| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
751
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hmmmm.
That doesn't sound very promising!
Thanks for the info.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-18-11 03:34pm
|
Comment
752
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
|
12-18-11 01:38pm
Replies (9)
|
Reply
753
|
Glam Deluxe
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Yes, I got the impression it was trying to be a little artsy, & that is the way they usually go in that niche.
Much as I was expecting then really.
Thanks for the clarification.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-18-11 10:10am
|
Reply
754
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
It is a level of interaction though, which I feel does step beyond fantasy, watching a video or looking at pictures.
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-18-11 10:05am
|
Reply
755
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
lutin's Reply
It does indeed.
Thanks for the additional information.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-18-11 09:54am
|
Reply
756
|
Hairy Triangle
(0)
|
Reply of
BrockLion's Reply
Yes, static.
I thought as much.
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-18-11 04:38am
|
Reply
757
|
Glam Deluxe
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
I take it this is exclusively art nude material.
Nothing really in the way of striptease?
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-18-11 04:33am
|
Reply
758
|
Hairy Triangle
(0)
|
Reply of
BrockLion's Review
Welcome to PU, Brock.
An interesting review. It sounds very retro, & none the worse for that IMO.
What is the update rate like?
I take it the material is non-exclusive?
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-18-11 03:48am
|
Reply
759
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
lutin's Review
Welcome to PU!
A solid start there, Lutin.
I am intrigued though. You mention 'strip interview'...Is there also photoset material of that?
As far as I can see, most of their photoset material falls into the classic error of either starting part way though or ending before full nudity.
Am I correct in that?
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-18-11 03:43am
|
Reply
760
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
LePornoisseur's Review
A nice gambit there, LeP.
Considered and informative.
Welcome to PU.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-18-11 03:39am
|
Reply
761
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I am undecided on this one.
On the one hand it is interaction on an intimate level.
On the other, it is only a virtual medium.
I certainly think it is a couple of steps nearer cheating than viewing pornography.
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-18-11 03:18am
|
Reply
762
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Unlikely.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-14-11 09:56am
|
Reply
763
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks for the reply, D. :0)
|
12-13-11 02:25pm
|
Reply
764
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Daphne from Scooby Doo.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-13-11 10:08am
|
Comment
765
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
12-13-11 09:58am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
766
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
Hi Monty,
There is a good deal of variation in quality as they use quite a few photographers at once and not all are first rate.
That said, it isn't usually lighting that gives a problem, it is usually focus & framing issues.
The poses vary with models, but generally there is a weighting in favour of held open & toy use, neither of which I care for.
The site owner has been asking for more standing full body shots;always at a premium; with limited success.
1) You get some of, although a lot are spoilt with excessive 'touchy, feely.'
2) Is usually fairly well covered.
3) There is some of that but usually they go for the closer in shot.
The coding on the site is arguably its best feature. The user defined custom zips are very slick & useful. Basil is always very helpful & attentive, but is limited by what his contract photogs supply.
I don't want to urn this into a mini review, but I would say it was worth a month's punt to see for yourself.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-12-11 04:09pm
|
Reply
767
|
Bikini Pleasure
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
It is a guess really, because as I like more clothing to give a longer strip I would never subscribe to such a site.
Going from the tour though, I would say there would be a fair amount of nudity, but I doubt it would feature in most sets.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-11-11 07:54am
|
Reply
768
|
Only Opaques
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
Probably. 'Only' sites are usually quite comprehensive in covering their subject matter.
The only thing they are really shaky on is their definition of 'nude'
It usually covers wearing clothing!
Cap'n :0(
|
12-11-11 02:35am
|
Reply
769
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
If you are not in the US watch for that regional pricing scam, if they haven't dropped it.
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-10-11 04:31pm
|
Reply
770
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
LOL!
That was about as subtle as a brick in the back of the neck!
Cap'n :0D
|
12-10-11 03:23am
|
Reply
771
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think it is very difficult to do anything original with it.
The Victorian based red santa outfit has been done to death.
Many times over! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-10-11 03:15am
|
Reply
772
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Reply
No perhaps not, but you listed it in 'cons' without a rider on it.
Welcome to PU BTW !
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-09-11 05:25am
|
Reply
773
|
Kari Sweets
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
Whilst I can appreciate you rating it this highly if you are enamoured of her looks, no zips is a big negative for photo collectors; and those low res video figures are going to be a problem for vid. folks.
Lack of nudity may be another issue! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-08-11 11:35pm
|
Reply
774
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
To be honest, you can't mark down a photo site for not having videos.
If it didn't have zips, yes.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-08-11 11:33pm
|
Reply
775
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Poll
I have an ever growing archive.
Thankfully, as I am not into videos, it is not as much of a storage problem as it would otherwise be. ;0)
|
12-08-11 09:01am
|
