Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : gaypornolover (0)  

Feedback:   All (704)  |   Reviews (17)  |   Comments (77)  |   Replies (610)

Other:   Replies Received (260)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 351-375 of 707 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
351
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Somewhat yes - if a site looks incredible I'd join it anyway, but there's a few sites I have in mind which look pretty good but are on my "to join" list. A discount would mean I'd join that one before the others.

09-13-12  08:45am

Comment
352
Visit Homo Gay Sex

Homo Gay Sex
(0)

Suitably dumb title for this site I think!

I was quite interested in this site as I had a good chuckle at the title - is there another kind of gay sex which isn't also homo?! "Homo Gay Sex" seems to be rather labouring the point!

Anyway I had a look at their preview page and was disappointed to see one of the videos entitled "Four eyed twink and his tiny penis". The model was cute but wore glasses and his penis wasn't erect in the pic, so you can't judge the size - but even if it was small, so what?

Unless a site is specifically a BDSM or humiliation site where such descriptions are part of the fantasy and consensual on the part of the model, I really hate this kind of description in porn.

Porn doesn't have to be unkind and I admire and appreciate models who make porn possible. I think they should be treated with respect.

I wouldn't join this site on principle now.

I sometimes think the porn industry treats its models the way it treats its customers - contempt is too often shown for both of them - yet without either one, it wouldn't exist and neither would the profits - something a studio called (appropriately!) "BFProfit.com" might want to reflect on. Easy to see where their priorities lie - well you make more cash being respectful with me!

OK rant over! Sorry!

09-12-12  01:58am

Replies (0)
Reply
353
Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Reply

Excellent! I'm really happy you got a good result. We porn users need to flex our consumer power and show we're paying customers like with any other service.

09-12-12  01:42am

Reply
354
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Nope - still have my old CRT TV which I am perfectly happy with so I'd see no benefit from a Blu-Ray player.

As they can play DVDs too and are pretty affordable now, when my current TV breaks I'll replace it with a HD one and get a Blu-Ray player to go with it, but I'm in no particular hurry to get one.


09-11-12  10:36pm

Comment
355
Visit Bears Fuck Boys

Bears Fuck Boys
(0)

Alas!

Another site which doesn't have an independent biller. It looks really hot, but I simpy don't trust sites that do their own billing. I am noticing more and more of them. Do other users trust such sites? Am I being paranoid?

09-11-12  07:57am

Replies (1)
Reply
356
Visit Ladyboy Ladyboy

Ladyboy Ladyboy
(0)
Reply of quekchoze's Review

Excellent first review! Welcome to the site. It's great to see someone reviewing a slightly more unusual genre of site, so I do hope you stick around! Added you to my trust list.

09-10-12  01:44am

Reply
357
Visit Euro Foxes

Euro Foxes
(0)
Reply of rodstroker's Review

Oh dear, another con! Hadn't heard of GXBill which is always a bad sign - a company to avoid, clearly.

What did the standard e-mail reply say?


09-07-12  12:44pm

Reply
358
Visit Lady Sonia

Lady Sonia
(0)
Reply of hiker's Review

Outrageous! This is the thing I hate about the industry, they change stuff on you all the time.

You might have some recourse though - if the site users an independent biller, then complain to them - explain that when you joined the site it advertised itself as offering downloads and you joined on that basis. It is no longer offering what you paid for, and you want a refund.

It's worth a try, and thanks for letting us know about the problem as it alerts other users - if enough people protest and leave or stop joining, they may discover they can't treat their customers in this way.

Excellent warning review - I hope to see more from you and have added you to my trust list. Welcome to PU, and may your future porn experiences be better than this one!


09-07-12  08:08am

Reply
359
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Of course, it's often less value for money for a euro or a pound than a dollar thanks to our friend regional pricing!

09-07-12  06:43am

Reply
360
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Definitely - the price of a months subscription is a similar or even lower price than a single porno DVD, and you usually get a lot more content for your money.

This only refers to non-DRM download sites though - streaming sites are not such good value and pay-per-view sites usually work out more expensive than DVDs.


09-07-12  04:56am

Reply
361
Visit Boat Girls Gone Wild

Boat Girls Gone Wild
(0)
Reply of Tree Rodent's Reply

That is absolutely shocking Squirrel but well done for highlighting it. We porn consumers need to take a stand against this kind of unethical business and show we're consumers like everyone else and we deserve respect. Together we'll do it - thankfully we have a great forum here to do so.

09-06-12  12:17pm

Reply
362
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't download picture sets - I've never really understood the appeal of photos when videos are available.

09-05-12  03:38am

Comment
363
Visit The Casting Room.net

The Casting Room.net
(0)

Improvement?

I'm keeping a close eye on this site - it used to be known as First Auditions and whilst I liked it, it was mainly for the occasional fucking scenes (called, imaginatively, Second Auditions!). However these were so infrequent - once every three months or so - I tended to leave this site for much longer than others before rejoining.

The update pages show a couple of new ones in the last month or so though (now called The Fucking Room) so this is moving up my list of priorities for a rejoin and new review!

Watch this space!

09-04-12  05:15pm

Replies (0)
Reply
364
N/A Reply of Claypaws's Poll

Definitely the face - first thing I always look at.

09-04-12  05:01pm

Comment
365
Visit Gentleman Handling

Gentleman Handling
(0)

Now this does look different

I've kind of blown a lot of money on porn lately so I won't be splashing out on any new subscriptions for a while, but this site looks very interesting and different.
It's aimed seemingly equally at gay men and straight women and seems to be a "arty", tasteful sort of site, just solos of men masturbating.

It's rare to see this kind of sites. It certainly makes a change from amateur sites or sites which self-consciously try to be "dirty" and tacky.

It might all be a bit soft-focus and softcore for me, but I have added the site to my list of sites to give a try to - not a bad monthly price either.

If anyone joins I'd love to see a review and have recommended it for one on TBP.

09-03-12  08:23am

Replies (0)
Reply
366
N/A Reply of Rick's Poll

Totally agree with you BadMrFrosty - the sites are such poor value I'm amazed anyone uses them.

Maybe if they were very cheap they'd be a good way of previewing videos in full to decide whether to join a site or download an individual video.

However in reality they are so expensive I can only assume people who don't know about regular sites, or for some reason don't trust regular sites but do trust these, are their only customers.

DRM-free downloads all the way for me!


09-01-12  02:31am

Reply
367
Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Comment

Do they use an independent biller? If so and you've already complained direct to the site and had no joy, contact them and say you want a refund based on the site not giving you what it promised. They often issue refunds in my experience.

08-30-12  09:57am

Reply
368
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Never watch it, there seems no point with the censorship. I don't understand it - if they think porn is inherently degrading just ban it outright - the censorship is just porn rendered pointless.

08-30-12  09:51am

Comment
369
Visit Str8 Hell

Str8 Hell
(0)

Kinda cheeky...

Naming this site "Str8Hell" when there was an existing site called "Straighthell" was naughty! Perhaps it's why Straighthell is now renamed BreederFuckers!

It's obviously on a very similar theme but the previews don't look up to the same standard - they use a lot of very similar ideas to Straighthell - pure conincidence I am sure - but it doesn't look as well done.

The preview scene of a woman fucking a man with a strap-on was a hoot - never have a seen such a bored-looking girl!

Looks like they're trying to combine lots of different ideas like CFNM as well as gay stuff into one site.

Interesting but I don't think I'll bother.

08-28-12  06:36pm

Replies (0)
Reply
370
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of slutty's Review

Superb review - the gold standard I aspire to and haven't yet achieved! I gotta take some tips?

08-28-12  04:21pm

Reply
371
N/A Reply of marcdc1's Poll

Only if exceptional, because I like dirty talk and roleplay and language is important in that. I guess in standard porn it doesn't matter, but I prefer some dialogue so it would be an issue for me.

08-28-12  04:19pm

Reply
372
Visit Tokyo Hot

Tokyo Hot
(0)
Reply of Toadsith's Comment

I wonder how they do this - I thought Japanese porn had to be censored by law? Perhaps it's okay to de-censor it outside the Japanese market? Perhaps this site isn't available in its uncensored form in Japan?

08-28-12  08:10am

Reply
373
Visit Digital Playground

Digital Playground
(0)
Reply of dextro's Comment

I am amazed at the significant minority of sites I keep finding which are download-only. I've only joined one once when I didn't even realise such sites existed! I won't be fooled twice. Streaming sites just aren't worth it to me, especially as many of them charge the same price as download ones.

08-27-12  03:24am

Reply
374
Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy
(0)
Reply of oldfizzywig's Review

Very comprehensive review, well done! Not sure I can suggest any improvements!

08-27-12  03:22am

Reply
375
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes absolutely. I won't join a site which doesn't use an independent biller that I recognise and trust - I simply don't trust a site which isn't prepared to do so.

It's frustrating because there's some great-looking sites out there that do their own billing and I am sure the majority are trustworthy, but I don't know which ones and I'm not prepared to take the risk.

I know it might seem obsessive but I've suffered bank fraud twice and whilst I got my money refunded both times, it's made me paranoid. The whole process is a real hassle and very stressful.

Ideally my favourite processor is Verotel, as I've found them the most helpful when I've needed support.

I will also use CCBill, but I find their support less helpful - often dismissive and slightly sarcastic - and of course CCBill offer regional pricing which I hate.

I haven't yet used any other billers, but I'd use Epoch as I've heard them mentioned favourably on here.

Any others people can confirm are safe?


08-26-12  04:20am


Shown : 351-375 of 707 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.35 seconds.