| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
651
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
I'm in the same boat really....there's only a couple of sites in the network that interest me so I find the regular join price in Euros prohibitively expensive. I think i'm getting those offers because a couple of times i've started the sign up process by entering my email address on their website and then not gone through with the sign up.
|
07-19-12 12:18am
|
Comment
652
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
|
07-16-12 03:18pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
653
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
I only wish I could sign up for $30 but with their prices being in euros my end it always works out a lot more expensive. I've had DDF sites bookmarked as a possible join for about 7 years now but i'm afraid with their euro prices I always find something else better value for money to join, factor in their unfamiliar billing processor with pre checked cross sells and they have no chance of getting a membership out of me. If it was $30 through CCBill or Epoch with no regional pricing I would sign up tomorrow.
|
03-11-12 06:20am
|
Reply
654
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Yes i realise there's more to it than just the word count but i still find it difficult to see which of the criteria he didn't meet, the only thing i can think of is maybe missing some basic factual information such as picture/video specs which i guess most of us like to know before signing up to a site....still an impressive first review though and hope to see many more from him...
cheers
Tangub
|
12-10-10 05:08am
|
Reply
655
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Thedebilman666's Reply
The number in brackets (1) next to your user name is the number of points you've been awarded for your reviews, generally 1 point for a good review of at least 150 words or 2 points for an exellent review normally at least 250 words. I was just surprised you were only awarded 1 point for that review. Once you reach 5 points you can enter the weekly raffle by making further contriburions ie. reviews, comments, replies.
|
12-09-10 02:15pm
|
Reply
656
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Thedebilman666's Review
I'll second the Cap'n there....impressive first review. Not sure why they only gave you 1 point though...certainly looks like a 2 point review to me...welcome to PU.
|
12-09-10 04:44am
|
Reply
657
|
Debbie Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
My initial attempts at trying to cross reference her at some model index sites came up with a blank so I was quite willing to go along with the fantasy that she's a nice wholesome 18 year old Texan girl. Only thing was when going through the photo sets particularly the outdoor settings something was telling me "this is not USA". I just got the feeling that the locations were some of the same ones used by the photographer Leocont at Met-Art so I dug out some of his photo sets just to see and of course one of the sets I opened was Venus A and after seeing those distictive tan lines and the mole on the left tit that's when I made the connection.
Anyway Met give her current age as 25 so I guess that would put her at around 18 when the Debbie Teen content was shot and as the site is not updating she will always be 18 there so I guess some truth in the advertising afterall.
|
11-14-12 01:50am
|
Reply
658
|
Debbie Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Oddly enough once inside the member's area it does have the appearance of a single site with all the models listed on one page and no further logging in required to access each model's content.
|
11-13-12 03:13pm
|
Review
659
|
Debbie Teen
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Part of a network of 13 solo model sites that includes Mollys Bedroom, Lanas Fantasies, Busty Alli plus more.
Decent sized solo site with 183 photo sets (20,000+ images) and 71 videos.
Most photo sets sized at around 1033x1550px
Zip downloads for photos
Good mix of indoor and outdoor shoot locations
Videos can be downloaded or streamed online.
Bonus sites accessible from single network page with no further login required. |
| Cons: |
Video quality is mediocre
Mostly softcore solo nude posing which may be a con for some
Content can become a bit repetitive.
She fakes masturbation
Site not updating
Only 1 site in the network is updating with actual new content
Most of the content is probably 5-7 years old despite the site showing posting dates as between 2009-2012
No model info or bio.
No model interaction |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the solo site of Debbie Teen a cute blonde with a fit, tanned body and quite distinctive tan lines around her boobs and ass. The site gives you very little info about who she is other than a brief introduction in the tour which says she is 18, was born in Texas and is studying English Literature at college. After doing a little digging around I discovered shes actually Ukrainian and has appeared at a few other sites looking totally different with black hair under the aliases of Venus A at Met-Art, Venus at Nubiles and Kerri at Femjoy.
The content here is mostly solo with some explicit nude posing and some implied masturbation. There are also a handful of two girl sets where she poses with her friend Lizzie who is a rather cute small breasted blonde but they never really get up to anything other than playing around and posing together. Considering the age of the content the photos looked surprisingly good and for the most part are fairly well shot. Given the large number of photo sets I did feel however that the set ups and outfits did become a little repetitive. In so many shoots she starts out wearing cotton panties, a thong or shorts with a cotton sleeveless top or t shirt. Sometimes you see several shoots in the same location and the only difference between one shoot and the next is the panties or top are a different colour.
The downloadable videos are 640x480 mp4s with a bit rate of around 1900kbps. They are mostly quite short at between 2 to 4 minutes and usually consist of a strip and posing naked. Sometimes she pretends to masturbate putting her hand down to her pussy but in reality she is barely touching herself but gives off a few fake moans. In a few other videos she gets out a vibrator and makes out as if she is masturbating with it. She just holds the vibrator down close to her pussy and moves it around a bit without actually inserting it while letting off some more fake moans. Quite honestly Ive not seen anything as unconvincing and fake as this before so thankfully being a picture lover I dont get too concerned about a models lack of acting ability as long as she looks pretty in a photo.
Theres none of the extras you might look for in a solo site such as a diary, blog, cam shows or even a basic about me section so you can get to know the model; its basically just an archived collection of pictures and videos. The network overall provides nearly 1300 photo sets and 560 videos which if youve not been here before should be more than enough to make a months subscription worthwhile but if youve been here within the last few years you would probably find little actual new content. |
|
11-13-12 11:52am
Replies (7)
|
Reply
660
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
Thanks for the complimentary feedback LKLK, much appreciated. Honestly I would love to post more reviews but as my primary interest is softcore photography based sites my choice of new sites to join is becoming rather limited these days and most of the new sites I do come across that catch my interest never seem to get listed at PU anymore.
|
08-03-20 01:10am
|
Review
661
|
Digital Desire
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Currently offering the bargain price of $9.95 for the first month.
Billing by Epoch with the option to use Paypal.
Site has been updating 3 to 4 times a week for the duration of my membership.
Large archive dating back 20 plus years.
Photo sets in up to 5 sizes, 800,1024,1280,1600 & 3000 px.
Zip downloads for photos but only in the largest available size.
Recent videos have up to 8 download options where 4k is available, 2160p, 1080p,720p,480p,360p & mobile in h264 format plus a 720p & 480p wmv option.
Streaming options Low, Normal, 720p,1080p & 4k.
User features include ratings, comments and add to favourites.
No problem using my download manager. (DTA) |
| Cons: |
Recurs at around $30 after the first month.
Pre-checked cross sale.
Updates regularly consist of recycled or remastered old content.
Some recent updates consist of non exclusive purchased content, I'm guessing they are not currently shooting due to the pandemic.
Not a huge amount of 4k content although not a problem for me as I don't download it.
If you're not into solo masturbation content you won't find a lot to interest you here.
Oldest content is lower resolution which is to be expected on a site that's been around this long. |
| Bottom Line: |
Site stats as of today 2nd August 2020:
Models: 1327
Photo sets: 3893
Videos: 1712
This is a site I've joined three times before but not since 2011, so my first time to go back and check it out since the death in 2013 of the main photographer and creator of the site J.Stephen Hicks. Since I've already collected all the photo sets issued prior to 2011 on my previous visits I just focused on the newer content since 2011 on this visit. The models who caught my eye this time include Alex Grey, Elena Koshka,, Emily Willis, Gia Paige, Lena Anderson, Lexie Fox and Uma Jolie. One thing I've always liked about this site is the nice selection of exotic models thanks to their featured “ethnic” category. Some of the ethnic models I really like include Alex De La Flor, Ivy Sherwood, Marica Hase, Megan Salinas, Noelle Monique, Scarlett Bloom and a pretty, large breasted ebony babe named Jezebel Vessir who I first noticed at MetArt a couple of months ago. Incidentally Charles Lightfoot who shot Jezebel's sets and many of the other Amercican models who appear at MetArt is also one of the photographers here at Digital Desire.
The vast majority of the site's content (around 95%) features solo females in artistic, erotic photo sets and videos including masturbation and occasional toy use. If you checkout their “Girlfriends” category you can find the lesbian content which includes 69 videos but nothing new has been added to this category since November 2018. It looks like they experimented with boy/girl hardcore porn for a brief while. If you check out their “Couples” category you'll find a handful of boy/girl shoots, 8 videos and 8 photo sets to be precise, all issued around 2015-16.
When it comes to browsing the site you have the usual categories of Videos, Photos and an A-Z model index. You then have another 15 sub categories to help you find more specific interests you might have. Aside from the Couples, Girlfriends and Ethnic categories already mentioned above others include Dreamgirls, Amateurs, Young N Fresh,Toy Lovers, Flashback and Backstage. Within each category you can then refine your search by criteria such as Hair Colour, Breast size and Pubic Hair.
Whilst the site has been updating 3 to 4 times a week during my membership when I look back through the updates from the past couple of months I don't see an awful lot that looks like new exclusively shot content. Just in the last week the updates were a photo set and video of Heather Summers who as far as I'm aware retired somewhere around 2011 and a Flashback remastered photo set of Sandra Shine who seems to have been around as long as I have had the internet. The video of Heather Summers had a maximum resolution of 480p so it's clearly more than 10 years old as even in my 2011 membership here they were producing videos in 720p. They also seem to be adding non exclusive purchased content similar to that found at sites like Teen Mega World and Club Seventeen. I know for a fact the video and photo set of the cute Asian girl named Aliona added in June of this year dates from around 2012 as I previously downloaded it from Club Seventeen where she was named Sevil. Looking at the update schedule for the month ahead they also have more of her Club Seventeen sets scheduled as future updates.
Although my main interest is the photo collection I've always found the videos at Digital Desire better than those at most similar solo nude/glamour type sites. They certainly contain more heat than the ones at MetArt for instance. They mostly start out with the model dressed in some clothing or lingerie then teasing and stripping before masturbating. There's background music at the start of the video which fades away as the model gets down to the action. Average runtime is around 10 to 15 minutes. I downloaded the 1080p versions which had a bitrate around 6000k.
Other features at the site include the Daily Photo, a Featured Model, a Daily Desktop and a Blog. There's also a link to what looks like a store selling sex toys but I can't enter as I just get a page saying “connection not secure, the owner has configured their website improperly”. Oh well, looks like no chance of me getting the free cock ring LKLK mentioned in his recent review.
In summary, 9 years on from my last membership here, I would say this is still a good site for collectors of softcore glamour content and good value at less than $10 but the seemingly increased use of recycled old sets and non exclusive content as updates means I'm going to score it a few points lower than I did in 2011. |
|
08-02-20 03:22pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
662
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom D Admin's Reply
Thanks for checking that out Tom, I figured there's plenty of new content since my last membership here so signed up today, using the PU referral link of course.
|
07-05-20 02:52pm
|
Reply
663
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
I'm a sucker for those cheap deals too but unfortunately I've only just finished a subscription at MetArt last month and I don't really feel enough time has lapsed since my last subscription at SexArt to want to go back just yet. Limited options I'm afraid for fans of solo softcore content these days.
|
07-03-20 10:20am
|
Reply
664
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Reply
Thanks for the reply and extra info. I went back and looked at the tour again and found the model index this time listed under the "more" heading which I never noticed before so was able to get a better idea of the models and their content.
I can't imagine the Jana Cova video would be new, she's been around since the early 2000s and must be at least 40 years old by now.
I guess I'll probably sign up this weekend since it's only $9.95 and I've seen no other holiday offers that interest me.
|
07-03-20 09:18am
|
Reply
665
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LKLK's Review
This used to be one of my favourite sites. I've just realised I haven't had a membership here since I last reviewed it in 2011. You don't mention if the site is still adding new content. Is it still updating or if not are you able to say how long since it last updated (assuming the content is dated in the members area) as I don't see any dates in the preview area.
You mention 700+ models, I noted 800+ in my 2011 review so sounds like they have lost content rather than added it. Even back in 2011 I found that many of the updates were simply recycled earlier photo sets re-released in a larger size.
|
07-03-20 01:34am
|
Reply
666
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
LPee23's Comment
I've had several memberships over the years going back to when it was called DDGirls.com and I don't recall ever seeing any squirting content. I honestly can't remember now if the DDGXtreme content was included with the DDgirls membership.....if it was I probably didn't take much notice of it since I'm more interested in the solo stuff.
|
01-04-16 04:15pm
|
Reply
667
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Very sad news indeed, he has always been one of my favourite photographers and had a very unique style. DDGirls (previous name for Digital Desire) was one of the very first sites I joined when I first got online back around 10 years ago and to this day his site remains one of my favourites. Condolences to his family, friends and colleagues at Digital Desire. R.I.P.
|
02-10-13 02:17am
|
Reply
668
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Review
Good review Hooliganzo, can't really disagree with anything you wrote there. Personally I love their style of photography with the natural light and it's a site i'm likely to return to time and time again as long as it stays at the great value for money price of $10.
|
12-02-12 01:43am
|
Reply
669
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Lol....glad you're enjoying it.....kind of.
|
09-22-12 05:10am
|
Comment
670
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
|
09-21-12 08:31am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
671
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
I don't get the point of this comment....why would any PU member need to do an internet search for this deal when the $18 discount price is already available via the link from PU/TBP?
|
05-01-12 09:57am
|
Reply
672
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
An excellent well written review as always otoh capturing the mood of the site perfectly.
|
08-11-11 01:28am
|
Review
673
|
Digital Desire
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
TBP/PU discount
No regional pricing
Lots of exclusive content
Daily updates
No download limits or DRM
Browse photos online in a choice of up to 5 sizes (800, 1024, 1280, 1600 & 3000px) or view slideshow.
Zip download but only in the largest available size for each set.
Latest videos have 6 download options, H.264 format in HD720p, 480p, 260p and Mobile plus WMV in HD720p and 480p. Streaming also available in high and low quality. |
| Cons: |
Some of these are not really cons for me but may or may not be for others depending on your personal preferences:
Unfamiliar billing processor but no problem with the cancellation process for me.
Content may be too softcore or too artistic for some tastes.
No file sizes listed for zips or video downloads
Those with a slow connection or struggling for disk space might be disappointed at the lack of a zip option for the smaller sized photo sets.
Many of the photo updates are years old recycled sets simply re-released in a larger size. (These photo sets usually have a maximum resolution of 1600px)
The sequence of photos in some sets seems mixed up.
Some non exclusive content. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the site of glamour photographer J.S.Hicks who has been taking photos of beautiful women since way back in the 80s and whose work has been associated with names such as Playboy and Penthouse. Ive been a member here a couple of times before but not since 2006 and although Ive been a big fan of his photography certain issues with the old site such as the DRM and meagre download limits as well as constantly recycling old photo sets as new updates had put me off going back until now when I was tempted back by the special offer price of $9.95 for a month Thankfully the DRM is long gone and I didnt hit any D/L limits but I did recognise that many of the photo updates are recycled enlarged versions of sets Ive already downloaded prior to 2006.
Ignoring the recycled sets I did manage to find plenty of new models and content which have been added in the last 5 years since Ive been away. The site now boasts a collection of over 800 models and I found many of my favourites here including Ariel, Faye Valentine (Reagan), Georgia Jones, Jana Jordan and Shay Laren to name a few. They have a well organised model index where you can easily find all the photos and videos of your favourite models or you can simply browse photos or videos separately and sort them by date order or ranking. The content is also tagged with some of their dozen different category listings such as Dreamgirls, Young & Fresh, Toy Lovers, Girlfriends or Ethnic if you wish to search the content via a specific niche and you can refine your model search within the niche by hair colour, boob size or shaved/bush/landing strip. You can also rate the models and create a favourites list.
The photos here have more of an artistic feel to them than your usual glamour site often making use of natural light and shadows to create some dramatic effects. Also they dont go overboard with the airbrushing so the pictures tend to have a more natural feel to them than the artificial looking glossy pics you get at some glamour sites. Overall I was highly impressed with the quality of the 3000px photo sets. The only slightly annoying thing for me was that sometimes the sequence of pictures seems muddled and doesnt always run in the expected order from clothed to naked. A prime example of this is the July 1st update of Malena Morgan, she starts off wearing a sexy white see through lace dress with matching bra and panties underneath, picture 27 the dress is off and shes removing the bra, pic 29 the bra and dress are back on again. Pictures 52 and 53 shes almost naked and removing her panties, pics 54 and 55 the bra, panties and dress are back on again. Is this the deliberate intention of the photographer? Surely not?.or is it just laziness on the part of the webmaster not ensuring the photos are uploaded in the correct order?
The site also has a collection of 787 videos to date, 407 of which come with an HD option. When searching the video library you are able to check a box to include only HD videos in your results if you so wish. Most of the videos Ive watched so far range from around 8-12 minutes in length and usually feature the model in a slow sensuous striptease accompanied by music followed by masturbation session. As the model begins to pleasure herself the music fades away so you can hear her moans and groans. You can also find some videos featuring sex toy use and some girl/girl videos although these are in the minority here. The 1280x720 wmv option I chose had a bitrate of around 3400kbps. On average 8-9 new videos added per month as part of the daily updates.
Extra features include the Daily Word, over a thousand desktop wallpapers, backstage features, talent search, forum and a Twitter feed. Overall a highly recommended site for fans of solo glamour photography especially if you can grab one of their special join offers. If I go back in another 5 years I wonder if they will be recycling all those 3000px photos I just downloaded in a bigger size again? |
|
08-07-11 05:17am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
674
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
Thanks for the tip off otoh, i just signed up here today as that price is too good to miss out on although at first i was only getting the TBP/PU price of $18 when i linked to it from here, had to clear my cache and enter the site name manually in my browser to find that $9.95 join offer.
|
07-14-11 08:23am
|
Reply
675
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
knightz's Comment
Thanks for the info. I've been here a couple of times before but not since 2005 so i might be tempted to take another look at this price. Only thing that bothers me is that in the tour under "some of our latest" i see sets i've had on my hard drive since 2005. I know the second time i was there in 2005 some of the updates were just re-released increased resolutions of sets i downloaded on my first visit in 2003 so it makes me wonder how much actual new material has been added in the last few years and how much is remastered older content.
|
05-19-11 12:59am
|
