| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1101
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Trip999's Reply
It sounds to me like your tastes are evolving & refining.
Nothing at all wrong with that.
For me a fully clothed reclining shot can be just as erotic as the same pose nude.
Oh and to expand a little on my earlier comment.
I have nothing against seeing the model nude.
It is just I appreciate the anticipation of a slow build up, given by a decent striptease.
Even if it is a model I have seen nude many times before, I still really enjoy seeing her strip from different outfits.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-31-11 11:57am
|
Reply
1102
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Trip999's Review
Had another look.
It may be an odd thing to say but....
Still not enough clothes!
The slow reveal of a leisurely striptease builds up anticipation nicely.
Not BAM...This is what she looks like nekkid.
Nothing to look forward to then.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-31-11 04:26am
|
Reply
1103
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Trip999's Review
A detailed review.
Thanks.
I'll give it another look.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-31-11 04:14am
|
Reply
1104
|
Exploited Moms
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
That copyright being stuck at 2006 is ominous.
That sounds as suspicious as another site I ran across recently which had samples of recent updates.
The watermark on the phots were dated 2005!
To answer you question, I don't know for sure, but I would put the chances around 95% that it is dead in the water.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-31-11 04:08am
|
Reply
1105
|
Beauty Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
A very detailed & comprehensive review.
Thanks.
Obviously this site is weighted towards the videos though.
Material is harder than I prefer too.
Honestly, I don't think it is going to float my boat.
Cap'n.
|
03-31-11 04:01am
|
Reply
1106
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Variable.
It is never anywhere near what they claim it to be.
Up to 16 Megabytes per second.
They may as well claim up to 50, because the highest I have ever seen is just under 8 once.
Drop outs of connection in the early evening are a pain too.
When it is behaving itself on average I get just over 5 megabytes per second.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-31-11 03:45am
|
Reply
1107
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I can't really argue that point.
I'm pleased you found it useful anyway.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-27-11 11:57am
|
Reply
1108
|
Euro Teen Movs
(0)
|
Reply of
Rotterdam854's Comment
Very few sites have exclusive models.
Any career model is likely to pop up at various sites from time to time.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-27-11 04:55am
|
Reply
1109
|
Euro Teen Movs
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Personally, I can't see how you cannot do that.
To exaggerate somewhat, something that is worth £10 cannot be recommended if it is being sold at £50.
I appreciate value is subjective, but I do think it has to be factored in somewhere.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-27-11 04:51am
|
Reply
1110
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It is on one of my regualr accounts.
Cap'n.
|
03-27-11 03:51am
|
Reply
1111
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
I am pleased to have helped.
Yes, it is but I am afraid it is so poorly implemented at the moment, I couldn't recommend it.
Whilst the style & standard of photography is there, there is neither quantity or quality of content at the moment.
I have never been a member of Digital Desire.
I may check it out, but not for a while yet.
Being burnt like this makes you more cautious for a while. ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-27-11 03:46am
|
Reply
1112
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
You are spot on with that.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-27-11 03:40am
|
Reply
1113
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
If it has had a turn around, that is interesting.
Knowing my preferences, do you think current content would appeal to me?
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-26-11 02:52pm
|
Reply
1114
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Very few.
I am tightly focussed on what I like.
Moreso the older I get.
I don't have the same amount of patience for wading through stuff that doesn't appeal to find the nuggets like I used to.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-26-11 12:48pm
|
Review
1115
|
Morey Studio
(0)
59.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1) Reasonably priced for an 'art' oriented site.
2) Nice variety of model type, as with all things in life, some more attractive than others.
3) Photography is of a high standard.
There are some really nice ( short ) sets.
4) No attempt at videos.
You may think it odd to put this as a pro, but I do admire someone that sticks to their strengths.
This is purely a photography site. |
| Cons: |
A lot I'm afraid.
1) Poor navigation.
Some links even take you out of the member area.
I haven't come across that in a long time & it used to be a pet peeve! ;0)
2) Short of opening every link, there is no way of knowing how much material is available on the site.
3) Very little material of each model & published sets are short, typically 40 odd shots, some as much as 60 some as few as 20.
4) Viewable photos are NOT high res.
Some are still around 800 pixels, a 'large' set is 1200 although the downloadable zip sets tend to be a little higher, but still only around 2000 pixels. Poor show for a purported art photography site. |
| Bottom Line: |
Although I really wanted to like this site, because I appreciated the style of photography shown in the free area, once becoming a member I was deeply disappointed, both in quantity & quality. Doubly so after Spencers relatively glowing review!
At times, I found myself wondering if it was the same site he reviewed.
Largely, it is the poor site implementation that is the main problem, but as things stand I shan't be letting this one renew.
Of the content that is there, some is familiar, probably from LSG as Drooler pointed out.
The clincher, dropping the site to not recommended, was Access Blocked, due to 'Excessive Usage' whilst I was actually writing the review.
Not impressed.
Membership cancelled.
Cap'n. :0( |
|
03-26-11 12:27pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
1116
|
Fedorov HD
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
A very interesting review, engagingly written!
You have certainly piqued my interest & I shall take a look at what is on offer.
Thanks for your efforts,
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-26-11 07:31am
|
Reply
1117
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I voted 'No' because I very seldom download a video.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-23-11 12:31am
|
Reply
1118
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
ditto otoh!
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-21-11 04:26am
|
Reply
1119
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like both.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-19-11 05:00am
|
Reply
1120
|
Wicked Pictures
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Yes, a lot of sites forget that a lot of folks like pics too.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-17-11 05:39pm
|
Reply
1121
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Once a day per site works for me.
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-11-11 05:49am
|
Reply
1122
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I thought as much.
Thanks for the additional information anyway!
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-10-11 09:00am
|
Reply
1123
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Interesting review.
A shame about this regional pricing issue coming up again.
A very odd situation.
Why request regional pricing & then bypass it immediately someone complains?
I take it there is little in the way of stripping content?
It looks as if it is mainly nude, glam wear or lingerie?
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-10-11 07:12am
|
Reply
1124
|
A Measure of Curiosity
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yes, I didn't think it would be quite right for you, M.
That is why I didn't suggest it to you earlier.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-02-11 12:33pm
|
Review
1125
|
A Measure of Curiosity
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Niche content of ladies taking the journey from fully clothed to naked.
10+ updates per month
Photos at 2048 with zips for all photosets.
MP4 Videos HQ & LQ for download |
| Cons: |
Not a lot of material of any one model.
Older content, especially video, understandably not quite of the current quality. |
| Bottom Line: |
Photosets are well edited and usually cover the ground required well.
They are not overly long.
Typically 30 - 40 photos.
A pleasant change from the current norm of over 200 photos with 6 duplicates of every pose.
Currently about 1 in 4 updates are video
They are MP4 HQ whatever that may mean.
There is a MP4 LQ version as well.
Suffice to say they are all quite watchable once you have them downloaded.
Usually they are around 3 - 4 minute duration.
Whilst the content is definitely softcore, full nudity of at least one lady is always guaranteed.
There are stories, often featuring 3 girls one or more of whom will end up naked before long.
I do mean properly naked, not the 'naked' you often get which includes wearing some clothing! Huummmph! ;0)
There are solo strips & 'auditions' where one girl is stripped for the camera by another model.
Occasionally a man but usually a woman.
You will see full frontal nudity, but no open leg explicit shots or anything harder.
Typically the 'strippee' will be made to perform a twirl for a better view, sometimes at underwear stage as well, but often full nude at the end.
The member area is basic, clean & functional.
It is quite straight forward.
You may find it a little quirky at first, but you soon learn how to navigate the site.
Members of the old site will find quite a lot of the old material here, but in higher resolution than they will have seen before.
Updates are a mixture of new & improved older material.
If you haven't seen it before, which most folk won't, you will find it very much on topic for the woefully underserved 'full strip' niche.
Those that have, well... you will see it bigger & better. ;0)
It certainly isn't a huge site, but it is growing & staying faithful to the niche.
If the idea appeals, for the entrance fee, you shouldn't be disappointed.
What I would really like to see is more return visits from models, using different outfits.
'OK, so I have seen her strip the once.
I don't need to see her do it again' you might say.
Fans of this niche will counter that by saying.
It is not just the destination, it is the anticipation & the enjoyment of the journey there. |
|
03-01-11 04:14pm
Replies (3)
|
