Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It didn’t take me long to find new, exquisite transsexual sites
217 scenes of transsexuals in hose and stockings
Solo is the main category of these scenes and that’s my favorite transsexual niche
Easy site to use, join and cancel
Mostly good-looking transsexuals
Though not a large site, it does update twice per month and it is 217 scenes of a niche I have not seen covered before.
Cons:
The scenes are way too short. This con hurts, some scenes are as short as 6 minutes
I prefer ladyboys and there’s only a few on here
Bottom Line:
I don’t know if it’s a compliment to say this is a progression in transsexual porn or if it shows how slowly the genre has caught on. The main feature of these scenes is a solo transsexual masturbating. The big difference from usual is these transsexuals have hose or stockings on while masturbating. That does add a new element and it’s one I hope continues to progress and a faster rate. That is a fetish towards clothing. There is very few things more exciting or arousing to me than seeing a penis getting harder. If it has clothes around it and causes a bulge that’s even better. The hose adds another element as the erecting penis is viewable through the hose. Very sexy for me.
I have talked about this before in transsexual reviews. This site brings out and showcases the female side of these transsexuals and it shows. The models are often even prettier than they really are. Meaning, you can tell they are feeling the mood or vibing or however you prefer to say that. It’s why I don’t like my first con. Some of these transsexuals get off in less than 6 minutes. I am trying to avoid the pun of “feeling themselves”, but it has to be said. I really believe that is what happens. These models feel so sexy and are so aroused, they are nearly prematurely ejaculating.
I am sexually attracted to women in porn and one of my biggest fetishes is when a woman wears a full body fishnet suit and as her nipples get hard, one pokes out of the holes in the fishnet. That led me to watching these scenes waiting for and finally seeing, the transsexuals becoming aroused and hornier and their penis head popping out of the holes in the hose.
It’s strange to me to think a guy becoming aroused slowly is arousing, but we tend to want to see women get aroused quickly in porn. It seems like I’m focusing on one part of the scenes too much, but I’m not. This is the part of these scenes that previous transsexual scenes didn’t offer. I can say, this action of the erecting penis head popping out of the hose is extremely arousing and satisfying.
All transsexual niches come with the concern of the producers will stop producing this niche and attempt something new. Which is usually a variation on hardcore. I hope that doesn’t happen with this site and hope others try the niche out. I will even suggest a transsexual in biking shorts or anything spandex to show the penis getting harder. That’s a big part of arousing a woman or at least for me and the few women I’ve talked to about it.
The video downloads are unlimited, but do only max out at 1080p HD. The pictures are also downloadable and are really good picture sets focusing on showing the transsexual as sexy.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The genre-defining site for legs and foot fetishist in an equally as impressive network.
An incredible 2,789 scenes. The updates have slowed to 1-2 per month, but this site is 3-4 times bigger than the other foot fetish sites.
Different from Footsie Babes, Hot Legs and Feet has as many lesbian scenes as male/female scenes and Hot Legs and Feet has more hose, stocking and pants used in their scenes than Footsie Babes.
The oldest scenes are from 2001. I was not legal age in 2001.
Features the top models out of Europe. Photos are studio photo set quality, not screencaps.
Cons:
An advantage Footsie Babes has is they use the same men in different scenes, most of them are obvious foot fetishists. DDF's guys are good, but not quite as believable. Hot Legs and Feet makes up for it with the lesbian scenes. There is an added level of sensuality when it is two women.
All good things come to an end -- at nearly 3,000 scenes with sparse updates, it looks like Hot Legs and Feet might be nearing their end.
Bottom Line:
If I was to pick two sites or networks to score highest they would be Kink and DDF. The network included with Hot Legs and Feet is one of the best and most diverse networks.
Hot Legs and Feet is the best site for reverse foot fetishists. The women here do a good job of acting like their feet and legs are not a big deal. The men and women show them their legs and feet are a big deal. I do not feel a lot of sensuality in porn or get the erotic feeling from most porn. This site does both or maybe it is a combination of them.
The use of fishnet hose to showcase the woman's toes, thighs and vagina creates a visual relation between points of sexual interest. Their scenes with stuck stockings becoming impossible to remove while having sex show a precursor to harder bondage acts. It hints at artsy with the struggling female trying to enjoy the sex while fighting her bound hosiery.
There are scenes with the added bonus of the models removing their hose only to wrap them around the man's penis. Is she doing it to to let him feel her silky hose or to hold onto him and not let him get away?
There are enough scenes here to come up with your own conclusions. With nearly 3,000 scenes including a video and picture set each, there is little to no competition for them in terms of quality and quantity.
If you use their tag system you see they have nearly 900 scenes with stockings, hose or leggings in them. Those outnumber the next biggest foot fetish sites in total content. Someone might ask why not join a site with stockings, hose and leggings as their focus; those sites are usually tease sites.
The tagging system works very accurately. I do wish I could use multiple tags to search, but either it doesn't work or they don't have any scenes with mini-skirt, fishnet and handjob.
The most recent 90-100 videos have 4K option. The 1,000 before those have 1080p option and the ones before those have 720p option to download.
If you are into the legs, feet, hose, leggings niches, 1 By Day and House of Taboo mix those in on a regular basis. It is for me the best of the foot fetish sites and a network worth keeping a long-term membership to.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An often overlooked site that's genre could also cause it to be looked over.
- Despite now being a network site it still delivers 4 updates per week (pictures/videos) in each.
- Has a huge catalog of content, over 2,500 scenes.
- A strong pro for me is it has the foot and leg fetishes involved, but there's also plenty of sex, pretty posing and everything you'd expect from a hardcore site not a foot/leg fetish site.
- Very good quality videos, 1080p videos date back to 2010-2011 and are still in every update.
- Photos can be downloaded in 3 sizes, topping out at 2000 long end and have been and still are some of the best photos you'll see.
- Has the added bonus of being in a network that covers nearly all genres.
- Download speeds are above-average and consistent.
- Navigation is as good as you'll find on a network, though you'll still run into the occasional glitch.
- Archive dates back to 2001, you'll find nearly every top Euro model on this site.
Cons:
- The price without the TBP/PU discount
- Fetish content always carries the potential of being repetitive.
- A small percentage of the foot/leg scenes won't go beyond foot teasing, leg flirting, etc...
Bottom Line:
Way back in the old says of online porn (early 2000s to mid 2000s), DDF sold this as a standalone site and it cost a premium price, seems like $30 back then per month.
Things have changed. I think it's both a good thing and a bad thing in this case. It's easy to see how someone would avoid this site since they might think it's a lot of toe worshiping, toe-sucking and so on. I'll say ahead of time, I'm not into feet, but this is one of my all-time favorite sites. I've always liked hose, fishnets on women and there's all kinds of those scenes on this site.
There's plenty of hardcore here as well as lesbian action. There's a smaller amount of solo and and even smaller amount of tease/very softcore.
The models, as with most Euro sites, are almost always very pretty ... at worst. DDF's sites aren't quite as glam as they used to be and that's now a plus for me. It used to would have been a negative.
The amount of content competes well with almost any 100% exclusive site. Over 2,500 videos, over 2,500 photo sets and the videos have the 1080p option and have for the last 5-6 years.
So, why should someone join it if they're not into feet and/or legs? Simple. The leg and feet category was one that Viv Thomas, DDF and Fred the photographer excelled at. The focus though isn't just on the feet and legs. It's on the panties slipping down the legs then off the feet. It's sensual in ways most porn these days can't even touch. Nothing in these scenes seems hurried. Could be two women in a pool, teasing each other with their toes, which leads to the panties sliding down, which leads to rubbing their legs together, touching, kissing, and finally what looks like believable out of control sex.
The solo scenes offer similar as well. You'll have a solo model teasing the camera, rubbing her own legs, rubbing her feet, panties start sliding and she goes into a wild masturbation.
The scenes with guys involved are also very good. Lots of teasing, fairly good chemistry between the guy and girl (also rare these days), there are footjobs, there are cumshots up legs, but it's still sex, just a little more sensual than we're used to seeing on most mainstream sites.
I would even say I would join it by itself without the network for a month. One of my favorite parts about their videos is they don't go overboard with the bit stream of the videos. A 25 minute 1080p video will be around 1.5 GB instead of the 3-4 GB you see on a lot of sites. I know that's a preference, but I really can't see enough difference between a 1080p video with 3,000 bitrate from one with 1080p with 10,000 bitrate, except in the time it takes to download and the space it takes up on my external hard drive.
I do think the pictures have taken a slight backseat to the quality they used to have on here, but from what I understand DDF is no longer the photographer, so it's to be expected.
The navigation on Hot Legs and Feet could be slightly better. We're getting into the area where less is more. There's 15 years of scenes on here. Just something to make it a little easier to find older scenes. I have trouble remembering all the different model names and end up trying to search through 127 pages of scenes. But maybe that's not a complaint? I was once told if I couldn't offer a fix then there's no reason to complain about it. I do believe their navigation is close to as good as you can get on a site like this one. My advice is to use the model list instead of trying to dig through 127 pages.
Last, the network that comes with this site has no less than 6 other sites I've joined in the past for $30 each. This is a really great deal for Euro-lovers especially. The only deductions I took off the score was for repetitiveness and the lack of adding anything new to the scenes. It was somewhat groundbreaking 15 years ago, but now it just looks like really high production quality porn. I've always believed the leg/feet sex sites were the precursors to today's heartcore sites. Definitely worth a join for anyone.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-One of the longest going sites in the DDF Prod network if not the longest one. The earliest scenes are dated January 2001 which is quite historic when it comes to internet porn
-Number of scenes going at nearly 2000 with your standard DDF Prod caveats of possible cross site content. However this site with it's clear niche is less likely to have content shared between sites and one can almost guarantee any footjob scenes are site exclusive
-Very strong approach on the subject again. Scenes may be solo, lesbian or hardcore but legs and feet are always in the focus of the action
-DDF understands that there should be multiple women in the same scene with a man. This is what 21Sextury.com could learn from
-Everything related to production and technical side is fine. Quality of photos, videos and sets in general is very high. Site works well with multiple download options, tagged searching is great too. Downloads are generally very fast and I repeatedly max out my bandwidth
Cons:
-Recycling. With this network it's hard to tell if material is new or old as scenes of all ages are added regularly and it's not uncommon to see a previously removed scene added again
-This is subjective but personally I'm not that much into feet and when it comes to legs, it's good enough that they look good. This site has many scenes where the only female part getting much action are the feet and they are nothing for me. However fans of the niche will 100% disagree
-Casting scenes that are of lower quality and not very interesting
Bottom Line:
Feet, legs, socks, pantyhose, stockings and some shoes and boots are the focus here. The rest varies as much as on all the DDF sites from solo girls to group hardcore action. This site has been going for a very long time and if the oldest scenes all the way from the early 2001 aren't worth much in their 320x240 video format, at least they have decent photosets with many legendary stars. Actually the very oldest ones have only photosets with the video starting few months later.
Even if one is not into the feet and legs in particular, this site offers lots of videos with enough normal sex to entertain non niche people. Due to the specific foot focus in those scenes too, they are more often site exclusive too and not found on other DDF Prod sites as often as ones on some other sites. DDF also does one thing right if one compares with the "main competitor" 21sextury.com, there are usually more women than men in the hardcore scenes. Of course there's lots of solo scenes too and many that feature maybe only short blowjob in addition to footjob so if those are your thing, you might like this site even more while for me they are just filler.
Quality of photography and video in newer scenes shines here too. The ones available in 1080p are generally very good but as they are updating also with older (sometimes recycled) material, you will see 720p too which is perhaps a bit smudgier than the new content but still nice. Photos are the subjective best in the business and available in three sizes in zips although I cannot see anyone really downloading anything but large size ones these days. The large photosets in zips are usually from few dozen to maybe fifty megabytes so no 600Mb monster zips here.
The talent is nothing new to the ones familiar with DDF and the other European sites. The names may vary from site to site but the girls are the same big Euro names of today and past years with some Americans thrown in between. In case anyone is interested, yes the guys are the same handful you have learned to tolerate on every site and film over past few decades ;)
Technical side is in good order and exactly the same as on the other network sites. After they did away with the individual site designs and interfaces, everything has been clearer and very easy to search. It's also easier to check if the content is duplicate or a re-edit of some other scene from another site. Downloads speeds are not maybe the most consistent I've experienced but generally fast enough to max out the fastest connections with a DL manager.
This site is another cornerstone of the DDF Prod network. Despite the topic, it has much to offer to users more interested in just plain action but also many 100% topic focused scenes.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+++ 10 years of content online
++ Decent sized pics (all with zip) at 1300x2000 for the newer stuff
++ Good quality 1280 x 720 video
+ Choice of stream, wmv and mp4 downloads on newer vids
+ Some older material has been remastered for better size and quality
+ Updates 2 - 3 times a week
+ Good mix of solo, lez and hardcore (each about 1/3 although about half the HC scenes are just footjobs)
+ 2 day full access trial for $7 through TBP
+ Allows for DL managers (12 channels - 6 channels if downloading manually)
+ Many pic sets are set up for 3-D viewing if you download an app and have the glasses (I didn't try it).
+ Overall good quality production and lighting
+ Exclusive DDF material (not a lot taken from other DDF sites either)
Cons:
-- Quality takes a dive once you get back to 08 and 07
-- Navigation and website need a big overhaul
-- The "casting" section of the site shows numerous updates but many sets have no material in them.
- Slow movie downloads (I rarely got above 200 kb/sec with a broadband connection)
- Many photo scenes seem incomplete (set abruptly ends when it looks like it should continue)
- Some recycled content from other DDF sites and earlier HL&F scenes
- No search function and no scene tags
- Only a few screen caps (get more)
- Newest vids only allow full scene downloads, no clips available
- Newer content doesn't have as many hot models, not as much true HC (as opposed to footjobs) and less costume/lingerie focus.
- No email confirming membership and they bill through vxsbill which is fine but canceling was easy and done through the website (I did get a cancel confirmation email).
Bottom Line:
When I first found this site about 7 years ago I loved it. Hot girls, good lingerie and costume setups, good photography with some unique angles and frequent updates. While I wanted to give HL&F a 90 or better I just can't do it because the DDF boys just aren't putting out what they're capable of. Here's the lowdown:
PICS: Sets have about 100 to 120 pics and all have zips though only in the largest size. Newest pics go up to 2000x1300 but drop off to 1600x1080 starting around '08 and the oldest are only 800x600. Zip labels are actually good here and don't need relabeling. As noted, a bunch of photosets feel like they've been randomly ended. Quality is very good but more pics would be appreciated. 3-D is option on many sets that I didn't try. Watermarks present but not too big.
VIDS: Flash stream available for about the last 5 years of material (usually at 960x540). Newest vids are 1280x720 but before 08 tend to only be 850x480 or 7620x400. MP4 and WMV options available for the last two years but '08 and earlier only WMV, DiVX and QT available. Smallish watermarks on all vids. Vid sizes seem somewhat random for their release dates between '05 and '08 (one update will be small while the prior one will be large). Download speeds were a bit slow too. I don't know why they do this but the recent vids don't allow for clip downloads, only full scenes. Quality, again, is very good.
OTHER: The website needs an overhaul. Very plain looking and getting around takes some clicking. No real preview available. There are only a few search categories that are useless. No search function or scene tags also hurt with this much content available. They need a calendar update page or they need to better sort their material to make it more user friendly. There are brief model bios but it's pretty sparse.
The site seems to have lost some mojo the last year or so. Less focus on lingerie and more on the feet is not a great improvement by my standards. A lot of the recent hardcore and lez scenes focus more on footjobs as opposed to leg and sex worship. The girls aren't as hot as they once were either. The photography also seems more vanilla as opposed to unique and interesting which may be because DDF farms out more of their shoots maybe (not sure on this).
If it were up to me, I'd update the site look, add a search function and scene tags, make the videos more uniform in size, while adding more screen caps and allowing for clip downloads, remaster their oldest content, make sure their "casting" updates actually have content in them, and bring back more of the lingerie/hosiery focus and limit the amount of pseudo domination and foot emphasis they've recently been doing.
I know DDF can do better than this and I hope they do because this is a great site rivaled only by footsiebabes. I'd like to come back in another year or two and see things improved. Right now they need to do a little work but it's still a pretty good site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Gorgeus European women
-Amazing foot fetish action (solo, g/g and some b/g)
-Really huge archive, updated every day (one day with a picture set, next day with the corresponding videos)
-Several video download options
-zip archives for pictures sets
-Part of the ddfprod network
Cons:
-Best days of this site are long gone
-If bought indepentently it's quite pricy
-Some "new" sets are just re-editions of older ones
-Older sets have not been improved since they first appeared and have quite low quality
Bottom Line:
Hot Legs and Feet continues to be my favorite foot fetish site, although I think that it's "golden days" are now over. I remember when I first joined, Sophie Moone was in her full splendor and making tons of videos for DDF; the same could be said about Eve Angel, Anetta Keys, Sandra Shine... Now most of those models are retired, working for 21st Sextury or in the US, and the new models that have appeared since then don't have the same sex appeal or charisma. Or maybe it's just me...
In any case, this site works very well for someone who is looking for foot fetish action: it has quite a lot of solo sets; many girl/girl action sets, and quite a few boy/girl sets. It is updated very regularly (three new sets a week, consisting on pictures and video) and in its new sets it offers different download options and qualities. Only good things can be said about directing, lighting, editing, etc. None knows how to capture the beauty of female feet in action like these guys.
My last consideration is a quite obvious one: this site is included in the DDF Productions network deal, so if you are interested, I would recommend joining the whole network for a bit more money, because you will get access to other good sites too.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The dude below me gave the stats so I will concentrate on content, service and overall 'delivery of goods'.
Excellent quality and fast download speeds(4MBit) 1280x720
Multi formats
Decent sets
Nut burstingly horny babes
Good support (now)
Good camera work
Classy and pro presentation
Exclusive content
'Casting' shorts are a great addition
Stockings (about fukin time)
Cons:
REGIONAL damn pricing
Not enough updates
Some 'movement' of content from other DDF sites and some recycled older low res quality, although both are not repeated content
Not enough ethnic babes
Too many solos and same 'format' dudes
Not enough location shoots although the shoots are classy
Older films are low res and many models not repeated again
Bottom Line:
If you're into legs n shit, like I am, then this site is the leader in it's genre/field.
Stunning babes wearing hot gear in cool locations and emphasis being on feet and legs they do not disappoint.
The exclusive content is one of it's attractions. You will get the odd 'known' babe but the scenes are still exclusive.
I could do with more variety in terms of ethnic babes, guys who don't 'machine-gun' rump the babes as sometimes it's nice to 'see' the sex, maybe some better location shoots and re-introduction of babes from their back catalogue would be a winner.
The regional pricing stinks and I for one am really fukin sick of this shit. You can't call a 'small person' a midget any more unless you want your nuts torched and your house sold in compensation, but you can charge what the fuk you like when it comes to us in the UK.
I love this site but due to their slow updates and regional pricing it's not one I would stay a member of on a monthly and regular basis.
I also believe, much like other 'umbrella' sites, that there should be a discounted membership for those who want to sign up to all the DDF sites. It makes sense and keeps the variety and update aspect manageable.
Had it not been for the updates and regional pricing practices I would have thrown a few more points on the overall score. And until sites realise that we ARE their income streams and they stop treating us as if they are doing us favours then maybe the scores would grow and sites would establish a long and loyal paying customer base.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- as of today: pics come in 2000x 1331 or 1331x2000.
- Videos: Good looking 1280x720 4162kbps Wmv. Downloads in: Dvix; mpg; quicktime, and Wmv in hi resolution -as stated above- and in a nice 852x480 2000kbps. New videos weigh around 500-800 mb's.
- Due to their camerawork we get to watch female legs in rather pleasing perspectives, thus, enhancing their appeal.
-boy vs girls scenes of: Aneta keys with his boyfriend, i believe, a rather ugly guy, this one comes in 704x396 2500kbps ; Sophie Moon, this one comes in 704x528 2650kbps, what a treat is to watch this women in a b/g scene!
-The girls are not loud and are very skilled teasers. male talen't don't batter the women.
- Very good customer support, although they could even reply faster to e-mails.
- Vids of stunning women such as: Zuzana Drabinova; Veronica De Souza, two of them riveting on account of being recent, and therefore looking great; Ines Cudna, Verona aka veronica fasterova; Susana Spears; Maya, LEA TYRON, GOOGLE HER!
Cons:
-Disgusting regional pricing. They apply double standards when it comes to billing their members. i took that into account when i scored the site.
- Videos prior to 2007 don't look good.
-Pictures and videos watermarked.
- Some of the models look downright bored. i assume that the notion of men aroused watching them rubbing their feet bores them stiff.
- they should revamp the quality of their older videos since the models are amazing.
-Downloads didn't come fast for me.
Bottom Line:
- if you're a leg man or you like good looking women you can't miss this site. Barring their freaking regional-pricing practices the site is next to perfect.
-You can add to the above list of stunning models: Monica Sweetheart; Merylin Sekova; Silvia saint (three episodes); Simony Diamond in boy/girl scenes; Regina Ice; Peaches, Kathia Nobili and the list goes on.
-i'd like to add that there are a ton of girl/girl scenes.
- you can stream the vids.
- this is a pro i couldn't add above: to the best of my knowledge, there are no DL limits and i belive that you can use a DL manager if you so choose.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- High Quality, DDF site
- Pictures go up to 2000 on high end and are available to download in zips.
- Newer movies are HD and there are over 900 video clips
- Site has a classy feel to it, maybe it is because of the emphasis on legs and feet?
- I'm getting some of my best download speeds, over 1100kb/s on a 10M connection
- Just about every great model you know who Europe that are the other DDF sites, and there is a lot of content overall!
Cons:
- You know things are good when I start nitpicking on the first con, I'm not going to say the price is too high, but I guess it is just seems that way at first, price on TBP despite having an American dollar sign is in Euros. So, as of now, what is listed as $24.95 on TBP is actually $36.74.
- Older movies are a lower quality than average, this can be a slight negative if your favorite model has a lot of older material.
- More fishnet, can never get fishnet!
Bottom Line:
Let me start by saying that I love this site. The quality is top level, very few sites can even match it. The emphasis of leg and feet kind of worried me since I don't have a real leg or feet fetish. The model list pulled me in though. If you can name her and she is a Euro star, she is on here.
The biggest and best surprise for me was the amount of content. I really hadn't seen much of this site before joining. It reminds me a great deal of 1byday, DDF's big site. There is less hardcore here, but you get a new kind of porn from this site. One that lets you look at the women as beautiful. It has a very high tease factor in every video that I downloaded. Which for me is very important.
The HD videos are incredible. My only complaint there is that I have to keep buying external hard drives to store all of the content I download.
Pictures are very clear, let me add the word, "clean". No blurriness, just clear, well-lit pictures in 2000 resolution. Some of the models really show that they belong on a runway, moreso than in front of a camera with a dildo. Eve Angel's clip with Eufrat, both in nurses outfits, made me want to check in the hospital for a month or so!
The negatives are far and few between. Price will catch US members off guard, but I've been to enough crappy $20 per month sites, that I don't mind putting out the $36 for this high quality content that I keep and watch more than 1 time.
I recommend this site with as much enthusiam as possible!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Great Selection Of Models
- Hi-Res photos, With Zips
- Updates Daily
- 4 Video Formats (4th being HD Where Available)
- True To Fetish Concept
Cons:
- Most Videos Not Hi-Def (Yet)
- Not A Lot Of Strict Hardcore
Bottom Line:
DDF has a solid foothold in the world of website porn. OK, that was a bad joke, but it is very refreshing to see a site that defines itself by a strict genre, in this case fetish, and actually sticks to it 100%. The only fair way to review this site is through the eyes of a heels and hose/foot fetishist. And it does not disappoint. As with every DDF site, the photography is first rate, the models A list east Europeans. The emphasis on "legs and feet" is for the most part tastefully done, and oftentimes erotically subtle. Maybe a little too many "footjobs", but I guess that's obligatory. It's easy to see that the photographers and models work very well together. Everyone understands the concept of the site. The photos are 2000px, crisp and downloadable in zip files. The videos for the most part are normal size, and available in .avi, .mov, and .wmv formats. They are offering a lot of the newer videos in HD wmv, be warned, they are huge files. The site does not offer a huge amount of strict hardcore. If you do have the leg and/or foot fetish creeping around in your psyche, this site is your nirvana! Even if you don't, you'll probably like it as well. First class, professional site.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Gorgeous models. Most, if not all, look to be Eastern European which I love. The content looks like it's actually been shot by someone with a foot fetish. You guys know what I mean. I've seen so much supposed foot fetish stuff where you can tell that neither the photographer nor the male performer are in to feet at all. This is absolutely not the case here. Incredible quality stuff.
Cons:
As some others have said, the site could use some more actual sex scenes, but honestly, the quality of the softcore stuff is so good that I can't imagine anyone really complaining about this.
Bottom Line:
Well worth the cash in my opinion. I've joined several ff sites over the years and this one just blew me away. One of the only sites I've ever stayed with for longer than a month.
If you don't love this site, you do NOT have a foot fetish.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Very sexy models
- Literally loads of content
- High quality pictures and downloadable videos
- Nice feet and shoes
- Decent site design
- Easy navigation
Cons:
- A bit expensive
- Could be more 'sex' scenes
Bottom Line:
If you're into feet, legs and shoes you must see this. It has to be the highest quality foot fetish site on the web full stop.
There is loads of content to browse with all pictures and videos sorted by date or model. The quality of both pictures and videos are impressive even at full screen and can be downloaded easily. The women look fantastic, most are genuine models with perfect bodies and feet.
There is a fair amount of variety in the scenes with lesbians, couples and single models although it would be great to see a few more 'sex' scenes.
The site isn't cheap but you get what you pay for here and that's quality DDF content. Good stuff!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large archive of models, I can't even count how many. And hot!
- Regular updates.
- Great price for the amount of content.
- Video quality continues to improve. Movies look great, photos look even better.
Cons:
- Older material is not always exclusive or highest quality. Only becomes a problem when you see a model you like then realise she hasn't been active for a few years.
- Not all performers seem to be 100% into their performance.
Bottom Line:
I really had to put some work in to come up with cons. The site is constantly improving its already great features and does a great job of appealing to a wide variety of foot and leg fetish fans. Some say glam - I say high quality. The models are by and large enthusiastic and kinky.
It's not the number one for pantyhose or shoe fetish lovers, but still plenty here for almost any fan. Lesbian and footjob scenes are particularly hot!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
*high quality pictures
*attractive models
*good selection from each category lesbian/hadcore/softcore pictures
*good range of coloured stockings
Cons:
*some sets can be found on other DDF web sites
*set location is repeated too often
Bottom Line:
The quality of this site cant be highlighted enough.It really is superb. If your into stockings/feet then this is the site for you. Fans of pantyhose will be dissappointed because there are limited sets available.
The photography is excellent and the variety of shots(close-ups etc)in each set is enough to keep you interested.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-Pretty girls with pretty feet
-Classy shootings
-HQ videos and pics
Cons:
-A bit pricy
Bottom Line:
This is site is hands down one of the best -if not the best- foot fetish sites in the net. It has it all: beautiful models, good photographers and directors, variety in the type of action (solo G, GG, BG), erotic foot fetish stories... The only possible con is its price, and that it doesnt have a trial suscription. But if you like female feet, you won't regret getting a membership for at least a month...
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
