| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1501
|
Nylon X Files
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
A very nice review,otoh.
It seems you have here a decent niche site starting on the slide.
A shame.
Oh, there really shouldn't be any doubt on the definition of nudity.
I even did a thread on it a while back onthe forum IIRC.
Nudity means no clothes. Simple.
Clothes pulled aside is flashing.
Partially clothed is partially clothed, regardless of whether naughty bits are on view. ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-31-11 03:09am
|
Reply
1502
|
Office Fantasy 2
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I think you will like this one.
Outfits are smart & mostly plausible.
The office is used as a set in every update....I can't think of an exception. Apparently it is the Webmaster's own office.
As I said earlier, this purports to be the 'nude' site.
Yes it does go a little further than the other site of his, in that 'naughty bits' are seen. They usually only go to stockings & garter belts only.
There isn't one set to actual nude, which is a shame because I like the photographers work, the set the models & the outfits.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-09-11 05:12am
|
Review
1503
|
Office Fantasy 2
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Almost exclusively a pic site (Some may see this as a negative ;0) )
On topic material.
Attractive models (currently 33, most are at 4 sets each, a few have a lot more) not really a duffer amongst them, some of whom make return visits. Always welcome ;0)
Very nice outfits.
Photography is generally well lit & shot.
Reasonable subscription rate.
Updated once a week, usually with one photoset. |
| Cons: |
No choice of pic sizes, typically 640 x 1070 portrait format.
Only seem to have the one studio set.
Only a few zipped photosets, with no choice of photosize..
Largely portrait format.
They seem to have a very shaky definition of 'nude.' See BL
Updates are not dated in the archive.
Site is quite old fashioned & clunky.
If you like video you will be disappointed, there are very few.
No model data. |
| Bottom Line: |
Whilst I do like the Marlowe-esque '30s style office, which fits very well with period outfits, some
more variations on the setting would be welcome.
Even if they were to change a few props you have a 60's or '70s office, for instance.
The models are first class & pose well. Most 'get' what the theme is about.
The outfits generally are great & the lighting & photography are very good,
issues with content & lack of use of landscape aside. ;0)
The set is actually very good, but is over used in its standard format.
The site claims to be a slightly raunchier version of Office Fantasies, going to nude.
Honestly, I take issue with this...
Sure the goods ( upper & lower ;0) ) do get displayed, generally coyly,
but more in the nature of flashing rather than full nudity.
I haven't found one set where the model reaches fully nude.
Always there are shoes, hose & or other garments pulled aside.
By missing off the removal of shoes* & hose a potentially particularly erotic part of the strip is omitted,
not to mention the omission of any decent full body naked shots :0(
* Oddly, I noticed in quite a few sets at a point part way through the shoes are removed
only to immediately be put back on again ??! :0/
To sum up. I really want to like this site,
but it needs seriously updating in functionality & bringing into the noughties at least. ;0)
Edit: Belatedly got a nice reply from the webmaster, so deleted the 'con' of 'no response' Added a couple to the score for that too! ;0) |
|
03-19-10 02:00pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1504
|
Office Fantasy 2
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I reckon so! ;0)
|
03-19-10 06:52am
|
Reply
1505
|
Office Fantasy 2
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Well, I wish the news were better...
Unfortunately, the pics aren't to current size expectations.
Typically 640x1070 portrait.
Better news on the galleries.
Currently there are 33 models & not really a duffer amongst them.
On average there are 4 sets of each model but a few have a lot more.
Cap'n.
|
03-18-10 05:07pm
|
Comment
1506
|
Office Fantasy 2
(0)
|
|
03-18-10 11:32am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1507
|
Office Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Magnifico's Review
Office Fantasy may be a better bet for you.
That said it is non-nude.
Office Fantasy 2 does go to full nudity, but sometimes their definition of 'nude' is a little shaky. ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-24-10 01:48pm
|
Reply
1508
|
Old And Young Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
For a third of the price I might give it a punt.
Cap'n. :0/
|
09-09-12 03:44am
|
Reply
1509
|
Oldje
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
You are just reinforcing what I am saying.
Price is important.
Everything has to be marketable.
ie, Worth it's price.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-03-13 02:43pm
|
Reply
1510
|
Oldje
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for the added background.
Price is always a factor. It has to be.
Otherwise we would all be driving around in top of the range cars.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-03-13 02:14am
|
Reply
1511
|
Oldje
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
The subscription is a hefty price.
85 is a high rating.
Do you honestly think it is worth it?
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-02-13 05:34pm
|
Reply
1512
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
Very nice to see the welcome return of the enigmatic Roseman! :0)
I do hope we shall see you around here regularly again.
To comment on the detail of your review, I am surprised and disappointed to see that not only do you reckon the package is expensive, but they also have the gall to charge you again for content!!??? :0E
Well out of order, IMO.
All that & no nudity! :0/
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-23-11 04:15pm
|
Reply
1513
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
tasha's Review
For me, whilst I really do love the tease, I also really need the pay-off.
The lack of full nudity on their sites is at the very least very frustrating for me, & in recent years a total deal killer.
As one of my buddies on here once memorably said:
'All sizzle & no steak!'
I think that succinct summation still holds good.
Cap'n. :0/
|
10-12-11 04:17pm
|
Reply
1514
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
A tease is no good without the pay-off!
I made that point a few years back when I was a member.
My main beef with them is when they claim sets to be nude when they are not.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-21-10 02:06pm
|
Reply
1515
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Yep, that is pretty much as I expected. :0/
I do appreciate that different folks like different things, but I really would have thought that a so called striptease site would feature a lot more frequent full nudity at the conclusion of the items.
Cap'n. :0(
|
03-21-10 09:15am
|
Reply
1516
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I was a member of OnlyTease a couple of years back and got very frustrated by the lack of full nudity.
Even sets that were billed as full nude often weren't! :0E
At one point I asked that they were flagged more accurately, but received no response.
Striptease I love, but for me, it HAS to go to full nudity.
It sounds like little has changed in that regard. :0(
IIRC I seem to remember seeing another negative fairly recently; the use of CCBills regional pricing 'service.'?
Cap'n. :0E
|
03-21-10 08:54am
|
Reply
1517
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
That is a good solution.
I usually just use notepad. ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-21-10 07:45am
|
Reply
1518
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Aye...
I thought it needed to be added! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-21-10 06:42am
|
Reply
1519
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Certainly not if you are in Europe!
If you live in Europe you get hammered by the CCBill rip you off 'service' ...sorry regional pricing!
Cap'n. :0(
|
03-21-10 03:09am
|
Reply
1520
|
Only CFNM
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Well, if nothing else, it distilled out another dislike for you. :0/
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-31-11 04:21pm
|
Reply
1521
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
I thought 'How odd?'' when I saw the 'Only' in the name & you went on to discuss hardcore.
When I looked into it, it isn't done by the 'Only' sites, so that would explain it.
It may cause some confusion though.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-21-10 12:25pm
|
Reply
1522
|
Only Opaques
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
Probably. 'Only' sites are usually quite comprehensive in covering their subject matter.
The only thing they are really shaky on is their definition of 'nude'
It usually covers wearing clothing!
Cap'n :0(
|
12-11-11 02:35am
|
Reply
1523
|
Only Opaques
(0)
|
Reply of
tjsully's Comment
Another example of what a venerable friend of mine once said of the Only Tease site:
'All sizzle & no steak!'
I am afraid it still holds true now.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-24-11 09:22am
|
Reply
1524
|
Only Secretaries
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
If I understand it correctly, it is a 'service' CCBill offer to webmasters. Only the greedy use it! :0(
|
02-28-10 11:14am
|
Reply
1525
|
Only Secretaries
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Well basically, D.... If she starts off fully clothed & ends up full frontal naked, that would do me fine.
The smarter & primmer the outfit the better!
A natural look 'below decks' is always my preference! ;0)
|
01-08-10 07:45am
|
