Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
676
|
Alt Exclusive
(0)
|
|
03-16-11 02:56am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
677
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Thanks tangub! Your own reviews always appreciated - looks like we agreed on this site too.
|
03-14-11 12:09am
|
Reply
678
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's not something I openly admit to... but I do find myself increasingly hinting at it in polite company - probably to do with getting older and caring less about raising the odd eyebrow...
|
03-13-11 03:00am
|
Reply
679
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
I'm with BadMrFrosty, agree there's a distinction! :D
I like and enjoy regular (whatever that means) porn, but I'm not sure I'd consider myself a collector of it. But where it falls in my area of interest - pinups, erotica, nylon/latex fetish - then I do keep (and revisit) any good material I find.
|
03-12-11 05:38am
|
Reply
680
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Pretty much concur with messmer - this is a tricky one to vote on.
If I'm a long-term member of a site that updates daily, I might visit a couple of times a week to see what's new.
On the other hand, if I'm subscribing for a month, I might visit every day for a week or so and work my way through the site, downloading what I like - then visit back a couple of times a week for the remainder of the subscription to pick up any new stuff.
|
03-12-11 04:40am
|
Reply
681
|
Hot Pics Direct
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
Well, good point - it is what is is so I'm not really complaining as such.
It just seems an odd model; I can't see that the material is unique enough to warrant it when there are many sites around offering their whole catalogue to download from for a similar fee.
|
03-09-11 02:50pm
|
Comment
682
|
Hot Pics Direct
(0)
|
|
03-09-11 07:31am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
683
|
I Am Trouble
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Review
Thanks for this helpful review, PP. I'm a huge fan of this kind of pinup/fetish/glamour content, and am very familiar (well, not quite as much as I'd like to be...) with Ms Max from various books, magazines and sites she appears in.
Great to know that her own site is also good, and that she's as charming as I'd imagined! Suspect I'll join Mosh's site before Masuimi's, but I'll be interested to see how it compares.
|
03-09-11 04:56am
|
Reply
684
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Anal doesn't really work for me in general, so I'd have to say no on this one.
|
03-08-11 08:01am
|
Reply
685
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Just getting a new one, the last couple lasting me 3 years apiece. I work in IT and like to keep reasonably current... but I have a lot of stuff set up on my computer and its a PITA to do it again, so I try not to upgrade too often!
|
03-05-11 01:21am
|
Reply
686
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I do wonder why some sites still post 1200px or 1600px when, for probably the past 5 years, even a relatively modest camera will produce 3K or 4K pics :|
But agree re photoshopping!
|
03-04-11 11:38pm
|
Reply
687
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I like interviews, but as others have said, it depends on the interviewer. If it's a girl, cool; but many of the guys just ask really inane stuff.
On sites that post multiple videos of any given model, I like to see one that's just an interview - it then makes their other videos and/or photo sets that bit sexier to know a bit about what she's like.
|
03-04-11 02:29am
|
Reply
688
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
4K is a pretty good size for pics - I'd prefer to see at least 2K and ideally 3K on sites I like.
If you're really into the details, then newer sets Hegre-Art are almost 9K!
|
03-04-11 01:00am
|
Reply
689
|
1Pondo.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
Some time ago, I subscribed to a site in the same network and found the same issue - probably in common with some other folk here, I have a separate webmail address (gmail in this case) for, er, extra-curricular activities.
I got round it by setting up a dummy address on one of my personal domains and forwarding it to my gmail account. Works fine, but obviously only if you have a domain you can play with.
Depending on your ISP, you may be able to play around with their email setup? Eg some ISPs may give you an address of anything@slutty.isp.com and give you the tools to forward varations of the anything@ etc.
|
03-04-11 12:57am
|
Reply
690
|
Latex Style
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Review
Thanks for the review, which I read with interest, although my own interest in latex is a little milder and doesn't go as far as the full body and face variety. But looking at this site, and some others you've reviewed, I can see the appeal...
|
02-25-11 02:47pm
|
Reply
691
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I really like the fact that nowadays, it can be more of a personal choice with more things being web-based, and less reliance on OS-specific applications.
10 years ago, I was building GUI software that had to be run on Mac or Windows. Now, with very few exceptions, I'm building web apps instead - I only care where and what my server is, but users can be Mac/Windows/Linux/Android/iOS - anything with browser.
|
02-25-11 08:59am
|
Reply
692
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Well, I have, on a number of PCs, downloaded and burned a Ubuntu/UNR ISO, started from the CD, said yes to everything in the GUI install, and ended up with a good, working computer for browsing and other typical tasks - with no tweaking or configuring. I guess I've just been lucky!
However, I'm not willing to bet any organs, let alone the reproductive ones... so by that measure, you win :)
|
02-25-11 06:36am
|
Reply
693
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
I'd argue that Windows is more of a tax - if I want a Linux computer, chances are I have to pay for Windows anyway as part of the price, and then get rid of it. Whereas anyone paying the - admittedly steep - premium for a Mac is doing so because they want Mac OS in the first place.
Anyway, agree that Linux can be fiddly, and if I was doing all my usual stuff on it (I'm also working in IT), it would drive me nuts - but Ubuntu has installed and worked well on any old PC I've tried it on without any tinkering and I'd still recommend if it you use a PC largely for web browsing (and especially UNR, which I far prefer to Windows on a netbook).
|
02-25-11 04:37am
|
Reply
694
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
BadMrFrosty, stop being pedantic :) The question is, after all, which OS do you use... did it start out as which computer do you use?
Anyway, I use everything for work but am largely a Mac user - I'm not the zealot I once was, and it's not perfect, but it is stable and secure. lk2fireone, you are right in that Mac OS is easier to use - that's subjective but I've never had any malware issues and don't even use any AV software.
I'd definitely recommend Mac OS, but you do pay quite a premium for it - I'm looking at £1000 for a new laptop, vs £600 for a similar spec Windows machine (albeit not as svelte).
What I really wish, though is that more folk were aware of Linux - it's free and some versions of it now are very user friendly, more secure, and IMHO a better fit for many folk than Windows. Unfortunately PC makers are heavily incentivised by Microsoft not to offer Linux pre-installed, hence you always end up paying for Windows.
|
02-25-11 03:00am
|
Reply
695
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks messmer - I have a couple more impending reviews coming up, so I'm sure I shall continue to baffle and confound you :)
|
02-24-11 11:05pm
|
Reply
696
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I'm feeling somewhat guilty for messmer's disappointment with this site, since I did strongly recommend it and I'm sorry it didn't work for you.
However, despite that, it still remains my favourite site (and have been through a number more since my review) - it might be relatively soft and perhaps the photography might be seen as too artsy by some folks, but I find it much more erotic and exciting than the other art-nude sites. And there aren't many sites run by a single photographer that manage daily updates - there is either a high res set of maybe 80 pics or a HD video of 6-10 mins every day.
I also had no problems managing my subscription via Billing France -which although not as familiar as CCBill, seems to work well (and is a lot less esoteric than Allopass which I have come across on other French sites). And the photographer/webmaster is helpful and enthusiastic in the members' forum.
tangub, if you've not visited lately, the recent redesign gives you a slightly better flavour of the site now.
|
02-24-11 06:49am
|
Reply
697
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Many thanks Capn... as you say, it's very Japanese - I've visited there a couple of times and they do like their loyalty schemes, systems etc.
Anyway, will add it to the list and take my chances sometime, hopefully not too much of what I'm after will need points!
|
02-24-11 12:05am
|
Reply
698
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
Cap'n, sorry for asking you to cast your mind back... while you were enrolled here, did you ever figure out the points system?
I'm generally not into gravure - the girls are lovely, but I find it all a bit wholesome for my liking - smiling girls in flowery bikinis and the like ;)
But I found one section of this site - 'feti style' - that really appeals to me. But since it's the main area of interest, I'm not sure if I'd subscribe if a large chunk of it isn't available on an initial subscription. Is the point-blocking across all sets?
Anyway don't worry if it escapes you, it all seems a bit bizarre...
|
02-23-11 12:06pm
|
Reply
699
|
Katie K Official
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Well, I'm not so much into the male-bashing thing - femdom/humiliation doesn't really work for me. But I just find a bit of racy chat in a solo video - eg the girl talking (graphically) about what she's doing, what she likes etc - is far more exciting than the bland music they usually throw over the top instead.
|
02-21-11 11:11pm
|
Reply
700
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
And just this week, I see a couple of really nice updates, I like the direction it's going in... I may not stay subscribed, but I will very likely visit again in a few months. As Cap'n says, still great value!
|
02-20-11 09:12am
|