Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The scenes are high-quality, even the earliest ones. No low-res video here
-There is a ton of material; well over 1000 scenes
-The models are overwhelmingly gorgeous
-If you're into creampies, the majority of b/g scenes are creampies
Cons:
-It appears they followed the industry trend of using mostly Eastern European models starting last decade
-Due to having so many scenes, the nature of glamcore porn, and using mostly the same "type" of model, the scenes all start to feel the same
-If you're into cum swallowing, there are very, very few, probably less than 20 out of the over 1000 on the site
-The tag system is made by the users, not by the site. This means that you can search for "Creampie" or "Asian" and only see a fraction of the scenes that would fit that tag.
Bottom Line:
Sex Art is high-quality artistic porn similar to what X-Art used to be. And just like early X-Art, it's sometimes a little too artistic for its own good. Some scenes would have been my all-time favorites but a pillow or prop was "artistically" covering the good stuff
A solid majority of b/g videos are creampies. If you're more into swallowing there isn't a whole lot of that; the remainder of scenes are cumming on the pelvis or the guy getting jerked off and cumming on himself.
One of the hottest things in porn (and real life) is when the woman stares into the guys eyes and says "Cum inside me". Sadly since the majority of the scenes involve non-English speaking Europeans, there is very little dirty talk.
There is also a lack of diversity; there's a respectabler number of black women, but there need to be way more Asians and Latinas (and not just white-passing ones as seems to be what they mainly use)
Unfortunately it seems like a lot of mainstream tropes like highly tatted women have been creeping in over the past five or so years. At least they don't say "daddy" or do the stupid step sibling/parent crap. Overall it's not perfect but probably the best you'll get in this day and age.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Maybe not my highest rated site, but unquestionably is my all-time favorite site.
The opposite of gonzo porn. Wicked Pictures creates a story or parodies a story, all within a hot, porn movie.
1080p and 4K downloads of videos. Be sure to get the membership that includes downloads!
Site works well and is unique just based on the scenes being a part of a bigger story (the DVD).
The DVDs are all exclusive and in full.
Cons:
I wish they would allow you to download the entire DVD at one time, instead of having to download all the scenes.
The looks/acting scale you will develop with certain female models who are so pretty or hot, that you don't even care that she can't act.
Bottom Line:
Wicked Pictures is something of a lonely site in 2023. There's just not many sites or production companies producing story-driven porn.
I do think it makes it unfair to compare this site with other sites. You have to go into watching the Wicked DVDs, with the knowledge, they are focused on making a story work. It's why their parodies are so popular. Those stories already worked in mainstream film. All they have to do is make a porn with the same story while making fun of the story. That's still more than most porn sites do or accomplish.
You will find some Wicked DVDs that are near perfect and I'm positive other sites cannot even reach that level of creativity. To take a story, make it work, while including logical sexual situation and showing it all come together. That's why Wicked is capable of doing.
The downloads are only limited by Gamma's 200GB per day limit and you can download many of the DVDs in 4K with 1080p and 720p being available on the older scenes.
There's consistency throughout their site. Nearly everything has the highest level of detail in it. The production, the costumes, the music, the flow of the story in the porn, you're going to have trouble finding anything to truly complain about.
I do think having each DVD in one downloaded file would be better than having every scene from a DVD. And that's also how to view the Wicked Pictures stories. If you're wanting to fast forward or skip ahead of skip a scene, you've defeated the purpose and trouble, of Wicked Pictures putting it all together for you.
The question I ask myself is if DVD/story porn hurts itself? One of my most common habits as a porn viewer is watching a favorite scene over and over. That's a little less likely if the story is within a 2 houur, 5 scene DVD.
It's not for everyone. Anyone that prefers straight to the sex porn, may be bored with this style of porn. Those who like to fast forward and pick out favorite parts, may not like this.
I do think it appeals more to older porn fans than younger ones. This is the type of porn that built the backbone of porn in the 1980s, 1990s and early 2000s
The best compliment I can say about it is I've never been bored or tired of their content.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Maybe porn’s longest running – and still operating – studio
Classic hardcore, story-based porn
Funny and sexy parodies of mainstream movies.
The industry’s top models are almost all on Wicked
Photo sets are high quality
It is a premium site and it looks and functions that way.
Cons:
It comes down to if you remember story porn from pre-Gonzo porn days. Some love the story porn DVDs others hate it
Black Friday special is too good to be true. It advertises $5 a month membership, but that is streaming only. If you want to download you have to pay $15 a month.
Bottom Line:
Wicked Pictures may be a victim of their own success. For many years, they were known for their story-driven porn and their main audience eventually lost interest. They branched out to include parodies of some of mainstream’s biggest movies and found a whole new audience, but that too has lost some interest. In current times, Wicked Pictures is a combination of their classic hardcore story-driven porn and porn parodies.
The site’s exhausting catalog is thanks to their nearly 30 years in business. All the content is not only high quality, but also exclusive. There is a download limit, but it is one of the most lenient download limits I have seen at 300GB per day. They offer nearly 2,000 authentic Wicked Pictures DVDs, which equals almost 7,000 scenes and over 5,500 downloadable photo galleries.
A major step in the right direction for Wicked Pictures was selling or merging with Gamma, the same company that created Adult Time. The Wicked Pictures site is as professional and smooth of a site as any you will use. Everything is easy to use, find and search. The site feels as premium as the movies.
The one problem I believe this style of porn has is there is a group of people that do not want a story in porn. That sounds minimally detracting, but there is so much more going on in these Wicked Pictures videos. The clothing, the accents, the good or even very poor acting, it is all part of the formula for creating their style of porn. If you’re used to or prefer just a lot of naked people having sex it might be disappointing to you, but if you like a story, outfits that work as costumes or props for their story and good/bad/cheesy acting, you’ll love this content.
There is a lot of content to go through so be sure to be prepared or you may become overwhelmed and frustrated with the sheer size of the site. It is easy to think this site should have more sites or bonus content, but the amount of content can be misconstrued. There are nearly 2,000 Wicked Pictures DVDs on the site. Those each have 3-4 scenes per DVD. You are sure to find something you like and may even find some DVDs that you didn’t know you like.
Well worth a monthly join to grab some scenes that interest you.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
An interesting site that works as a finder for unique porn scenes.
There are educational and instructional videos too.
Most scenes have subtitles or captions.
Epoch is the biller.
Some of the scenes remind me of early 2000s Vivid scenes which are my favorites.
Cons:
A lot of shorter scenes under 10 minutes.
No dates on the scenes. I don’t know if it’s updating.
No downloads
Bottom Line:
This site is run by the same company as Crash Pad Series that I reviewed. This is a video site that’s not unlike Videobox or sites like that. What is different though, this is more like they found the unique scenes and that’s what they have. It’s not going to be for everyone. I thought some of the scenes were cast poorly. I don’t think this site does the casting. I believe these videos are by other studios. I could be wrong. The scenes are different to say the least. There is one with an overweight transsexual with an overweight gay man. It’s like softcore. I’m sure my mind has been corrupted by all the porn I’ve watched, but I just don’t see that pairing fitting in a softcore scene. There is the uniqueness of that. If a person is into an overweight transsexual and overweight gay man in softcore, here it is. I think that would be really hard to find.
I didn’t see a reason to put this in the cons. I don’t think they film there themselves. A lot of the scenes I liked had strange camerawork. I’m not known for loving hardcore porn, but the cumshot is my favorite part. The camera scans away or to the left. It’s almost like it’s trying to be too artistic. The cumshot is the one part I would want to fully see.
They do have some really good lesbian scenes and masturbation scenes. I like that they don’t stick with the traditional models. You will see a big variety of sizes, looks, tattoos, piercings and I do prefer that.
They also have men masturbating which is my favorite porn niche. It’s too bad I can’t download those to put in my collection. They list those as Gentlemen Handling. You also get a variety in those with some being transsexuals. I have joined sites just for Gentlemen Handling.
I believe what they do is go out and get independent porn producers’ scenes. That’s going to always be hit or miss. And what could be hit for me may be miss for someone else and vice-versa. There are some group scenes, even have some pegging which I sometimes like, but other times not so much. It’s not mostly amateurs like their other site. I recognize a lot of these performers. I know I saw Kali Sudhra and Amirah Adara. Most of the scenes I watched have the same positive the Crash Pad site had. The action is very believable and sincere. That’s going to enter into your preferences. I don’t know how much some people want to see sincere kissing in porn. I like it, but I’m a woman.
Those instructional and educational videos are very interesting to me. They even have a how to squirt video. I always wondered why more sites didn’t try videos like that. I don’t know about you all, but everything I learned about sex was from porn! Why not give us some instructional videos and manuals?
That no downloads part is going to be a sticking point for me. There are a lot of these scenes that I would like to have. That’s a compliment that I would like to download them, but it doesn’t change that. I haven’t been on that many sites over the years. I never really understood the thinking behind no downloads. It’s one of the first sites I’ve been on that has that rule. It just seems like the style of porn they have goes against conventional thinking so why shouldn’t the business practice? I won’t take a lot off for the no downloads, but will take 5 points off for that. It’s a good, unique video site that only needs to fix that no downloads part. Everything else is workable with the site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Wicked is a major player (owned by Gamma I think?) they have a huge catalog of over 6,250 videos.
- Parodies, Parodies, Parodies. This is probably the best selling feature on wicked. They have a TON of Axle Braun's stuff (maybe exclusive partnership?)
- zips for photos normally about 50 in a set. Often screen grabs of the video action (sometimes promo material thrown in)
- LOTS of 4K (I guess I really do need to update my monitor)
- UNLIMITED DOWNLOADS. This is harder and harder to find especially on the big network sites. If there's a cap - I didn't hit it.
- Video previews available (normally this is just the trailer of the full video not unique to the scene you may be looking at)
- Organization by latest, engaging, views and upcoming
- keywords and search are a lifesaver. With so many great models and so much content, I'm glad to see the search and keyword tagging works great
Cons:
Pros CONT:
- favorite and like video functions (this is good for me I use that as a way to keep track of what I've checked out already)
- So many top models have worked with them. Some of my favs were: Sarah Shevon, Britney Amber, Kimberly Kane, Lacy Lennon, Dani Jensen, Lauren Phillips, Cherie DeVille, Penny Pax and Kenzie Taylor
- Excellent super hero parodies especially: Captain Marvel, Wonder Woman, Batman (all of them!), Super Girl (don't know why but DC movies make for better parodies
- Bonus content from Adult time - this was really good when it came to the pandemic and they brought in stars to do virtual shows.
- feedback is available through comments (with staff responding)
- multiple formats are available so you can pick 4K to lower resolution.
- Excellent production you see and hear all the action.
- REAL MILFs. I enjoy women closer to my age bracket. I'm glad they don't stretch the MILF category to teen moms.
Bottom Line:
PROS Cont Again!:
- Creative! You know with wicked you're going to get hot sex but the writing can be fun and clever. If you did watch through the dialog you typically get some good jokes. You can tell fans are making the content.
- Updates come 1X/week with 4 scenes dropping at once
CONS:
- Cross sales inside (I find this to be the minorest of sins)
- Mainstream porn though and through. Predictable acting/sex positions/etc. Everything is well made but predictable.
- Plot lead-ins can be too much. I'm a plot and dialog person but this was sometimes too much for even me.
- Content rotation. I guess all companies do this but it's a little crappy when it's parodies that should be more timely to take advantage of the zeitgeist.
Bottom Line:
This site was FUN. I'm glad I checked them out but I only hung around for one month (that's unusual for me I normally do nothing less than 3 months).
I know I focused on the parody aspects but that's not all they have. They had some older (looked like older 5-10 years back) stuff from the back catalog. All the favorite stuff - squirting, female-female action, co-eds, and car washes. Mainstream porn - nothing of note which is why I focused on their unique stuff.
Why didn't I go higher with the score? The biggest thing is a lack of creativity. Even with the parody stuff where they shine, I don't feel like they're leaning into that as they could. There's so much more they could be doing. I look at some of the pro-am stuff and they're killing it. I'd like to see the big-budget guys join their unique takes on superheroes.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A once favorite that I haven’t been a member of in several years.
- Always known for high production values and themed DVD scenes
- They show 6,258 scenes as of 12/8/21
- A total of 1,171 models.
- Photoset count isn’t as high as the videos at 5,488
- Run by Gamma now, I don’t remember where they were at a few years ago, maybe Mind Geek? I know something pushed me away. Easy cancellation with Gamma/Fame.
- Navigation is very good, again, thanks to Gamma. It used to have terrible navigation.
Cons:
- I know for a fact the current newest few updates are not new. One is the Avengers Parody scene featuring the late WWE star Chyna as She-Hulk, that scene has been around for years. I don’t know if they’re recycling or maybe just re-released that very popular DVD. The updates are showing as 3 per week.
- Their login system like the other Gamma sites can be annoying. They send you a generic username and password that when copy and pasted in, says it’s wrong and it’s because the copy/paste is adding an extra space in front of the letters.
Bottom Line:
Wicked Pictures or just Wicked, which was a good idea if they dropped Pictures from their name, was a longtime favorite of mine. They make interesting, themed DVDs and you get a lot of fetishes involved including cosplay, clothing fetishes like partially clothed sex, there’s a lot going on in their scenes. I believe they are one of the last studios shooting themed DVDs. I’m just noticing as I type that it looks like that Avengers is some kind of tribute re-release and isn’t so much recycling. It has a trophy beside it.
On the dropping of “Pictures” from their name, I always thought that hurt the site since people thought it was a photo site. They’re not recycling, the other newer scenes have 4K. Leave it to a porn site to throw an older DVD in as a tribute when I return for the first time in several years. They make a lot of parody DVDs which is usually fun and good for fantasies. Just glancing over some of the full DVDs, they have a Wonder Woman one, Batman, multiple Avengers, Black Widow, Captain America, Superman and they have some of the best classic DVDs ever made. One of my all-time favorites is showing up called, “Best Friends” which features, my pick for the most underrated porn actress of all-time, April Flowers. The model with the electric hips. They have tags on the classic DVDs and that’s where I started.
These DVDs follow a story and Wicked was right there with Vivid when it came to making porn DVDs that were worth watching each scene in. I have had one of the same complaints with Wicked for years. They don’t have a full DVD download option. You have to download each scene. You would be surprised how much it hurts a story when you pass on that 8 minute scene with no sex in it. They could add 3-5 points to their score just by adding a full DVD download option.
I am not familiar with this channel section. It looks like it’s just a section for their exclusive models and DVDs. I thought maybe it was bonus content.
There are classic DVDs on here now that I don’t remember them having on the site. One of my favorites that I remember watching on a DVD, Without a Trace is now on here. I’m getting sidetracked.
They have a total of 1088 DVDs. Those usually have 4-6 scenes per each. I am positive they’ve upped the number of Classic DVDs. I still have my folder of those on an external and only show 71. The site now shows having 155 of the Classic DVDs. The one downside to those is they are 480p but I can make it work if the content is good enough. Most of their content is good enough.
The photosets are downloadable in zips but are only 1920 long end. I have always thought their picture sets are good.
This site, at least to me, has improved since I was last a member. I don’t know if that is just where I’ve been away or possibly seeing April Flowers, who is always good for a positive feeling. I notice they also have 3 scenes I didn’t know of featuring Alexis Tae who is a current favorite. This is high quality porn.
The improvements in navigation make a big difference. They now have a favorites section, all options are along the left margin and while the site design is clean and slick looking, it does load a little slow between clicks. I forgot to test the download speed. Download speeds on that scene, Alexis Tae, Foxy Ladies Scene 1 was in the rare area of excellent of about 90% of my max speed. That’s good, there’s a lot here for me to download.
I’m going to say something I rarely say anymore and that is I’m glad I took a chance on this old favorite. It looks like there are improvements all across the site. Could see any porn fan enjoying this site especially if you like themed scenes and even the parody and cosplay parts.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- It was once my highest rated site, then fell out of favor, seems to be taking a different turn now.
- The growth of this site has to be one of the most impressive and fastest we have seen. Daily updates currently and the quality is as high as you get.
- As of 12/7/21: 785 models, 1,573 videos/films and 2,036 photosets.
- Everything is downloadable and as far as I know, unlimited. I don’t download enough anymore to really know.
- While its big sister site Met Art has become more explicit in recent years, Sex Art has been more explicit since the first scene. I will focus a little more on that in the bottom line.
- The technical quality is very high and it will be in the bottom line.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max).
Cons:
- Don’t hate me for saying this. I still don’t like the hardcore scenes. I like hardcore porn as much as most do, but hardcore porn is everywhere. I would be fine with this being a solo/lesbian site.
- Their memberships can be confusing when upgrading or adding. I will explain that in the bottom line since I know they usually have a webmaster that checks in here.
Bottom Line:
I remember the days of thinking Met Art could be a lot more than it was. I even remember making comments about Met Art at least getting the attention of my side that likes teasing. Sex Art came along and showed what Met Art could be. It was kind of surprising to me that Met Art then started shooting more explicit photos. It was like Sex Art tested the waters. The early years of Sex Art were kind of messy. They were trying too hard. Take that as a compliment. I don’t remember who said it, “It’s still just porn and about nudity.” Sadly, that’s probably as far as we will get in our lifetimes but will say Sex Art does a very good job of blending the more innocent porn with the not innocent porn.
I don’t feel like much of an explanation is needed for why I don’t like the hardcore scenes. It’s just a feeling I have. It’s not bad hardcore porn. It’s just kind of there. I don’t like mentioning other sites in a review of a different site but I feel the same way about FTV adding hardcore. And didn’t ALS Scan try it too? The hardcore on sites that are rooted in softcore, to me, is a bad marketing idea. I will just say take any hardcore major network you know of. Would their fans be happy about a solo scene?
The bad part is it does seem like the number of hardcore scenes are increasing. Or I should say the percentage of new updates featuring hardcore scenes is increasing.
The confusing part with memberships and add-ons. There’s a good chance I was able to join two of their other sites on Black Friday prices. I joined Viv Thomas and Met Art for $5 each. I was thinking maybe I would add ALS Scan since I haven’t been on it in a long time. I clicked to add it and received this choice: $39.99 per month or $100 for a year. I haven’t paid $40 for a site since those very rare Japanese sites. And have never seen ALS Scan priced at $40 per month. I just thought it was strange that I was able to add those others at $5 per month. Not that I think ALS Scan or any of these sites should be $5. These sites stand on their own strongly at even $20 per month.
My favorite part of Sex Art are the pictures. The newer photosets are downloadable in multiple resolutions but the high one has photos that are 5800x3800 resolution and they have a nice blend of portrait and landscape orientated photos. The settings are usually pretty and even will use the word, neutral, so you don’t get the clash between the models and colors in the background. I don’t even know if it’s a compliment to tell a Met Art site its pictures are my favorite part. The videos are as impressive in technical quality at 4K, 1080, 720, 360 and 260. The videos have some story to them but are not as long as I expect from story-driven porn. Most of the newer hardcore videos are under 30 minutes. I’m going to just focus on one and it’s a newer one. It is titled, “Just Relax” and the screencap has a very nice view of Lilly Bella standing, pulling her panties and it’s from behind her. That looked like it was going to be a solo scene. I then clicked the video. I stream everything before downloading. The scene starts with male Maxmillian Dior. I hate showing my impulsive side this much but I just closed it. If you wonder why I would think it was solo, it’s the only one of the last 20 scenes that just shows a female in the preview screencap.
That is going to be the problem I have. From what I can tell, Sex Art is now almost exclusively hardcore male/female or lesbian. I am guessing the new solo content is on Met Art X, which is fine, but it shows how much this site has changed (for good and bad, in my opinion). I do know the bigger picture is to just join the entire Met Art Network and then you’ll get everything.
I’m not going to knock the score down on it just for that personal preference. The content here is very good if you like hardcore that’s not offensive (which I do) and aren’t expecting the solo scenes that used to be more common on here. I was starting to think I just thought there was less hardcore on this site but using the tags, it shows 291 “boy-girl” scenes and all 291 of those with that tag started in 2019. The site has been around since 2013 or 2012. There’s a chance the tags aren’t 100% accurate but you can see that the last two and a half years have produced nearly 300 boy-girl scenes.
It’s still a top quality site, preferences aside, I just can’t score it as high as I used to. This used to be a 96-99 site for me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
One of the most conflicting sites for me and I consider that a positive.
They have 736 models and I would say -- in my opinion -- they have the most attractive collection of models of any site I have been a member of. Even their male models are very attractive.
There are 1,462 videos and I am focusing on that since it’s where a lot of my conflicting feelings come from. I won’t list it as a con, but the scenes are too short.
They have 1,895 photo sets and because of the conflicting nature of the videos, I often find myself more interested in the photos.
All videos and photo sets can be downloaded with no limits.
Daily update of either a photo set or video. It alternates day to day.
Cons:
They have tried several different angles at creating unique content, but seem to always pull the plug on them. “Fan Fiction”, “Girls Love Sex” to name a few.
The male/female scenes are my least favorite male/female scenes from any site. I doubt I have ever used this word to describe a sex scene or ever will again -- stodgy. I’m even happy that most of them are short.
Bottom Line:
Sex Art is a site I want so bad to love and I do like a lot of it, maybe even crush on it some too, but have yet to reach that love feeling. While I didn’t list it as a con it is my biggest problem with the site. The scenes are too short, maybe they’re too edited even. One of the newest scenes has three of the most attractive female models I have seen: Baby Nicols, Anya Krey and Mina Moreno. They are in what looks like a tropical, exotic jungle or forest. Excuse my American side. The scenery is beautiful. The models are all stunning and natural. The “good part” starts around the 3 minute mark of the video and the rest of the video lasts another 13 minutes. How can you go through that much trouble to get these 3 near perfect models into a near perfect location then just shoot 16 total minutes of video? At the minimum, I would say it should be 30 minutes and I wouldn’t complain if it was 60 minutes.
That problem isn’t just with that one scene. Nearly all the scenes are under 20 minutes. Are we saying that professional porn stars can’t last longer than average people? That’s why I call this a conflicting site. There are a lot of scenes I want to love on the site, but then they end. I do not think it’s a situation where the site is cheap. Their production values are as good as any site I have been on, but why are the scenes not longer? It reminds me of a review I posted last month of a site which I said about it, “They’re trying to do too much, but not doing any of it very well.” That’s not how I feel about Sex Art. I feel like they are doing everything right, but then just cut it short. Well, almost everything, I don’t like the male/female scenes on here. They do a very good job of setting these scenes up with varied storylines, but once the initial dialogue is over the scenes fall into the redundancy of most hardcore scenes.
There isn’t much you can complain about as far as the site goes unless something in particular bothers you like the short scenes do me. They have almost 1,500 videos and nearly 2,000 photo sets. The photo sets are excellent quality and oftentimes take longer to look at than it takes to watch the video. One complaint on the photo sets is they are not coordinated with the videos. The video scene I started the review with is titled, “Adventurous”. There is no “Adventurous” photo set, but there does seem to be a couple of photo sets that connect to the videos (same model and outfit).
I don’t know why they stopped attempting their different series. I thought the “Fan Fiction” series was very interesting since it goes into different fetishes, but they stopped those in 2017. If nothing else, I guess you have to give them credit for at least trying and trying again to keep improving. The newer scenes do not give me that same feeling. Maybe the market and feedback dictates that? They seem to be settled into a certain style of scene for male/female, lesbian, solo and are sticking to it.
I am going to bump my score up from the last time I reviewed it. Back then, it was one of my first reviews and I had only been joining artsy/softcore sites. Now that I’ve been through the ups and downs of very hardcore sites it makes me appreciate Sex Art more. I just hope they don’t fall into a formulaic pattern. The videos are downloadable in 4K, 1080p, 720p, two smaller versions and two lesser used formats WMV and DivX. I did upgrade to a 4K monitor/television, but I only download the 720p or 1080p versions. If you’re into scenes that end way too fast this could be your new favorite site. For me, it’s an excellent site that just leaves me wanting more with nearly every scene.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Award winning porn for women. That's what the main page says.
Implies the stories in the scenes were written by professional erotica authors.
This should be a con, but I am going to give them credit for doing a great job of marketing what is a poor to mediocre site.
I believe there is a market for this type of "female-aimed" porn, it's just not for me.
Cons:
Has not updated in years. The site itself does not look modern either.
Boring content that is just not erotic enough
Very little if any HD content. The photo sets are also low quality and do not even zip downloads.
Not a big name biller.
The site is hard to use as it has folders inside folders to find only low quality inside.
Bottom Line:
I am very interested in the niche of porn for women. I never knew that back in 1999, there was a site dedicated to what us girls want to see. So I took the plunge and joined. The site was only $4.95 so I figured I did not have much to lose by checking it out.
In the more than 20 years since this site opened, there have been two major changes. One is that women have become more assertive sexually and we know what we want and how we want it. The other change is in the world of porn. It is now so readily available that we have choices. When this site was started this was it. For women we have seen a lessening of the stigma there once was when we admitted to liking porn. To a degree porn itself has evolved, just not enough. One day there will be better choices but modern porn is still a man’s world.
For me this was a history lesson, a peek into the world of sexual entertainment of a different time and a different place. The founder was a woman. Looking at it now, she made a site that seems to represent stereotypes of what women need. There is a large emphasis on sexy stories, shopping and makeup. That may be fine for some, but it is not me in 2020. I think she made a site that she would like. It did not work for many of us and it abruptly ended in about 2015 as a failed experiment. It even comes off as more of a blog or personal experience for the webmaster who decided to add some porn for some extra zest and appeal.
I want to see a lot more that stimulates my mind to make me in the mood. I need a harder edge than many and I am not ashamed to say that. One of my all time favorites is Kink, and this is not in the same class, not the same building or the same country for that matter.
I hate to complain about a site that was extremely cheap to join, but whatever little there was to download, I did not bother to keep.
This site probably deserves a score of fifty, but I am in a good mood today and will give them a few extra points for being a pioneer. I think 64 is about right.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the MetArt network. So you can expect a professional, high class offering of erotic porn.
-A large catalog of photo sets and videos.
-Updates daily. Either a photo set or a video.
-The main strength of the site is the level of the attractiveness of the models. Both the girls and the men are attractive. The women range in age from late teens to the twenties, and are either good-looking or beautiful.
-Videos are offered from 220p to 4K (UHD), in download.
-Photo sets are offered in high, medium and low definition zips.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. No limits, no extra charge for downloads.
-PU has a discounted price of $19.99/month recurring.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale in join page.
-The videos lack heat. Although this is glamorized hardcore sex, it's more like a softcore version.
The site offers high-quality professional videos and photo sets, but the videos just lack heat.
-The videos often have a setup of 10 minutes or less, before the sex starts. Since the video runtime is 30 minutes or less, that doesn't leave much time for the sex.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Videos: over 1200
Photo sets: Over 1600
Number of photos per set: Over 100
The site theme is softcore erotic sex. I say softcore, because it's glamourized sex, not raunchy, but it would be considered hardcore. You have guy/girl, girl/girl, and solo female masturbation.
-SexArt is like a glamorized, erotic version of MetArt. MetArt focuses on photos, although it also offers some videos, and the videos at MetArt are becoming slightly more erotic. But there is no sex in the MetArt videos. There is sex in the SexArt videos (and photo sets).
-Although I think the videos lack heat, the photo sets are more erotic. Looking at Candy Kate, in her first photo set at SexArt, titled "First Time", posted Jun 04, 2020, she is a wet dream come true. It's a solo model set, but she is fucking gorgeous. Or maybe sexy is a better word, because I've seen prettier models, but none more luscious, more fuckable.
Note: you are supposed to respect the models, but respect has nothing to do with it: Candy Kate is hot. At least in the Sex Art photo set titled "First Time".
She has 2 photo sets at MetArt. The same model, professionally photographed in high-class glamour setting, but the set at SexArt is far more erotic.
The site is easy to navigate. And the search feature is excellent for bringing up a model's content at the site.
I can't describe what makes the photosets are SexArt more erotic than the photosets at MetArt. Maybe it's because I have seen thousands of photosets at MetArt, and I'm becoming slightly bored with that site.
But the photosets are SexArt are just more enticing. More erotic. I have a hunger for the model at SexArt, while at MetArt, I think she is cute or attractive, but no hunger. Even though MetArt has thousands of really attractive, even beautiful or gorgeous women.
I'm giving SexArt a score of 90. It has a fine catalog of outstanding women. But outstanding women are common: Femjoy, MPL Studios, MetArt, and a score of other fine photo sites have 1,000s of outstanding, lovely models.
What could SexArt do better? They could put some heat into their videos.
But their photo sets are really outstanding.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+A well designed site with multiple icons to help members find what they like.
+Currently 900 available models that include teens to more mature women and all natural body types to more enhanced models.
+A library of content going as far back as the early 90's.
+Over 1000 movies which are broken down into over 5700 individual scenes.
+You can download the movies by sex scene or the entire movie which is crucial in this type of porn where it is all plot driven.
+Each video has multiple tags and their search engine allows search by more than one keyword to help narrow results.
+You can search by video quality and as it stands right now. They offer 141 x 4K videos, 2468 x 1080p, 3429 x 720p and 193 x 540p.
+You can download photosets but they are all taken from the feature films.
+They offer the same live cam content as NVG and since I am not a fan of thys type of content then I can't add anything to this.
Cons:
-The only major con is that the sex scenes themselves are often too short with the bulk of them being under 30 minutes and nearly 1500 of them being under 15 minutes.
-Not a con for me but it's important to point out that people who don't want to see a condom will really dislike the content here.
Bottom Line:
*The most important thing anyone has to consider before joining Wicked is whether they are okay with condoms because this is the last studio to still only shoot safe sex porn. If your answer is yes then you will find porn that is rarely done today as the industry has moved on to gonzo only porn. Even the studios that shoot artcore style can't be considered to offer true scenario driven porn.
*It may also be one of the only sites to offers it's members the ability to download the entire movie as opposed to only the sex scenes and to me that is probably it's biggest selling point because context is super important in scenario driven porn and if you only got the sex scene portion than no matter how great it could have been. It would never get there because of the missing piece of context necessary in plot driven porn.
*Important to point out that since Wicked has always been a contract performer studio then a select amount of their models spent maybe their entire career working for them and therefore this is the only place where you can see them do porn.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-Sleek and nice looking site
-Content exclusive to Joybear
-All films (in hd) and photo sets downloadable
-Models are all natural and are from lots of different ethnicities
-Natural, ‘real-life’ scenarios which focus on connection between models
-Blog (‘journal’) is a nice extra on the site
Cons:
-Videos don’t tell you how long they are
-Content is not dated and there is no upload schedule except for vague ‘coming soon’ posts in the ‘journals’ section
-Can’t rate, comment or save favourites or models
-Search function is just a search bar and only simple searches work
-No info about models other than other Joybear films you can link to
-Photosets are presented poorly. They’re displayed under the film in a sliding viewer, 3 photos at a time at poor quality. The upside is you can download the whole set at a time. Not all shoots have photosets attached.
Bottom Line:
It’s a film production company created in 2003, and they make ‘award-winning, sex-positive erotic films’. It’s like if hollywood does porn for couples. They make ‘films’ which consist of several ‘chapters’. Titles include ‘Housemates’, ‘Secret Sex Society’ and ‘Exposure’. If you click on the film it takes you to all the chapters. Models don’t play themselves in the films but characters, and they keep the same characters throughout the chapters of the film. There’s a voiceover at the beginning of each chapter to give some back story, and although the models are playing fictional characters, the reactions look real and they look like they’re genuinely having fun.
It’s mostly gb couples with some gg, some threesomes and there was a foursome I found. No solo shoots that I saw. It’s not hardcore. There were about 200 videos with almost as many models. It’s part of the stiffia network so buying a pass to the network is better than buying a pass to just this site.
I enjoyed Joybear’s films a lot, they're very well made with high production quality. But the lack of features on the website makes it difficult to navigate and makes me just want to download my favourites and be done with the site. However, the videos themselves are great, the models do an amazing job and the filming and editing is top notch.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Dark, artsy, hardcore, major close ups.
- Well-known performers seen in ways you're not used to.
- 160 scenes, each has a video and photos.
- Unlimited downloads on videos and photos.
- Easy to use navigation.
- Some of the most realistic and believable porn I've seen.
Cons:
- If you thought dark meant there's an edgy side to it, there is and there's a visibly dark (lighting) side to it too. At times is too dark visually.
- Seems like they could get more than 2 updates a month in this genre.
- Bonus scenes are stream-only and are mixed in with the regular scenes.
Bottom Line:
This site is receiving points just for being different. If you've ever been a member of I Feel Myself it's what this site reminds me of except it has male/female and lesbian scenes instead of solo.
The models, male and female, seem to have to be professionals as this isn't wildly filmed porn or anything too jerky. The camera often stays in the same area for minutes at a time, showing penetration, showing kissing, showing a woman going down on other woman. And they get close enough to see beads of sweat/fluids. The scenes feel slowed down, going for an erotic feel and they do a pretty good job of it.
I'm no fan of heartcore which is what this will remind some of but I don't see it as heartcore. I think this is serious hardcore, even the lesbian scenes. There's little to no story even though the scenes last around 30 minutes each and I think that goes with my thinking the action is slow, deliberate and erotic.
There are 160 scenes (including stream-only bonus scenes). The videos can be downloaded in 540p, 720p, 1080p and the scenes since November 2017 also have a 4K option.
The word that comes to my mind when watching these is artsy. The camera will pan away from the action to show the male or female's face as they are having an orgasm, then it will shift back to showing the orgasm happening. There's a lot of editing going on. That could be a con for some since the scenes have that television show feeling of a flashback, you saw their face and know they had an orgasm, the screen goes black for a second and shows the orgasm.
For me, it's worth a few points added since I haven't seen any studios shooting porn this way. This is a studio that produces DVD so the scenes are named and numbered to go with their associated DVD like Steamy Stories 1, Steamy Stories 2, Steamy Stories 3 and so on but there's not much story.
One thing the scenes aren't lacking, at least for me, is realness. For one, some of the oral, fingering, sex parts are so close-up it seems bigger than life-like. This could be a different form of POV even. This is like POV if you were the finger. I don't know if the site has much return value since they only update twice a month but if you've never been a member it's a good site to check out and download what they have.
There are plenty of stars here which kind of surprised me. Brandi Love is here, Blue Angel, and from the looks of it this site has been around awhile. The earliest scenes are from 2015. The scenes between 2015-2017 have 540p, 720p and 1080p. Even as a picture collector, this is one time that I don't think the pictures add anything. Between the lighting and the close-ups the pictures just don't help much.
Good for a one time join if you're looking for something a little different.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-Nice looking site, easy to navigate. You can search for models as well as tags.
-Videos are well made, full HD quality and professionally edited
-Each video has a description of what happens/the set up. You can comment, star and like the videos.
-All types of sex are featured, including solo masturbation (girl and guy), couple (GG, GB and BB) and a few threesomes
-Content is exclusive
-no cookie cutter films of the same thing. Even the hot sauce series (more on that later), they are all different enough
-The models are all natural, laid back and genuine. They looked like they were all really enjoying themselves, and sometimes even laughing at themselves with the person behind the camera. Also it looks like the models can choose what to do and the only thing that is ‘directed’ is the set up/theme
Cons:
-There are only 53 videos at the moment, and some of them are behind the scenes ones
-Content not updated often (one a month?)
-No photos
-Can’t download (more on that later)
-Sometimes the films were too artsy for me (but that's obviously personal preference).
Bottom Line:
Commonsensual (Lucie Makes Porn) is a feminist ‘art’ porn site founded by Lucie Blush. There are mostly videos made by Lucie, and a few from other videographers as well (eg. Pillow Book). Each shoot has a name and has custom made music, which is cool. The site says you can listen to them but all I found were 4 tracks. Either it’s not updated regularly or it’s been forgotten about.
The site captures nice, intimate moments rather than bdsm or rough sex. It’s people enjoying each other naturally, not prompted by the camera. There are some ‘alternative-looking’ people, most are probably in their 20’s, and mostly English speaking. Most people speak with an accent so English is not their first language (sexy as hell) and if it’s in another language there are subtitles.
Regarding downloading the videos: I found out after I subscribed to this site, that you can subscribe to mega site Stiffia, where you can download these videos. The bad things are, that Stiffia doesn’t have the latest videos (last one is from 2018) and the site contains an annoying pop up you can’t get rid of. So it depends what you want. On Stiffia it’s still branded as Lucie Makes Porn, so when the website changed to Common Sensual, they may have stopped providing videos to Stiffia, which could explain the lack of new content.
There were hot shoots that I loved. But there were also some that were more strange and not what I’m into (etg. documentary style with scenes and behind the scenes together, or psychedelic UV paint dancing in the dark occasionally wanking). But because there are around 50 shoots, I very quickly got through all the ones I liked.
Last but not least, they have a series called Hot Couture. Basically they get the models to eat food (the first few episodes were hot wings, now it seems like any food) with hot sauce with levels of increasing hotness, then masturbate. It definitely has comedy value, and is surprisingly sexy.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- clear website setup and design
- many different angles in the videos
- 'movies' are categorized by themes/practices
- mostly no lengthy intros, action starts quite fast
- no music when action
Cons:
- no test-phase available, before signing up you can only watch trailers
- The registration process was annoying: when refreshing the registration window (because of using an already existing username), system automatically switched from a 1-month subscription to a 3-month subscription, so you had to be careful what you subscribe to.
- difference between „movies“ and „chapters“ in the navigation menu unclear.
- no information about total video-length
- confusing thumbnails before playback
Bottom Line:
- Joybear is an award winning porn-site from the UK (e.g. winner of 'feminist porn award 2013')
- the website offers videos with different actions, mainly hetero-sex, three- to foursomes and lesbian sex, most of it soft style.
look seems high-end and professional.
- after a short introduction with the models voice-over giving hints about what to come, action starts quite fast.
- from then on there's usually no more music, only original sound, which i appreciate.
- chapter category is a nice feature, where 6 videos each are assigned to a superior so-called "movie", such as "Sex with friends", "Everyday Turn-Ons" or "Roommate".
- for me, at first I didn't get the structure of 'chapters' and 'movies'. It took me some minutes to figure out, that all 'chapters' belong to different 'movies', but can still only be viewed individually.
since both belong together, i find the division in the navigation menu misleading.
- I also definitely missed information about the video length. It's neither displayed before, nor during playback.
before clicking start on a video, a thumbnail of a different one is shown in the player which i find confusing.
- Even though there are differences in style and themes, you usually see slow, soft sex. If you're into a wider range in practices, Joybear probably isn't the best adress.
- the same goes for the actors: models are mainly slim, trained and shaved.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A near perfect site for me. Couples living out their fantasies with each other.
Touches on nerves and hormones that most porn doesn't ever get close to.
Four downloadable video options, 480p, 720p, 1080p, 1920p.
I would have paid $15 for the 11 scenes on this site and been very happy about it. Instead, you get this site and 19 more.
Very attractive male and female actors.
I have watched each scene multiple times and probably will keep doing so. A site with this type of content being produced regularly would get me to join it on a lifetime membership.
Cons:
Only 11 scenes. I know that's bad and maybe it will make my score look bad, but I have watched these 11 scenes more than the 500 I have on my hard drive.
Doesn't look like they will be updating it anymore, last update was in 2017.
The actors inability to speak English removes most of the bad acting and causes their actions to speak for them.
Bottom Line:
The premise of these scenes is simple. There's a male/female couple and one of them has a fantasy or they both have the fantasy. Since there are only 11 scenes and I know there are people that want porn like this, I'm going to go over a few of them.
My Wife Wants to Squirt
The husband and wife invite in a third woman to teach the wife how to squirt. She starts with fingering the wife with the fully clothed husband watching. As the wife starts having orgasm(s), the husband walks over and pulls his dick out and starts jacking-off. The wife squirts, he cums and some of his cum even hits the woman assisting his wife.
Furtive Fingering By A Stranger
It's the fantasy us women like to say is not real. The shop owner Tiffany Doll is awaiting a package. I believe they are speaking Spanish or Portuguese. There was a man in the shop. Because I don't understand the language, I don't know if he was her husband or boyfriend. After he leaves, the delivery man brings a package and she's clearly attracted to him. They kiss deeply, he pushes her up on a counter, reminding yourself this is supposed to be a business anyone could walk in and he fingers her very hard, she even opens her shirt and bra. This is what makes these scenes different. She never touched his dick. There's no actual sex other than the fingering. It gives the realistic feel to the fantasy. He walks out of the shop like nothing happened.
One more is Turn Her On.
Male/female couple are attracted to a younger woman and they see her masturbating. The husband tells his wife to seduce her. They end up in a wild threesome.
This is the type of content I was first introduced to porn with. Vivid used to have this type of content and still do in the archives. It's the type of content that makes you wonder what you would do, it has a natural -- in the heat of the moment, feel to it.
The rest of the score comes from it being on a very good network with 19 other sites besides it. They seem to explore several areas of fantasies on their sites. I would compare the content to Pretty Dirty and Pure Taboo, it's porn that does more than just physically arouse you.
I will add a lot of the stepfamily type porn also touches on similar nerves and hormones, but I find these more believable since they are saying "this is a committed couple and in the heat of the moment they agreed to do something committed couples usually don't." Maybe one day someone will make more content like this. Until then, I'll hope I don't wear my 11 videos out!
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of content
Cons:
Non-existent customer service
Bottom Line:
MFF is definitely my favorite site hands down, but the customer service is non-existent. Rich is selective with his social media interaction (Twitter & email) since my feedback and/or requests have been completely ignored. Aside from that, MFF has a good amount of content since it's been around for a long time. Just don't expect any response back from customer service if you'll need it.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Extensive archive (1,000+ scenes)
- Daily updates (4x photo gallery and 3x video each week)
- Good age distribution (18 to 30+), increasing ethnical diversity
- Decent member interaction (comments are made quite regularly)
- Very female-friendly, softcore action (although a bit dull at times)
- Modern site layout (recently upgraded), easy navigation
Cons:
- „Once you've seen one, you've seen them all“-feeling sets in relatively fast
- Inconsistent content quality (typically determined by model pairing and director)
- Certain models get assigned very often, which induces a sense of repetitiveness over time
- Most scenes are structured equally (introduction accompanied by music, specific occurrence causes the models to be attracted to each other, vanilla-style sex act, ending and wrap-up)
- Unbalanced amount of B/G, G/G and threesome scenes (with a tendency to B/G)
- Rather short scene duration (15-25 minutes, which frequently leads to a rushed performance)
- No “backdoor” love, almost no use of toys (strap-on dildo, vibrator), truly kinky scenes are rare
- Site’s “upcoming” feature is practically worthless (upcoming scenes are revealed 1-2 days before the actual release date)
- Occasionally too “artsy” (excessively theatrical, overly dark environment)
Bottom Line:
I’ve been a member (lifetime subscription) of SexArt since mid-2013. While you might get infatuated by the genuinely beautiful cover art of each scene, I’ll go ahead and express a word of warning. If you’re completely new to SexArt and wish to check out their vast content archive, a temporary subscription is absolutely recommended. Everyone else (especially males), won’t likely get what they anticipate.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A tiny channel from Adult Time. There are only 11 videos and matching photosets at the channel. Actually, this is the Adult Time version of the site. I have an Adult Time membership through 21Sextury.com. I should also have an Adult Time membership from my Devils Film membership, but as far as I can tell, I was never given an Adult Time membership from Devils Film, even though Devils Film advertises that you get an Adult Time membership as a free add-on with a membership to Devils Film.
The SinfulXXX site still exists as a separate entity, and you can join that site directly, giving you a much larger amount of this style of content. There are approximately 200 videos at the SinfulXXX site.
Note: I've noticed that when a site is merged into the Adult Time network, sometimes it maintains a separate existence for a while, and you can join that site directly.
However, the separation can dissolve over time.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
I have a membership in Devils Film, which became part of the Adult Time network a while back.
Until recently, I could log in to the Devils Film site directly.
Today, when I log in to the Devils Film site, I am re-directed to the Adult Time network, even though I still have a paid membership in Devils Film.
Also, my membership to Devils Film was through FameAid(the biller agent). And when I logged into my Devils Film site directly, and was automatically transferred to Adult Time, the billing details of my Devils Film membership were not available.
Since I copied my membership details to Devils Film, I simply used a live chat with FameAid to cancel my Devils Film membership.
Sorry for the involved explanation of how I cancelled my Devils Film membership.
But you need to copy the details of each membership when you join.
Because cancelling a membership can get tricky.
Especially when they merge sites and seem to drop the membership details of some of your join sites.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-Site favors large-breasted women, so implants are common.
-They add a plot to the videos, to make the sex more meaningful, but the models are poor actors.
-For glamcore sex, I much prefer The White Boxxx, probably the finest glamcore site on the internet. Or the early X-Art videos, which can be more erotic, with greater heat, than the SinfulXXX videos.
-Adult Time has a pre-checked cross-sale. So does the SinfulXXX site. But pre-checked cross-sales are standard for porn sites.
-Uses a proprietary biller: VXS Billing. I'm more comfortable with CCBill or Epoch.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
This is a glamcore site geared toward sensual erotic scenes.
The target audience seems to be couples who enjoy racy sex. This is porn with a strong artful approach: the scenes are darkly lit, the video quality is excellent, the sex is slow and sensual. They also use oil or water on the models' bodies to highlight the sex.
Most of scenes are man-woman, but there are also some lesbian and two women-one man scenes for variety.
The videos run for about 20-30 minutes, which is plenty of time to show the slow, sensual approach the models take for their sexual pleasure.
Because the site has been partially folded into the Adult Time network, even if you are a fan of the site, I would hesitate to pay for a long-term membership (1 year) because you do not have any knowledge of how the site managers will treat the site: will the site remain a semi-independent site, with all of its content and any possible updates, or will it be completely folded into Adult Time? If completely folded into Adult Time, how much of the current content will still be available under the Adult Time network?
The site does an excellent job presenting high quality sensuous videos. But the connection to Adult Time makes a long-term membership to the site a gamble.
Take a month or two membership and download as much content as you want, is my recommendation.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A Met-Art inspired site about sex. Hardcore, lesbian and masturbation.
Male and female models are very attractive.
The site works as it should. There are no gimmicks or tricks required to understand.
Big site with 1,550 photo sets and 1,178 videos.
The site updates each day.
Not the best way to find out this pro, but after a cancellation mix-up, their support staff fixed it (within 24 hours) and added a month to my membership at no cost.
Cons:
Potentially the most unheard of con -- it does not feel like porn. It feels like I am watching a one hour drama series that slipped a sex scene in.
I think the extra month of Sex Art was also because of my complaining about the "staff selection" releases. These show up in the regular updates and require you to pay separately for each one.
Bottom Line:
I was hesitant to join Sex-Art. I am not into the more hardcore, kinky content (usually), but I had seen a few samples from their site. The samples were what I would describe as plain, vanilla and when I watch porn, I expect more than that.
It is hard to look over the content since all of the models, male and female, are attractive. The problem I see is it does not feel like I am spying on a couple having wild, passionate sex. I feel like they invited me to evaluate their performances. I am not a seasoned expert in hardcore porn. There is a reason I prefer solo or lesbian scenes. I like the added intimacy of solo porn. The lesbian scenes, as I have alluded to in previous reviews, shows me what I always heard happened in college, but never experienced it.
A nice looking guy and nice looking female having sex in positions I have had sex in is nothing exciting. I do like those scenes, but they are not going to turn me into a fan of hardcore porn.
The lesbian scenes are not much different than the male/female scenes. They look like professionals having professional sex. Our minds like to believe porn is dirty. It is not dirty on Sex-Art! Either the male/female or female/female really like each other or they were paid a good amount of money to make me believe they really like each other.
The solo scenes are very good, and that was my complaint I sent Sex-Art when I had the cancellation problem. I saw all these solo scenes in the staff selections, including titles like, "My Favorite Fetish", "Turning Myself On", "Watch or Watched" and "Raw Orgasm". There are almost 50 of these types of scenes in staff selections. They all sound like scenes I would really be into.
They are $4.99 each for members. I am not new to online porn, but I am new to this style of selling someone a membership then expecting them to pay more for your premium content. I paid $5 for the Sex-Art membership. Why not sell it for $25 and include those staff selection videos? Obviously, 50 x $5 each is a lot more than $25, but as women start joining porn sites, the porn producers are going to realize we are more into bargains and thinking we are getting something more for our money.
I would not feel the separation between the regular Sex-Art scenes and the staff selection scenes if the Sex-Art scenes did not feel vanilla. I bought one of the staff selection scenes, titled, "My Favorite Fetish". I would not pay $5 again for one of these scenes. First, it was only 16 minutes. It was a solo scene, it was not that unique. The model has a hose or stocking fetish. She inserts her stockings inside of her and then sniffs and licks them while she masturbates.
It left me feeling like the site is not as great as it thinks it is. I still believe it is a good site and would appeal to others more than it did me. Their quality is excellent it is just not a site I would normally join. I should have looked more into it before joining, but for $10 including the staff selection video, I do not feel ripped off.
The pros covered the large amount of content and the site works very well. I have joined other sites listed as female-friendly. I do think it is disambiguation to call it female-friendly. All that has meant on the sites I have tried is it is very soft hardcore. Are they saying it is friendly to the females in the porn? I don't believe that. I believe it is marketed at women that want to see their favorite erotica book brought to life. They even have erotica-like synopsis of the scenes.
These are from one of the most recent male/female scenes, "she emerges from the pool with water dripping down her voluptuous body". Another is, "She frees his rigid cock" and ends with, "Her orgasm is wet and explosive as they slam together and she jerks out his load rapidly, both of them gasping for breath from their exertions."
That is not porn. That is from the minds of my middle-aged, unhappily married friends, put there by the stack of novels in their bathroom. Maybe I need to try a more hardcore site. With all my complaining and bitching, it is still a very good site if this content appeals to you. I do not collect pictures. I think that probably hurts my view of the site too.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Simple convenient design, easy to browse
Good video player, photo quality and download speed
Natural sex in all scenes and movies
Long scenes and full movies with a background story
Accurate keyword search
Cons:
Shadows on videos
No duration on videos or on the video page
Less than 100 movies total
Bad photo slider
Bottom Line:
Joybear is a site where you can find long scenes, mostly movies, with a story behind. Videos start with the explanation of the story in the audio, and again beginning of the story in the video. After the explanation of the story, there is not any talk in the video, only moanings, except maybe a last sentence at the end of the video. Early videos have some slow background music, but most scenes don’t.
The site is simple and elegantly designed. Photo slider is not the best, but downloading the whole photoset button is conveniently placed. Photo quality and download speed for both photos and videos are good. You can download the videos in different qualities.
On the Members Area Homepage, you can see the latest uploaded and upcoming movies. You can search for chapters, movies, and cast. When you select the video, you can see the cast and a short explanation. Unfortunately, seeing the duration is available neither on the page nor on the video player. Even though, the duration is not displayed on the video player, you can watch the videos in different qualities and also picture in picture mode. You can also search the site with keywords you want and it is working pretty accurately.
Sex scenes are definitely slow. Scenes uses different positions and camera changes positions and zoom in and out enough. Sometimes, they have problem with shadows. Most shoots are indoors. You will find both straight and lesbian videos. The explanation of the story in the beginning of the videos can take up between 10 and 20 percent of the video.
Cast does not act like ‘I am a pornstar’, but instead they are natural or they come close. Moanings does not sound acted mostly, same as the actions and face and body language. You could watch natural sex, or sex that is close to being natural. The Stories makes the site content much richer. And instead of 5 minute videos, you can watch full movies or chapters at once, featuring different positions and scenes.
If you like natural sex and stories, I definitely suggest to check out.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Inexpensive two day trial membership, but no discount through PU
-Pioneer in porn for women genre. Started in 1999.
-Nominated for numerous XBIZ and AVN awards from 2012 to 2016
-Much of the content suggested by members. Some content, but not the videos, are member submitted.
Cons:
-The site tells me the biller is Phoenix Group. No link on members pages.
-Not a secure site (http, not https).
-Videos have hidden download link.
-The videos are not dated, so it is hard to tell how frequent updates are. Possibly not even updating.
-No zipdownloads for photos.
-Small photos at 1200x1600.
Bottom Line:
This site as started in 1999 to provide porn for women with a female focus. Sssh.com founder Angie Rowntree has been a frequent panel discussion participant at adult industry trade shows, and has been profiled by major media outlets including ABC’s Nightline, Cosmopolitan, CNBC, Fox News, Time Magazine and Psychology Today.
The Best Porn rated this an 80 in 2013 and Rabbits Reviews a 79 in2018. On Pornusers Pinkerton gave this a 78 in 2014. It was nominated for numerous XBIZ and AVN awards from 2012 to 2016.
Much of the content has been suggested by members. Some content, but not the videos, are even member submitted.
In 2013 the TBP review stated there were 269 videos and 475 photo galleries. When Rabbits Reviews counted the videos in 2018, they found only 255 and only 176 photo sets. In 2019 I don’t know how many of each there are. Most are not HD videos, I counted at most 20 and the photos are small by today’s standards at 1200x1600. You can’t use a zipdownload option as there is none and the sets have only a handful of photos in each one. The problem with getting an accurate count is that there are many subsections and categories and if you want to see older videos you need to find a link to an older website that is quite different than the one you see in the preview before signing up. The other problem is that many of the videos are split in to clips. I saw one that was eight updates, but I would call it one video.
The content rarely has a date associated with it, so it is impossible to see how often there are updates. One example that is dated is the one for the live twitter chat every Tuesday. The last time it was active was in 2015. You can download “51 Shades of Submission” a BDSM program of a virtual 3D world. It was added to the site in 2013 and looks to have very primitive graphics.
The category erotic movies come in sub categories:
Couples TV- 108 story driven porn videos. Some are interracial with black men. Not one has a non white female model. The videos can be downloaded if you click on show in HD and then right click to save after the video starts. Not many videos are HD, so this is counterintuitive.
Discover TV- 45 documentaries on BDSM, sex positions, guide to stripping for your partner, guide for bicurious women, you can meet a doctor specializing in sex questions, the art of the blowjob, g spot, a vibrator guide, women’s satisfaction guide, anal secrets, and the sex men love.
Kink Cinema -32 story driven BDSM videos. Low quality standard definition. Some cannot be downloaded.
Man Channel-7 male stripper videos Very low quality standard definition.
Girlfriend Channel-13 story driven lesbian videos form Dane Jones, Lesbea, Joy Bear, SexArt, etc.
Talk TV-42 videos featuring a talk format, such as interviews with both male and female pornstars, discussions of ethics in porn
History-four old porn videos. Black and white ranging from 1910 to 1950.
Three premium VOD channels with access included with membership. DVD scenes of heterosexual sex.
Next there are some interesting sections. Are they still active? Who knows.
All About You section-Member submissions of the Art of Masturbation techniques, articles about masturbation ethics, myths, learning from porn. Not very explcit galleries of erotic couples and women masturbating. Member submissions of masturbation stories.
Girl to Girl section-Member submitted lesbian stories, lesbian photo galleries, BiCurious articles
Shopping Boutique-Movie rentals, sex toys, toy reviews, dvd sales
Health and Sexual fitness section-Articles on topics ranging from the benefits of learning pole dancing, body weight and sex drive, sex and pregnancy, etc.
Style and Beauty which has standard female advice on lips, hair, skin, etc.
The site does its own billing and my bank lists it as Phoenix Group. I sent an email to cancel. It took a day to acknowledge cancellation and mind you I got a two day trial.
The site is not secure. My computer tells me it is http not https. This does not sit right. The website Digicert states “Any page providing an HTTP connection will cause the “Not Secure” warning. You should avoid conducting any sensitive transactions on these pages—such as logging in, providing personal information, or payment information—browsing insecure sites could put you at risk if you are viewing information that is dangerous or not condoned in your country.”
The impression I have is that they had a great idea when they started, but then gradually neglected it. I was disappointed with the current state of the site.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Part of the Stiffia network so you can enjoy this site alongside a bundle of other websites.
Also has the great advantage of being available at an excellent price point if you time your move on the offers they have on.
A very slick and professional looking website with defined menus and options which make this site a breeze to navigate.
Truly stunning models feature on this site. Just take a look or Google the following- Julia Roca, Bianca Resa,Kali Sudhra, Loren Minardi, Avril Sun and Claudia Rossi to name a few.
Couple friendly website - which means it carries a positive message. Joybear like to focus on female-friendly porn that has both realistic and sensual sex scenes and a storyline that will hopefully be enough to keep viewers’ interest.
Superb production values throughout a wide range of areas.
Flawless camera work and model selection.
Cons:
Photo sets are not available for all scenes, however they are crisp when featured.
There is a potential that this site won't be as hardcore for some people who perhaps prefer more gritty scenes.
Not all actresses are credited correctly e.g. Ashley Long and Kat Varga both appear in the 1st movie uploaded to the site but aren't credited as you might expect to get. You have just blonde and 'Kat' despite others having full names.
Scenes can tend to play out with a similar ending - a cum shot over the pussy is a notable big favourite.
Scenes tend to often have long build ups which will interest some more than others.
No tags in download names - all scenes download with either 'scene SD' or 'scene full hd' for example.
Site probably doesn't update as often as you would like.
Bottom Line:
Joy Bear is a British, London based porn production company that I believe came to life in 2003 as a reaction to them seeing films with people in their opinion having pleasure-less sex, especially women.
You will therefore find Joy Bear to be a positive message site which looks to reconstruct modern pornography to appeal as a more mutual based pleasure for both sexes- nothing wrong with that at all in my humble opinion.
As a consequence if you are looking for a porn site to indulge with a partner then its definitely worth giving Joy Bear a go as I'm sure all persuasions will find something appealing and easy on the eye.
A big plus is that Joy Bear is now part of the Stiffia network so if you are wily you can sign up to this on a good deal - available through this site too at a very budget friendly price.
If you are looking for some stats you will find the following:-
185 scenes from 37 movies.
Average scene length approx 25-30mins.
You have over 160 models, which includes both male and female and is split between mainly British and European nationalities. A lot of them are great looking too which is obviously a bonus. You will find mainly genuine hotties who are very easy on the eye such as Stella Cox, Sienna Day, Lolly Badcock, Zoe Doll, Claudia Rossi and Ella Hughes to name a handful who are bound to get you feeling the urge! The male stars too are no slouches either and I'm sure will tick all the right boxes for those looking in that direction!
The slick modern layout presentation gives this site a very high end no expense spared quality.
Its also worth noting that there are no log in issues or requests for futher purchases once you are a member (in reference to old comments posted here regarding this site). This appear resolved, at least I have had no issues.
Download speeds have always been decent when I've pressed the button to fill up the hard drive!
With each scene you have the option to stream or download up to 'Full HD' quality(1920x1080/9 mbits).
The production quality is what you would hope to find for a site which proclaims to ooze quality and expense.
All of the production values such as selection of cast, video angles, locations, make up, background and final product are top division. It really does have a big budget feel when pitched against other British and European efforts.
All in all I recommend this site as something definitely to at least give a months trial to, its very modern and forward thinking and if your looking for some mutual porn fun this would be my go to pick from the sites I've looked at to date.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- ‘Alternative porn’, sex-positive site: mostly B/G scenes, with some lesbian and solo
scenes
- It’s a pro site, but lots of the girls are inexperienced performers, and there are real
couples in a number of the videos
- Lots of behind-the-scenes content like interviews with performers after they’ve
finished shooting
- Videos have ‘categories’ like blowjobs, shaved, couples, etc. You can click a
category to see all related videos
- You can also search by the performers in this way
- When signing up with Vendo there were no other pre-checked sites/payments.
Secure and safe
- Hot-wings eating challenge videos: unexpected sexiness
- High-res streams: 720i and 1920i.
- Made by a woman (Lucie Blush), more than almost any other site I’ve seen, I would
watch this porn with a lover.
Cons:
- A big one: you can’t download the videos
- There’s new behind-the-scenes content every week, but ‘real videos’ aren’t
uploaded as often (there are no upload dates on the videos)
- Only 47 videos at the moment
- The smaller number of videos on the site means that some of the categories and
search features aren’t super useful (yet)
- No pictures/photosets
- Another big one: Sometimes streams get stuck and buffer endlessly
- Dom/sub scenes aren’t super hardcore. Usually it’s spank-and-shove kind of
domination, so this isn’t the site if you want real BDSM
Bottom Line:
Firstly: on this site it’s called ‘Lucie Makes Porn’, but at some point they changed that
name to Common Sensual.
Lucie Makes Porn/Common Sensual is made and run by Lucie Blush, who is an ‘alternative porn producer’ in Spain. At the time I wrote this, the site had 47 videos that range from solo girl masturbation videos to one-on-one lesbian videos to B/G scenes. B/G scenes are the site’s specialty. Many videos start with short interviews with the couples or very basic storylines and situations. Then you get sensually filmed touching, fingering and handjobs, blowjobs, pussy-eating, and fucking (often with condoms). Scene locations are usually in houses, performers’ bedrooms, and some scenes in parks and one in an abandoned building – the feeling is always that you’re watching real people getting off together.
I love the sensual and close way that the scenes are shot. There’s not athletic or typical mainstream porn fucking, but the performers here always seem comfortable and really turned on. Seeing real couples fucking is a serious treat, and it’s extremely hot to witness the real chemistry in some of the scenes here. Because it’s so sex-positive, this is the kind of porn that I would watch with a lover.
Because this is an alternative porn site, you won’t find so many fake breasts or heavy makeup. The girls on Common Sensual generally have a more ‘natural’ or everyday look (with some tattoos, of course). They are all in their early to mid-20s, mostly speaking English (there are English subs when they speak other languages). Some of the girls are
slim, some are curvy, but there is always this imperfect ‘real girl’ vibe. This increases the sexiness of the videos, because I feel like I could run into any of these girls on the streets of Barcelona… I like also that the guys in these videos look normal, it makes the scenes feel even more believable. I can easily imagine myself in them, which is a huge turn-on.
Common Sensual has two unique things that I want to mention. They say that they have an in-house producer who makes original music for the videos. This is a cool touch. Membership lets you listen to all of this music, but all I could find is a 4-track release on Bandcamp. So, don’t sign up just for this! Think of it as a nice bonus. They also do a series of videos called ‘Hot Couture’ – these are interviews with girls eating chilli wings, then masturbation scenes while they suffer from the spiciness. It’s a gimmick for sure, but it’s a creative way to get a feel for the girls and their personalities. A nice appetiser before they use their hands and vibrators to bring themselves to orgasm. Plus, seeing them vulnerable like this gives a whole new dimension to the solo videos. Great idea!
There’s lots of space for interaction on the site (comments below videos, you can like/ favourite videos). Sometimes Lucie Blush replies to comments, and it’s nice that the crew interacts with members like this. These features aren’t used a lot, though. Videos normally have only a few likes and comments are rare. Maybe as the site grows these
features will get more use.
I do have to talk about the big negatives, because they really do make a difference. First of all there’s no option to download and there are no photosets to accompany the videos. It’s not the end of the world, but this is pretty disappointing when you’re paying around $20 per month for membership. Second, I have had some problems with streaming from the site – skipping ahead in the videos can sometimes cause the stream to get stuck. I don’t know if this is a problem with the website or its host, but since downloading isn’t possible this is a problem that can make it hard to enjoy Common Sensual.
As you can see in the Cons section, I have other criticisms, but these are the two main ones. If they could fix them, it would make a huge difference to the quality of the site. This is a great site for fans of sex-positive couples and girls at play.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
NOTE: I'M WRITING IN CAPS, BECAUSE MY EYES ARE POOR. NOT TRYING TO BE RUDE OR SHOUTING, BUT IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO SEE (AND EDIT) RATHER THAN SQUINTING TO SEE TINY LETTERS.
ANYONE WHO IS REALLY ANNOYED BY CAP LETTERS CAN SKIP THIS REVIEW, AND WHATEVER OTHER POSTS I MAKE.
ALSO: I WROTE AN EARLIER REVIEW A LITTLE OVER A YEAR AGO ABOUT THE SEX ART SITE.
I THINK THAT REVIEW WAS EVEN BETTER THAN THIS ONE. MORE PROFESSIONAL. GIVES A BETTER OVER-VIEW OF THE SITE. BUT BOTH REVIEWS ARE ACCEPTABLE, IN TERMS OF GIVING A FLAVOR OF THE SITE, I HOPE.
PROS:
-SEX ART IS PART OF THE MET ART SITES. SO YOU CAN EXPECT A QUALITY EXPERIENCE:
-SEX ART IS A GLAMOUR SITE. THE MODELS (MANY OF WHICH ARE FEATURED AT OTHER MET ART SITES) ARE SOME OF THE MOST ATTRACTIVE WOMEN IN THE INTERNET.
-THE SITE STRUCTURE AND NAVIGATION ARE EXCELLENT.
CONTINUED IN THE CONS SECTION:
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS.
-NO STREAMING LIMITS.
-DAILY UPDATE.
-PU DISCOUNTED PRICE OF $19.95/MONTH RECURRING.
-SEX ART SUPPORT STAFF (PART OF THE MET ART SUPPORT STAFF) IS EXCEPTIONAL: FAST TO RESPOND TO EMAILS (WITHIN A FEW HOURS), AND HELPFUL. THE ONLY IMPROVEMENT WOULD BE IF THEY HAD A LIVE CHAT LINE, WHICH THEY DON'T.
-THIS IS A FULL-FEATURED SITE WITH ALL THE EXTRAS YOU GET WITH A GLAM SITE:
-YOU CAN STREAM ONLINE THE PHOTO SETS IN MULTIPLE DEFINITIONS.
-YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE PHOTO SETS IN MULTIPLE DEFINITIONS.
CONS (START OF):
-CONS ARE BASICALLY MINOR. THIS IS PART OF THE MET ART NETWORK. SO IT'S A FULL-FEATURED GLAM SITE.
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE. THIS IS STANDARD FOR PORN SITES.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-IF YOU DON'T LIKE GLAM PORN, THE SITE WILL PROBABLY NOT APPEAL TO YOU. THE MODELS ARE GORGEOUS, AND PRESENTED VERY ATTRACTIVELY.
-SOME MODELS APPEAR IN COSTUMES, TO GIVE AN EROTIC TOUCH. SO YOU HAVE TO BE IN THE MOOD FOR EROTIC GLAM. DON'T EXPECT CRUDE, HARSH HARDCORE, ALTHOUGH THERE IS A SLIGHT TINGE OF FANTASY HARSHNESS IN SOME OF THE PHOTO SETS AND VIDEOS.
-NO BONUS SITES COME WITH A MEMBERSHIP.
BOTTOM LINE (START OF): SEX ART IS THE EROTIC VERSION OF THE MET ART SITES. MET ART MODELS ARE BASICALLY PRESENTED AS SOLO MODELS, WHO, ALTHOUGH NAKED, ARE NOT ALLOWED TO SHOW MUCH SEXUALITY. VERY LITTLE SELF-TOUCHING. THAT'S THE WAY IT USED TO BE, ALTHOUGH SOME MILD TOUCHING IS NOW ALLOWED. NO BOYS ALLOWED (ALTHOUGH I DID ONCE SEE A FLASH OF A MALE PHOTOTOGRAPHER'S HAND AND WRIST IN A MET ART PHOTO SET, POSSIBLY TO ARRANGE A MODEL'S P0SE.
BUT SEX ART IS DIFFERENT:
A MODEL IS ALLOWED TO MASTURBATE.
A MODEL IS ALLOWED TO HAVE A BOY PRESENT, EVEN TO HAVE SEX WITH THE BOY.
A MODEL IS ALLOWED TO HAVE A GIRL PRESENT, EVEN TO HAVE SEX WITH THE GIRL.
I THINK OF SEX ART AS MET ART WITH SEX. MET ART IS BEAUTIFUL WOMEN WHO STRIP NAKED. SEX ART IS BEAUTIFUL WOMEN WHO STRIP NAKED AND HAVE SEX. ARTFUL, EROTIC SEX. BY THEMSELVES (MASTURBATION), WITH A PARTNER (A WOMAN OR MAN).
GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 90.
IT'S A FINE SITE, BUT I PERSONALLY ENJOY MET ART MORE. BECAUSE OF THE MASSIVE CATALOG OF PHOTO SETS OF GORGEOUS MODELS AT MET ART.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
