Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Includes access to all 34 sites on kink.com
- 269 scenes as of March 1, 2020
- Top notch production adn quality.
- Good direction you see all the action and actresses do some of their best work here.
- Top of the line talent I really enjoyed the scenes with Bobbi Starr, Dana DeArmond, Julie Night, Sasha Gray (god how I've missed her), Phoenix Marie, Isis Love, Christina Carter (she's really hard to find and she's so good!), Dee Williams, Jade Fire, Penny Barber (I can never get enough of her)
- Model diversity. More ethnic diversity than most sites. Less body
type diversity than typical of kink network
- More creativity than I have. I wouldn't have guessed that there could be so many different ways to tie someone up and spray then/submerge them in water. I was wrong.
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps.
- Light and sound is always good no poorly light shots even when they shoot in a "dungeon" set.
Cons:
PROS CONT:
- mix of action some "disciple" is handed our by men - sometimes a woman
- Post model interview focus on consent and respect
- It's interesting to see talented women pushed into interesting situtations and bondage. However I found that while there were some different setups the niche itself became retative. I found myself only tunning in to my favorite actresses
- pix available as .zip downloads
- Easy organization: tags, search
- No longer updating last update was August 2013 (there was only one update in 2018)
- No PU Discout 😞
- Narrow niche. I just couldn't get excited with the premise of the site, but that's just me.
Bottom Line:
The real value of this site comes from the kink network. Kink is a leader in BDSM porn. They care a lot about getting things right so you see the lengths they go through to demonstrate consent. They also don't cheap out on production they have dedicated sound and multiple cameras for all the action.
The preview side give you up to 5 previews a day. The previews run almost two minutes so you can see enough to know if this is what you're into or not. Try before you buy.
The site is a little pricy so if this is all you were into I don't know if I can say if justifies the price. That said I don't think you can get content like this anywhere else on the web. So you may be out of options.
All in all I would give this a pass except for the most die hard BDSM fans. The fact that they haven't updated in a while and don't seem likely to restart is a bit of a killer.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I liked Slime Wave so much I decided to try All WAM (Wet And Messy). It's a unique niche I hadn't seen before.
Comes with the Tainster Network and the add-on content from Sinx.
The models are a lot like the models on all of the Tainster sites, very attractive, European, usually slim and they are believably turned on.
Could be a great find for those with clothing and wet clothing fetishes.
Scenes are titled like, "Fully Clothed Bath Buddies". This network as a whole is impressive with their different niches.
Close to 500 scenes, 2 have been added in the last 6 weeks.
Older scenes followed a Wet And Messy theme, but some were mud wrestling.
The site works very well.
Cons:
Some of the scenes are tens -- others, the models don't seem to be as into this as on other Tainster sites.
I haven't seen one scene with a man in it.
Video quality isn't consistent. "Older" scenes have HD and True HD, while some "newer" scenes only have Standard Definition.
Bottom Line:
I liked Slime Wave so much that I expected to like this one just as much. Some of the scenes I do, some of the scenes just get too messy. It gets to the point that you can't even see through the see through clothing.
Having been a member of Tainster in the past I still get the feeling they have removed older, less quality scenes. With nearly 500 scenes there isn't much to complain about.
On the majority of the scenes you can download 1080p, 720p and 480p. Some of the oldest scenes only have 480p and 360p options (there's not many of these).
All of the scenes have photos you can download.
One of my biggest complaints is there are no men in the scenes. It seems like a naked man or a clothed man getting wet and messy would add to the niche and add more depth to it. Most of the scenes are two women and those are the best ones on the site. It looks like two women just don't make as big of a mess as three or more. Once they have three or more it becomes hard to even tell which model is which.
The best way to describe these scenes is to say -- a woman in clothes, or panties, is going to either get water or pudding or milk or some kind of liquid poured on her. The women then rub the liquids in on each other from their head to their toes. You can look at the beginning outfits to tell which scenes are going to be best. The ones with white t-shirts or white pants or white blouses are going to be showing a lot of see-through parts.
This is the part of the review that will either sell you on the site or turn you away. There's not a lot of sex in it. There's not even a lot of nudity in it. If you are into women touching themselves over their clothes or being touched over their clothes this site does that a lot. There are parts where the women start groping each other after 15 minutes of no touching. It gives it a believable feeling of them becoming aroused.
I liked that part for the sake of it being different than what I'm used to seeing, but if you require nudity then you might not like this site as well as their other sites. There were a few where I wanted the women to get naked, but they didn't.
I think that's a situation where you have a site sticking to their niche too well. The whole focus here is getting the women wet and messy.
I did notice the differences in download quality as well. One of the first scenes they have listed doesn't have HD or True HD option. Four pages in, every video has HD and True HD.
It's a good site in a niche I didn't even know existed. Some of the erotic parts with the touching over clothes are very sexy, but most of the scenes drop off too much from the no nudity and no sex.
It's worth checking out if you are a member on Tainster, but I wouldn't recommend it as a standalone site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I thought I would hate it, but I think I love it. Extremely erotic site with fake dicks and fake cum.
Gloryhole setup on most scenes, some do not, makes the fake dick seem less fake.
The performances by the women!
Watching something that looks disgusting becoming sexy is erotic to me.
Most of the scenes have the model in clothes making the ensuing mess even more messy and fun to watch.
Cons:
It's a small site, only 170 scenes, but I haven't watched a bad one yet.
The multiple women scenes gets too confusing, fake dicks, fake cum, slime blasting, four women, the ones with one woman gives a more focused view.
No dates on scenes, they have added one new scene to this site in the last 2 weeks.
Bottom Line:
In a lot of ways this might be my most excited review. I have seen WAM (wet and messy) porn and fake dick, fake cum scenes, but this site takes it to a whole other level.
The women, the camerawork of focusing right where they need to focus, the slime (fake cum) dripping off the model's face, down to her thigh, sliding up to her pussy lips, it's some of the most erotic porn I have ever watched.
These models should not be this excited should they? The fake dick squirts them at high impact, anywhere from 5-10 times in one scene. The aiming of the fake cum adds to it. In one scene, the blast of fake cum hits the model's clit at full impact. She looks like she's in orgasmic bliss.
The scenes have no story to them. It's just like a random gloryhole scene. The first few scenes I watched I had to look twice to see that those are dildos. The cum or slime blast let's you know for sure. Some of the models are covered head to toe in slime by the end of the scenes. They love every blast of it.
Maybe I feel a little biased. The first one I watched was probably the best scene on the site. The model with a skirt and hose on, rubbed the slime on her pussy and as she was doing it, a second blast hit her in the mouth. It is like these models are channeling their inner beliefs these are real men all cumming for them.
The videos are clear even the 720p ones. They have 1080p too. The pictures add a new element of showing the fast action frame by frame.
I'm not curious if other sites exist that do this on this high of a level. I watched one years ago and the women were giggling at the fake cum. Maybe it's the European models that are more convincing?
This is a hard site to recommend to others, but it does come with access to Tainster and a selection of videos from Sinx. I would have been happy with just this site. That's how much I like this content.
If you can look over the fake dicks and fake cum to watch sexy women in usually tight clothes, get soaked with slime, it really is worth a try.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Unique niche. I'm not aware of any other water based BDSM site.
- Top of the line talent I really enjoyed the scenes with Bobbi Starr, Dana DeArmond, Julie Night, and of course Sasha Gray.
- Model diversity. More ethnic diversity than most sites. Less body type diversity than typical of kink network
- More creativity than I have. I wouldn't have guessed that there could be so many different ways to tie someone up and spray then/submerge them in water. I was wrong.
- Includes access to all 24 sites on kink.com
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps.
- Light and sound is always good no poorly light shots even when they shoot in a "dungeon" set.
- Post model interview focus on consent and respect
- mix of action some "disciple" is handed our by men - sometimes a woman
Cons:
- No longer updating last update was August 2013
- Narrow niche. I just couldn't get excited with the premise of the site, but that's just me
- My biggest complaint with this whole network is the lack of search. They have keywords but very few shoots are tagged. There is not much you can search for other than model and date. The result is if you don't know what you're looking for - it's hard to find without lots of browsing.
- no photos for download
- I like porn with a plot (I know I'm a weirdo). Anyway there's very little of that. Most shoots have just action and little/no reason as to why it happening.
Bottom Line:
The real value of this site comes from the kink network. Kink is a leader in BDSM porn. They care a lot about getting things right so you see the lengths they go through to demonstrate consent. They also don't cheap out on production they have dedicated sound and multiple cameras for all the action.
Water Bondage has over 250 shoots with each shoot being over 45 minutes. I myself was bored with the length - but as I said above this site just didn't scratch my itch. I don't hate on them for being what they are.
The preview side give you up to 5 previews a day. The previews run almost two minutes so you can see enough to know if this is what you're into or not. Try before you buy.
The site is a little prices so if this is all you were into I don't know if I can say if justifies the price. That said I don't think you can get content like this anywhere else on the web. So you may be out of options.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 274 scenes
- Approximately 70 scenes available in HD
- Most available in three formats/sizes
- Pics available (singles or small sets of zips)
- Part of the Kink network
- Good support service (a question was answered via email within a couple of hours on a weekend)
- Good mix of known and less known models
- Very high production values
- Very innovative
Cons:
- No longer updating
- No major quality improvements from 2003 until 2007
- Scenes are no longer dated
- Last update in 2007 (I think, scenes aren’t dated)
- No discount price offered
Bottom Line:
I had last joined Water Bondage in 2008 and it hasn’t updated since then, but I wanted to get more scenes and higher quality now that I have a faster connection. The fact that I went back to a site that offered me nothing new probably says a lot about what I think about this site. For BDSM fans, this is an extremely well done and innovative site that offers lots of material. Its part of the Kink.com network, which, in my opinion, sets a high standard for other internet porn sites.
The site offers 274 scenes dating back to about 2003. Older scenes tend to be fairly simple and short, with many at about 15 mins long. Older scenes are a lot more complex with different setups and are usually over an hour long. As you would expect, the resolutions for the older videos isn’t great by today’s standards. The videos are available in two formats: wmv and mp4. For most of the time the site was updating there was only one resolution of wmv available: 640x480 / 1900kbps. There are two sizes of mp4s available. One is for IPods and such, while the other is labeled as ‘best quality.’ I don’t know how to find resolutions for mp4s, but subjectively the larger file wasn’t much better than the SD wmv.
At some point towards when the site stopped updating they did start to offer higher resolution videos. For most of the last 70 or so updates on the site there is the option of wmv HD at 1280x720 / 7150kbps. SD is still available, as are the two sizes of mp4.
There are pics available too. The resolutions for these didn’t change through the whole run of the site: they are 1200x865, not bad, but not particularly sharp. Zips are available, and in the longer scenes the zips are broken down into the themes in the scene.
For all the dated technical issues, this is still a very interesting site. I’m not aware of any other like it where models undergo BDSM treatment in water. In most of the videos there are several ‘scenes’ within the video, with bondage while being sprayed with water to machines and toys being used, and in most cases some complete immersion in water tanks while bound. There is a good mix of models too. There are surprisingly many A-listers here, as well as some well known fetish models and also some lesser known girls. There are body types for every taste.
Given the size of the site, I don’t consider that it isn’t updating to be a serious drawback. There are issues though: for much of the life of the site there were no real technical improvements until the very end. One pet peeve of mine too is that the scenes used to be dated, but they aren’t now. That troubles me since I wonder if Kink is trying to hide the fact that the site isn’t updating. Finally, Kink doesn’t offer any price discounts for members of other Kink sites like they do with most others. Paying $30 for a site that doesn’t update seems a bit steep.
But… it is still an amazing site and a decent value considering the quality and quantity.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very interesting concept (if this is something you're interested in)
- Large database of models
- Many of the models are very beautiful, some appear to be exclusive
- Reasonable price
- All segments to a scene are available in one zip file
- some mainstream porn models take a turn (Sasha Grey, Dana DeArmond, Nadia Styles, etc)
Cons:
- This may sound weird, but the site is often too soft, too playful
- No sex (I realize that another review has said there is lots of sex, but I've viewed many hours on this site and have yet to see any)
- some of the scenes can get a bit repetitive
- I read in one of the WB forums that the site has stopped updating. There is at least 30GB of material on the site so it will always be a good value, but apparently we won't be getting any more new stuff. That is the biggest con of all for those of us who like this site. (I'll have to find Wenona somewhere else...)
Bottom Line:
I've had a membership at The Training of O and wanted to try another Kink.com site. This is a very innovative company and it is obvious that they put a lot of effort and money into what they do. Water Bondage is no exception. The site is reasonably priced and well laid out.
The theme, of course, water and bondage. The girls are usually tied into various positions and often on custom made bondage equipment. Most of the girls also do a session in one of the site's several water tanks. These are really fun to watch, but I find that they can get a bit repetitive and are usually too soft. The mood is more playful than menacing. Maye they should let Max Hardcore guest direct a few scenes!
The tank scenes are a bit repetitive - girl tied up in water. There are a few scenes where the model is given some 'tasks' which can be as simple as touching her nose to the bottom or retrieving something with her mouth. These make the scenes more interesting and I wish there was more of it.
The models are absolutely stunning. Most are petite, which is fine with me, but there are a few with bigger breasts. One model deserves special mention - Wenona. This woman is very beautiful and is worth the price of the membership alone. She seems to be exclusive to WB
Bottom line is that if you like this kind of thing it is a very good site. I wish it was a little more rough, but even as soft as it is it is very innovative. Definitely worth the membership. I highly recommend it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Very good pissing videos
-many download options
-Decent speed
-Exclusive
-The videos ARE downloadable
Cons:
-LIMITED ACCESS TRIAL, did not used to be this way
-Very few updates in the past 6 months
-Pricy at $30
-TBP lists as using CCBIll, they use WSPay instead, I like CCBill better
-Extremely slow updates
Bottom Line:
I was very disappointed when I tried to use the trial to get in for 3 days and found it was limited access. It used to be a full trial.
I was a member about 7 months ago and thought this site was great. The videos do not look bad and now they give 3 options: 128, 512, and 1024 kbps. The they can be downloaded in chunks or in full and even in Flash format.
If you use the trial it gives access to the first three chunks of each video. About 20 MB a piece. There can be anywhere from 5 chunks up to around 15. Each chunk is kinda like a new scene, but with the same location and people. Obviously they have to cut a lot...they cant pee 3 gallons without stopping!
The updates dates are a lie though. I only see one video that was not there 7 months ago! The videos are good, as I said, but they need to have plenty of updates for $30 a month. Also, dont bother with the pictures, they are nothing special at all.
They do a good job with the peeing niche, one of my favorites is when a nice looking girl drinks a glass of champaign then refills it I believe 5 times with her pee and drinks it all!
I score an 75 because the content is very good, but they need to update, not just change the way everything looks. I would like to score higher based only on content, but limited trials and scammy updates prevent them from getting a high score.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Fascinating site for those interested in a unique form of bondage/torture - use of water. Very good content, increasing data base, and improved access to previous episodes.
Females on this site are often members of the Kink.com repetoire of attractive models, some of them quite lovely. They do tend to add new faces to their repetoire, including some that have appeared in other Kink.com sites, e.g. Sandy San Dimas. Viewer input is a nice touch.
Cons:
Lighting and video quality could be improved. A few of the models are not good actresses or sufficiently expressive, diminishing the appeal of their segment.
Response to viewer comments or suggestions can be slow, or not at all.
Bottom Line:
Probably the best type of water bondage site available. Others are starting to make inroads, but so far none is close to challenging Water Bondage. Discount to other Kink.com sites available when subscribing to this one.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Last one of the sites in the Orgy Max network that I will review and probably the best.
- As is the norm for this network, 640 on high end for videos and they have a ton of these on this site, over 1,000 video clips
- Ok, I didn't know what WAM is. I still don't! This is a food fight fetish site, will explain BL
- Pictures are zipped, but are not as big as the other sites on the network, 1200 max
- Bathing/shower fetish, big deal to some!
Cons:
- Price is too high individually or as a whole network.
- Some of these videos on this site aren't as clear as the other sites, could be juice on the camera!
- This food fetish is a turn-off for me, not my thing at all
- Really can't tell who is sexy and who isn't because they are covered with food
Bottom Line:
I take it this is the most popular site on the network. I didn't join the network for this site though. I will review it since I know there are people with all kinds of fetishes.
What you get here is a room full of young women, look to be 18-21.
The videos are still not bad at all. The specs are the same, but I believe it is the whole food fight that is making the video look blurry. The girls splatter pies on each other, then lick it off. They dump pudding on each other, then lick it off, lots of touching, mud wrestling. And another fetish that is in this site is clothing, latex suits, uniforms and clothing that I don't understand, maybe it is a European thing?
I personally didn't like the site, but I can see it being a great site for those who have these aforementioned fetishes. You will see a little of everything here including bathing, seriously bathing, not fingering while bathing, but women bathing each other. Still, I can't give it a great score, because the content isn't up my alley. I don't like seeing women soaked with pudding. If you do, then you have no reason to look for another site. This is the one to join! Gooey, messy, mud wrestling, pouring pudding on each other, throwing pies at each other. It is a real fetish freak's dream come true.
Overall, I can't recommend any of the sites in this network unless you have a fetish for the content. Some of this is just a little strange for me. I'm more here for the beauty, not the pudding soaked panties.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Unique, original content for bondage fans.
- The models are attractive, expressive ... just sexy as hell.
- Video features have much improved. Huge files that are worth the time to download.
- Scenes are well edited and exciting, and situations are not repetitive.
- Regular updates.
- Price very reasonable.
Cons:
- Few video options for slow connections.
Bottom Line:
You'll not find a better produced, bigger budget water bondage site anywhere. Exotic and wild enough for big fans of bondage, but often tame enough for the causal or curious viewer. I also love the feedback section, even if it looks a little thrown together. The Dom/Sub interaction is often playful and chatty, and scenes feature a lot of sex. Both are often considered unacceptable for “serious” bondage fans. But for me, I couldn’t really classify that as a con. Big fan of the site.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
