| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
651
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Tangub, re the lack of zips, and saving your pics as... have you not tried a download manager? DownThemAll for Firefox is free, and effortlessly downloads a whole page full of images.
Otherwise, thanks - as ever - for the review :)
|
06-04-11 04:40pm
|
Reply
652
|
Rate These Guys
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
Hmm... odd that they got banned from Twitter. I'm on a bot of a hiatus from it at the moment, but I was following a number of high profile porn stars, photographers, sites etc. I think you'd get banned for spamming, malware etc, but as long as you are a genuine user, I don't think they have any particular policy on adult content.
|
10-08-11 12:27am
|
Reply
653
|
Real Colorado Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Gosh :) Looks like they may be form the same folk who bring us Mastasia...
|
07-26-11 11:38pm
|
Reply
654
|
Real Colorado Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Well well... I knew about the fake gushing, but not about such skulduggery as passing off a dildo as the real thing. Is nothing sacred?
Still, least I'm one step closer to being a man of the world. ;)
|
07-25-11 11:11pm
|
Reply
655
|
Real Colorado Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
That did actually occur to me straight after posting the comment... but the site seems to feature material with dildos, so I'm guessing that's not it.
I wonder if there are any surgically enhanced male porn performers around? :|
|
07-24-11 06:44am
|
Comment
656
|
Real Colorado Girls
(0)
|
|
07-24-11 05:05am
Replies (8)
|
Reply
657
|
Riding Boots
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
Perhaps a bit too niche for me... there was a site listed here that was about boots in general, which appealed a bit more - but I think now defunct.
I think I'm in the minority by preferring winter for girls' apparel; most guys like to see girls in skimpy tops in the summer, but I prefer the winter when they get the boots on :)
|
12-06-11 11:55am
|
Reply
658
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
TalonIcefire's Reply
'In my study, I’ve got two projectors (portrait and landscape, respectively) set up to randomly showcase the various models.'
I have a shelf of racy books in my study, but you, sir, show true dedication :)
|
01-29-12 03:12pm
|
Reply
659
|
Rubber Passion
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Reply
Thanks for the tips - Latex Heaven is definitely more my sort of thing (lightweight? me?) Will also keep an eye out for Latexotica, since the link to Lilly Roma also looks like my sort of thing. Speaking of which, are you familiar with fetish/pinup model Mosh? She's not too explicit, but definitely my favourite model, bar none.
|
02-20-12 03:37pm
|
Reply
660
|
Rubber Passion
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Review
As per other users, welcome and thanks for a great review. A shame about the DRM and other issues with this site, which would be an immediate turn-off for me - besides which, although I like latex, I prefer milder, more glam-type fetishwear than seems to appear here. But either way, I look forward to more reviews from you!
|
02-19-12 10:38pm
|
Reply
661
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
mashy's Reply
Hmm... considering that 720p HD video is perhaps 3gb/hour, this site's limit allows downloading 12 hours of video a day, so approx 1TB over a month. If there's that much content that one person actually wants... definitely VFM that can't be argued with.
But mashy, you are right - no matter how profitable certain customers may or may not be, if their activity is within the allowed limits, then it's unprofessional to complain - a customer is a customer, and hopefully valued as such!
|
06-22-11 03:48pm
|
Reply
662
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I have to agree with pat362... whereas it's annoying when sites limit you to eg 2gb per day - stopping you even downloading just a few scenes in one go - bandwidth does cost the sites and 41GB is pretty generous.
Unless you were trying to download an entire site with eg a 3-day trial membership - which, to be fair, isn't really in the spirit of things - I can't imagine that being much of a restriction.
And if you can download >1TB of content for around $30, there's really not much of anything - porn or otherwise - that can compare in value :)
|
06-22-11 01:39am
|
Comment
663
|
Sausage Party
(0)
|
|
06-26-11 12:34am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
664
|
Secretease
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
This looks appealing, and from the preview, it seems to cover my definition of nudity (ie all the relevant, er, bits on display) - even if not yours (not a stitch on) :)
Just thought it worth noting since you compared it to the Only sites, which AFAIK don't show much of anything - I see that as far more of a divide.
|
12-21-11 07:08am
|
Reply
665
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I just finished a year's sub at The Life Erotic - am just now pondering what combination of TLE and SexArt to subscribe to.
But while at TLE, I took a couple of trials (they were 2-day for existing members) and I had no problems downloading anything, or subsequently cancelling.
Further to the webmaster's reply here, I also found MetArt customer service to be responsive (very quick!) and helpful when asking about various subs options.
|
02-02-14 02:16am
|
Reply
666
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Arlen84's Review
Like Parsnip, I don't necessarily have an issue with this. Like with file sizes on jpgs, bitrate doesn't necessarily define the quality; it also depends on the codec settings and the source material.
Not sure what it is on 1080, but the 720 videos I downloaded from SexArt and The Life Erotic are 2,000K and they look just fine - their style (whether you like it or not) is a little soft, which can contribute to the low bitrate rather than the other way around.
I did download 10,000K 720 videos from Twistys and it was a waste of space - I reencoded them at 4,000K with no discernable difference.
|
12-18-13 08:17am
|
Reply
667
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Parsnip's Reply
Looking forward to your TLE review - it's one of my favourite sites and the one I have a 1 year membership to. As you say, they often get the pictures right - make them genuinely erotic where Met Art (and SexArt on the photo side) fail.
BTW you may also like Babes - it's a little formulaic, but still not at all bad.
|
10-31-13 01:18am
|
Reply
668
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Parsnip's Review
Great review and welcome. I've just spent a couple of days at this site - a trial for being a member at TLE - and found much the same as you. The only real difference being that I thought the early arty, body-painting ones etc were too daft; I prefer the more recent more ordinary ones.
But otherwise concur - this is good stuff, well made and respectful. Like you I'm not a fan of anal and don't really feel it belongs in (although others are free to disagree!) in this kind of heartcore site, so I'm glad they've not done it here.
And agree completely about the pics! I find Met Art pics entirely insipid and the one here are too - I don't know how they are so unerotic when the videos are so good.
I also like that that it's not wholly fixated on 18-21 year olds, but still I'd like to see a few more girls 25-30+. Not sure if this beats Joymii, my favourite sex site so far, but it is good.
|
10-30-13 04:49pm
|
Reply
669
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks for a great review. I'm a recent convert to this genre, but this has helped me priotitise this site a bit; much as I like creative photography and camerawork, it sounds like they've erred on the arty side a bit much here. Much as I enjoyed X Art, I'm a bit suspicious of any sites with Art in the name; it's good to add aesthetic value, but we're still here for porn!
Oh, and I'm glad it's not just me that recognises that, although beautiful, most of the 18-22 year old models need just a few more years before being genuinely sensual...
|
09-16-12 04:17pm
|
Reply
670
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Abel Semen's Review
AS, thanks for testing the waters here and giving us such a good first review of this anticipated site. Although I find Met Art a bit bland, Sex Art appeals to me more - not specifically because of the extra explicitness, but because of the eroticism that I find MA lacks.
Sounds like it's worth waiting a little while for some more material - in particular, like you, I'd like to see a bit more boy-girl. Hardcore generally isn't my thing, but when it is, this is the sort of stuff I'd prefer - so meantime I may try Joymii, but Sex Art is definitely on the list.
|
04-18-12 02:31am
|
Reply
671
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
Looks like it might actually have some eroticism, compared to Met Art - worth keeping an eye on. And glad to see Alexis Texas on there, although I'm not generally into mainstream hardcore material, I'm quite fond of her.
I note with some amusement that they are still going with the ludicrous set names of Met Art - eg Stalagmitis, Prothimo, Falos (no, really)...
|
04-16-12 09:33am
|
Comment
672
|
Sexy Panthose Models
(0)
|
|
02-22-12 02:34am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
673
|
She Don't Blush
(0)
|
|
12-31-11 03:41am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
674
|
Shiny Sluts
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
Always good to hear your opinions, EP, thanks. I'll confess, I'm a bit of a lightweight when it comes to fetishwear - I like latex but don't go for the full encasements as much as you.
I actually quite like Forever Vamp and in theory Shiny Sluts is the kind of material I like - but looking at the limited preview, it does look a little lacking in atmosphere.
I'll reread your excellent reviews to see where else I might try, but in the meantime, although it's a different direction, I'm tempted by Alta Heels...
|
11-19-11 10:34am
|
Reply
675
|
Smelly Dick
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
I noticed this one too... and - purely out of morbid interest (er, dicks are not really my thing, clean or smelly) clicked through to the site. Not recommended - although perhaps amusing for Red Dwarf fans...
|
12-05-12 05:28pm
|
