, thank you!
|
05-21-12 11:28pm
|
Reply
466
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I never thought I'd be a notebook person but got my first last year and it's the only computer I need now. Of course, now I finally gave in it's all about tablets now so still behind the times!
|
05-21-12 10:26am
|
Reply
467
|
Latex Heaven
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Review
Fascinating review - not an niche I am very interested in but I do understand the frustration of finding a site which seems to cater to your niche only to find the owners obviously don't really understand it and are just putting in a token nod to it with standard porn.
|
05-19-12 03:37pm
|
Reply
468
|
N/A
|
Reply of
OneMan's Poll
Not really relevant to me, but I don't understand why condom use would put off the viewer in hetero porn. Your focus on is on the girl, presumably? Why would the cock having a condom on it be a problem?
I chose director instructions being heard, but even that depends on the video. I can ruin a scene if there's a fantasy to maintain, but I quite like to hear it if it's made sexy, like the director is getting into it!
|
05-18-12 05:30pm
|
Reply
469
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Anything more than once a week is frequent to me. Weekly updates are regular but not freqent.
Does depend a bit on the content though. If the site makes long videos once a week is more acceptable than if it's a site that breaks a movie up into short scenes - then I expect more updates.
|
05-16-12 06:02pm
|
Reply
470
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Poll
Websites first, then by model name within the website folders.
If the model is on more than one website, I cross-reference them in the titles.
|
05-14-12 01:29pm
|
Reply
471
|
Daring Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Yep - gotta agree, that's one well-written review with everything in it!
|
05-13-12 06:19pm
|
Reply
472
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
As in so many things, quality is more important than size! I'd rather have a good quality smaller screen than a big cheap one.
|
05-12-12 07:57pm
|
Reply
473
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I can cope with a few, but I don't like there to be loads, as I am already paying for access to the site. What especially annoys me is when a site is particularly expensive but they still do it - sites like CFNM, CMNM and First Auditions are particularly bad for that.
I also hate it when they mix banner ads for similar content in between the videos - for a second I think a banner ad is content on the site, go to watch it and find it's an ad!
If it's for another site in the network I also think the ad should be showing a discount unique to you as a paying member of one of their sites, so you get some kind of reward for the loyalty you've already shown. It amazes me how few companies give even a small token discount to a sister site - I think they'd make a profit that way and encourage loyalty and rebills.
I know porn companies have to make money, but we're the honest paying customers who have paid for their content, so ads can be a little too much on top.
Still, I suppose I see ads in magazines I've paid for. As long as it keeps the site cost down and they don't make it look like content I can cope, but I think sites should be careful.
|
05-10-12 08:44am
|
Reply
474
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I'd say several weeks - sometimes I go through periods when I'm a bit "porned out" and don't really look at them for a while - but it never lasts long!
|
05-09-12 03:29am
|
Reply
475
|
Rubber Tanja
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Review
Always good to see a webmaster replying positively and constructively to a review - I wish more would, well done.
Well-written review but if you used paragraphs it would be much easier to read.
|
05-07-12 03:30pm
|
