Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
If potential had value; this would be a very good porn site
Five sites are included though seemingly unrelated
Very good first month price
Downloads are unlimited
Videos do include 4K downloads
Cons:
It’s underwhelming as a network with under 1,000 total scenes
The site I was most interested is very small (My Dirty Novels)
Bottom Line:
I was not going to join any new sites this month, but saw the site, My Dirty Novels and thought it sounded unique and interesting. It is unique and interesting, but the content from it is very small and updates are very slow.
While this is a network and I believe it’s good to be advertised that way, the sites are almost all small in quantity and it’s really just Slim 4K with 4 very small sites added. Over 80% of the content is from Slim 4K. Keep that in mind if considering a subscription. You are effectively joining a slim niche site. One of the other sites also follows the Slim niche, My Tiny Wish.
The included sites are Slim 4K, My Tiny Wish, My Dirty Novels, Dud Cast and Doc Squirt. Slim 4K has nearly 500 scenes while the other sites are all under 100 scenes.
For the most part, the content on all the sites is good, but is nearly all standard hardcore, which goes against My Dirty Novels. It’s a site that has a real-life couple who bring in a third person to their relationship and video it. That’s far from a fully unique idea, Teen Fidelity and Porn Fidelity come to mind as bigger, better options of this same niche, but My Dirty Novels has the advantage of amateur models.
The quality of the downloads is very high, and the site works exceptionally.
It's just not enough variety and far from enough quantity. You would need to be a huge fan of Slim women porn to get any value out of the network.
The potential I see is if the sites on the network were somehow linked. Having a model appear on Slim 4K then having her feature in a scene on My Dirty Novels. It might not be as good as I think it would be, but it would give the network something different.
I don’t regret joining but doubt I will ever join again. The price of $10 makes it worth the risk and the scenes on Slim 4K are probably worth the $10 price. I just don’t think it’s a good join for the average porn fan. There are other sites that do this type of porn and have larger catalogs of content.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I joined through Doc Squirt, but believe this is the network’s main site. I will try explaining it since it’s confusing. As a full network it has some good content.
Currently shows 8 updates over the last 7 days.
The model list only works for the entire network and there are 170 models.
If you select the alternate biller link it is CCBill
Poor navigation won’t allow an accurate count on scenes, but from what I’m piecing together there are around 400 scenes total with most having 4K video option.
Videos are downloadable, I wondered since the name “feeds”, but they are downloadable and I see nothing about limits.
Some improving (though cliche) stories in the newer scenes. Some scenes have subtitles, others do not.
Cons:
The navigation will have you going in circles. If you go to “latest” it brings up a scene that was posted 1 week ago. If you go to the Xfeeds link it says 8 scenes have been released in the last week.
The main screen shows the 9 newest scenes. To get to the older ones you have to jump from site link to site link and even then you don’t know if you’re seeing everything. The category search which has 7 generic options at least is one way to get to the majority of the scenes.
For some reason the site logs me out anytime I close the page even if I click “remember me”.
Bottom Line:
When I first joined this network through Doc Squirt, I started to realize the XFeed.net site was the main site. I can’t say in what experience I have with porn sites, I have been on a porn site with navigation like this one. They list having Doc Squirt, Slim4K, MyTinyWish and DudCast. But some of the newer scenes start off with the name “My Dirty Novels”. Those are the improved scenes. Yet, there’s no link to go to for just the My Dirty Novels scenes.
The problem with the navigation includes con #2, going to any of the listed sites separately, including Xfeed.net, only shows you 9 scenes. Doc Squirt and DudCast have a “see more” button to see all of their scenes. But if you put the scenes together for Doc Squirt, DudCast, MyTinyWish it’s not even 75 total. Those 3 show all their scenes. The other around 300-400 scenes are found by going through the categories. Those categories with their number of scenes for those interested are:
Squirt with 27 scenes, Creampie with 62 scenes, Anal in 206 scenes, Threesome in 69 scenes, DP with 22 scenes, Hardcore with 249 and Cumshots with 389. That is the only plainly clear way to find the scenes as far as I can tell.
They do offer 4K, 1080p and 720p on nearly all of their videos except the Doc Squirt ones -- those top out at 1080p.
There are subtitles on the Dudcast scenes, but I haven’t seen any subtitles on the other scenes. It would seem like those would be most useful in the My Dirty Novels scenes since there is a story. Instead, the story is just listed in the scene description. There are pretty and cute models in nearly every scene. And if their update schedule is true, they are updating more than nearly all sites I have been on lately, but the navigation is going to make it frustrating for most to use and the inconsistencies from site to site makes it even more frustrating. When you use the categories search you don’t know which of their sites the scene is from so if you wanted subtitles, you have no way to know until you either stream or download it.
It’s a decent choice (for the price) if you are into hardcore sex with teens. Those newest scenes are trying to bring an edgier feel to the scenes with swinger type scenarios. One of the newest scenes is my favorite scene I watched, the name of it isn’t the best translation, “Shy cutie tries sex with a couple.” A shy young woman would hop into bed with a couple? There’s just some confusion, possibly bad translations (including in the subtitles) and all those navigation problems are stopping it from being a better network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Routine, casting-type site
Currently is updating 6 times a month
“Amateur” models (I recognize several of them) that I believe are speaking Russian
Subtitles for the talking parts
Multiple camera angles for good or bad
Videos are 1080p or 720p and are downloadable
Most of the models are young and cute
Cons:
The multiple camera angles sometimes messes up the view
No 4K (possibly recycling?)
I never figured out the “dud” part
A model with as known of a name as Gina Gerson is on this site, but they don’t even list her by name until the description of the scene.
Bottom Line:
This came with Doc Squirt and I believe the XFeeds.net site also gives access to the same sites. This one does make me wonder about the new updates. Longtime PU members have talked about the video quality often pointing to older videos being recycled. Most of the sites in this small network have a 4K video option, but this one doesn’t, yet they show 6 new updates over the last month. I will review the XFeeds.net site separately as it shows the full list of problems these potentially good sites are having.
I would like an explanation on the “dud” part of the name. I was expecting something along the lines of guys that were having trouble keeping it up or ones that started having performance anxiety. Also, with the way they show the site “her first time”, I was expecting female models that were hesitant, maybe even believably shy, but what I got was a normal casting site with an older man (maybe he’s the dud?), casting younger women and they do try to add a story of them talking the model into the scene. The older man doesn’t have sex with all of the models. He sometimes has a guy he calls his “nephew” also in the scenes. One scene I watched ended with the older casting man, simply known as “agent”, say, “You both were great” where’s the dud?
This is also not a large site. It’s quite small with 36 scenes. I do think that puts more emphasis on the importance of whether those “new” scenes are really new or not. The scenes may even go too much into a story, which I’m usually complaining there’s not enough of. The scenes are under 30 minutes and you can expect 10 of those minutes to be the setup. Some of the scenes just read like (from the translated subtitles) they picked a hooker up. One of the women says her cost is 800 Euros per day. I’m not for sure anything can get lost in that translation.
The videos even without 4K are very clear in the 1080p format. The camera angles are probably done for effect, but I don’t see any major benefit from them. They have one camera angle from the ceiling that looks like a security cam view. There’s the older agent guy carrying a handheld camera and there does seem to be at least one other camera view. There isn’t much bouncing camera which is why I believe there’s another camera. It’s not full point-of-view even when the agent is the one having sex. It’s not a bad site, but the group of sites combined, even the discount here on Porn Users, still feels underwhelming.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good site that is only held back by its small size
Includes access to four other sites
Pro models including a few I really like (Roxy Lips and Roxy Sky)
Three separate download options on videos including 4K, 1080p and 720p
Uses CCBill as biller if you select “alternate biller”.
Scenes are surprisingly long despite hardly no story (30+ minutes, with some in the 40+ minutes range).
Cons:
Varying consistency in the “squirt”.
Navigation on the “network” is okay, but it shows terrible inconsistencies.
There are screen captures, but no pictures and the screen captures are not downloadable.
Bottom Line:
The site has some strong positives. The video quality on all the scenes is excellent. They have even started adding updates again after what looks like a Covid break. The 4 sites that are included are: Slim4K, MyTinyWish, DudCast and Xfeeds.net, from what I can tell the Xfeeds.net is just a site that collects all the content from Slim4K, MyTinyWish, DudCast and Doc Squirt into one location. That’s why I said there’s terrible inconsistency. Doc Squirt only shows 15 scenes, but if you search in the categories, there are 27 squirting videos. It looks like they tried to make everything look more complicated than it is and it made the sites more complicated than they need to be.
The scenes do follow a similar plot. I will go into my experience of “squirting”. It is possible for an aroused woman to squirt, but I assume porn directors and producers don’t take the time to look up definitions. A squirt is a small quantity of liquid ejected from something. That’s when you know the squirt is real and some of these scenes do have women ejaculating or squirting small amounts of liquid. The rest are doing the porn-loved fountain squirt that soaks the entire room. That is accomplished by pressing on the bladder. Much talk is about g-spot stimulation with the fountain squirt, but it’s bladder pressure. The g-spot stimulation causes the small squirt that isn’t near as visually impressive or -- soaking.
I thought both of the Roxy Lips scenes on Doc Squirt were excellent. She does seem to be a natural squirter and you can even watch the woman’s expressions. A lot of those fountain squirters are laughing. If a woman is having an orgasm that causes fluid to squirt across a room she’s not going to be laughing. I have seen Roxy Lips on a few other sites showing her squirting ability. The other Roxy (Sky), just puts on a great performance, she’s very energetic and into the scene. It seems like as long as squirting has been in porn someone would realize how fake or real the squirting looks.
The size of the site is disappointing and it’s one reason I decided to review it. I joined through Doc Squirt since it looked like they had at least 30-40 or more scenes on the site, but it only shows 15 once in the member area. The recent updates include 3 over the last month. The scenes I could live without are the ones where the guy sticks multiple fingers in the woman and jerks his arm as fast as possible since if you do that to any woman she’s going to urinate on you! This niche would be better served with a “Mistress Squirt” instead of Doc Squirt. They could easily find women who are capable of teaching most women to at least ejaculate a little liquid. Instead, it’s more of the same as it has been for the last 10 years of a man showing the bladder weakness of women if their insides are being stretched open. It’s a good site when combined with the network, but as a site on its own it wouldn’t be worth most people’s time unless they really liked specific models. The model list follows the problems of the navigation since it doesn’t separate the models scenes by site. It just shows you that a model has 4 scenes and one of each of those could be on one of each of their sites, even if you are on the Doc Squirt site.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
