| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
951
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
BabeSpottingTV's Reply
Thank you for your reply.
I shall put your site high on my list.
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-28-12 04:45pm
|
Reply
952
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
BabeSpottingTV's Reply
Yes, it does help.
Are these screen caps or higher quality images?
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-28-12 01:53am
|
Comment
953
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
|
07-27-12 06:21am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
954
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
True, but that doesn't alter the fact that the main site is also misleading, as it flags sets as nude when they aren't. :0(
|
11-12-09 11:11am
|
Reply
955
|
Babespotting.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Only Tease always has a strange idea of 'nude' that usually involves having a few clothes on. :0(
|
11-12-09 09:25am
|
Reply
956
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
A great shame there are no stills here as it is a topic that is of interest to me.
That said, I have to commend a site for specialising either to video or still photography as they are 2 entirely different areas of skillsets.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-16-12 08:58am
|
Reply
957
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
I quite like the interview & strip videos.
As you said though.....
A shame there are no photos too. :0(
Cap'n :0/
|
08-18-10 11:54am
|
Reply
958
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Comment
Well, I don't know what language it is they are using on there.
It isn't English.
......or if it is it is a mutilated, disfunctional version. :0/
If that is what twitter is about I am pleased to pass on it.
|
08-10-10 02:20am
|
Reply
959
|
Bad Tushy
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
You are probably right.
That slightly underhand practice sort of backfired on them in that sense.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-26-10 11:37am
|
Reply
960
|
Bad Tushy
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I think you can lump that in with the practice of only offering a discounted rate when you go to cancel.
Cap'n. :0/
|
05-24-10 10:31pm
|
Reply
961
|
Bad Tushy
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
What a load of 'Hoop La' to have to go through, Pat. :0(
I am intrigued by how on Earth you discovered it though. :0/
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-24-10 10:22am
|
Reply
962
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I'm afraid I am more cynical than that.
I think: 'Well, that kind of shady practice is probably how they got big in the first place, then they added a veneer of customer friendliness.'
Can you not get a refund, as they have not provided what they promised?
Cap'n.
|
11-24-12 01:31am
|
Reply
963
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
whowho's Comment
I'm sorry I don't think that was accidental.
Either it is dishonesty, incompetence or there has been hacking going on.
In any event I think avoiding them whilst they do not have a trusted processor is wise.
Cap'n. :0/
|
09-20-12 09:23am
|
Reply
964
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
IIRC this site also feaures the very lovely Tiana too.
A very striking & pretty lady.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-15-12 04:36am
|
Reply
965
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
Hooliganzo's Review
Not many videos is not a con for photo folk ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-12-12 04:01pm
|
Comment
966
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
|
01-06-12 08:01am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
967
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I have to agree with you on this one.
It is an unique site.
The models, costumes, photography & effects are first rate. Navigation is a little flaky IIRC, which detracts from the 'story' element somewhat.
As you quite rightly point out though, it is really a photography, not video site.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-15-11 04:27am
|
Reply
968
|
Barely Legal
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Correct. ;0)
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-03-13 11:33pm
|
Reply
969
|
Barely Legal
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
It doesn't inspire much confidence when their site is so poorly maintained it has different prices all over.
It always irritates me when you get an offer a different lower price when you click away from their site.
If they are happy with that lower subscription rate, why don't they just have the honesty to put it on the main join up page?
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-31-12 03:30am
|
Reply
970
|
Beauty Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
A very detailed & comprehensive review.
Thanks.
Obviously this site is weighted towards the videos though.
Material is harder than I prefer too.
Honestly, I don't think it is going to float my boat.
Cap'n.
|
03-31-11 04:01am
|
Reply
971
|
Bella 1010
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I would use either 1200 or 1600 pixel based zips out of preference.
|
05-02-10 03:39am
|
Reply
972
|
Bella 1010
(0)
|
Reply of
Alder Media Gro's Reply
How about calling the 'Standard' membership 'Trial', as it gives a taster and allows a little flexibility?
'Premium' membership could be amended to 'Full Membership'
This would make things clearer for surfers.
I am not saying that was deliberate, but the use of the term 'FREE' in relation to zip sets is potentially misleading.
It would be prefrable to say, 'Zip files available to Full Members.'
HTH
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-02-10 03:38am
|
Reply
973
|
Bella 1010
(0)
|
Reply of
Alder Media Gro's Reply
I'll try and make my point clearer.
As I understand it the Standard membership would be useless to me as I don't care for videos & I am only interested in photosets which I would like to download as a zip set.
I would need to be a premium member for that?
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-27-10 09:07am
|
Reply
974
|
Bella 1010
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Just taken a look around.
It actually looks a little 'glam' for my tastes, certainly in choice of outfits.
There are some lovely models.
One thing that turned me right off though was this!
'High-Res photo sets in zip files are FREE for all Premium
Members. Standard Members may purchase zip file sets'
So a photo loving member has to pay twice!!!
Cap'n. :0(
|
04-03-10 04:02am
|
Reply
975
|
Bella 1010
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Comprehensive review with some very pertinent & well reasoned suggestions, D. ;0)
If they pay any attention to following them, it would certainly be worth a look for me, I reckon.
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-03-10 03:29am
|
