Nude Celebrities Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
No Sites Found.
|
|
Most Active
No Sites Found.
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Mr. Man (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
This site is the converse of Mr. Skin – but instead of showing nude women, the site features nude men.
If an actror has appeared nude in a movie house movie or broadcast or cable TV, his nude scene is almost certainly going to be here
Video downloads are now offered in h.264 format (MP4)
HTTPS is used
Newer clips available in 720p for download (older may still be lower quality)
LOTS of content
14000+ Celeb Pages
12000+ Title Pages
110000+ Pics
37000+ Clips
540+ Playlists
1040 Original Videos |
| Cons: |
Most videos are not HD, and the ones that are top out at 720p
Most clips include only the parts with nudity, so you lose some of the context and build up in the scene. Adding a couple of minutes to get the complete scene would be nice.
Many of the thousands of scenes they show are extremely short - as in a couple of seconds. For some of the super-short ones, they’ll offer a super-slo-mo instant replay.
Nearly all the photos are screen caps
No biographical information |
| Bottom Line: |
Mr Skin has been around since 1999, Mr Man was spun off more recently (I’m not sure when but I’d guess at least 10 years ago).
As you can probably tell from my User Name, female nudity is more my thing. But I got a chance to get a one month membership for 5 bucks, and curiosity got the better of me, so I joined up.
When you first go to Mr. Man, to sign up, they do require a credit card to be presented. They claim they will not charge the account, it’s only to prove you are over 18, and in my case, to their credit, they did not charge me anything and no transaction appeared on my account.
If you sign up this way and also sign up to receive emails, you will soon get an offer to join the site for $5 for the first month, rebilling at $20 per month after that. I signed up for that deal. Cancelling after the first month was very easy. Note that they have cross-checked sites so clear those, they also provided a one-month free subscription to two additional sites. Cancelling those extra sites is easy too, but make note – you have to cancel each of the three sites individually.
A ”Playlist” is a collection of scenes that fit a theme, such as “Best Blowjobs of the 90s” (this one has 17 scenes) or “Hot Gay Threesomes” (this one has 19 scenes). Body of Work is a pretty regular series where they focus on a single actor.
Their “About Us” statement is a pretty good summary of what they offer
“Mr. Skin- the world’s foremost authority on celebrity nudity- is pleased to present the newest destination for male celebs at their hottest, Mr. Man. Since 1999, Mr. Skin has been the greatest, most dynamic, most all-encompassing warehouse of celebrity nudity on the planet. Now we’re using our below the belt expertise to bring you all your favorite male celebrities nude and exposed.
With meticulously catalogued video clips and pictures of actors who have dared to bare, Mr. Man has no fakes and no scams, only the highest quality content that you can trust. Forget the days of wading through plot and dialogue just to get to the moment when your favorite actor gets nude, Mr. Man is “fast-forwarding to the good parts” so you don’t have to.
From Hollywood heartthrobs to the latest nudecomers, Mr. Man delivers one-of-a-kind celebrity entertainment experience with Mr. Skin’s signature brand of bawdy, boisterous comedy. If you’ve ever seen a gorgeous actor on-screen and wondered if they’ve done a nude scene, Mr. Man has the answer.
It's a dirty job, but someone's got to do it!”
Navigation is quite good, especially if you can recall the actor’s name (first or last) or the name of the movie. The browse function for celebs also offers a lot of choice (some sites might call this advanced search). For example, some of the filters include: has shown penis (2947 actors yes, 11,106 no), hair color, ethnicity, country, and keyword such as athlete, childhood star, singer/musician, etc.
Downloads are fast - helped by the small file sizes due to short scene length. But browsing and streaming are also pretty snappy.
Mr Skin has offered lifetime memberships off and on for years, I got mine a long time ago for $99. Mr Man also offers them occasionally, but the cheapest price I have seen the past couple of months was $139. If you subscribe to their emails, there will be sales where annual memberships go for $48, or one-month for $5. So if you are considering this site, do sign up for emails first. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Mr. Skin (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Low priced membership. Can often find a first month membership for $5.
Lifetime memberships are sometimes offered for $100 during the year.
-Mr Skin is probably the easiest, best site for looking up brief sex scenes of your favorite movie stars and celebrities.
-They list lots of discounted memberships to other porn sites.
-Downloading and streaming is included in the membership. You don't have to pay extra for downloads.
-Clips are available in 360p through 1080p.
-You can play clips in .25 through 1.5 speed. Seems like a gimmick to me, except you can slow down the speed to watch "good parts" more slowly.
-Search is excellent. You can search by name, or title of the movie or tv show. |
| Cons: |
-Clips are mainly short, 3 minutes or less.
-The quality of the clips is just OK, not really excellent. Which is surprising, since they take the clips from commercial movies and tv shows. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site advertisies:
300,000+ pictures and videos
20,000+ sexy celebrities
30,000+ movies and TV shows
New updates daily
Detailed reviews and ratings
They frequently advertise a first month's price of $5, rebilling at $20/month.
Or a yearly price of $60/year.
They also advertise a special price of $100 for a lifetime membership every once in a while.
I joined the site for $100 for a lifetime membership.
Which is fine, except that I rarely use the site.
I think a better idea is to join for $5 for one month, explore the site, and see if it's worth joining for a longer period.
If you think it's worth joining for a longer period, wait for the $100 lifetime offer.
That makes more sense than joining for $60 for a year, even though that is a cheap price.
The positives about the site:
It might satisfy the itch if you want to see scraps about the celebrites/movie stars who have done nudity in movies.
I say "scraps", because most of the scenes are very brief, a few minutes or less. So you might see some nudity, but the scenes at Mr Skin lack most of the impact that the scenes from the movies have.
Their motto is: Fast-forwarding to the good parts, since 1999!
That's good, which is what most guys (and girls) want to see.
Except that, the good parts lack the impact and value without the buildup that gives the scene meaning.
And the quality of the videos can often be lacking.
Which I don't understand.
If you're going to copy from a commercial movie, shouldn't the quality be excellent?
But the clips often disappoint, in how brief they are (3 minutes or less average run-time), and the quality of the images can be poor.
Having said that, it's still worthwhile to explore the site, to see for yourself what the site offers.
For a very low price, you can re-visit briefly some of the scenes from memorable movies that you saw years ago, and stuck in your memory for years afterward. Personally, I've found that tastes can change over the years. But there are some instances where the scenes are good, but not as great as they should be.
For example:
The scenes from Fast Times at Ridgemont High with Phoebe Cates and Jennifer Jason Leigh are classic.
Both girls are lovely.
And the scenes are good, but not as great as they should have been.
You can watch those scenes in definition from 360p through 1080p, but it doesn't seem like 1080p when you're watching them.
The images are definitely not as crisp as 1080p images should look like.
And maybe the colors aren't as vivid as they should be.
So the site best serves to satisify your curiousity about some movie stars. But the clips lack the power that the source movies have.
They advertise detailed reviews and ratings. I've been a member of the site for serveral years now (I bought a lifetime membership years ago for $100), and the only reviews I've read at the site are very brief snippets of reviews.
I don't spend a lot of time at the site, so I don't know where they are hiding the "detailed" reviews..
Expectations:
Don't join the site expecting to see a lot of hot clips of nudity or sex.
Instead, the site serves mainly to satisfy some of your curiosity about semi-nudity or nudity of movie actors (and other celebrities). |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Mr. Skin (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-The main pro is that the site serves as an encyclopedia of nude appearance by movie stars in movies.
An easy way to check if a movie star appeared nude or semi-nude in movies. More suitable for fans of movie stars, instead of fans of erotic content.
-Unlimited downloading and streaming.
-Secure login and member pages (https).
-The introductory page after login is a page of ads. Normally, I don't consider ads a positive, but there are only a few ads for major sites, and some of the membership prices are very low: MetArt, for example, has a $60 annual membership listed, which is the lowest price I've seen for that site.
-The clips usually end with a "SkinVision" segment, where they replay the "sexy part of the clip" in slow motion, so you can re-watch the "best part of the clip".
-A low membership price: $60/year. They often offer a lifetime membership for $100.
-Excellent search engine. |
| Cons: |
-The tags describing a clip can be misleading:
A tag says breasts, but the model/actress can be wearing a bikini or a blouse, and the breasts are not naked, but covered by material. You figure she has breasts, because she is female, but you can't see them.
Or the tags say ass, and the model has an ass, but it's covered by a bikini bottom or shorts.
-The clips are not erotic. They are too short to be erotic. Even when the clip is from the erotic part of a movie, you lose the impact of the movie because the build-up to the clip is missing, and the clip itself lacks the original meaning of the scene. And when I say the clip is too short to be erotic, you have a clip of two minutes or less, so it's like a fleeting glance, instead of a full-blown experience.
An erotic photo or photo set can, and usually is, a more complete and satisfying experience instead of the Mr Skin short movie clips.
-The quality of the clips is disappointing. The clips from movies are degraded definition. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site is for fans who want to search for brief clips of movie stars nudity.
The clips are not erotic. They are mainly short clips, 2 minutes or less, with minimal build-up.
As an encyclopedia of movie star nudity, it serves a useful function.
But I feel Mr Skin is built for fans of movie star nudity, and not for fans of erotic content.
If you want erotic content, go for a fine photo site, like MPL Studios or MetArt or other softcore glam sites.
Or if you're into hardcore teens, the Wow Girls/Wow Porn sites, X-Art, Teen Mega World offer a lot of value.
Or a hardcore glamcore network like LetsDoeIt is a fine choice.
Even though Mr Skin is catalogued as an erotic site, since it focuses on nudity in movies, it is not a site to go to for erotic content. Instead, you go to the site if you have an itch to see if a favorite movie star has done any public (movie, tv) nudity.
There's a reply from PU member marcdc1 on 2019-04-25 that sums up the site:
"I keep checking out Mr. Skin and so far haven't pulled the trigger - mostly because I fear it's going to feed my curiosity - but not my libido".
I'm giving the site a score of 80.
It's a good site for what it does: There's a huge amount of short clips, many of them non-nude. As an encyclopedia of movie star near-nudity or nudity, it does a good job.
I just wish the quality of the clips was better, the clips were longer to include a build-up to the scene to give it greater impact.
As a site of erotic content, it's disappointing. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|
