HD Porn Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
No Sites Found.
|
|
Most Active
No Sites Found.
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |

1. U Got It Flaunt It (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Lots of amateurs – few have appeared anywhere else
Visits to the most beautiful beaches
Always fun to see a girl get coaxed out of her top. Even more fun if she is coaxed out of her bottom.
Also fun when a girl needs no coaxing at all – she’s got all the confidence in the world already and is quite happy to flaunt it.
The commenters are quite enthusiastic, especially when a girl finally lets go and really does flaunt it.
Regular updates – every other day.
No download limits as far as I can tell. |
| Cons: |
Many of the videos are kind of grainy
Many photos are out of focus
The models are amateurs, and probably some of the photographers too. So they haven’t developed a full sense of how best to pose for a camera.
Many of the sets make it no farther than Wet T-shirt or hand-bra. There’s plenty of full topless sets, but a lower percentage than you might expect.
Only a small percentage go fully nude.
Search function is quite limited. |
| Bottom Line: |
his site is kind of tough to give a numerical rating to. This site is a lot of fun, I’m very glad I joined, and I will probably make an annual pilgrimage here. But there are enough minor dings that it doesn’t earn a top-shelf score.
One con I mentioned, that many of the girls never go full topless, can also be a bit of a pro. Now when you first go to a set, “will she or won’t she” is a legit question, so it does add some anticipation as you work through a set.
Considering that most of these beaches are well known for ladies going topless, it’s kind of surprising the low-ish hit rate they get in getting the girls to go full topless.
The compensation they offer the girls isn’t that high – a T shirt with the company logo, and digital copies of every photo or video they take of that girl. I suspect that the ones that agree to go back to the apartment for a more extensive photo shoot do get a little more than that.
Videos top out at 1080p, so no 4K yet.
The subscription for one month goes for $24.95, 3 months for about $45 and 6 months for about $70.
I signed up via ccBill which is an excellent biller to work with. Cancellation was very easy.
If you enjoy seeing softcore amateurs, and sometimes very softcore, you will find lots to like at this site. I'd definitely recommmend giving it a whirl |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|


2. Passion HD (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The site includes a wide variety of models, including some of my absolute favorites from the 2010's. The best part is that there are a few I have never seen creampied before who have only been creampied on this site to my knowledge
There doesn't appear to be any of the stupid "daddy" talk or forced step-relation crap that has become all to common in porn this decade |
| Cons: |
The editing can be absolutely horrible in some of these films. One minute you'll be watching the woman get fucked and then it snaps to her on her knees getting cum on her face. It's jarring and I prefer other sites that show the whole process. I also think this snap-editing is used to try to hide the fact that a lot of the creampies, especially on newer videos, are fakes.
The majority of videos appear to end with a facial. If that's what you're into, great. I prefer seeing the sperm go inside the woman, either her mouth or pussy, and feel that the ratios could be a lot better.
-The site layout and navigation is atrocious and half-finished. Only the main video page has functional navigation. In every other tab it appears to be non existent. There also appears to be no good way to search by category (you can but it shows a fraction of the videos that would actually fit that category) |
| Bottom Line: |
Some of the videos would have been among my all-time favorites if only the editing and camerawork was better. The site navigation leaves a lot to be desired, and a lot of videos recommended are locked behind paywalls to other sites in the network. This site could have been an absolute gem, and is pretty good given the sorry state of porn this decade, but unfortunately is only above-average |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
|


3. Hustler HD (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the biggest names in adult entertainment over the last 50 years.
Video downloads in clear high definition
Back catalog of the digitized Hustler magazines
Downloadable photo sets
Multiple updates per week
Professional, clean and not cluttered website |
| Cons: |
Despite a clean design, the site and its included sites can become confusing and overwhelming
I would like to see more download options on the videos |
| Bottom Line: |
Like many Porn Users, I remember the days of buying a Hustler magazine from a corner store. It does not seem like bookstores carried Hustler back then, but I could be wrong. I only remember Penthouse and Playboy in bookstores. Hustler was a premium adult magazine to most of us.
That is one of the most interesting parts of a membership to Hustler HD. It comes with access to a couple decades of Hustler digitized magazines. One of the oldest jokes about men subscribing to adult magazines was, “I read the articles.” Hustler was maybe the best and truest to that saying. From hilarious cartoons to stories of all kinds of sexiness and jokes, often, extremely politically incorrect jokes. You get to experience all that with these digitized magazines.I thought maybe it would just be a bunch of nude pictures, but there are all the features, or if you prefer, articles.
Hustler HD seems to be the future for Hustler. They include access to all the content from Hustler Mega Pass. I do not know why they would rebrand, but you get access to a lot of content. Which is one of the cons. The content becomes harder to find the further you go into the site or network. You are better off finding actresses you like or a series of DVDs and just searching through those, otherwise, you end up in areas of the site where some links are dead and pictures do not even load. It feels like this site is the future, but they are trying to either get rid of older content or somehow integrate it.
I have seen 3-4 updates per week and there are over 3,000 videos in the video section. There are also over 2,000 photo sets. You can download as many videos and photo sets as you want and the quality is high definition, 720/1080. The videos range from solo, lesbian, hardcore and group.
I was not even aware of this site until an email promo caught my attention. I do not see a huge difference between this site and the other Hustler sites. That is not really a bad thing, but it does make me wonder why they would replace an otherwise good site with another just good site.
The navigation is good. I am impressed with the site design and maybe that is my answer for why there is this newer Hustler site. I would confidently compare the sex quality in the scenes to Viv Thomas scenes. It is more like the porn from the late 90s and early 2000s than the hardcore gonzo we see in most newer porn sites. It is a definite positive step in the right direction, but it’s more of a pensive baby step than a giant step forward. |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
|

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|