| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
1626
|
Sex Sim
(0)
|
|
12-22-11 09:08am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1627
|
Sex Sim
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
I'm pleased you liked it.
I rather thought you would. ;0)
I am trying to get more activity on the forum there.
Feel free to join in if you would, please?
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-12-11 11:59am
|
Reply
1628
|
Sex Sim
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
Yeah, Jak is very communicative! :0)
What OS are you using?
It installed just where I wanted it for me.
I'm using XP Pro 64.
I have it on a subsidiary drive & all settings wound up to 11. ;0)
Those artifacts you refer to...I'm guessing they are 'poke through'?
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-10-11 04:36pm
|
Reply
1629
|
Sex Sim
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Could it be some sort of anti virus blocking on your computer?
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-09-11 01:19pm
|
Reply
1630
|
Sex Sim
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
Hmm.
It installed for me no problem.
Perhaps a corrupted download?
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-09-11 01:03pm
|
Review
1631
|
Sex Sim
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Better than average texturing of models for this type of game.
Feedback is welcomed. The Webmaster / Developer is still working very hard on site content & is responsive to user input.
Nice game interface. The controls are basic and fairly intuitive.
Forum available for support, to make suggestions & upload user created content.
Detailed instructions for doing this are posted in the forum.
There is a straightforward, basic categorised shop using pre-purchased credits.
It has additional customisers, characters, clothing, animations, & functionality.
It is fairly small at the moment, but more items are in the process of being added.
Daily Sale item at substantial (40%) discount. |
| Cons: |
This game is still at a relatively early stage of development.
Whilst it is stable and fully functional, as yet it does not have a great deal of in game options.
Forum activity is sporadic. Most days show some activity, but it really needs to grow a wider user base.
( Hopefully this review might help some with that! ;0) ) |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a different take on the interactive 3D Sex Game.
Whilst it is a similar concept to Thrixxx's 3D Sexvilla 2 ( listed here as 3D Sex Games) , there are some important differences.
The Webmaster / Developer is responsive & communicates way better than Thrixxx, who seem to largely ignore what is going on in their community site.
It is the sheer size of the Thrixxx ( Gamerotica ) community which seems to largely make it self sustaining.
There is a more friendly, relaxed, interactive atmosphere on the SexSim forums.
To sum up, what you are getting here is a decent quality basic 3D virtual sex sim, which is improving & evolving well.
It seems Jak ( the developer ) is interested in improving realism aspects of the game.
For instance, there is a Pubic Hair add-on which is the most realistic attempt I have ever seen in the 3D graphics world, & I have been mooching around this area on & off for well over ten years!
Relatively early days, but looking promising if the concept floats your boat.
If 3D sex sim games appeal it is worth a punt to see if you like it. |
|
11-08-11 11:20am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1632
|
Sex Video Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Review
I like the way they have relaunched this site.
Belatedly buoyed up by this review, I may well give it a whirl again.
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-13-11 11:11am
|
Reply
1633
|
Sex Video Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's Reply
Thanks for the response.
Cap'n. :)
|
04-22-10 02:53pm
|
Comment
1634
|
Sex Video Casting
(0)
|
|
03-31-10 09:50am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1635
|
Showy Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Just what we need! :0/
Another one!
The market for these is flooded I would have thought.
Cap'n. :0(
|
11-12-11 03:16pm
|
Reply
1636
|
Simon Scans
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Well,..Wow!
You have to call that one comprehensive! ;0)
Thanks.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-01-10 11:44am
|
Reply
1637
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
If that is the case that strengthens my prejudice against networked sites.
I really don't understand why they have cross-sectional material on one network.
Wouldn't it make more sense to have softcore, midcore & hardcore networks?
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-17-12 03:42pm
|
Comment
1638
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
|
|
11-13-12 09:26am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1639
|
Skinz Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I knew I had seen it somewhere! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-05-10 11:28pm
|
Reply
1640
|
Skinz Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Listing was there.
Looked for the 'Nominate for Review' button, but couldn't see one.
Mind you I was looking at PU not TBP :0/
Cap'n.
|
05-05-10 02:16pm
|
Comment
1641
|
Skinz Tease
(0)
|
|
05-05-10 11:58am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1642
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Trip999's Reply
It sounds to me like your tastes are evolving & refining.
Nothing at all wrong with that.
For me a fully clothed reclining shot can be just as erotic as the same pose nude.
Oh and to expand a little on my earlier comment.
I have nothing against seeing the model nude.
It is just I appreciate the anticipation of a slow build up, given by a decent striptease.
Even if it is a model I have seen nude many times before, I still really enjoy seeing her strip from different outfits.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-31-11 11:57am
|
Reply
1643
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Trip999's Review
Had another look.
It may be an odd thing to say but....
Still not enough clothes!
The slow reveal of a leisurely striptease builds up anticipation nicely.
Not BAM...This is what she looks like nekkid.
Nothing to look forward to then.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-31-11 04:26am
|
Reply
1644
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Trip999's Review
A detailed review.
Thanks.
I'll give it another look.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-31-11 04:14am
|
Reply
1645
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thanks for the additional info.
Sounds pretty much as I expected.
Cap'n. :0/
|
09-02-10 01:15pm
|
Comment
1646
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
|
09-02-10 02:10am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
1647
|
Slow Exposure
(0)
|
|
12-07-11 09:06am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1648
|
Slow Exposure
(0)
|
Reply of
Slowexpo's Reply
Any further developments on this?
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-24-10 11:56am
|
Reply
1649
|
Slow Exposure
(0)
|
Reply of
Slowexpo's Reply
I always try to make any criticism constructive.
I like the concept of your site & would like to see it be successful & develop.
As regards the poses, I am not suggesting you should encourage anything more graphic than they are comfortable with, just give them a little more time to express themselves how they wish at each point of the strip, before moving on.
On the subject of the still photography, I would suggest you do it after the video interview. The reasons for that being any flash photography would be intrusive and distracting, both for the model being interviewed and the viewing audience. Also after the video segment, she should hopefully be more comfortable and relaxed about the experience & perform possibly even better for the photoshoot segment.
As regards downloads, if you have a small to medium sized watermark, on the material, even if it should turn up where it shouldn't, at least it would give you some free advertising.....not that I condone the practice. :0/
I think it would be helpful if the archive episodes were indexed & sortable by name or date & upcoming episodes listed seperately.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-28-10 03:16pm
|
Review
1650
|
Slow Exposure
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A novel concept.
Amateur models straight off the street.
Reasonably Priced.
Models are treated politely & with respect.
A very slow tease, but with full nude pay-off.
You get one model a week going to topless Thursday & nude Friday.
It can be really interesting how the interviewer, who is very good,
attempts, usually successfully, to put the models at their ease & get them to slowly reveal their body. |
| Cons: |
Poor quality video
No download options.
Poor editing with clipped endings & some continuity errors.
Photos are vidcaps
Website layout poorly organised. |
| Bottom Line: |
I really wanted to like this site, & marginally I still do.
I love the concept of inviting ladies off the street to chat &
strip naked for the website members.
It is very softcore & based in New York so there should be plenty to choose from ;0)
In the site blurb, they claim it to be erotic.
In all honesty, as it stands, I do not find it so.
Intimate, friendly even & at times amusing.
It really could be done a lot more professionally though.
The website could do with polish & organisation.
There is no dated archive & has no sort function.
Currently there are 16 girls listed 3 of which are upcoming,
but they are all lumped together on the one page.
You have to click on the pic to see if she has been uploaded or not.
This will become more of a problem as the site grows.
For me, the following would go a long way to creating more eroticism.
Better quality video, with download options.
Longer, lingering shots of each stage of nudity, especially full nude.
This does not necessarily need to be covered with extra chat,
provided the model is at ease. Let her do her own thing for a while.
Encourage the models to try to pose more.
After the video shoot, have her strip again for a still camera &
put the photos in a zip for download.
I really like what they are trying to do, but I just wish they would do it better. |
|
01-27-10 02:57pm
Replies (7)
|
