Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : Capn (0)

Feedback:   All (1886)  |   Reviews (17)  |   Comments (167)  |   Replies (1702) Other:   Replies Received (778)  |   Trust Ratings (0) All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user. Shown : 1601-1625 of 1886 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Comment 1601 All Over 30 (0) Any Change? Am I right in thinking that on the whole the outfit selections are largely unchanged? I am always hoping for more appropriate mature attire: Formal, smart casual , real uniform etc which I do appreciate there is as well, but I still see a few tacky play uniforms featured in recent update section. Does that impression hold true in the members area? What sort of ratio are we looking at? Thanks. Cap'n. :0) 02-20-10  05:34am Replies (0) Reply 1602 Brooke Lee Playmates (0) Reply of Drooler's Reply Yes, I took another look the other day too. Nothing much has changed to my mind. :0/ 02-20-10  02:35am Reply 1603 N/A Reply of Duante Amorculo's Poll No. 02-20-10  01:50am Reply 1604 ATK Natural & Hairy (0) Reply of Ray O's Reply I would go for 50% fully to part clothed 20% coy nude & 30% explicit nude. A lot of folk seem to have an odd idea of nude. Pulled away top & skirt showing naughty bits is NOT nude! BMB/Wanton is particularly guilty of this. Other than that, I agree with you Ray. Cap'n. :0) 02-19-10  02:25pm Reply 1605 Fucking Gamble (0) Reply of FuckingGambler's Reply That is a very positive & constructive response. Thank you. I shall take a closer look. ;0) Cap'n. :0) 02-19-10  05:23am Reply 1606 Exploited College Girls (0) Reply of pat362's Reply Thanks for the extra info, Pat. Appreciated. I think I'll pass on this one. Cap'n. :0/ 02-18-10  11:28pm Comment 1607 Exploited College Girls (0) Poor Tour So far as I can pick up, it offers no samples of full size photos or videos? Or am I missing something somewhere? Cap'n. :0/ 02-18-10  03:04pm Replies (2) Reply 1608 Milena Velba (0) Reply of Karasek's Review A very balanced & reasoned review. Welcome to PU Cap'n. :0) 02-18-10  02:46pm Reply 1609 Ripping 4 Fun (0) Reply of GCode's Comment Thanks for flagging this one up, GC. An interesting variation, but it doesn't really hit the spot for me. Why not just a straightforward striptease to full nudity? That would work for me. Cap'n. :0/ 02-18-10  02:34pm Comment 1610 Fucking Gamble (0) Interesting. Novel idea for a site. Are the outfits all glam orientated or is there some everyday wear in there in an attempt to give a bit less contrived feel to it? 02-18-10  12:47pm Replies (2) Reply 1611 N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll As my interests seem to be 'niche', I tend to stick with those that consistently provide on topic material. 02-18-10  09:34am Reply 1612 In Focus Girls (0) Reply of Helvetic's Review Dollars for Euros?!!!! That is Regional Pricing & in all honesty should NOT be condoned! :0E That apart, a decent debut review. ;0) Welcome to PU! Cap'n. :0) 02-16-10  09:43am Reply 1613 N/A Reply of badandy400's Poll I may not have been here that long, but the same goes for me. Cap'n. :0) 02-16-10  09:38am Reply 1614 Only Tease (0) Reply of wildstar's Comment Webmasters who would use such a scam don't deserve any sign ups from the European area. As I have said before, any webmaster using this 'service' has lost my custom. For good. Cap'n. :0E 02-14-10  12:13pm Reply 1615 Only Tease (0) Reply of wildstar's Comment That is the regional pricing scam. It is a 'service' offered by CCBill. :0E Cap'n. :0( 02-14-10  02:55am Reply 1616 N/A Reply of Khan's Poll I would have neither the budget, nor the time to attempt to flood the place like that! :00 Cap'n. 02-14-10  02:50am Reply 1617 Suicide Girls (0) Reply of PinkPanther's Reply Aha! Now that is useful information. Thanks for that, PP! Cap'n. :0) 02-14-10  02:48am Reply 1618 Pornstar IQ (0) Reply of Auxilia's Comment What a novel idea. I quite like that. To answer your question... I suppose they might have been filmed at different shoots? Cap'n. :0/ 02-13-10  03:36pm Reply 1619 Suicide Girls (0) Reply of anyonebutme's Reply Sorry, I wasn't intending to accuse you! ;0) Cap'n. :0) 02-13-10  08:12am Reply 1620 Naked News (0) Reply of asmith12's Review I wholeheartedly agree with you. The first time an anchor appears in the episode, she should strip from fully clothed. I can live with nude from the start on a second appearance. Are they still showing guest anchor segments fully nude then an interview with them fully clothed? I do wish they would show the clothed interview first! Cap'n. :0/ 02-13-10  05:32am Reply 1621 Suicide Girls (0) Reply of anyonebutme's Reply I wasn't doing. Unless you run the site. ;0) Cap'n. :0) 02-12-10  11:29pm Comment 1622 Suicide Girls (0) Cluttered and confusing...... Or is it just me? I went there looking for photosets, Floundered aimlessly around. Then gave up. Cap'n. :0/ 02-12-10  02:57pm Replies (6) Comment 1623 YouStrip (0) Lack of Updates A frustrating lack of activity with this site. It is a sound idea but poorly implemented. Updates have stalled too by the look of it. A shame. This site could be really good with some effort. Cap'n. :0/ 02-11-10  12:04pm Replies (0) Reply 1624 We Are Hairy (0) Reply of messmer's Reply He likes constructive feedback, which your comment is. :0) 02-10-10  03:03pm Reply 1625 We Are Hairy (0) Reply of messmer's Comment I am sure Basil will take note! ;0) 02-10-10  02:59pm Shown : 1601-1625 of 1886 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.86 seconds.