| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
426
|
Cosplay Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
I love the way they splash "only $14.99 a month" all across the tour pages then when you go to sign up its actually $24.99 for the first month....that's shady for a start.
|
02-05-13 12:41pm
|
Reply
427
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not that I know of but it's certainly possible since I used to get up to it in all kinds of places in my younger years. It would have been frowned upon to bring a girlfriend back to my parents home for sex when I was younger so invariably ended up going out in the car and parking up somewhere or going for a walk in the woods or fields of long grass.
|
02-05-13 12:36pm
|
Review
428
|
Layered Nylons
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Choice of CCBill or Epoch for sign up
Exclusive content
Updated 4 times a week (Mon, Wed, Sat, Sun), usually 3 photo sets and 1 video per week.
All content is high res and hd
Photos have a choice of 4 sizes available; standard 711x1066, extra-large 1365x2048, ultra large 2000x3000 and super large 3744x5616.
Downloadable zips in all 4 sizes.
Video download options are hd 1280x720 wmv (20000+ kbps), 640x360 wmv (6000 kbps), 640x360 mp4 (1000 kbps) for smartphone or tablet. There is also a high def and standard def streaming option.
File sizes and run times of videos displayed.
All content date stamped.
Excellent navigation, browse options and search engine |
| Cons: |
Regional pricing with CCBill (Epoch was about $2 cheaper for me).
Site has only been online since September 2011 so not a massive amount of content yet; 198 photo sets (26,000 pics) and 53 videos at the time of writing this.
Hardly any full nudity, mostly just topless.
Videos are short, usually only 5-6 minutes.
No model info or bios
Poor preview area; click on a model in the tour pages to try and see what photo sets or videos she has and you are taken straight to the sign up page. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site features the unusual theme of girls wearing both stockings and tights (pantyhose) at the same time. I’ve always been a fan of girls wearing stockings and heels but have never really liked tights so couldn’t quite decide where I stand on this unusual niche. This site wasn’t really on my radar but a cheap email offer tempted me to take a look. This site is run by the same company that runs Only All Sites, Only Tease and Art Lingerie so quality was pretty much assured.
There’s currently 79 models on the site, most of them being the same British models that can be found on the other company sites. Many of the popular OT models like Carla, Melanie, Hayley Marie, Lucy Anne and Daisy Watts can be found here. A few Euro models such as Eufrat and Cikita are also present.
The photos are pretty much in the same style you find at Only Tease and have the same natural look to them; thankfully they have avoided the photo-shopped style that was prevalent at Art Lingerie. The photo sets usually start with the model fully clothed before they strip down to their tights and stockings. Those who like a full striptease will be disappointed since the tights, panties and stockings rarely get removed. As a result you will rarely see any full nudity within the site with only occasional glimpses of any pussy and quite often that glimpse is only through sheer tights if the model happens to be wearing them without any panties underneath. To all intents and purposes it’s really just a topless site.
I’m not really interested in videos so only checked out a few. The HD videos look nice and sharp whether downloading or streaming. They provide a screen cap gallery of 18 photos for each video where you can get an idea of the content before deciding if you want to download it. The video style is pretty much the same as I experienced at Art Lingerie. There’s no background music and usually no chat from the model apart from a brief introduction at the start so they have that same awkward silence. I guess the idea of that is so you can hear the sound of the model running her hand up and down her nylons or twanging her suspender belt.
The navigation is the same as at other “Only” sites, a choice of browsing photos or videos by year and month listing or an alphabetical model index. Under “My LN” you can set your browsing preferences like default photo size, number of thumbnails per page etc as well as managing your favourites. There’s also an extensive search engine with several filters which will be great when the site gets a lot larger but for now it’s hardly needed since the site is still quite small, in fact it only took me 3 or 4 days to download and view everything I wanted here. Overall I enjoyed the high quality content in this unusual niche but I feel the site needs some more growth to make it worth the regular price. |
|
02-03-13 02:34pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
429
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I would guess from their point of view it wouldn't make sense to send a promotional join offer to excisting full paying members if indeed you are paying the full price. I don't very often rejoin sites and looking at the date of my review for Young Legal Porn its been 15 months since I had a Diesel membership so I guess it pays to play "hard to get" :)
|
02-03-13 01:15am
|
Reply
430
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Hi Lk2,
The sender is listed as DieselAccess News.
The subject line is "DieselAccess News Free Access to our New Project"
It went to my spam folder so I almost missed it.
|
02-02-13 05:14pm
|
Reply
431
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I was going to say pretty much what Marcus said, it's nice to see some personailty particularly in solo model sites and I agree with Marcus that Karla Spice was one of the best for that aspect.
|
02-02-13 11:24am
|
Comment
432
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
|
02-02-13 11:19am
Replies (8)
|
Reply
433
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't even know if it's shown in the UK, if it is it's probably on the satellite or cable subscription channels which I don't have. I'm not interested in American football anyway.
|
02-01-13 02:08pm
|
Comment
434
|
Photo Dromm
(0)
|
|
01-29-13 02:28am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
435
|
N/A
|
Reply of
bibo's Poll
Depends on the definition I think, even the softest of softcore sites like Only Tease could be considered a Uniform fetish site which I have certainly joined but if you're referring to BDSM content I've never joined one of those sites specifically but had access to that type of content like on House of Taboo in DDF Network.
|
01-29-13 12:31am
|
Reply
436
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
Don't get me wrong Marcus, I certainly don't doubt the problems you had last time and it seems the webmaster was very quick to dismiss them at that time and accuse you of wrong doing even by his own admission now it seems. I really hope you have a better experience this time around. Personally I think all the models in this network look great and I love solo model sites and I'm only sorry that I can't support them with my hard earned money due to the fact I don't have time to sit in front of my computer saving photos one at a time.
|
01-29-13 12:24am
|
Reply
437
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
It's good to read an impartial review on this site from a long standing PUer without an axe to grind against the site. I would quite like to join this site but as I'm only interested in photos and like to collect full sets the lack of zips is a deal breaker for me. If I knew I would be able to download the photo sets with a programme like Firefox DTA I would still be tempted but I think the webmaster doesn't like download managers either. I think the webmaster expects us photo collectors to "right click save as" on every photo and I haven't really had the patience to do that for years. Add in the regional pricing that bumps the price up to $32 means I'll probably be holding on to my money for now.
|
01-27-13 03:13pm
|
Reply
438
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Thanks otoh, I'm afraid you won't see much editing here, that is their selling point that it's raw, uncut and unedited amateur content. Picture sets are usually anything from 100 to 200 pictures in size.
|
01-27-13 02:48pm
|
Reply
439
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Yes they finally have zips, only full set downloads though.
|
01-24-13 10:43pm
|
Review
440
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good value for money at $19.95
Payment processor CCBill with no regional pricing
Good sized site with 263 models, 930 photo sets and 860 videos.
Updated 7 days a week with a new photo set or video
Nice sized 1067 x 1600px photos complete with zip downloads
Latest videos come with a choice of 3 streaming quality levels and 4 download formats from ipod to hd 720p.
Model info and scene descriptions provided.
You can rate the models and leave comments |
| Cons: |
Much of the content is very softcore with over half the models being tagged as either “non-nude” or “topless”.
Some models don’t have photos and some don’t have videos.
When you click on a video it starts streaming automatically in your browser.
Videos released prior to 2012 usually have only 1 streaming size and a single wmv download option.
No file sizes listed for zips or videos
Whilst they do provide clickable tags and keywords there is no actual search engine. |
| Bottom Line: |
After a couple of months of browsing the highly polished glamour content at DDF I really fancied something different so ended up here at Cosmid attracted by the lure of some real amateur girl next door type models and I have to say I’m thoroughly enjoying this site so far. According to the site these girls are not models or porn stars, just ordinary girls with normal day jobs, students, waitresses, bar tenders, office girls. I’d estimate around 75% of them are from the US with some British and Prague based models thrown into the mix. Whilst there is a good variety in model type from petite to voluptuous and even a little bit chubby, anyone who likes large breasted girls will surely be in their element here. When God was handing out tits many of these girls must have been at the front of the queue. There are a few heavily tattooed and pierced models as is the trend amongst young women these days. Most models are aged 18 to mid-20s with just a few older ones.
The content is nearly all softcore solo posing, teasing and stripping although many of the models don’t get fully nude. Some of the more recent content has become a little raunchier with some models like Brittany Burns and Larkin having some toy masturbation videos. I’ve also come across the odd lesbian video and a blowjob video but they are difficult to find and I certainly wouldn’t sign up expecting to see a lot of that type of content.
You can browse all the updates in chronological order or by highest rated and also select just photos or videos. There’s also a model index which can be sorted by most recent, alphabetical, age, hair colour, model type (non-nude, topless, nude), boob or butt size. Each model has a short bio listing their age, occupation and location with a short paragraph of background info. She also has a list of physical attributes such as hair colour, body type, boob size which double as clickable tags so if she has large boobs click on that and it will bring up a list of other models with large boobs. Individual photo sets and videos also come with additional clickable keywords often relating to the outfits and lingerie to help you find similar type sets. They could really do with a proper search engine to allow you to search by more than one criteria though.
The photo quality is pretty consistent throughout the site. I only found a handful of the earliest sets with a resolution below the standard 1600 px size. They did announce in the blog last August plans to upgrade the photos to 3000 px and offer them in 3 different sizes which would be cool if they get around to doing it. They don’t provide the models with a wardrobe or make-up artist so you see them as they are stripping out of normal every day clothes. The photography is generally of a good professional standard with nice sharp well lit pictures but they do post the complete shoot without any editing or photo shopping so you will find the odd photos here and there where the lighting is not quite right or there might be some out of focus or blurry shots or the model is pulling a funny face but it all kind of adds to the amateur appeal. Overall I found the photos quite tame, even with those models that do nude shoots you will find the nudity is not that explicit.
I normally find solo videos boring and don’t spend a lot of time watching them but I did however find them a little more entertaining here than normal. I particularly liked some of the amateur style self-shot videos where the model is on her own in her bedroom or the bathroom, chatting to the camera, teasing or dancing, sometimes stripping followed by masturbation or toy play depending how far the model goes. The videos normally last about 6 to 10 minutes. There does seem to be a bit more explicitness in the video collection than the photos. Videos can be downloaded in 1280x720 wmv or mp4, 976x548 mp4 or 480x272 mp4 for ipod or psp. Prior to 2012 you only get the one download option which is 1280x720 wmv.
Overall a highly enjoyable site and these amateur US models made a refreshing change from the same old Euro models I keep seeing on nearly every site I join. |
|
01-24-13 02:33pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
441
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yes TBP appear to have delisted it but if you enter moreystudio.com directly into your browser you should still be able to get to it.
|
01-23-13 12:46pm
|
Reply
442
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yes I noticed it had been removed but I've just checked and Morey Studio is back online again.....they must have been down for maintenance of had some tech problems or something.
|
01-23-13 12:40pm
|
Reply
443
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'm gonna say other, it's usually boredom that does it, a day off work, crap weather outside and nothing else much to do.
|
01-23-13 12:53am
|
Reply
444
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
It was working for me earlier when i tried but now it's not...maybe they are just having some temporary technical problems.
|
01-23-13 12:50am
|
Reply
445
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
It's working ok my end, the site is still there.
|
01-22-13 10:41pm
|
Reply
446
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes I usually only join sites that contain solo girl photo content.
|
01-21-13 09:05am
|
Reply
447
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Comment
Let's hope it's a one off and they don't start going down that road. I've not joined Femjoy yet although it's high on my priorities but the thing that annoys me looking at the tour is that they don't have a decent mid size photo option around 2000px. Their mid size is only 1200px which will look pathetic on my 24 inch monitor so I'm going to be forced to use up extra bandwidth and storage space downloading their 4000px sets when I would be quite happy with 2000px photos like I get from Met, Mpl or W4B.
|
01-20-13 06:09am
|
Reply
448
|
Suburban Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
I see they show the first page of preview thumbs in the tour but when you click to try and preview the next pages it just takes you to the sign up page so difficult to know if they go to full nudity from the preview.....a missed opportunity I think.
Anyway this site is on my list so no doubt I will get around to joining it one day when I'm in the mood for some home grown British talent.
|
01-19-13 04:04am
|
Reply
449
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Face first, i'm not really that bothered about the size of the tits or anything else as long as she's attractive.
|
01-18-13 03:06am
|
Reply
450
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I always avoid downloading the largest sized photo sets when there is a decent mid size option in the 2-3000px size range. In my recent subscription at Amour Angels I found many of the largest sized photo zips were well over 1GB which is way too much space for a photo set to take up imo.
|
01-16-13 01:28am
|
