| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1151
|
Secretease
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
It just struck me, & it was too late to edit....
If you want to be PC about the webmaster / mistress angle, just use Webmanager.
It is an androgynous title! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-01-11 08:42am
|
Reply
1152
|
Secretease
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Just guessing.....
Billing company issues?
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-01-11 03:11am
|
Reply
1153
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Poll
Natural or trimmed for me.
Always has been.
Always will be.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-01-11 02:54am
|
Reply
1154
|
Nylon X Files
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Yes, this is a long term gripe I have had.
See the Striptease thread & also here:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=1382
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-31-11 06:10am
|
Reply
1155
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Well, I would say that the smaller set, where you would like to see more has done its job. ;0)
One of my pet peeves is the bulking out of photosets with 6 shots of each pose.
Take the shots for sure, but take only the best ones, FFS do some editing! :0E
Your last paragraph I agree with too.
Unfortunately, the art of capturing a proper striptease has largely been lost.
For instance, very seldom these days do you see the removal of hose & shoes in a photoset.
It can be one of the most erotic parts of the striptease.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-31-11 03:42am
|
Reply
1156
|
Nylon X Files
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Review
A very nice review,otoh.
It seems you have here a decent niche site starting on the slide.
A shame.
Oh, there really shouldn't be any doubt on the definition of nudity.
I even did a thread on it a while back onthe forum IIRC.
Nudity means no clothes. Simple.
Clothes pulled aside is flashing.
Partially clothed is partially clothed, regardless of whether naughty bits are on view. ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-31-11 03:09am
|
Reply
1157
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I can't pass a valid comment, because I do not understand the question.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-30-11 03:32am
|
Reply
1158
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Oh no....
I am still on with it.
Another 3 years dedicated effort should sort it! ;0)
Provided I stop downloading any more..
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-29-11 10:38am
|
Reply
1159
|
N/A
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
That is what led to my situation.
'Oh I'll edit it later.'
Been doing that for about ten years.
Now I am actually tackling this mammoth task.
Been at it a few weeks now.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-29-11 02:53am
|
Reply
1160
|
Alp Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
' piling a bunch of cuties into a VW 1300. '
Been there did that....
It threw a rod through the crankcase :0(
So I put a bigger engine in! :0D
Cap'n :0)
|
01-28-11 03:36pm
|
Reply
1161
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
That really depends on the size of the archive.
Yes, I could buy more space, but I am currently going through the gory job of slicing down decades of collecting, which will free up a fair amount of space, but I am spending a godawful amount of time looking at & deleting 60% odd of most sets.
Especially the recent greatly larger, poorly edited ones.
It is a PITA.
Ticks the ones you want, zip made download.
Job done!
None of this gory mess I have now.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-28-11 11:41am
|
Reply
1162
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Like I said.
I know that feeling well.
I don't know if it is better or worse.
With CCBill I get the Goldfish Scenario.
'Oh is there a problem.'
Here we go again! :0/
In your case it is difficult to know if the problem is the Webmanager or the billing company.
Either way there should hsve been some response by now though.
Hang in there.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-28-11 11:14am
|
Reply
1163
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yes it is frustrating.
Mind you, so is 6 weeks & counting for CCBill to get their GEOIP database sorted. STILL waiting!
All a matter of scale, I suppose.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-28-11 10:30am
|
Reply
1164
|
Alp Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
The impression I get from that is.
Nice idea. A shame about the implementation.
One of my pet peeves is toy play in preference to a nice ration of soft full frontal nudity.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-28-11 05:23am
|
Reply
1165
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mbaya's Poll
Very much in favour of them.
The user only has to cherry pick & saves a lot on download time & harddrive space too.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-28-11 12:24am
|
Reply
1166
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
RS?
Not heard of them before.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-28-11 12:21am
|
Reply
1167
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I thought those were the billing companies they used?
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-27-11 01:32pm
|
Reply
1168
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Reply
Yes, it all comes down to models levels with soft / midcore material.
Teendreams, I know & like.
I will take a look at Phil-Flash.
Thanks for the extra info.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-26-11 08:38am
|
Reply
1169
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Basically it appears to be stuff that is maybe 3 years old or so moved from their other sites.
The material is selected though, the turkeys don't make the cut. ;0)
Simlar to their other sites though the actual site itself has been revamped to current standards.
Whilst current updates are not quite current state of the art size & quality, the recent material at least is quite acceptable.
The really older stuff you have to make allowance for.
There is good value to be had here, because there is material from all their sites uploaded.
Unless you have been a member of all their sites all the time, you are going to regularly find material you haven't seen before.
Is it worthwhile?
Yes, most certainly for photos, probably less so for video.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-22-11 02:00pm
|
Reply
1170
|
Saint Paul Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
yadayada321's Comment
The link from PU is dead, so it doesn't look good, I'm afraid.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-22-11 03:39am
|
Reply
1171
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Reply
No.
What I am looking for hasn't changed in over 30 years.
Very simple.
Full strips from fully clothed to fully nude.
No masturbation, toyplay, gyno. or les.
It really isn't that difficult, but so often part of the sequence is left out or full nudity isn't reached, or toys appear too quickly.
There are some sites, but not many.
There are many sites so close that they really frustrate!
Onlytease is a prime example of that.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-22-11 03:31am
|
Reply
1172
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I am pleased you are enjoying the site, my friend.
It is generally of good quality & consistent.
It is always on the list for a rejoin for me.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-21-11 05:21pm
|
Reply
1173
|
Nanshakh
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Comment
Well, I have said 'niche' is the way to go with sites.
This one is certainly that.
Not for me, but I can appreciate the effort that has been put in.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-21-11 08:57am
|
Reply
1174
|
Spin On My Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Yep, I think that is what Brits refer to as a Chinese Burn.
It certainly adds reality to 'screwing' another Brit slang for a fuck!
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-21-11 05:11am
|
Reply
1175
|
Spin On My Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
It brings tears to the eyes just looking at it.
Pre-book an ambulance before trying that one!
Make sure you have a good story for the Doctor too!
Cap'n. :00
|
01-21-11 04:07am
|
