| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1076
|
Daphoz
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Many thanks for this 'heads up', D.
I'll take a look.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-21-12 09:34am
|
Reply
1077
|
Daphoz
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
How can a photosite survive without offering zips!!!!
Cap'n. :oE
|
02-21-12 07:23am
|
Reply
1078
|
David Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
That doesn't sound very promising! :0/
I like the 'stream of consciousness' comment.
Although I did run short of breath with that sentence! LOL
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-20-10 12:59pm
|
Reply
1079
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Thats good to know,Rusty.
I'll put it back in the Probables then! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-02-11 06:26am
|
Reply
1080
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Until regional pricing goes, I wouldn't even consider it.
Cap'n. :0(
|
07-02-11 06:19am
|
Reply
1081
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
I would go along with that!
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-28-12 10:45am
|
Reply
1082
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Yes, that regional pricing scam may allegedly be 'requested' by the websites.
In actual fact it is CCBill providing this 'service', so I avoid using them whenever I can on principle.
Cap'n. :0E
|
11-28-12 09:52am
|
Reply
1083
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
Basically in full agreement with the above posters.
If you haven't been there before, it is worth a one hit membership to get a taste of what they are about.
They do have some fine models & good material, but they are catering towards the glamour end of the spectrum.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-19-11 09:35am
|
Reply
1084
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
haagar's Reply
I noticed the Webmaster did not reply to jaqw's query.
You can see a fuller discussion of the topic here:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=1894
|
06-17-11 06:22am
|
Reply
1085
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jaqw's Reply
You can read my & other's opinion on the regional pricing scam here:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=1894
Cap'n. :0E
|
06-17-11 05:57am
|
Reply
1086
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Thedebilman666's Review
A very detailed review. Nicely done.
I think you must have been lurking for some time? ;0)
Welcome to PU.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-08-10 11:32pm
|
Reply
1087
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Rotterdam854's Comment
Thanks for posting the warning.
A shame you have to go through all the hassle to get it resolved.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-26-10 06:14am
|
Reply
1088
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Yes, that is what I suspected, sloppy at best.
A cheap way of bulking out content at worst.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-31-10 11:30pm
|
Comment
1089
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
|
01-31-10 10:30am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
1090
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
|
01-21-10 09:26am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1091
|
Debbie Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
A strange one that!
Cap'n. :00
|
11-13-12 03:14pm
|
Reply
1092
|
Debbie Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Hmm Network of solo sites?
Why not make it one site featuring a variety of models?
That would make it more user friendly?
Cap'n :0/
|
11-13-12 02:59pm
|
Reply
1093
|
Desperate Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Comment
All video here, I take it?
Cap'n. :0/
|
09-09-10 09:06am
|
Reply
1094
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
That really does not inspire any confidence.
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-19-13 04:20pm
|
Reply
1095
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Yes, I was rather hoping there was something more substantial, in the way of outfits, hidden beyond the preview area.
It sounds like, as I thought, there isn't. :0/
Thanks for the additional info though.
Cap'n. :0)
|
08-18-11 08:54am
|
Reply
1096
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
An interesting review.
Combining this with tangub's recent efforts, I get the impression that the main downfall of this site is more related to website / housekeeping rather than the quality of the material itself?
Would I be correct in that assumption?
Whilst I am here, looking at the preview area the outfits all look to be glamour wear.
Is this representative, or are there casual & formal outfits too?
Many thanks,
Cap'n. :0/
|
08-17-11 11:13pm
|
Reply
1097
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
I may give it a whirl, but I know from your review there will be two things that will irritate me.
The lack of zips on smaller pic sizes & more importantly the mis-sequenced photos.
I know that one will really grate! :0/
An informative review. Thanks.
Cap'n. :0)
|
08-17-11 11:08pm
|
Reply
1098
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
I really don't think it appears to matter to them. As long as they have a memorable name, pleasant or otherwise, they are happy with that.
ALS Scan was mentioned by RA.
The 'scan' part of the name, for me, harks back to the 1990's when a lot of porn was scanned in. Time to move on from that name IMO as it would infer very old content.
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-09-12 07:12am
|
Reply
1099
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
Whilst I do like the models, the lack of progression through the sets is a frustration.
Bang, they are naked....all through the set.
I would much rather have a nicely paced strip to give an erotic slow reveal.
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-15-12 09:42am
|
Reply
1100
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Reply
No perhaps not, but you listed it in 'cons' without a rider on it.
Welcome to PU BTW !
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-09-11 05:25am
|
