Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : otoh (0)  

Feedback:   All (754)  |   Reviews (27)  |   Comments (84)  |   Replies (643)

Other:   Replies Received (336)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 676-700 of 754 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Comment
676
Visit Alt Exclusive

Alt Exclusive
(0)

My kind of alt

Thanks TBP staff for adding this one for me - this site looks tailor-made for me (they shouldn't have...) and I'm rather excited about joining up as soon as budget allows.

Review will hopefully be soon, but meantime this is definitely worth a look for latex/pinup/alt fans...

Same goes for other new addition, The Mosh Room.

03-16-11  02:56am

Replies (0)
Reply
677
Visit Holly Randall

Holly Randall
(0)
Reply of tangub's Reply

Thanks tangub! Your own reviews always appreciated - looks like we agreed on this site too.

03-14-11  12:09am

Reply
678
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It's not something I openly admit to... but I do find myself increasingly hinting at it in polite company - probably to do with getting older and caring less about raising the odd eyebrow...

03-13-11  03:00am

Reply
679
N/A Reply of BadMrFrosty's Reply

I'm with BadMrFrosty, agree there's a distinction! :D

I like and enjoy regular (whatever that means) porn, but I'm not sure I'd consider myself a collector of it. But where it falls in my area of interest - pinups, erotica, nylon/latex fetish - then I do keep (and revisit) any good material I find.


03-12-11  05:38am

Reply
680
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

Pretty much concur with messmer - this is a tricky one to vote on.

If I'm a long-term member of a site that updates daily, I might visit a couple of times a week to see what's new.

On the other hand, if I'm subscribing for a month, I might visit every day for a week or so and work my way through the site, downloading what I like - then visit back a couple of times a week for the remainder of the subscription to pick up any new stuff.


03-12-11  04:40am

Reply
681
Visit Hot Pics Direct

Hot Pics Direct
(0)
Reply of anyonebutme's Reply

Well, good point - it is what is is so I'm not really complaining as such.

It just seems an odd model; I can't see that the material is unique enough to warrant it when there are many sites around offering their whole catalogue to download from for a similar fee.


03-09-11  02:50pm

Comment
682
Visit Hot Pics Direct

Hot Pics Direct
(0)

Not much appeal

This caught my eye when listed on TBP, since I see a couple of models I like there. But a further look reveals it to be a bit baffling...

Pics are pay-per set - $5-$10; OR for $30/month, you get 50 credits, with 5 extra for each month you are a member. Sets require 3-5 credits, so you might only get 10 sets.

Plus, some of the sample pics are badged with the model's own name, so I assume they are not exclusive either.

Am struggling to find the point here!

03-09-11  07:31am

Replies (3)
Reply
683
Visit I Am Trouble

I Am Trouble
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Review

Thanks for this helpful review, PP. I'm a huge fan of this kind of pinup/fetish/glamour content, and am very familiar (well, not quite as much as I'd like to be...) with Ms Max from various books, magazines and sites she appears in.

Great to know that her own site is also good, and that she's as charming as I'd imagined! Suspect I'll join Mosh's site before Masuimi's, but I'll be interested to see how it compares.


03-09-11  04:56am

Reply
684
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Anal doesn't really work for me in general, so I'd have to say no on this one.

03-08-11  08:01am

Reply
685
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Just getting a new one, the last couple lasting me 3 years apiece. I work in IT and like to keep reasonably current... but I have a lot of stuff set up on my computer and its a PITA to do it again, so I try not to upgrade too often!

03-05-11  01:21am

Reply
686
Visit Wicked Pictures

Wicked Pictures
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Reply

I do wonder why some sites still post 1200px or 1600px when, for probably the past 5 years, even a relatively modest camera will produce 3K or 4K pics :|

But agree re photoshopping!


03-04-11  11:38pm

Reply
687
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

I like interviews, but as others have said, it depends on the interviewer. If it's a girl, cool; but many of the guys just ask really inane stuff.

On sites that post multiple videos of any given model, I like to see one that's just an interview - it then makes their other videos and/or photo sets that bit sexier to know a bit about what she's like.


03-04-11  02:29am

Reply
688
Visit Wicked Pictures

Wicked Pictures
(0)
Reply of PinkPanther's Comment

4K is a pretty good size for pics - I'd prefer to see at least 2K and ideally 3K on sites I like.

If you're really into the details, then newer sets Hegre-Art are almost 9K!


03-04-11  01:00am

Reply
689
Visit 1Pondo.tv

1Pondo.tv
(0)
Reply of slutty's Comment

Some time ago, I subscribed to a site in the same network and found the same issue - probably in common with some other folk here, I have a separate webmail address (gmail in this case) for, er, extra-curricular activities.

I got round it by setting up a dummy address on one of my personal domains and forwarding it to my gmail account. Works fine, but obviously only if you have a domain you can play with.

Depending on your ISP, you may be able to play around with their email setup? Eg some ISPs may give you an address of anything@slutty.isp.com and give you the tools to forward varations of the anything@ etc.


03-04-11  12:57am

Reply
690
Visit Latex Style

Latex Style
(0)
Reply of Ergo Proxy's Review

Thanks for the review, which I read with interest, although my own interest in latex is a little milder and doesn't go as far as the full body and face variety. But looking at this site, and some others you've reviewed, I can see the appeal...

02-25-11  02:47pm

Reply
691
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I really like the fact that nowadays, it can be more of a personal choice with more things being web-based, and less reliance on OS-specific applications.

10 years ago, I was building GUI software that had to be run on Mac or Windows. Now, with very few exceptions, I'm building web apps instead - I only care where and what my server is, but users can be Mac/Windows/Linux/Android/iOS - anything with browser.


02-25-11  08:59am

Reply
692
N/A Reply of BadMrFrosty's Reply

Well, I have, on a number of PCs, downloaded and burned a Ubuntu/UNR ISO, started from the CD, said yes to everything in the GUI install, and ended up with a good, working computer for browsing and other typical tasks - with no tweaking or configuring. I guess I've just been lucky!

However, I'm not willing to bet any organs, let alone the reproductive ones... so by that measure, you win :)


02-25-11  06:36am

Reply
693
N/A Reply of BadMrFrosty's Reply

I'd argue that Windows is more of a tax - if I want a Linux computer, chances are I have to pay for Windows anyway as part of the price, and then get rid of it. Whereas anyone paying the - admittedly steep - premium for a Mac is doing so because they want Mac OS in the first place.

Anyway, agree that Linux can be fiddly, and if I was doing all my usual stuff on it (I'm also working in IT), it would drive me nuts - but Ubuntu has installed and worked well on any old PC I've tried it on without any tinkering and I'd still recommend if it you use a PC largely for web browsing (and especially UNR, which I far prefer to Windows on a netbook).


02-25-11  04:37am

Reply
694
N/A Reply of BadMrFrosty's Reply

BadMrFrosty, stop being pedantic :) The question is, after all, which OS do you use... did it start out as which computer do you use?

Anyway, I use everything for work but am largely a Mac user - I'm not the zealot I once was, and it's not perfect, but it is stable and secure. lk2fireone, you are right in that Mac OS is easier to use - that's subjective but I've never had any malware issues and don't even use any AV software.

I'd definitely recommend Mac OS, but you do pay quite a premium for it - I'm looking at £1000 for a new laptop, vs £600 for a similar spec Windows machine (albeit not as svelte).

What I really wish, though is that more folk were aware of Linux - it's free and some versions of it now are very user friendly, more secure, and IMHO a better fit for many folk than Windows. Unfortunately PC makers are heavily incentivised by Microsoft not to offer Linux pre-installed, hence you always end up paying for Windows.


02-25-11  03:00am

Reply
695
Visit Petites Parisiennes

Petites Parisiennes
(0)
Reply of messmer's Reply

Thanks messmer - I have a couple more impending reviews coming up, so I'm sure I shall continue to baffle and confound you :)

02-24-11  11:05pm

Reply
696
Visit Petites Parisiennes

Petites Parisiennes
(0)
Reply of tangub's Reply

I'm feeling somewhat guilty for messmer's disappointment with this site, since I did strongly recommend it and I'm sorry it didn't work for you.

However, despite that, it still remains my favourite site (and have been through a number more since my review) - it might be relatively soft and perhaps the photography might be seen as too artsy by some folks, but I find it much more erotic and exciting than the other art-nude sites. And there aren't many sites run by a single photographer that manage daily updates - there is either a high res set of maybe 80 pics or a HD video of 6-10 mins every day.

I also had no problems managing my subscription via Billing France -which although not as familiar as CCBill, seems to work well (and is a lot less esoteric than Allopass which I have come across on other French sites). And the photographer/webmaster is helpful and enthusiastic in the members' forum.

tangub, if you've not visited lately, the recent redesign gives you a slightly better flavour of the site now.


02-24-11  06:49am

Reply
697
Visit Graphis

Graphis
(0)
Reply of Capn's Reply

Many thanks Capn... as you say, it's very Japanese - I've visited there a couple of times and they do like their loyalty schemes, systems etc.

Anyway, will add it to the list and take my chances sometime, hopefully not too much of what I'm after will need points!


02-24-11  12:05am

Reply
698
Visit Graphis

Graphis
(0)
Reply of Capn's Review

Cap'n, sorry for asking you to cast your mind back... while you were enrolled here, did you ever figure out the points system?

I'm generally not into gravure - the girls are lovely, but I find it all a bit wholesome for my liking - smiling girls in flowery bikinis and the like ;)

But I found one section of this site - 'feti style' - that really appeals to me. But since it's the main area of interest, I'm not sure if I'd subscribe if a large chunk of it isn't available on an initial subscription. Is the point-blocking across all sets?

Anyway don't worry if it escapes you, it all seems a bit bizarre...


02-23-11  12:06pm

Reply
699
Visit Katie K Official

Katie K Official
(0)
Reply of graymane's Reply

Well, I'm not so much into the male-bashing thing - femdom/humiliation doesn't really work for me. But I just find a bit of racy chat in a solo video - eg the girl talking (graphically) about what she's doing, what she likes etc - is far more exciting than the bland music they usually throw over the top instead.

02-21-11  11:11pm

Reply
700
Visit Figure Baby

Figure Baby
(0)
Reply of tangub's Comment

And just this week, I see a couple of really nice updates, I like the direction it's going in... I may not stay subscribed, but I will very likely visit again in a few months. As Cap'n says, still great value!

02-20-11  09:12am


Shown : 676-700 of 754 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.37 seconds.