Voyeur Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
No Sites Found.
|
|
Most Active
No Sites Found.
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |

1. Lady Voyeurs (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It is a fun site on the Pure CFNM network
Upwards of 600 scenes
The Pure CFNM network includes 5 other similar themed sites
Downloads are unlimited and HD or better
The network is easy to navigate
I still believe it’s one of the most female-friendly porn networks |
| Cons: |
There is not a lot of sexual intercourse
There is not much plot |
| Bottom Line: |
Pure CFNM is the network and Lady Voyeurs is the site I am focusing on. CFNM porn stands for Clothed Female Nude Male. This niche had something of a heyday a few years back. I do not know if it ever became that popular, but it was better known than it is now. I also do remember the niche being popular with gay male viewers. I do not believe this is a site directed at females or gay males. The males in the scenes receive the pleasure and even though the niche’s acronym says Clothed Females, that rarely holds true for an entire scene. I could be wrong, but believe the niche was popular in the UK before the USA caught on.
The premise of the scenes on Lady Voyeurs is there is a woman who (usually) enjoys watching a man masturbate. I say usually because there has to be some room for the accidental female walking in on a male masturbating and watching instead of stopping him. The females in the scenes vary greatly, from older, heavier set women to college type young women.
The scenes usually progress from the female giving a reason for the male to masturbate in front of her. The guy, of course, agrees. Some even do a halfway decent job of acting like they do not want to and need to be talked into or coerced into doing it. If any performance is under a critical watch it’s the female. Some of the females just sit motionless and smile, flirt a little. Some of the females are almost as quick to get naked or at least show some skin to motivate the male. Despite me seeing these scenes as female-friendly, that is more based on, the males in the scenes are not in the dominant role.
The updates have been steady for years now. There were over 300 new updates over the last 5 years. Besides this, very unique niche Lady Voyeurs offers, there are also scenes on Pure CFNM that have a similar niche, but those give the males a little more control. The network as a whole has a good blend of variations on the CFNM niche.
Pure CFNM and Lady Voyeurs have around 1,600 scenes between them and the other 3 sites have around another 400-500. I think the number is impressive considering it’s not a common or mainstream niche. You also can download high quality videos; the pictures are not as good.
Navigation always matters to a point, but you will probably prefer the variation one of the sites has of the CFNM niche and just focus on a site at a time. I do not join as often as I used to but I do join at least once or twice a year.
I believe it’s a great site for females who are newer to porn and to males with open minds. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|


2. Beautiful Agony (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I can just imagine the first time someone thought, “I think I’ll record my face during orgasm”. The premise of Beautiful Agony was born that day.
It is as realistic and genuine as a site can be.
You’re going to get some of the best scenes you’ve ever seen, but as is the nature of amateur self-submitted, some are not worth even watching.
It's one of the only sites I have been a member of that makes me feel like nothing really matters except the performance.
Sometimes I think, the thoughts going through my mind when watching these scenes, would make some great porn scenes!
It's a great alternative to the overproduced hardcore, overacted “story” porn. |
| Cons: |
Just about all the pros could be reversed into cons. This is truly a site that is it what it is.
There could always be improvements in amateur sites, but at least for me, that’s a big part of the charm of a site like this. |
| Bottom Line: |
Try imagining an attractive woman telling you she’s going to masturbate and record her face during it. Would that intrigue or interest you? Does it excite you? Does it sound too tame? All those questions are ones someone joining Beautiful Agony, should ask themselves before joining. I do believe this is a site that has a core audience sticking with them for months, even years. It’s a very specific niche and that makes it a narrow-niche site.
I tell myself that and wonder just how much or how many people are really just into the moment of the climax? I would think those into female solo videos would be into this niche. I don’t know if someone into hardcore or even porn with a plot would even like this niche a little. The plot of every scene is the same. The woman is going to masturbate, writhe on the bed or whatever surface she’s on, moan, but there’s a good chance you’re not going to see the explicit penetration or stroking. I say all that like hardcore porn and porn with a plot doesn’t eventually lead to an ending with climaxes.
This pulls together the strongest points of Beautiful Agony. If a scene doesn’t seem as good as others, it’s likely the model just didn’t time her expressions right, which tells us how real it is. I remember hearing about one female pornstar who didn’t like the camera to show her face during orgasm. It was on a hardcore site. She said she made some of the weirdest, strangest faces during orgasm.
Beautiful Agony has a dichotomy for a name. And their content lives up or even down to the title. There’s no airbrushing or editing. It might not be as hot and sexy as an overproduced site, but it’s real and there’s no way to fake it.
They have around 15,000 videos of various lengths and some of the videos are very short. As I mentioned earlier, I’m not for sure the technical quality really matters with this style of porn. If you cleaned up some of the videos, had better camerawork, better sound and lighting, it very well could take away from the “in the moment” style of porn they are going for.
I do think this site is relatively easy to recommend to others, but only because it hits on some rather underfilled niches like voyeurism, not produced or scripted and it’s all amateur models. A lot of people like each of those niches. Beautiful Agony gives you a little bit of each of them.
It's a very good join, especially if you’re new to it, and they update enough for me to come back and join every year. I guess you could say you wish they would include their other sites, I Shot Myself and I Feel Myself, but I believe that would be too much to offer. The sites are close to one of a kind. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|


3. Beautiful Agony (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Real people having real orgasms. User-submitted.
+ All sexual orientations and genders.
+ Couple updates per week
+ Older videos are remastered.
+ Voyeuristic even if not an explicit scene, the sounds could be enough for some people.
+ Large catalog of nearly 14,000 videos, but most are short. |
| Cons: |
- Most of the scenes do not show nudity.
- Bigger deal when it’s a male and you can’t see his orgasm. |
| Bottom Line: |
This was the first porn site I joined nearly 10 years ago. It’s not a regular porn site. The focus is on watching the faces of people having orgasms. There are straight men and straight women. Gay men and lesbians. Transsexuals and non-Binary. The scenes are truly good if you’re into voyeurism. You may not see much if any nudity, but usually a voyeur relies on imagination and self-deception to make the voyeuristic moment more believable. I just like watching for the ones that slip and let some nudity show.
There are no real stories or plots. There are no reasons to follow any of the action other than to see the person orgasm. If you think about it that is what a lot of porn is. It’s just on Beautiful Agony you get closeups of the person’s face and get to hear and see their orgasmic ecstasy.
The site has nearly 14,000 videos with most being under 10 minutes long. They add an average of 2 new videos per week. I do think the different genders make it interesting since maybe you’re curious about how people the same gender as you look during orgasm. On the negative side there are no photos.
The videos are not looking to arouse you with action. I am thinking the goal is to catch the videoed person right in the moment of orgasm to cause the viewer to try and orgasm at the same time. Some of the females are very vocal while most of the men don’t say much or make many noises. It’s definitely different in a good way. I would like to see scenes of a man and woman mutually masturbating while showing their faces and how much they look at each other,
The site is very easy to join and cancel via CCBill. The site has been around for 15+ years and the older videos have been remastered to higher quality videos. I believe this site falls heavily into a niche category. The one thing you are guaranteed to see in every scene is a person having an orgasm. Nudity, dirty talk, are not guaranteed.
Few sites will show you the subjectivity of looks like this one does. There were some males and females I didn’t find attractive, but the comments showed that others do. These are all amateur and user-submitted so there is no standard in looks. It’s an enjoyable site at a good price ($14.95), but probably should only be joined once or maybe twice per year. There’s just not enough variety in the scenes to make it a site you regularly allow to recur. It Is worth it for those into orgasms. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|