| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1026
|
Real Peachez
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Picture sets are available in 3 sizes (since March 2010) with the largest being upto 2048 x 1365 px with a zip download for each.
Decent amount of content for a solo model site with 392 photo sets and 127 videos dating as far back as January 2005.
Latest videos look good at 1280 x 720 up to 8000k on average.
Still updating but not as frequently (see con)
Billing by epoch.
Full access trial. |
| Cons: |
The biggest con for me being a picture collector was finding out there is a daily limit of 16 on the number of picture zip sets that can be downloaded, I found this to be the case on the trial membership and also on the 1 month membership I purchased afterwards. Downloaded 4 GB of video though one evening without hitting a limit so I guess they are just over protective of the picture sets
Navigation could be improved
Some of the older videos poor quality
Some dead links/missing galleries
Site claims to update 4 times a week but nowhere near this in recent months. So far 2 weeks in to September only 1 new gallery added. Recent months updates August: 8 photo, 4 Video, July: 3 photo, 3 video, June: 5 photo, 1 video, May: 4 photo, 1 video
Some photo sets a bit over the top with the air brushing, more evident in recent sets. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the website of cute American teen model Sarah Peachez. Although her site has been going nearly 6 years and shes now 25 she still maintains that cute teen image and doesnt look a lot different in the newest content compared to the oldest apart from a change of hair colour away from the blonde in recent months. I originally signed up for the 3 day trial and cancelled within 30 minutes after being pissed off by the limitation on zip gallery downloads but after the 3 days I was hungry for some more of Sarah so I signed up again for the month
With so many picture sets and videos of 1 model it would be easy to become bored quickly but I found Sarah keeps me interested because she appears in such a large variety of cute costumes, outfits and sexy lingerie shot in a good variety of locations.
Navigation could be improved, if you click on pictures or videos you are taken to a page with the most recent 20 updates in date order, clicking next takes you to the next oldest 20 and so on. If you want to reach the oldest photo sets you have to click through 20 pages to reach them. A link or a drop down menu of page numbers would be useful. The only other way of browsing pictures of videos is by category, solo, Girl/girl, toy, hardcore and guest models.
The majority of the content is just Sarah posing with some masturbation and toys with a minimal amount of girl/girl and hardcore sets which just consist of blowjob or handjob scenes, no full sex here. Theres also an archive of webcam shows which gives you an extra 114 videos to download about 20 minutes each but no new ones added since 2008. The only other extras you will find are a brief bio, forum and a blog plus a link to Sarahs online store where you can purchase such delights as signed photos or Sarahs used lingerie.
Overall a fairly decent site as far as solo model ones go but had it not been for the half price offer I probably wouldnt have bothered as I find it hard to justify paying 30 bucks for a solo site unless its part of a network or has some decent bonus sites If the update rate gets back to what it used to be, they improve navigation and get rid of the mean daily download limit on zips I might score it an 85 but as of now 78. |
|
09-14-10 04:56am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
1027
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
You seem to be making a good arguement in favour of webmasters who charge customers $30 for content that can be downloaded in a day.
I'm certainly not interested in ripping the whole site in a day as i'm not even remotely interested in the videos which use the highest bandwidth. All i wanted was a collection of her solo photoshoots and at the end of the day i'm paying a premium price at $4.47 for 3 days access compared to around $15 for the whole month so being restricted to such a limited amount of downloads does feel like i've been ripped off. If they had clearly stated that download limits apply then i would have had the choice to either subscribe for the month or not at all, just seems like a shady business practise to me.
It could also be argued that 4 cents per photoset is expensive when compared to sites like MET or ATK where you can download as many as you want in a day.
|
08-30-10 03:26am
|
Comment
1028
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
|
08-29-10 11:43am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
1029
|
Rigin Studio
(0)
|
|
01-07-13 09:41am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1030
|
Ripe Flesh
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
LOL....sorry to disappoint messmer, sadly looks like only ripe young teens here.
|
11-21-11 01:35pm
|
Reply
1031
|
Ripe Flesh
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Oh yes so it does, i never noticed that before....looks like one or two models are non nude or topless only. Another thing i just noticed when checking it again are the given dates for all the picture and video updates seem to be February 2009 which would seem to indicate it's just an archive site without any current updates.....unless anyone knows differently.
|
11-20-11 02:48pm
|
Comment
1032
|
Ripe Flesh
(0)
|
|
11-20-11 01:08pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
1033
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
Ok, thanks for the update Amanda.
|
08-12-15 03:54pm
|
Reply
1034
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
The regional pricing scam is still very much alive and kicking Cap'n, in fact I'm finding it difficult to find any site of interest these days that doesn't add at least 20% to the exchange rate which is why I rarely sign up for anything now unless I have an unbeatable email promo price.
|
08-12-15 03:53pm
|
Comment
1035
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
|
08-07-15 09:45am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1036
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
Jent's Comment
I would have thought that damn toothbrush would have been worn out by now, he was using it in nearly every video when I had a membership about 10 years ago. This was one of the first sites I ever joined way back then and I would agree with you that I found it a big disappointment even back then and I've never been back since. I guess he still hasn't learned to shut the fuck up during the videos?
|
02-24-13 01:48pm
|
Reply
1037
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
Ron Harris was about the 3rd or 4th pay site i ever joined way back in 2003 and judging by your review it doesn't sound like an awful lot has changed in 9 years. This has got to be one of the most overrated sites on the internet and to this day is still one of the most disappointing I have ever joined.
|
02-26-12 12:59pm
|
Reply
1038
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
This was one of the first paysites i ever joined back in 2003 and even back then there were big gaps in the update schedule. One of the most disappointing sites i've ever joined. I was tempted to join on a special 2 month deal they had but i was done within 2 weeks and i only had a 512k connection back then..
|
12-28-10 05:44am
|
Review
1039
|
Royal Boobs
(0)
58.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of a network of 13 sites
Discount price of $19.95 available through TBP or $9.95 for returning members via email link
Billing by Epoch with no regional variation
Zip downloads
No download limits |
| Cons: |
Non exclusive content
Content not dated
No browse or search features
No model info
No updates
Only 9 low res videos |
| Bottom Line: |
This is small bonus site that comes along with the network that includes Babelicious, Sexy Babes and Babes.tv.. On first logging into this site it took me less than 5 minutes to realise there is absolutely nothing to interest me here. Not only is the content here non exclusive, its not even exclusive within this network of sites as it appears to be just a selction of the big breasted models pulled from the other sites and thrown together to create another site. Immediately I recognised most of the models and photo content here that I had already seen when I first joined the Sexy Babes and Dream Babes sites around 5 years ago. The content is not dated and theres no updates and I would guess there is nothing in this site much newer than 5 years old.
As for the actual content there is 57 models, generally a few photo sets each with the photo size being mostly 1024 x 684 px, a mixture of solo and hardcore and a zip provided should you find anything interesting enough to download. As for the videos page youll find 9 hardcore scenes featuring big breasted women about 20 minutes long but the quality is quite weak at 480 x 360 @ 1036 kbps and only available in windows media format.
For me this is a poor site and doesnt add anything to the network |
|
10-31-10 04:03pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
1040
|
Rylsky Art
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
PU/TBP Discounted price.
High quality photo and video content.
Multiple download and streaming options for videos.
Photos available in 3 different resolutions with a zip download for each.
Regular updates.
Excellent navigation and search tools.
User comments and ratings. |
| Cons: |
Sites in the Met Art Network seem to have adopted the worst kind of regional pricing where $1 (USD) = 1 (GBP).
Too many photo sets start out with the model already nude or nearly nude.
Anyone who prefers videos would find the collection rather small here. |
| Bottom Line: |
Rylsky is one of the more popular photographers featured on Met Art and this site is devoted to his work having started up in September 2012 and with consistent updates has grown in to a collection of approximately 218 models, 824 photo sets (around 50,000 total pics) and 86 movies. Updates come regularly but not quite daily, averaging about 5/6 sets a week.
The photos come in 3 sizes with the largest size going up to 3744 x 5616px, a medium size at 1365 x 2048px and a small size at 682 x 1024px. A zip is available for all 3 sizes and as is normal for sites in the Met Art network the zip file names always include the date of the set, the name of the model and title of the set which I love. One of my pet hates are sites that make you mess around having to rename everything you download. The majority of the photo sets are solo and fairly softcore although most sets do give you some spread and close up shots with occasional finger insertions. There is a small number of two girl sets and also a few backstage sets.
The videos have up to 6 download options 1080p, 720p, 360p, 270p, WMV and Divx avi. The 1080p videos that I downloaded were in mp4 format with a 5000 kbps bitrate and looked excellent on my 24 inch monitor. This is primarily a photography site with photo sets outnumbering videos by about 10 to 1. Average run time of the videos is around 5 minutes. I have to admit I've always found the videos of Met Art Network sites rather boring and this site was no different for me.
The layout and navigation of the site is pretty much the same as other sites in the Met Art Network that I've previously had memberships to with all the usual search features and settings options including the user defined tags. There is user interaction in the form of ratings and the possibility to leave comments. Quite often you will see the Photographer Rylsky replying to feedback from users.
The only reason I joined this site was because of an email promo I received a couple of years ago when the site was fairly new with the offer price of $7.99, surprisingly the link still worked even after a couple of years. Other than cheap email offers I have to say that the Met Art Network sites have lost me as a customer as long as they persist with the $1 = 1 regional pricing. The site was ok for what I paid but in general I like to see models starting out in a bit more clothing with a bit more tease but I knew what to expect here so I can't really complain too much. |
|
07-08-15 02:16pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1041
|
Rylsky Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
If you've been a member of Met-Art before and receive their promotional emails there's been a couple in recent weeks to join this for $7.99. I bookmarked the link from that email and the promotional price still works for me. Agreed though I certainly wouldn't pay the full price of $30 for the amount of content that is available at the moment.
|
01-03-13 09:37am
|
Reply
1042
|
Saint Paul Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
yadayada321's Comment
Looking forward to reading the review on this one, i've had it in my "to join" list for a while, those latin girls look soooo cute.
|
04-11-10 02:14am
|
Reply
1043
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Hardy214's Review
How did you manage to sign up without noticing which billing company you were using, did you not keep the confirmation email? As Sevrin said seems like user error.
|
08-13-10 03:35am
|
Reply
1044
|
Scandinavian Feet
(0)
|
Reply of
Berrinchez's Comment
You've described the exact same thing i experienced with a subscription to Beautiful Nude.biz back in January of this year and i can see from the tour of Scandinavian Feet that they use the exact same site design so i can totally understand your frustration. This is the extract copy and pasted from my review describing it:
"Sadly for those of us who like to collect the full photo sets this site makes it really hard work. Theres no complete set zip downloads, you can only zip the 20 photos on the page youre viewing, first you have to check the photos you want or click check all, then select the size from the dropdown menu, then click download zip and then just wait because you cant navigate to the next page until the zip has finished downloading. Eventually you end up with 4 or 5 zips for each photoset which then have to be extracted and cut and paste all the photos into one folder. Add in the frustration of pages that take ages to load and often slow download speeds and it all becomes so tedious I could hardly be bothered to enjoy what I downloaded."
It's a shame because it looks like they have some hot models there at Scandinavian Feet but seeing that site design and your comment here i couldn't put myself through that frustration again.
|
09-19-11 11:29pm
|
Reply
1045
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
Wow amazing, you even won $150 for this sham review, and your alias BatorAly also won another $100 for the original review of Gender X whose bottom line you copied and pasted here LOL. Clearly the PU admin just dish out raffle tickets these days without even reading or checking the submitted reviews. This site has become a joke.
|
01-17-24 01:31am
|
Reply
1046
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
KayTBuffs's Review
Hmmmm seems you've screwed up here. The bottom line appears to be about a site called Gender X not Sex Art. And coincidentally it's word for word identical to the BatorAly review of Gender X immediately below it. Does this mean that KayTBuffs and BatorAly are the same person using 2 accounts to scam the raffle for double prizes?
|
01-10-24 06:23am
|
Reply
1047
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
It was easy enough to do, the download links for the older versions of Firefox can be found on the Mozilla website.
If you do decide to go back to the old version the main thing to remember to do after you install it is to go into the browser settings and check the box "never check for updates" and also make sure you uncheck the box "use a background service to install updates" to stop other applications such as your anti-virus from automatically updating your browser. I missed the box about the background service first time around, turned my pc on the next morning to find that the old browser had gone and the new one was back again so had to reinstall the old version a second time.
|
10-02-18 03:09am
|
Reply
1048
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Your memory is quite correct, yes you did ask me before and yes I am running an old version of Firefox so that I can continue to use DTA. When the new Firefox was forced upon us and I lost the use of DTA I did try another couple of download managers but just couldn't get to grips with them as I'm not that technically minded, it took me several years of trying before I really got the hang of DTA so I just went back in time and reinstalled the older version of Firefox to get back the use of DTA. As far as I was concerned the new Firefox served no useful purpose without DTA.
|
10-01-18 04:40pm
|
Review
1049
|
Sex Art
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Discounted join price through PU/TBP. Special deals to join for less than $10 can often be found during holidays.
Exclusive content.
Daily updates, usually a photo gallery one day followed by a movie the next.
Photos available in small (1024px), medium (2048px) and large (4300px minimum and up) with a zip download for each.
Download options for films are 270p, 360p, 720p, 1080p and 4k although not all films have the 4k option. Films can also be streamed online in the same options up to 1080p.
Good download speeds.
No problems using my download manager.
Site layout and navigation is the same as other sites in the Met Art Network giving you all the usual browse and search options as well as being able to rate the content, add comments and add favourites.
Excellent file naming of photo zips including site name, date, model name, set name and photographer. Zips also include the photo set cover and a .txt file containing the model's biographical details. |
| Cons: |
I've mentioned it before on other sites in the Met Art Network, I don't like the deceptive regional billing practise where they display a join price with a US Dollar symbol but when I check my card statement I find I've been charged the same figure but in UK pounds which is about 30% more.
I also don't like the fact that when I sign up I am then automatically signed up to and issued with a password for the associated cam sites. I have zero interest in cam sites. The biller is ECHST.net, other PU members have reported fraudulent or unauthorised charges relating to this biller and cam sites, for this reason I will now only use a prepaid card when joining any of the Met Art Network sites. Also watch out for the drop down menu with another purchase preselected. |
| Bottom Line: |
Sex Art is a difficult site for me to review and score because I have absolutely no interest in the Heartcore style porn movies which are the main feature of the site. The reason I was drawn to the site was discovering that a lot of my favourite softcore models from the other sites in the Met Art Network have a large number of solo photo sets here. My current favourite model Milena D has a whopping 43 photo sets here and other favourites of mine including Melena A, Mila Azul, Lorena B, Caprice A (Little Caprice), Emily Bloom, Dido, and my favourite Redhead Mia Sollis all have between 15 and 30 photo sets each. Another Redhead I'd not really noticed before named Michelle H here (sometimes known as Red Fox on other sites) caught my eye and she looked particularly stunning in her sets here.
The photo sets here on the whole are more explicit than at Met Art, the models will spread their pussies, insert fingers and often use sex toys on themselves. Most of the photo updates these days are solo sets but oddly they don't ever seem to add any new solo videos these days.
The site has been online since April 2012 and has built up a collection of 989 films, 1384 photo galleries featuring 571 models and 50 artists. In addition they have what they call “staff Selections” which are additional films available to purchase individually at prices ranging from $3.99 for the 720p to $5.99 for the 4K version. I'm not a fan of paying again for additional content when I've already paid to join the site.
Whilst my main interests here are the photo galleries I did however attempt to watch a few of the films but quite frankly as a male watching alone I can say I was bored shitless by the romantic, slushy, heartcore style of porn but I can see the possible attraction of it to women or couples watching together, it's just not my cup of tea. The production values however are top drawer, the sound, lighting, setting and music all combine to create the perfect ambience. The 1080p movies I downloaded had a bitrate of 8000k and came in at around 1.5 GB for a 25 minute movie. I didn't try any of the 4k movies as I don't have a 4k monitor and I doubt that my low spec pc would be able to play them without crashing. Not all updates come with the 4k option but in the sort options you have the option to select only the 4k movies if that is your desire.. The movies also come with a matching photo set with downloadable zips in 3 different sizes the same as the regular photo galleries.
In my personal ratings I would put Sex Art below other sites in the Met Art Network such as Met Art, Erotic Beauty and Errotica Archives as those other sites produce more of what I like therefore I'm going to score Sex Art an 85. As long as they keep updating with the solo photo sets it's a site I will surely come back to from time to time. |
|
10-01-18 03:54pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1050
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
I did take a free trial to Sex Art via an email offer at the back end of 2012. I didn't encounter any download restrictions and was able to download everything I wanted within a couple of hours then cancelled. I had no problems cancelling since CCBill was the biller and I didn't have any problems with unexpected charges. I'm pretty sure you can trust those free trial offers for Sex Art or any of the Met Art group of sites.
|
02-05-14 02:01pm
|
