| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1851
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I am sure Basil will take note! ;0)
|
02-10-10 02:59pm
|
Reply
1852
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Gotta say thanks for flagging up this site.
It really is 'in the zone' for me.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-06-10 04:33pm
|
Reply
1853
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
You are very welcome.
It wasn't you, my friend.
There was a target error that has now been rectified.
I tried it today. It works well now.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-06-10 01:06pm
|
Reply
1854
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Yes, I was equally impressed.
There is a forum there too....
Which is a bit lonely at the moment. ;0)
That said, I am finding the webmaster very responsive & friendly.
As regards the custom zips...Just tick each picture you want in the set & save when you are done.
You then get a download link generated.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-06-10 12:41pm
|
Review
1855
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Clean & effective site layout.
Very attentive & friendly staff
Good quality photography. Well edited.
No 3 dozen shots of the same pose here
Sticks to niche well
Regular updates. 2 per day
Biased towards photosets.
Zips available in at least 2 resolutions & user defined custom zips are available
( 15 of the last 18 updates photosets )
Good value |
| Cons: |
Still a young website. 58 models so far.
A few minor glitches with the website, which are in the process of being sorted out. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is catering to an undersupported niche well.
There is full nudity, both coy & explicit &
at times, for a refreshing change there is actually some shots of hose & shoes being removed.
Sets usually start fully clothed, & they seem amenable to making a feature of full strip sets.
The photography is very well done, without much if anything in the way of post work.
It is solo softcore although toys are present at times.
If you are looking for hardcore, this isn't it.
It wouldn't be fair for me to pass comment on the video as it is
not a thing that appeals to me, but at a cursory glance, it seems to be decent enough quality.
It is obvious this is a website presented by people who care.
If softcore solo photosets of natural pretty ladies appeals, this
site should hit the spot for you.
Gets two thumbs up from me. |
|
02-05-10 06:04pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1856
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Another vote for mature ladies here too!
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-05-10 04:55pm
|
Reply
1857
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Trust me! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-05-10 09:53am
|
Comment
1858
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
|
02-05-10 06:18am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1859
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Thanks for the Heads Up, D.
I'll take a look.
Cap'n. ;0)
|
02-03-10 02:15pm
|
Reply
1860
|
We Do Blow Jobs
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I think that is fair comment.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-21-10 09:11am
|
Reply
1861
|
We Do Blow Jobs
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
The site is not big on photos then! ;0)
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-20-10 02:23pm
|
Reply
1862
|
White GFs
(0)
|
Reply of
drcocktor's Comment
Thanks for posting the warning.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-21-10 09:46am
|
Reply
1863
|
Who Is Nexxxt
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
I'm with Pat on this one.
Seriously, the site doesn't look like it has had any TLC in years.
The webpages look like something from the 1990s!
Avoid!
Cap'n. :0(
|
03-10-13 01:56pm
|
Reply
1864
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Yes, a lot of sites forget that a lot of folks like pics too.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-17-11 05:39pm
|
Reply
1865
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
As I don;t see any mention of photos, from the way this reads they are using 'pictures' as a pseudononym for 'movies'?
Another one to give a wide berth to, I think. :0(
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-26-10 11:23am
|
Reply
1866
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Ah I see.
Potentially somewhat misleading.
Cap'n. :0/
|
07-12-10 11:28pm
|
Comment
1867
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
|
07-12-10 04:24pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
1868
|
Wicked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Well, Teen Dreams used to be reputable.
I suppose if sites change hands anything can happen.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-26-13 01:38pm
|
Reply
1869
|
Wicked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
Given the current state of the market, I can't understand the reluctance to show what they are trying to sell.
Very few are rash enough to spend money when they don't know what they are likely to get.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-26-13 09:35am
|
Reply
1870
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
bibo's Comment
Wow, the prices here are really steep!
Cap'n. :00
|
01-03-13 12:33pm
|
Reply
1871
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
Only an impression from your review, but I feel this site may define that new 'heartcore' term?
From what I can see of it on a personal level, unfortunately I think I would find little here to keep me happy.
Midcore & hardcore does very little for me.
Cap'n. :0/
|
09-02-12 08:36am
|
Reply
1872
|
XL Asians
(0)
|
Reply of
Watson's Review
If only the owners of that site would put in as much effort as you have with your review, they would have a site which is 3 times better than it is.
Very commendable work reviewing a mediocre site.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-30-11 04:30am
|
Reply
1873
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
It is nice to know someone is paying attention! :0)
|
06-15-10 01:27pm
|
Comment
1874
|
Young Busty
(0)
|
|
06-13-10 02:21pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1875
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Oh don't get me wrong.
I agree it is a desirable feature.
It was intended as a mild swipe at those that offer bonus photosets you have to download a photo at a time.
Cap'n. :0)
|
09-29-11 12:22pm
|
