Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: BadMrFrosty (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (124)  |   Threads Started (3)

51-100 of 124 Posts < Previous Page 1 Page 2 3 Next Page >

03-11-12  12:52am - 4848 days #6
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
I like 1080P at least 8mbps. Don't really mind if its wmv or h264 but please please please use a compliant encoding profile that allows hardware accelerated playback. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

03-07-12  11:54am - 4851 days #3
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
A year or so ago I ditched Windows and installed Unbuntu which I used exclusively for 3 months or so. While it is a fine OS there were certain things that were still unnecessarily complex or hidden away so much that it felt like it was deliberately trying to be obtuse. Love it or hate it Windows has a certain logic to it and usually if you are reasonably tech savy you can hazard a guess at where a certain setting or feature would be. With Unbuntu I had to constantly jump on google to find out how to do what I considered simple tasks. Long story short, I switched back to Windows. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

01-25-12  10:20am - 4893 days #26
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
I have about 15 Terrabytes of porn. My home internet connection linked to the network where my porn is stored has a upload speed of 0.5 Mbps.

Assuming I was able to transfer using 100% of my bandwidth and did not use my internet connection for anything else it would take about EIGHT AND A HALF YEARS to transfer all my porn into the cloud. Can anyone guess why I dont use cloud storage? The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa
Edited on Jan 25, 2012, 10:23am

01-25-12  08:32am - 4893 days #12
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Originally Posted by Denner:


BMF, you forget one thing(LOL): The webmaster of Diesel Media states, that he's making 95 pct. of the shoots at Diesel Media - how that's possible is a question "blowing in the wind"...(when I see all the content at other sites).

And, BMF - got to agree with your question about: "definition of exclusive"....

As a new member now I still have to be very reluctant to go along with that "exclusive" - and in spite of somewhat fine content of the site: Do not take us for fools, webmasters - and think you can just go along with those "exclusive" claims.


I have not seen the reply from the webmaster so I may have the wrong end of the stick but claiming that he produced 95% may well be accurate as for all we know he may be licensing the content to the other sites. Any claim that 95% is exclusive would however be grossly misleading. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

01-25-12  07:31am - 4894 days #10
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
After a cursory look over the YoungLegalPorn.com preview pages I can see a fair number of hardcore scenes that I have already seen on sites like FirstAnalQuest.com and HardCoreYouth.com. Who produced it for whom I have no idea but it certainly does not fall within my definition of exclusive. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

01-12-12  11:57pm - 4906 days #45
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


The term "rip" means to rip off. If you're paying for a site and downloading from the site that you paid for and it's for your own purposes and you're not doing anything that is injurious to the site, then even if you're using a digital vacuum cleaner, you are not a site ripper and nothing that you are doing could be honestly construed as site ripping.

As the web masters in the thread have said, what makes something constitute "site ripping" is if you download the site's contents and post it on a forum, a peer-to-peer network or other means to constitute piracy.


I have always thought of "rip" to mean taking something from somewhere and transferring it somewhere else. For example, ripping a audio CD or DVD to my hard drive. I'm not ripping anyone off as I own the CD, I am just transferring it in its entirety to some place else. I think the same way about websites, if I join a site and want to download its content in its entirety I consider that to be site ripping. I dont redistribute it but I have a rip of that particular site, or a "siterip" if you prefer, sat on my harddrive which is available at any time with or without a internet connection or when my membership has expired. I paid for it and downloaded what was on offer. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

12-29-11  12:00am - 4921 days #16
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


We have three Xboxes in my house a 1st gen 2nd and this new one. We got the red ring of death on one a few years ago both have coolers. I do get the idea of the dust but PC's and Mac also use fans a very bad way to cool but seems industry standard unless you buy like we did my son a few years ago a Alienware PC that is liquid cooled and came with a 2500.00 price tag. The new XBOX has more cooling vents and does not seem as warm as the other ones. There are a few notable differences.

The new model ( Slim ) is smaller, consumes less power with a smaller power brick, makes less heat, the chances of it over heating(most likely reason of RROD) is now very low, other technical improvements, bigger HD, built in Wi-Fi,and is faster in loading games and Xbox live Netflix is blazing fast on it compared to my Bluray player.

I like the sleek black look of thew new Xbox its foot print on my desk is not much bigger then a phone answering machine. I am not happy with MS's past performance and agree the PS is superior lasting wise, but play wise the PS and Wii still do not stack up. Kinda like Macs and PC's mac's are superior lasting wise, but unless you are editing movies gamers prefer PC's still .


The design of the 360 has vastly improved since the 1st gen models. Even the newest versions of the fat models based around the Jasper design do not overheat, the slims run even cooler. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

12-15-11  06:16am - 4935 days #14
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
I apologise in advance for the vulgar and crude nature of these jokes. They happen to be some of the most offensive I know so if you are of a nervous disposition or sense of humour challenged I suggest giving this post a miss. Here we go...

Q. How do make a gay man fuck a woman?

A. Shit in her cunt.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Q. What is the worst thing about eating 12 oysters from your grandmothers pussy?

A. Realizing you only put in 11


I know, I know, I am a bad bad man The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

10-14-11  07:07am - 4997 days #9
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Originally Posted by Micha:


I much prefer HD in video and have had few problems downloading and playing 720p vids from several paysites. What has given me problems are the 1080p vids (from Xart and now Reality Kings) These three to four gig vids won't play on my puter. (running XP on a 2Gh processor)
A still image appears and then nothing. I can advance using the ff slider to other still images for the entire duration of the vid. I can sometimes get movement by coaxing, but it is of short duration and very choppy. My players are WMP, VLC, and Media Player Classic. 720p works just fine for me but that format is not available at RK. Any suggestions out there? Any suggestions for vid players?
Thanks for any help on this.


michael


1080P video needs a lot of horsepower to decode. A 2ghz CPU cant do it without a bit of help. You have a couple of options, first a piece of software called CoreAVC and the second is to use your graphics card hardware to help. Unfortunately, both solutions require the video to be encoded in a compliant way. From my experience, very few WMV files I download from porn sites are DXVA compliant so it may be best to download and try h264 encoded mp4 or flv files. Once you have the files and one of the helpers you need to use a supported player to make use of them. I use MPC HC which given the right graphics card or CoreAvc and a compliant video file should work with default settings. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

10-14-11  06:58am - 4997 days #8
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Originally Posted by anyonebutme:


Higher the resolution, the better the picture. Higher the bitrate, the better the picture. Otherwise, there really isn't a relationship between the two. You can encode a video at 640x480@20mbps, or the same at 1920x1080@3mbps.

But there is a point where more bitrate produces negligible improvement in video quality.

Typically
640x480 - 4mbps
1280x720 - 6mbps
1920x1080 - 12mbps


Of course this only applies to porn videos. Hollywood videos go up to and sometimes over 50mbps to get the desired look.


For codecs, on a computer "9" is about as good as "8", negligible differences. But your hardware player only supports a limited number of decoding options. It is what it is.


The codec plays a large part as well. A MPEG 1 video encoded at 640x480 4 mbps will look worse than the same video encoded using h264 at 1 mbps. You can go even further by comparing the encoding profile, number of encoding passes, cbr vs vbr and all sorts of other jargon until your head spins but usually given the video codec, bitrate and resolution you can make a educated guess at the quality level. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa
Edited on Oct 14, 2011, 07:10am

10-09-11  01:24pm - 5001 days #6
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
To my admittedly limited theological understanding, a agnostic is willing to hedge his bets to believe that some kind of higher power exists while the atheist believes in nothing but cold hard logic and scientific proof. I believe that the explanations for our being, purpose (or lack thereof) and evolution are far better explained in scientific terms than any kind of religion, I guess you could call science my higher power. If god were to land on the white house lawn and reveal the heathenous nature of us unbelievers I would be willing to look into the possibility I am wrong. As I believe hell will freeze over before that happens I stand firm. And yes I do see the irony in my last sentence The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

10-09-11  09:10am - 5001 days #2
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Religion must be the only form of playing / talking to imaginary friends that is still socially acceptable. So in short, religion belongs as much in porn as it does in any other part of life: not at all. Not am I only a miserable old cynic but also a staunch atheist. I guess if I'm wrong about the whole thing I am going on a express elevator to hell when I pop my clogs The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

10-09-11  01:19am - 5002 days #5
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
I have hit the limit a couple of times on FemJoy but under normal circumstances 3GB/hr is more than enough. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

08-28-11  02:43am - 5044 days #3
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
What I would consider to be the greatest barrier facing anyone wanting to take legal action against these downloaders is actually proving who it was that downloaded the file. Unless we find it acceptable that whoever pays the Internet bill is the person liable for the download then this type of thing can never work. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

08-10-11  02:52pm - 5061 days #9
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
I would bet my left ball that "porn tube" is one of the most common search terms on the planet. Having a porn.com domain combined with liberal use of the tube keyword would likely bring them a lot of visitors. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

08-09-11  08:47am - 5062 days #7
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Thanks guys.

As for the NAS talk, while they are obviously a lot easier to put together than a server the price difference is very large.

As a Netgear ReadyNAS has been mentioned I will do a quick price breakdown comparing a NAS and custom built servers. Prices are from newegg.com

Here is a very quick spec for a server PC that can support up to 6 drives giving a total storage space of up to 18 TERABYTES(!)

CPU - AMD Sempron 145 $43
Motherboard - MSI 760GM-P33 $49
RAM - Kingston 1GB DDR3 1066 $9
PSU - LOGISYS Computer PS480D2 480W $13
CASE - GIGABYTE gz-ph2a3 $22
ODDS AND Ends (power splitters, cables etc) - $20
OS - FreeNAS or any linux = Free

TOTAL $156

Netgear ReadyNAS supporting 2 drives, 6 TB max = $298
Netgear ReadyNAS supporting 4 drives, 12 TB max = $545
Netgear ReadyNAS supporting 6 drives, 18 TB max = $795

Remember these prices do not include the hard drives themselves! So you can see, even if you were to throw someone $100 to put the server together for you, it is far, far cheaper to put together a high capacity server than to buy a ready made NAS. With the server, you could even install something like FreeNAS which would make it behave in the same way as a dedicated NAS box for a fraction of the price. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

08-09-11  02:18am - 5063 days #3
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
The problem with off the self NAS boxes are they generally dont support more than a couple of hard disks and the ones that do are VERY expensive. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

08-08-11  11:48pm - 5063 days Original Post - #1
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)


This is supposed to be a total newbie friendly guide to putting together a home server for storing your "stuff". If anything needs more explanation, let me know and I will try to clarify. I will split the guide into 2 parts, the first covering the hardware needed and the second will go over the software, configuration and additional tips.

Choosing the Hardware


If you have any old PCs knocking about you can probably salvage a lot of this stuff from them. I tend not to recycle the CPU, motherboard or RAM as modern CPUs need a lot less power to do their job. As most of the time the CPU will be doing very little, it can switch itself to a lower power / slower mode which is more than good enough for a simple file server. As well as being Eco friendly, a added bonus is less power used by the CPU = less heat generated. Less heat means slower fans, slower fans mean less noise.

1. Motherboard


You will need one to match whichever type of CPU you choose. My servers use AMD based CPUs so the motherboard must be able to take one of those chips. The blurb on the box will make it clear what CPU you can use. You want a motherboard that has on board graphics, as many SATA ports as possible, usually this will be 6 and Gigabit Ethernet. Other than that get the cheapest possible.

2. CPU

The cheapest possible will be fine. Go for the retail boxed version as it will include the fan and thermal paste pre-applied.

3. Memory (RAM)


1GB, cheapest possible to match what your motherboard takes. This will be either DDR2 or DDR3. Speed of the memory is not important.

4. Power supply

If you plan to leave the server switched on 24hrs a day (I dont, more on that in part 2) then go for a decent power supply like a Corsair, if not a el cheapo 400 Watt will be fine.

5. Case


Again cheapest that you can find will be fine. You should just make sure there is enough space to fit 6 hard drives. You can buy brackets very cheaply which allow the spaces that DVD drives fit into to be used for 3.5 inch hard drives instead so nearly all tower cases will fit enough drives.

6. Hard drives

You don't have to buy all the hard drives at once. Just get at least one which will be used to store the operating system. Also buy a SATA cable, some motherboards come with them but they are very cheap and you dont want to put off your build because of missing a essential cable. If you are buying many drives at the same time you want to make sure the PSU is going to have enough plugs to power them all. If not you will need to get some molex to sata converter cables. These are very cheap and just allow you to power modern SATA drives using legacy molex plugs.

7. Temporary stuff

You will also need access to a DVD drive, a monitor, keyboard and mouse. Once you have the system up and running you wont need them again unless something goes badly wrong.


Putting it together


Once you have all the bits its a case of putting them all together. If you played with mechano or some such thing as a kid you will have no trouble at all putting together a PC. The stuff you buy will come with instructions but may be written in Engrish so follow the pictures! I will give you a basic overview here with advice on common mistakes but you can find much better guides to putting together a PC from the bits via Google. Also most computer shops offer to build a PC from the bits you choose very cheaply. My local place charge about $15 to do that.

1. Attach the CPU with the fan to the motherboard. This will be clamped very tightly. If you bought the CPU and fan separately make sure you also bought and applied the thermal paste to the CPU. The power cable from the fan will usually also plug into the motherboard.

2. Slot in the memory. This will fit only one way so make sure its the right way round before applying too much force.

3. Screw the PSU into the case.

4. Install the motherboard. Make sure you put the little risers in the correct place to match with the screw holes on the motherboard.

5. Attach the power cables from the PSU to the motherboard.

6. Attach the button and LED wires from the case to the motherboard. This is fiddly, just make sure you get the power button attached, the others don't matter too much as servers are usually stored out of sight.

7. Install the hard disk(s). Plug one end of the SATA cable into the motherboard, the other into the drive. They will fit only one way so no danger of plugging them in wrongly. Plug in the power cable.

8. Install the DVD drive in the same way as the hard drive. As the DVD drive is there just for installing the OS, you don't need to close the case as you will remove the DVD drive soon anyway.

9. Attach the external cables, power, mouse, keyboard, monitor.

Now you are ready to install the OS. Your choice of OS is really up to you. I use Windows 7 which is very easy to setup and configure. More on that in part 2. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

08-02-11  10:44am - 5069 days #3
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Just how much does this interest you, maybe I can convince the GF to shed her camera shyness.... The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

08-01-11  11:27pm - 5070 days #13
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
About your second point, maybe some sort of carousel feature (similar what is on the TBP homepage) would placate those users who feel hard done by whilst also allowing fresh reviews to be added without the fear of a faux pas. Maybe the last 5 reviews can be shown changing after a set interval. Obviously to make them readable a little pause button would need to be in place to stop the carousel. What do you think? The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

07-06-11  01:43am - 5097 days #16
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Originally Posted by pat362:


See I never saw Max's stuff has pedophilic in nature. I agree that he loved to dress the girls in mini skirts and make them play young teenagers but I always took that to be is shtick or trade mark. That particular fondness of dressing the women like young teenagers goes back to his beginning in porn.

The thing about having a woman dress like a teenager or young girl and then play the part isn't really going to satisfy a pedophile. These people aren't interested in looking at women that play as little girls they want to see little girls that play as women. I personally love the long white socks, plaid skirt, white blouse and pigtails look. I don't care that the woman is 40yrs old or 18yrs old. The look is what I'm interested in and not the fact that it's usually worn by young girls. That's why I never had a problem with his choice of play acting and clothing.


Its the way he gets them to act that bothers me. When he gets a skinny girl that has just turned 18 but could easily pass for 13, dresses her in a VERY childlike mannor and instructs her to call him daddy or mister you cant say that alarm bells dont start ringing. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

07-04-11  11:36pm - 5098 days #9
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
I think the thing that differentiates ol Max from the other kings of humiliation is his obvious pedophilic tendencies. I like harder porn. I like humiliation porn. I like rough sex. I like to see fisting in porn. You would think I would be a loyal fan of Max's work. This, however, is not the case. I feel very uneasy seeing very young, although 18+, girls dressed up and instructed to act like they are 12 years old. What makes me feel even more ill is the thought of what this guy gets up to off camera... The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

06-11-11  01:18am - 5122 days #8
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Originally Posted by pat362:


The Leisure Suit Larry series.
The King's Quest series.
The Space Quest series.
Crusader no Regret.
Crusader No remorse.
Star Trek the Original series.
The Wing Commander series.(super fun to play)
Privateer Series.
Command and Conquer.
System Shock(both amazing and scary like hell)
Autoduel.
Deux Ex.
Starfleet Command II and III.
Jedi Knight-Jedi Academy.
Jedi Knight-Outcast.
Masters of Orion.
Star Wars knights of the Old Republic I & II.
Arcanum.
Tron 2.0.
Nox.
Fallout.
Fallout II.
Fallout III.(on the PS3) Fun but I wou,d have prefered a different ending. rather depressing.


Some very good titles in there

With regards to Fallout 3, there are quite a few different endings. None of them are happy, happy, joy, joy but some are a little upbeat at least. Also if you install the addon "Brotherhood of steel" the end of the main game is also very different. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

06-10-11  07:23am - 5123 days #3
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
I'm not a big fan of FPS games but did really enjoy Bulletstorm purely for the fact it was so over the top in just about everything it did making it thoroughly good fun.

At the moment I'm playing The Witcher 2 on the PC which is one of (if not the) most gorgeous games I have ever seen. On top of looking good it is also well written and acted, a must for a RPG. Speaking of well written RPG's, anything by Bioware is worth playing just for the story and character interactions alone.

Also worthy of a mention are Obsidian who did Fallout: New Vegas, which is really great story and gameplay wise. I must have sunk a total of 100+ hours into that game getting both the platinum trophy on PS3 and 1000/1000 on 360. Not to say that Obsidian deserves full credit as I also devoted ungodly amounts of my freetime to Fallout 3, Oblivion, Morrowind and even Daggerfall. What we were treated to in New Vegas is the marriage of the absolute masters of the open world RPG, Bethesda, with the masters of storytelling and character design at Obsidian. The results are clearly great

Obsidian's previous game, Alpha Protocol, is another example of where their skills lie. The gameplay itself is utter trash, severely unbalanced, cheap and stupid AI, repetitive levels to name but a few of its problems. The saving grace however was the extremely complex dialog and story systems. It is one of the only games where I have felt that the choices I make when interacting with people actually have a tangible impact on the story and outcome of the game. As long as they are forbidden from designing the gameplay mechanics, Obsidian make great games.

The last couple of years have produced a fair number of games that fulfill the basic principle of what a game should be, namely great fun to play. Of note are Just Cause 2, the free roaming tropical island detsructo fest; Prototype, the free roam NYC destructo fest and Red Dead Redemption the free roam wild west fest. The open world genre has come on leaps and bounds since the early days of likes of Elite.

But those are my current favourite games. In favour of being as breif as possible I will mearly list my fav's, I dont need to justify my choice to you lot anyway

10. Dune (NOT Dune 2)
9. Moonstone
8. It Came From The Desert
7. Grand Theft Auto 3
6. Civiliation 2
5. Deus Ex
4. Ultima 7
3. Elder Scrolls 4: Oblivion
2. Sid Meier's Pirates

Drumroll please....

1. Elder Scrolls 3: Morrowind

Yes I'm a bit of a games ponce The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

05-07-11  04:13pm - 5156 days #4
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
While my tastes do verge on the extreme I have watched some, even by my standards, weird shit in my time. I think its quite comforting to watch some of the more, shall we say, avant-garde stuff and remain completely unaroused. I guess that either means there is more room for me to spiral into depravity or I do have some limits of taste and decency. I think its the latter. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa
Edited on May 07, 2011, 04:39pm

04-28-11  03:49pm - 5165 days #4
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Originally Posted by anyonebutme:


This particular site linked I would not trust.


Agreed, any site that would look dated had it been online in 1995 does not deserve to be trusted The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

04-28-11  05:52am - 5166 days #12
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Originally Posted by FuckingGambler:


I am sorry, but I have to disagree. While you can get comparable video quality within MKV, feature-wise MKV is inferior to Blu-ray. Last time we've checked it, there were no menus in MKV, support for subtitles was scarce at best (and BTW SSA which is used in MKVs, is much more difficult to handle in uniform fashion than DVD or Blu-ray subtitles because of font issues), and we didn't find in MKV any support for alternative streams or user-selectable "jumps" within stream or between streams. MKV is just "yet another container format" which allows plain playback of movies, but anything more complicated (which needs some logic to be added) seems out of reach .


Well, if they'd also support playback from Blu-ray ISO file (or set of BR folders) which resides on HDD, it would be the best of both worlds, won't it? I myself is not a big fan of burning process, but nice menus, ability to select chapters, and some extras make movie watching experience significantly better for me than plain movie without any controls, except for pause/resume, which IMHO seems to come from VHS era, even if video quality is much better.


Actually MKV is one of the most feature rich container formats available. It does support subtitles including vobsub which is the same format used on DVD's, multiple video tracks, multiple audio tracks, chapters and even menu support has been added. All of that with a smaller file size thanks to the lower overhead. Best of all its a completely open format and can be played back on a lot of different equipment when the right codecs are used. Other than the increased file size, the problem with a blu-ray iso or disc is that the player, weather hardware or software, has to be licensed which obviously is not free. This adds to the cost of the player while adding, in my opinion, no additional features. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

04-28-11  02:34am - 5166 days #10
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
All of which can be done in the MKV container format without the ~6% overhead impossed by using m2ts. With a BD25 or god forbid a BD50 that means downloading up to 2.5 gigs more without a real benefit. I admire you for pushing the boundries like this but I think these days we are moving more and more away from physical media. Hell, with my TV I just plug in a USB hard drive and can play most media files, high def h264 included, without any extra hardware. Thats the future

Originally Posted by FuckingGambler:


I thought you'd never ask . There is nothing wrong with playing the material directly from hard drive, and actually our guide describes how to play ISO from the hard drive (unfortunately, you will need commercial software player - the one by Arcsoft - to do that ). But both Blu-ray ISOs as such, and burning it will indeed provide many benefits.

Benefits from burning Blu-ray:
First, PC monitors are usually much smaller than TVs, so without burning users are restricted to monitors (20-24"), and with burning it can be viewed on 52" TV. It also means watching it in a comfortable armchair, etc. etc.

Second, burned Blu-ray disc is something tanglible you can put into your collection (and BTW, we are going to provide disc labels to print too). While many don't care, many people do.

Now about benefits of Blu-ray as such, burned or not:
Third, there are certain viewing options which simply cannot be implemented with simple clips. For example, our videos consist of gameplay and action, and our members have requested a feature to watch only action (for the first view they want to watch full movie, but for the second view - they want an option to skip gameplay and concentrate on the action). Doing it with simple clips would mean creating another version of the clip, and need to re-download it; on Blu-ray it is the very same disc (downloaded only once) with two options in the menu (this you can already see on our BR disc). Another example of such feature (not implemented yet on our discs, but planned) is subtitles in different languages. To provide it for WMV we'd need to supply a separate .srt file, which user has to download, put it into specific folder, change three different settings in Windows Media Player, and then it will either work or won't work. With Blu-ray, it is as simple as selecting an option in the BR menu. Add here other user-selectable options like size of subtitles (requested by member), level of music (also requested by member), and multiple angles (over-hyped for usual movies, but potentially a very nice feature for porn) and you'll get the picture. Simple clip is just a simple clip - you cannot control it at all, for BR we can relatively easily provide many user-controlled options to enhance user experience.
The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

04-26-11  02:50pm - 5167 days #15
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Different day, different taste. One day a skinny teen, the next a curvy MILF, followed by a average looking but extreme slut. Maybe I have diverse tastes or maybe I am schizophrenic, who knows The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

04-22-11  01:20am - 5172 days #6
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
I have only been caught a couple of times by sites that are stream only. I have yet to find any type of stream that cannot be downloaded using one trick or another but as badandy400 said its a pain in the ass. I do already make a point of mentioning and deriding sites that are stream only so hopefully others wont fall into the same trap. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

04-14-11  11:24pm - 5179 days #9
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
The only site I am a long term member of is 21Sextury because they are the only site that conforms to my holy trinity of long term membership:

1. Excellent download speeds
2. Excellent content quality and update frequency
3. Cheap price

The last one is the make or break on a lot of sites but for $10 a month I would be crazy not to be a long term member. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

04-12-11  12:11am - 5182 days #8
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
I have a 100 mbit connection and have found that very few sites can supply my grot at speeds anywhere near that. There are a few tricks you can use to get more out of it. Some sites limit the speed per connection so you may find that a single file will only download at say 500kb/s no matter how fast you are cappable of downloading. In those cases, use a download manager or download multiple files at the same time. Then you will run into the problem of sites limiting the number of connections as well so you will find you can download only 2 files each at only 500kb/s leaving a quarter of your bandwidth unused. There is not much you can do except download multiple files from multiple sites at the same time. Last option is choose your sites carefully, read the reviews and join only sites that are capable of suppling your need for speed The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

04-06-11  05:00am - 5188 days #296
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Can lysxtreme.com be added please, been meaning to review it for a while and just discoved its not listed! Thanking you The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

03-22-11  06:42am - 5203 days #35
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Originally Posted by Drooler:

If the porn content creators had even a blog-style site to which they'd upload their content and charge $10 per month for it as a flat fee, the question would be if that's better for a user than the boards that have the shitty malware and image hosts and annoying pop-ups and window-closing scripts and so on. I think it would be.


While I agree with most of what you say, the thought that file sharing site are just havens of spyware and viruses is not true. While there are of course some sites like that, they won't be around for very long as the user community will not put up with it.

During my time working in the porn industry one of my tasks was to investigate some of the ways that content was being illegally distributed. I think you would be surprised at just how safe, well organized and designed some of the top file sharing communities actually are. It is quite shocking when you think about how much effort has gone into a file sharing site which the owners generally make no money vs. the horrible members areas of some sites that look like they were knocked together during someone's lunch break with popups and cross sales galore. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

03-21-11  04:20am - 5204 days #33
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Originally Posted by Drooler:


Here's an idea for the paysites if they want to beat the free sites at their own game: pool resources and offer a site (or sites) that cost no more than a subscription to one of the file sharing services and keep such sites free of annoying advertising.

In other words, offer the same kind of thing, but better for the user than the free sites can.

I think you'd then see the free sites getting less traffic and the sharing services fewer subscriptions. The revenues could be shared by the pay sites that post their material there.

It wouldn't generate as much revenue as a regular pay site would, of course, but it would be better than none at all. And that way, they might not have to bother themselves as much with legal action, which is also expensive.


Nice idea but I don't think it could work. When you consider a premium membership to a file sharing site costs, what, $10 a month? For that $10 the user can download not only porn but also games, movies, music, TV shows basically anything that can be digitally distributed can be digitally distributed illegally. Add to that the fact that any smart "pirate" is not going to be paying for a file sharing account anyway. How can a legit site compete with that?

At the risk of over simplifying the issue, I think people fall into 3 groups. The pirates that would never pay for it anyway, the guys that would never consider pirating and buy all their porn and the people in the middle who will download some for free and pay for some. Spending time, money and energy pursuing the hardcore pirates I think is totally counter intuitive. They would never have bought your stuff so you have not lost a single penny by them downloading it for free.

I personally think that the best way to solve this is to focus on the people in the middle and make it as easy as possible for them to get the content they pay for. Why, when they can very quickly download the entire contents of a pay site in a couple of clicks via illicit means would a user sign up for a pay site? Sites put all sorts of barriers up to protect their content, download limits, speed limits, banning download managers, drm, not providing zipped pictures, making you go through 20 clicks to download a single scene etc. When a user has to go through all that to get their legitimately paid for porn is it any wonder so many say screw it and download illegally? The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

03-17-11  02:39am - 5208 days #17
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Be careful, that is a Nvidia ION / Atom system which means it will play HD video no better than a netbook. There is not enough raw CPU power to play HD video without help from the GPU which, as I mentioned in a previous post, needs properly encoded video; Something which porn sites dont seem to be able to do (WMV at least) The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

03-15-11  01:38am - 5210 days #7
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
The conclusions above that netbooks are not suitable for HD video are not totally accurate. The cheaper netbooks have no chance of playing high bitrate HD smoothly but netbooks based around Nvidia's ION chipset or the new AMD Fusion chipset will be able to playback properly encoded HD WMV and MP4 using a player that supports hardware accelerated video decoding. I emphasise the word properly because I would say 90% of the porn WMV files I have downloaded are not encoded properly and do not benefit from acceleration but h264 encoded MP4 files tend to fair much better. Additionally, netbooks based around these fancy chipsets are much more expensive so makes a mockery of the idea that netbooks are cheap, for the price of a Fusion netbook you could buy a decent normal laptop. Sure the battery live would not be so good but if its for home use that wont be a issue.

Your other questions are easier to answer:

VGA out port?

Depends on the model, I would expect most to have either VGA or HDMI out.

External hard drive?

Should work without a problem

Windows media player? Installing other software?

Most netbooks would be running either Windows XP or Windows 7 Home, both of which will have the ability to run WMP or any other windows software. Yes plugging in a external DVD drive will work.

Speakers?

The netbook will have speakers, the quality would depend on the model. Best bet would be one with HDMI out which (usually) carries both the video and audio signals to the TV for playback.

In short, I would say ditch the idea of using the netbook to playback HD video. Better would be to get a el cheapo netbook just for browsing and a popcorn hour or some other cheap media player device to plug in to your TV. That would be much cheaper than getting a netbook capable of doing it all.

Hope it helps The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

02-26-11  08:18am - 5226 days #278
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
dirtygardengirl.com is not listed. Please add it as I want to tear it a new one (and good lord does it look like she needs a new one) The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

11-02-10  03:28pm - 5342 days #3
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Dolly Buster certainly has seen better days but I'm quite a fan of big ol titties, fake or otherwise, so it will be nice to see them, I mean her in person

Hopefully I will be allowed to take pictures or maybe even video when I'm there so I will post a report after the party. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

11-02-10  10:37am - 5342 days Original Post - #1
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)


Sometimes I hate living in Prague but other times I love it. This is definatly one of the later If anyone is here on the 11th of this month, perhaps you would be interested in going to a porn party. I'm looking forward to meeting Christopher Clark as his Euro Angels series was one of the reasons I had to come to Prague in the first place Hope to see some of you there...

The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

11-02-10  07:31am - 5343 days #20
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
I have a feeling that it was my review of norestnetwork.com that inspired messmer to post this thread

Like others here have said, it is the principle of the thing that really irk's me. The cost to the site to provide me with the content is exactly the same, regardless of where I live. Why should the price be different just because I happen to be sitting in Europe? It makes absolutley no sense. If the memberships were priced at what the market could bear, while still reprehensible, it would at least follow some kind of logic. But no, here I am sat in the Czech Republic where the average salary is considerably lower than that in the USA and I am expected to pay more for my porn? Something is certainly rotten in the state of Denmark. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

10-14-10  02:39pm - 5361 days #5
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Use Firefox and install the NoScript addon. Only allow Javascript on the pages you trust and never download anything from sites you dont trust. That should protect you from 90% of the nasty things that dodgy websites can do to your PC, installing decent free antivirus software like AVG or avast! will help with the rest.

Nice and secure without spending a single penny The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

09-28-10  03:15am - 5378 days #41
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Protecting content is, has and always will be a impossible game of cat and mouse. As soon as a new method of protecting content is dreamt up, it may work for a while but will be eventually cracked.

Making videos streaming only is not protecting your content. If you have the right tools, streamed content can be downloaded just as easily as downloading via links. What is stopping the pirates saving your stream and making that available for download via filesharing sites? All that happens is your paying customers may become pirates because they cant download what they want via their PAID membership but can via a filesharing site.

I believe the porn sites need to start thinking outside of the box and start providing features with memberships that inherantly cannot be pirated. Things like live shows, chats with models, user interaction, competitions etc. When the user feels that they are getting things with their membership that cannot be got elsewhere, for free or otherwise, they would be more willing to subscribe and keep subscribing.

Of course there will always be people that would never pay for porn but how can you with a straight face say that you have lost a sale when they download something for free? The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

07-09-10  03:25am - 5459 days #3
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
My girlfriend and I have been swinging a few times and have a very healthy relationship. If you are thinking about it, consider the following points:

1. Agree what you and your partner are comfortable with before you go. For example, I don't want my girlfriend playing around with any other guys so we stick to girls only.

2. If you or your partner are jealous you could be in for a pretty uncomfortable time.

3. Make sure one of you didn't talk the other one into doing it. It must be something you both equally want to try.

4. Don't even consider that swinging will help repair some problems in the relationship. If you are not a strong couple going in, that wont change with swinging and could be actually made worse.

5. Don't be scared to go along to a club. The places we have been to are not dens of sexual depravity, you wont be expected to do anything you don't want to. On some occasions we didn't find anyone we were sexually attracted to so we just chatted and had drinks or just had sex together without any 3rd person involved. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

06-22-10  12:17am - 5476 days #17
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
I dont have a problem with music in a scene per se, it's just that every porn movie I have seen with music, the music has been complete trash. I guess it's the licensing issue, they dont want to pay out royalty fees and they also dont want to pay a half decent composer to come up with the tunes. The result is the utterly crap music usually done on a cheap synthesizer that instantly makes anyone with any appreciation of music instantly reach for the mute button. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

06-17-10  04:31am - 5481 days #8
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Originally Posted by Yariana:


Someone has to produce all this porn. It cost a lot of money to produce porn. If so much of it continues to be pirated at the rate it is, it will eventually put producers out of business then where will people find the porn to pirate.

Seriously, being a producer I can tell you that the piracy of porn is hurting producers. But on the other hand, many of my members refuse to go to these free porn sites because of the threat of contracting a computer virus.

The problem is that most producers try to sue the tube sites instead of going after those that downloaded the materials and then uploaded them to other sites. This is highly illegal because those stealing the material then distributing it for free are placing themselves in a position of being a porn distributor, therefore they are required to have the 2257 age compliant documents. If they did not produce the materials and do not have a license to distribute them, they are breaking Federal law by not only stealing, but distributing pornography without 2257 documentation.

This is the approach I am taking and I know it is catching on with other producers. IP addresses are traceable, whether a person is uploading or downloading. Once the porn industry catch's on to this most simple concept (and it will) and starts pursuing the pirating offenders themselves instead of the tube and share sites, we will see a decrease in pirated porn. I myself am pursuing this option with a vengeance.

Currently, when a tube/share site is sued their defense is that they did not know the user uploaded it. Fine, go after the user. Once news gets out that users are facing Federal charges, it will have a sufficient effect of at least slowing down piracy. I am testing out this theory. My attorney is seeking a subpoena on a tube site to obtain the IP address of a user. Once obtained I will bring charges against the user. The tube site did get scared and took down my videos.


Good luck with that, we all know how well it turned out for the MPAA and RIA when they started suing their (potential) customers.

While of course I agree you have the right to protect your IP, suing your average porn pirate is most certainly not the way forward. Porn has always found new and inovitive ways to use new technology, why cant some of that forward thinking be applied to the protection of your content? The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

06-16-10  08:36am - 5482 days #3
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Originally Posted by Denner:


BUT, but, but: The ongoing development of the net can soon give serious changes for us PUs and especially the pay sites - the freedom, like some would call it - and others: the rip off will grow and no law can stop it - unless we're in North Korea or (maybe) China. And the way to rip off porn from pay sites will definitely become much more common - AND that again could result in much less GOOD Porn - because those producers got to make some kind of money - but maybe a lot less than today - only time will show.....
How will this end? Any ideas?


I would say we are already there. Pretty much any video from any paysite can be found and downloaded for free. I dont mean a low quality version, I mean the exact same file that you download from the paysite. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

06-02-10  11:34am - 5495 days #13
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
I have never been a member of abbywinters.com and probably never will be, not really my cup of tea. Regardless of that I wish you all the best in the move and hope that things go well for you over here in Europe. The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

05-29-10  10:09am - 5499 days #6
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
I watched a interesting documentary a few years back covered this question and a few other interesting points about the porn industry. Try and track down the porn stars episode from "Louis Theroux's Weird Weekends" (The rest of this guys documentaries are also excellent) The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

05-18-10  11:35am - 5510 days #6
BadMrFrosty (0)
Active User

Posts: 124
Registered: Mar 05, '10
Location: Prague (Czech Republic)
Hey, don't take it personally my friend we are all entitled to our own opinions here.

Maybe I'm old school but I would rather put up with all the grief that comes with a real woman than trade her in for a piece of rubber and plastic.

Now if that piece of plastic could cook it would be a different story The problem with the world is stupidity. Not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Frank Zappa

51-100 of 124 Posts < Previous Page 1 Page 2 3 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.04 seconds.