Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Fun blend of hardcore, lesbian and solo amateurs
Newer videos are 4K; all videos have 1080p at least
No download limits on videos or pictures
Very believable amateurs
Includes 2 good sites and 1 that’s okay
Easy to use navigation
Cons:
The sex quality is hit or miss which is common on amateur sites
Camera work is good for the most part, but does have some shaky moments
Not enough information about the scenes or the models
Bottom Line:
It’s hard to say what makes a good amateur porn scene; making it even more difficult to say what makes a good amateur porn site. For me, I don’t pay quite as much attention to the looks or attractiveness of the models. But Nebraska Coeds really has mostly attractive models. All of the strengths of a good site are present. All videos are downloadable at least in 1080p and many have 4K downloads. The pictures are high quality and also downloadable as zips. All of these downloads are unlimited.
Nebraska Coeds is the big site with over 1,500 videos and 1,100 picture sets. The scenes are also varied which isn’t that common for amateur sites. There are solo, lesbian, group and hardcore scenes. Most amateur sites just stick to one of the genres, but Nebraska Coeds gives you everything you could possibly want.
I do like this site a lot. The scenes have a real and close to natural feel to them. It’s what you would expect from a professional site or studio. It is hard to tell if the more inconsistent scenes are that way because of trying to follow a script or if it’s just they’re not that experienced.
Besides the videos being very high download quality, the pictures are 6000x4000 and come in zips for easy download and organizing. I do think that’s one of the less common features for an amateur site.
The navigation is excellent, but a common problem with amateur sites is also present – there’s not enough information about the scenes or models. It’s not that I want to get to know the models, but instead, why they are shooting porn and to show some of their personality.
The package is finished off on a positive note with CCBill being the biller. It’s very easy to cancel. I like it well enough to maybe return again, but part of that is to see if they’re really releasing new scenes or are just remastering old scenes to release as new ones. As a first-time member, the content looks new enough for me.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
4 site network of amateurs
Unbeatable quantity of this many amateurs
Over 3,000 scenes on the 4 sites combined
Professional and trustworthy billing handled by CCBill
Several new updates per week
High quality zipped pictures of amateur models you likely won’t ever see on other sites.
Cons:
Only 1 of the sites is updating
Older content takes a negative quality hit
Bottom Line:
While it’s not promoted or named as a network, this site does include 3 more sites and that helps it reach the 3,000+ scenes. The included sites are: Spring Break Life, South Beach Coeds and After Hours Exposed. That used to be a bigger deal than it is now, but for some – it could be the peace of mind leading them to join.
The other sites: Spring Break Life and South Beach Coeds are college girls in Florida. The scenes range from softcore and tease to hardcore. Those two sites are worthy sites with the two combining for nearly 1,000 scenes. After Hours Exposed is the only throwaway site with under 30 scenes and in a niche that’s not very popular.
I feel like the pictures on Nebraska Coeds deserve to be mentioned. It’s not easy to find photo sets of sexy, amateur models, but Nebraska Coeds does it. A downside is a lot of the content is categorized as softcore. There are lesbian scenes and a lot of the scenes are introducing a new model to porn. I think – in my opinion – that innocence is what makes those scenes good. For some reason, pictures just seem to be more innocent than videos, even if the photos show the same actions as the videos. The picture quality is 6000x4000 and those are downloadable. I see those specifications and know the site is trying to at least put some emphasis on their photo sets.
This package of sites is a lot like any network. There’s some good and bad. The good thing with Nebraska Coeds is the good outweighs the bad by a long distance. The models are not always knockout quality, but what group of amateur women is filled with perfect tens? How many teen women are there out there willing to take nude pictures and make videos? Not to be topped by the high picture quality, the video downloads go up to 4K.
The navigation takes a little time to get used to, but overall – it is good. There’s really not a lot to pull this site or network down. It’s pretty simple, if you like young (legal) models exposing themselves, often for the first time on camera, then this site could be your next favorite. With all these positives and the realism and authenticity, this is a solid 92.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of naked men being groped, sucked and fucked by "stranger" women.
As a past member, it is nice to see their additions of multiple camera angles to see different views of the action and different models.
Have changed nearly all scenes to a new style, combining what used to be 2-3 part scenes into 1 and scenes over the last year have 4 different camera angles.
That random drunk woman you know isn't a porn star that grabs two of the guys and sticks their dicks in her mouth.
Most of the guys are attractive.
The amateurs in the crowd -- in most cases -- look like real amateurs.
Cons:
The editing needs to be improved. Having to watch the scene from 4 different cameras gives it a "genuine" feel, but they no problem getting every cumshot into the scene.
The porn girls in the scenes are either too obvious by their looks or they have yellow bands on their arms letting the guys know which are the women to do the most with.
In a few words -- the scenes are too hectic.
Same venues.
Bottom Line:
If I had reviewed this site 10 years ago it would have been a mid-90s. It was different and seemed to be aimed at women viewers. The scenes often lasted too long, but they were enjoyable. I think the new format with 4 camera views is good if there are parts you really want to see. If the scene is not a good one, the 4 camera view makes it 4 times worse.
I don't know if the DVD site Videoez had anything to do with the change in the way the scenes are now laid out, but at one time, you could download a lot of these scenes from Videoez in "Best of" compilations. That is how they have done the older scenes on here. They have taken the best of their previous 90 minute scenes and lowered them to 30 minutes.
They have photos and screencaps which I don't remember them having in the past. The photos show a lot of what you don't see in the videos.
The scenes have removed most of the pre-action stripping and dancing by the males -- which is a plus. I still have some of the scenes from 7 years ago and the names are much different. Instead of the name just being the date and city of the scene, they are now titled like "Party Hardcore Gone Crazy Vol. 17".
Every video I have downloaded has a 1080p option, 720p and 480p option.
The hectic parts are not as bad as they used to be, but they are still using the same venues. The scenes play out the same and can be somewhat repetitive.
I think the niche is intriguing and could be better with some work on the amount of men and amount of "audience". A hundred women screaming and cheering on one model while music is blasting is distracting and frustrating.
It's hard to say much about the amount of content. It looks like it has dropped, but where they have combined scenes, the drop in quantity is most likely because of the combining.
The more I have watched these scenes I am starting to think these would be just as good for men -- maybe better -- than for women. I have been to three bachelorette parties, but never experienced anything like this. Maybe the fantasy is for a male viewer to think this is what goes on at the bachelorette parties their wife goes to?
I'm stuck in the middle on this one. I want it to be one of my favorite sites, but I like the videos I have from the past as much or more than these.
It's a good site by itself that is helped a lot by being in the Tainster network. My score would be a little lower if not for the pictures as they add a lot to the scenes. Good site in a little represented niche.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The site claims to have 1236 Movies and 283 models and as far as I can tell that's pretty accurate, you can go back all the way to videos from 2004 (and surprising enough, a lot, if not all of the older videos have remastered versions which are very good 1280x720 quality)
- Regular updates (I'd say maybe every 3-5 days there's a new video going up)
- Not all videos have photos, but those that do have a very useful zipped archive and even a larger resolution zipped archive.
- Definitely amateur models, don't think I recognize any of them, but overall the selection is pretty good with a range of body types and looks.
- The content is mostly girls masturbating, but there is a lot of variation in location, toys used and length of the scene. There are a lot of videos from festivals showing nude women dancing or wet t-shirt contests, decent amount of girl girl action (hard to navigate the categories, but maybe about 100 scenes), about 40 or so scenes of blowjobs.
Cons:
- The site looks dated, the search is not great and the categories are not always that descriptive or easy to navigate.
- The model page is pretty bare bones, it's useful to see all scenes from one model in one place, but they often don't even have a photo of the model, just her name and how many scenes she is in.
- Camera work is pretty bad at times with a lot of jerky movements and a lot of scenes have a very distinct "college" feel. There are several scenes of weed smoking, the camera man making bad jokes about the sex toys and several of the girls don't really seem that interested in the action.
- Slow download speeds on the largest videos (as far as I can tell these are pretty much uncompressed high bit-rate videos that are not that different from the HD mp4's and the site does warn you it will be slow so there's that)
Bottom Line:
I'm a fan of amateur content and several, if not all of the models here are clearly not professional porn actresses. There is a very distinct "unscripted" vibe and from the way several scenes go together I get the sense that the site owner finds girls who are willing to film and they hang out for a day or so shooting a bunch of different videos. This site in particular has the solo or lesbian scenes while some of the more hardcore stuff goes to After Hours Exposed.
Because of this the scenes on here end up really varied: there are some interviews with the girls, some shower scenes, some videos where the girls are already naked and it feels like they just finished another scene. It's a bit of a mixed bag that doesn't follow any strict steps, for better or worse.
The same thing extends to the models and videos as well. As with any site that uses mostly amateur girls some are more comfortable and fun, while a few seem a bit stiff and awkward. Some scenes, especially when there's natural light in the room end up looking really good, while in some scenes the light and angles are not really that great. Overall a mixed bag, I'd say a mostly positive mixed bag, but don't go in expecting the standardized production quality of a large budget porn network.
Something else that didn't really work for me, but I'm sure is a selling point of the site is the focus on a "party vibe". For example, there are a lot of photos and videos from festivals and "spring break". Some of the girls in these are really cute, but I didn't feel like it was really worth paying subscription to see a few seconds of some topless girls at a fest. Luckily, there are plenty of other videos with more explicit content so it's easy to ignore this content.
All of that said, I got access through a membership at Backroom Casting Couch and as part of that network this is certainly a good deal. Between ExCoGi (Exploited College Girls), the Casting Couch HD content and this site I can't think of a better network for amateur models. It's not big budget porn so it doesn't have that level of polish and there are some rough edges, but there are certainly several really hot videos here and there is so much content it's easy to skip the stuff that doesn't work for you.
P.S. for what it's worth I haven't had any of the issues with downloads or videos not playing that RagingBuddhist mentioned in his review, but your mileage may vary.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+ Decent number of updates online
+ 3 file sizes for downloading
+ 2 resolutions for in-browser viewing
+ Network access*
+ Screen caps to preview video
+ Zip files for pictures
+ Updates on Tuesdays and Fridays
+ Search function
Cons:
- Flash popup picture viewing only
- File sizes not commensurate with video quality
- Quite a few files that don't play to the end
- A few failed downloads
- Layout seriously dated
- HOLD THE CAMERA STILL!
- *Duplicate files across sites in network
- Slightly higher cost to join
- Keyword search gives incomplete results
- Large Watermarks
Bottom Line:
OK... I'm the quintessential amateur fan so I'm willing to put up with less than the stellar quality video you get from the big name sites that mass produce their product. But this site really had me scratching my head, trying to figure out how to rate it. Lots of no name models. Love that! There's a bit of variety in the action, although it does tend to stick mostly to solo action. Still a plus for me. And it's got a bunch of the features you find on every other good site - search features, fairly simple navigation that, unfortunately, comes with a con mentioned below and network access (of sorts). The TBP review is dated because there are now 7 sites in the network: Iowa, Nebraska, South Beach and Euro Coeds along with After Hours Exposed, Nudes-a-Poppin Festival and Spring Break Life. The screen caps worked well to preview the videos. Picture sizes on amateur sites are almost always smaller than what you find elswhere so I'll call them more than respectable at 1600 long side for all the sites except for Nudes a Poppin which are considerably better at 3200 long side.
Now the other side of the coin. The file sizes on the newer material are insane! I mean seriously - how do you come up with a 7-1/2 gig, one hour file when it looks like something that could easily be around a gig? The quality isn't bad, but I've ripped DVDs to just over 2 gigs that look as good. But the real kicker is that none of the files over 4 gigs except from Nudes a Poppin would play to the end, even using VLC which will play pretty much anything. I tried re-encoding them to bring the sizes down but they still had the same freezing issue. Then there's the all too common layout and design. Definitely an early 2000s look and functionality here. There's a template for downloading every file that, in the case of some, belie the fact that that video doesn't exist in that resolution. Next, while on the issue of video, I really got to wondering if the guys behind the camera were hopped up on caffeine or "something stronger". Sure - live action means moving around to catch everything going on, but it would be nice if the camera was steady for zoom closeups and that was almost non-existent. Last of the major faults I find in this site is why they even bother calling it a network when there are scenes from just about every site in the other sites. The majority of that shows up with Nudes a Poppin' videos making up more than half of the videos in all the sites but Nebraska Coeds - but there are still plenty in Nebraska as well.
Other issues:
- When will sites stop using flash only picture viewing?
- When a word search turns up more pages of results than the same keyword, the videos haven't been tagged correctly.
- Server gets slugglish at certain times of the day, leading me to believe the majority of the signups are from the U.S. AND what could have caused the few failed downloads.
So here's the wrap up. I really wanted to like this site, but the problems left me wondering why they think it's worth the extra $3 a month over the usual $30 to deal with it all. As I see it, the site needs a lot of work. A layout redesign and some re-encoding to get the file sizes down to reasonable AND playable would be a great start. I doubt I'll come back to this one anytime soon, if at all.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The upgrade package for Bang Bros, comes with 10 sites and this content, at one time, was stream-only, it's now downloadable.
- I tried joining directly through Dancing Bear, but the price was $29.95. If you're a member of Bang Bros, you add this package of sites for $19.95.
- Nice variety of niches in this package.
- Good download speeds, possibly from not as many members?
- Quite a bit of unique, exclusive content.
- Some fairly rare content if you're interested in certain niches.
- Has a party site, a Latina site, two college girl sites, a busty site, a solo site, an amateur site, a public site and a gameshow type CFNM site.
- Good navigation that's straightforward.
Cons:
- Back to the same problem as Bang Bros. The cancellation process is tucked away in the "library" link. Even worse, if you upgrade your Bang Bros membership to include this package, you now have two Bang Bros memberships listed in the options to cancel so you have to go through and cancel each one.
- None of these sites are updating and haven't been in over 2 years.
- The ads become a major factor once your regular Bang Bros membership has expired. You now can only access about half of the scenes on your browser window unless you want to rejoin Bang Bros.
- And the winner of the "are you fucking kidding me" award, there's another upgrade package! After joining this upgrade, a whole group of sites looking to be associated more with Middle Eastern models, including Mia Khalifa pops up.
Bottom Line:
I joined this upgrade package back when they were first offering it, guess that would have been 2011/2012. This review is going to be a bit back and forth.
The content here goes into unique niches that are rare. The party site, Dancing Bear, is by far the best of this type of content. They must have realized people were tired of bachelorette party theme and started shooting some of these scenes in sorority houses, in offices, and it does add a whole new dimension to the party atmosphere. The other big party site in another network, sticks to club, loud music, upwards of a couple hundred people. The Dancing Bear scenes have maybe 40-50 women tops and the strippers come out one at a time so you don't have a hundred different angles waiting for them to get that one hot amateur-looking woman.
I don't know why, but I love the CFNM Show content. I'm pretty sure I have a crush on the host of it. And she is involved in some of the scenes which makes it even better, but this was a very short-lived site.
College Rules and Haze Her are both very good sites as well. While the basis is a fairly-common one in porn, the girls, the settings, the laughing, giggling, makes both of these sites seem much more genuine than their counterparts on other networks.
There's the Brandi Belle solo site that is above average especially if you like Brandi. She's a very cute college girl in these scenes and it's somewhat setup to make it like she's auditioning the guys.
MyGF is an amateur site. I'd like to say all these are real amateurs, but I'm not positive of it. I noticed one Asian model who looks a lot like London Keyes, but these sets have the unique feel to them thanks to the additions of selfies in pictures, and what does seem like real couples.
Public Invasion is more or less a less risky version of the Kink public site. It's usually just a male/female outside having sex in the grass.
Busty Adventures is another short-lived site and it's what the title says except you know with Bang Bros, the average girl is usually busty, these are models that fall into the heavier/chubbier category.
Culineros is a Latina site that can be very good, but also very confusing. From the looks of it, Bang Bros had a dozen Latina sites they were trying to get started and most of this content isn't marked as Culineros, but it is included.
I saved that one for last because it can be confusing. The site is Culineros, but you'll see content from Sexo in Public, Mi Primer, Por el Chiquito, Tetangas, and this wouldn't be a problem except we all know how Bang Bros operates. Normally, if you download a scene from site that is not named on your membership, you are getting charged.
All the other sites in this package have the right site names on the scenes.
Here's some numbers: Dancing Bear - 128 scenes CFNM Show - 22 scenes
College Rules - 85 scenes
Brandi Belle - 199 scenes Busty Adventures - 156 scenes Haze Her - 54 scenes
MyGF - 179 scenes
Culineros - 450 scenes Public Invasion - 212 scenes
I'll mention here that Culineros, from the best I can tell and I'm dipping deep in my memory, these almost all look amateur Latina models. The content is very similar to what we used to find on Pacino's Adventures and is probably worth a join just for its content if you're into Latina.
I found the Public Invasion content to be rather tame, there's some risky content, but most of it looks like two people having sex in their backyard.
There's a downside here. This content isn't the newest technology, so the video quality can vary, but all the scenes I've looked at have at least a 720p option.
I think the upgrade is one of those that if you're into these niches and genres, you'll easily get your money's worth with a one month membership. I do think it's questionable for anyone looking for the newest resolution and professional camera/video work.
I'll end with the question I had: If you're a member of Bang Bros then add this upgrade, the upgrade does NOT end when your Bang Bros membership ends. You still sign in through Bang Bros, but you only see the sites in this network, which honestly, kind of surprised me. I was mainly joining to add some of the content lost in a hard drive crash, but did download a total of over 200 scenes, which is more than I've downloaded from a site in a long time. Definite recommend, but only one month.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Porn Pros Network. Joining this site gives you access to the basic Porn Pros Network sites.
-The network collection of the models is very good. Mainly young white attractive teens.
-I like the simple home page with hot links to the major categories:
Home Scenes Girls Sites Categories Favorites Live Cams Deals Blog
-Easy login, if you have cookies enabled. You still have to check the captcha box, and go through the mandatory page asking if you want to upgrade to premium status (for $70), but cookies allow you to forget the random username and password assigned to you.
-Unlimited downloading.
-All content at Cruelty Party is advertised as exclusive.
One member posted that a scene at Cruelty Party was also posted at Passion HD. I would assume that the majority of the scenes at the network are exclusive. Passion HD and Porn Pros Network share the same parent company, AMA Multimedia LLC.
Membership in Passion HD does not give access to the Porn Pros Network, and vice versa.
Cons:
-Have to enter captcha to log in to site.
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page. Warning: even if you uncheck the pre-checked cross sale, you might still be charged for the pre-checked cross sale site. So check your credit card and email to see if you were signed up for a trial subscription, and be prepared to dispute the charge. If you used Epoch as the billing agent, you should be able to reverse the charge.
-Segpay is the default biller. If you can, switch to Epoch. I have little experience with Segpay. But I always found Epoch to be reliable, easy to deal with, and helpful if I had any billing problems.
-Each time you enter the site, you first have to pass through an offer to upgrade your subscription for $70 to the premium sites in the Porn Pros Network.
-Advertising for other sites on every page.
-There seems to be some elimination of basic sites over time.
A few months ago, there were 22 sites available in the basic Porn Pros network (not counting the premium sites).
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
Currently (2017-02-09), there are 16 sites shown in the sites listing.
They still advertise that you get access to 24 sites when joining. However, I've found that many porn sites advertise facts that are not true.
-They advertise daily network updates. However, when you check the network update page, you see 1 new scene per week for the last 2 months. Which is not the same as 1 new scene per day.
-User name and password are pre-selected on join. So have to copy them down to enter the site. Can't choose your own user name and password (for easier memory).
-The last update for Cruelty Party was on March 28, 2013. So this is an archive site, with no updates for almost 4 years.
-Some links lead to an Error 503 Service Unavailable.
--Sometimes videos stop streaming with the message: Network error.
-Sometimes photos fail to load: Message states: Forbidden.
We're sorry, the server understood the request, but is refusing to fulfill it.
-You have limited choices of definitions to download a video. Many videos only offer a 1080p or 480p choice.
However, when you choose the 1080p definition choice to download, and then check the videos specs of the downloaded file, it turns out that the video is really a 720p or 700p definition video.
On a small monitor, this is not a problem: My 14" laptop plays the 720p videos with sharp images and good colors and good sound. But if you play the video on a large monitor, you might be disappointed with the image quality or other factors.
-Videos download with the default name of the scene only. Does not include the name of the site, the model, or the date posted. So need to rename each video manually.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Download speeds are excellent
- Newer (see cons) videos are reasonable quality, 1080p mp4 is the highest quality available
- 108 scenes available
- Photos and screencaps zipped
- Camerawork and lighting is generally good, although given the genre, it can be a bit jumpy
- Unique genre, don't recall having come across a site like this before
- A very diverse set of women present in most videos, including body type and ethnicity
- There are some attractive women in the videos
Cons:
- Affiliated with Bang Bros, suspect billing practices, see reviews and comments of that site for more
- Site is dead, last update is listed as October, 2015
- File sizes are large. Many of these videos are very long, ~60 minutes or more, so at 1080p they can get very big
- Streaming starts instantly
- Limited download options on many videos, most are just mp4
- In a lot of the videos, the most attractive women (at least to me) don't participate
- Not a big deal, but the music is terrible, I know they are supposed to be strippers, but god it is aweful
- Pretty expensive for what you get
Bottom Line:
I honestly didn't think I would find this site very appealing, but it is sort of interesting, and I did end up keeping more scenes than I thought I would. The basic concept is a male stripper shows up at some party, sexual hijinks ensue. Most of the scenes involve more than one male stripper, and a large number of women (probably 10-30 on average), although in the scenes with many women, many do not participate in the action, and some appear to be genuinely uncomfortable. The general setup is a stripper shows up, gets near instantly nude (not a very good stripper if you ask me, what is wrong with a little titillation for your clients), proceeds to get blown by some of the women present, sometimes has sex, he gets off. In most scenes a few more strippers will show up following the same pattern. In some, a costumed bear shows up and follows the same pattern.
It is an interesting site, and perhaps worth joining if this particular scenario is one that excites you, personally I find it a bit unrealistic and at times awkward and uncomfortable, even for porn. Having talked to many women about bachelorette parties, the general consensus seems to be that most don't like getting dicks waved in their faces, and would definitely not start just blowing the guy. Regardless, it can be a sort of fun site, but bear in mind if you join that it hasn't updated in almost a year, and I sort of doubt it will start again soon. The other major con is its affiliation with Bang Bros, so if you do decide to join, please be very careful in doing so, and consider getting a new card number soon after.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discounted price
-The videos are 1920x1080 7132 kbps mp4
-Good number of videos with 427 presently available
-Updates every seven days
-The photos are zipdownloadable 4000x2667
-There is a photoset for every video
Cons:
-There has been a change in policy as to what sites are available from the network. You get the site you joined and the rest are available on a pay per view basis.
-The members area has lots of advertising. Even the page for support has advertising.
-There is a popup upon log in to ask if you want to upgrade.
-Off color disco type lighting that makes the models orange or some other distracting color. Weird.
-Distracting, nonstop techno disco type music that is too loud and distracting.
-Camera work that does not make for an erotic experience. It focuses on the background and often misses the best action.
Bottom Line:
This site has videos that were originally on DVD’s. These DVD’s are offered in a separate section listing them as 720 in quality. I downloaded only one and it was 640x360. Unfortunately this was not the only thing disappointing about the site.
The preview of the site made no mention of the network Tainster, which I had previously been a member of. I found the content to be disappointing and a waste of time and money. Upon logging in for the first time, I was surprised to see a popup advertising a live cam site.
My membership did not include access to the other network sites. The only mention of this fact was on the members support page, and nowhere on the preview. I paid about $20 for a single site and could have gotten a network membership at half the price, with the PU discount. This is not cricket as the saying goes.
Individual videos could be accessed on a pay per view basis though. The members support page has advertising.
The members’ section is badly cluttered with advertising for other sites as well as upgrades and pay per view. Nowhere does it say how much an upgrade would cost, just a link to customer service.
All of this was a turnoff, but at least I should be able to say that the content was worth it. Well, it wasn’t.
Many of the videos were filmed in colored lighting, giving the models off color oversaturated tinges. For example, orange is a nice color, but it is also distracting in a porn video. The music was bad techno disco music. In most scenes it was just too loud and yet another distraction.
The cameraman has a knack for missing the erotic. Ten to fifteen minutes of following a male stripper around is not all that interesting. He should have focused on one of the other male strippers who were getting blow jobs or were feeling up one of the women. He consistently was filming the wrong action. There is always this one really attractive woman having sex, but the cameraman is trying to get all 12 in the video. When the action was captured on film, it was not for long enough to really work. A few seconds or even a minute and onto something else. My recommendation for the cameraman is to take your meds before work so you can focus properly. The videos look like what a person with ADD might produce. A better job of editing would also help. The scenes are about 20 to 30 minutes and taken from a much longer original. Poor editing starts off many downloads without any buildup or tease. We all love to go right to the sex from the first second, right?
What attracted me to the site was that it is CFNM (Clothed female naked male) with a party theme. As far as I know there is only one other, Dancing Bear. That one is far superior in every way and is a much better choice if you like this kind of material.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Emphasizes the "Party" aspect as much as the "sex" part, making things feel more real
Attractive models, many of which have fairly limited exposure, keeping things fresh.
The group sex tends to really be group sex, with most films having at least one scene with the majority of the models active at the same time.
Most movies contain multiple sex scenes.
Cons:
While the site is entirely in English, and many of the scenes end with the site or network name being painted on the models (in English), the dialogue is in Russian with English subtitles. Nothing in the site description mentions this, and the video previews generally don't contain dialogue.
Models are identified by only a first name, which rarely corresponds to the name used by the model in other work.
Archive is a bit spotty, with movies missing from the sequence, and a few older ones lack sound.
Very infrequent updates
Bottom Line:
The site is decent, but the infrequent updates means that a long-term subscription is of little value once you've found the archive scenes that interest you. The Russian audio isn't necessarily a downside, but the site should be more up front about it, especially as the site goes for a plotty approach with a lot of dialogue.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Cute girls.
Girls (for the most part) don't look like porn stars.
Exclusive content.
Bonus sites with WTF pass.
Cons:
Unbelievably bad camera work on the majority of videos.
Photo albums are often incomplete AND redundant.
Often videos contain girls that don't get naked or only topless.
Distracting and annoying subtitles and MOVING watermarks.
Other peoples niche chocolate in my porn peanut butter.
Bottom Line:
STUDENT SEX PARTIES has every single problem that modern porn is guilty of:a propensity to try to satisfy too many niches that should NOT be part of porn sought by the demographic that seeks orgies: I would say MOST of this demographic do not want to see CFNM,(clothed females naked males)urination or worse.(seriously, what kind of a twisted twist wants to see girls getting "sick" in porn) We want to see naked girls! Often girls don't even get naked, or the camera is at an angle so we only see men's butts. Not a pretty sight.Also,girl's stripping (one of the most erotic ingredients to good porn) is often either completely missing, avoided or badly botched in extreme close-ups. Speaking of camera work. Hire a professional please! None of their "frat boys" seem to know a thing about head space or framing and the constant attention-span whiplashes often made me sea sick. In some videos it was so bad, it ruined the video and I deleted it. The ONLY time the camera seemed to stop for any period and hold still, was for the many, many, many blow jobs. Then there is the distracting subtitles (who cares what inane things they say! And trust me, they say quite a plethora of inanities)and ESPECIALLY the site's little MOVING postmark that mar EVERY single video. The downloads were incredibly slow.(one site took me 2 months to get through-often wasting hours only to find that that video could not download and I had to try a different download option) As to the rest of the "bonus" sites. Only ONE reason I even bothered to look at any of them: to find girls that didn't get naked in Student Sex Parties for "completion." Sometimes I did. Many times I was frustrated. Oh,one more thing:WTF stop insisting these parties are real and not staged with porn actors. Stop insulting our intelligence so you can get away with all of the stupidity above! Overall, a few decent picture sets and video, but A LOT of garbage to wade through. If you are OCD like me and a completest, you will have many hours editing the videos to subtract the redundant, gross and annoying watermarks.Not worth more than a month of your time.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Big $15 discount joining through TBP/PU.
No DRM, download restrictions, pre checked cross selling, or dirty tricks.
No regional discrimination.
Join through reputable billing agent (Epoch).
Genuine network, each site has its own identity.
Streaming available.
Original content that is individual and a little outside the usual cookie cutter mass produced porn.
Cons:
Little ethnic or size diversity.
Awful photography, camerawork, and lighting.
Videos are so unbelievably long they have to be cut up into 4-6 (sometimes more) 25 minutes or longer segments. That would be okay if it was action all the way, but it is most definitely not. It could simply be edited down to one 30 minute clip. If they did that, they wouldn't get to say they had 398 scenes instead of 80.
When the cameraman finally does focus on someone having sex, it is far too often in gynaeclogical closeups where all you see is two groins. Not only that, there is an inability to keep the camera still.
There is only one download option for WindowsXP and Vista, and one download option for the pics.
Customer sevice was awful. As reported in a forum post, I was locked out of the site for a while due to possible hacking of the membership password. I received no answer to four emails sent over 24 hours asking why, and was only reinstated after Epoch intervened.
Bottom Line:
Videos 1024x576 and 768x576
Pics 768x1152 768x1024 768x1039 1066x1600
There are supposed to be various mobile formats available. I don't use them but the following are listed - ipad/ipad2, iphone4, iphone3/ipod, Android.
This is a clone of Student Sex Parties available through Chicki Porn, the difference being you get extra sites through WTF and a $15 discount from joining through TBP/PU.
I found streaming facilities to be reasonable. Here in the UK streaming in the afternoon is often very difficult.
Models are mostly all the same type, namely young and thin. If you are looking for ethnic, size, or age diversity, you'll be out of luck.
Navigation is a little irritating. If you go to "view all scenes from College Fuck Parties," then click on several clips from the same video, there is no way back to the College Fuck Parties home page, without going back to the WTF Pass home page, then clicking on College Fuck Parties. You have to click several back buttons until you get back, or go to WTF Sites. In fact WTF Sites is better than the rather poorly laid out WTF home page.
It's a shame some great models are thrown away due to awful amateur camerawork and photography. You would think being a porn cameraman isn't that hard. It doesn't have to be spot on perfect, as they aren't working for the likes of Terrence Malick, Stanley Kubrick, or Jean Renoir, and never will, mainly because two of them are dead. All you have to do is point the camera in the general direction of the couple, or couples having sex. That's it, that's the job.
Maybe they are trying to make it look like a home movie, but realistically we all know these are professional porn stars. It's a shame because the performers are really good looking, and there is genuine group sex action. I just get the feeling the bits the cameraman has missed out while focussing on the floor, wall, ceiling, or shoes, are all the best bits. Thirty minutes of action with two hours padding, then the cameraman misses all the best bits, or the lighting is so bad, you have to squint to see what is going on.
Lighting seems to be one of the problems across the whole WTF network. For instance there is a video and photo set of one beautiful girl taken outside, where the sun's shadow across railings completely ruins the whole thing. It was like some 9 year old's first video or photo attempt.
The non porn bits take up hours of time. Then finally finally something happens, they are getting their kit off and it's time to wake up. Just as they are about to have sex, for some inexplicable reason the cameraman moves on to show the floor. Very video verite. If there are two or three couples indulging in group sex, the cameraman doesn't know where to go, so focuses on the wall instead, or on another couple who aren't doing anything.
To give you an idea of the padding and rubbish bits, you could watch three episodes of CSI (minus the adverts) in the time it takes to watch all the rubbish. Or to put it another way, think of the padding as the CSI episodes, and the adverts as the quality bits. That's how frustrating and annoying the episodes are.
As a bystander and observer my immediate feelings are to shout at the cameraman "oi you, there are people having sex over there...yes over there....NO, over THERE you fecking idiot, not here!"
Two people having sex, no that's not very interesting, let's have a look at the floor. Even when there is only one couple having sex and nothing else going on, the cameraman cannot keep the camera still, it is beyond his ability. He HAS to move it, he cannot keep his camera pointed in the general direction of two people having sex for more then two seconds. Two seconds, that's it, moving on, nothing to see here, must be something more interesting over there, if not, move camera to side, up and down, jump up and down, or tip diagonally, then back again.
The score of 78 is for basically remembering to remove the lens cap, and for pointing the camera in the right direction some of the time, and for the models.
Every network has its idiosyncracies. One of the annoying ones here is that for some reason the male performers continually pummel and pull the pussies of their female performers as though they were unblocking a sink. Are we supposed to think this is what female partners really find sexy? Only if you're 14, and at that age you're supposed to be too young to view this sort of thing.
Some of the orgies inside are badly lit, but even those on the outside quite often get it wrong. Many times dark shadows across the pics spoil the view. That's okay if you're Ridley Scott.
It's worth a membership for one month, due to the reasonably original, non massed produced material, and for the beautiful, newish porn models. It could have been so so much better.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Around 80 scenes with 2 new scenes added each month.
- Videos are available as MP4 and WMV as well as ipod format. 1280x 720 HD
- Images as well as screen-caps available in zipped archives. Photos are 2,000px × 1,333px and screencaps are around 720px × 406px. (around 1000 images per scene, but not all are very good... some blurriness here and there)
- The theme of the site is a gigolo stripper giving a good time to a supposed bachlorette or birthday party . Basically one or two dudes and a bunch of girls who will clap, giggle and cheer each other on. It all ends up being fun and very different, almost an orgy site, but with a unique spin
- The scenes have sex, multiple blowjobs and facials as well as some lesbian sex and various strange stuff (the guy puts his cock on a bun and the girl licks mustard off of it for example)
- Good looking models, a lot of cute girls getting facials.
- Decent navigation, they also offer a preview trailer for each scene.
Cons:
- The site is a bit shady when it comes to billing. Don't go for the 2 day trial since it's not really worth it as far as I can tell. Also if you only get this site the category search as well as the suggested videos will lead you to the main Bangbros site which costs extra. This means that I can't really use the category search to navigate only dancing bear.
- The fact that they have a lot of images for each scene means that they show you everything they shoot, without filtering the bad images. So if you download the zipped images expect some blurry shots, and a lot of images that look identical to each other.
- Not all females present get into it and there are several girls who you don't even see naked. Guess it goes with the theme of the site, but it could be a con.
- Some male models wear a bear head the entire time or a luchador mask, a bit silly and can make the scene feel somewhat awkward.
- Some of the older scenes don't have category tags so it's hard to say what you get
Bottom Line:
I joined this site as part of the bang bros network back in 2009, and I remember being extremely disappointed back then. They had few scenes, rare updates and the action was mostly BJ. In fact if you go to the first few scenes on the site you can see that most of the videos are about a dude stripping down with occasional BJ's behind a towel. Overall the site didn't really work well.
That has all changed since. Now they have around 75-80 scenes and are updating twice a month with about an hour worth of content each time. Despite the fact that the scenes are longer they feel a lot faster. The guys don't spend a lot of time stripping and they usually get to the first BJ within a couple of minutes.
Another nice change is that now almost all videos feature a sex scene, oftentimes with the girl still dressed. We also get several cum-shots, including cum on food which is then eaten (Icing on the birthday cake seems to be a favorite) They also added a bit of lesbian content and I hope they keep pushing that area as it would be nice to see some of the girls in the background going at it.
Speaking of background girls there are several who will never get naked or perform oral on the dude, so don't expect every girl present to show their boobs. Also on average there are only two facials per scene so no bukkake orgy here. Speaking of orgies, there is no anal, DP or rough deepthroating, everything feels more playful and funny than intense, rough sex.
In fact I'd say that is the most unique feature of the site, it all feels like a joke, a party that got a bit out of hand in a sexy way. They seem to really drive that point home and have several scenes where we see some shocked friends or co-workers who seem to say "oh Mary she is always so crazy, but I never thought she'd eat frosting of a guys balls."
Overall the vibe works well, and is helped by the fact that all the girls look like amateurs. They giggle, gag on the penis and overall act very realistic. Don't expect professional porn starlets here.
That being said most of the models are very cute and the main girl (the birthday girl or the bride to be) is usually very cute and attractive.
Unfortunately the site is really not up to it's potential unless you purchase a bangbros membership. The category search function leads you to videos on the network and you are encouraged to pay. The suggested scenes are extra and encourage you to pay for a bang bros membership. There is an ad next to the streaming video for the full membership and so on.
Also, due to the nature of the videos there are some strange scene cuts. In one scene we go from a blow job to a man doing cartwheels and rotating his cock like a helicopter for 5 minutes. I mean it's funny, but if you were getting into the action these scene breaks can be a bit odd. It's also strange when one girl is getting fucked and 10 sit around, some clapping a few looking bored, etc.
I would have preferred it if every girl got naked and maybe there was some light lesbian kissing in the background instead of fully clothed girls looking around and cheering at random intervals.
Bottom-line: As a bonus site to another network this site is awesome and a great value. As a stand alone, well you should make sure you really like the content. For me the whole amateur/ this could be a real party vibe made it interesting but then again I really enjoy porn that strays from the mainstream.
I'd say if you're uncertain consider a bangbros membership and go for that since it has this site as a bonus along with other nice goodies.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- The site has a large content with currently 72 parties
-It contains longer scenes with some partying, which creates a more personal atmosphere than just bedroom sex. It also leads to the performers looking more like real students getting together.
-The site offers different file sizes, including HD quality
-They have young, attractive girls, who look natural and not pumped up with botox and silicon
-There's a variety of party themes / locations (Halloween, Xmas, locations sauna, hut)
Cons:
-They are using the same guys over and over again, which gets a bit boring after a while. They should use some variety like with the girls.
-The camera work is often rather unprofessional with shaky pictures, bad lighting etc.
-The movies are sometimes not in a great quality, even if you watch them HD, they still appear a bit grizzling
Bottom Line:
In spite of the negative points mentioned above, this is a very good site.
The best thing is that most of the parties don't look fake. The first of the four to five vids of each scene is some kind of warm up with the girls and guys meeting and talking to each other.
Unlike many party sites, where this looks very clumsy and fake, they appear to enjoy themselves on this site.
With mebership to this site you get bonus membership to currently 5 other sites, most of which are also good.
To sum it up, this is a very good site, which I can highly recommend.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
On the majority of scenes I'm glad of the join here, its far from perfect but very few sites are. It is quite unique content and one of the leaders in this party niche in my eyes as the girls are the hottest.
There good variety of girls 232 to choice from but obviously some are in the same movie with others.
There is 67 parties currently to choose from so plenty to keep you occupied.
You get some great insight into the girl's personalities here with them being open and look to be generally having a good time with friends.
Good choice of video downloads
mp4 720p
avi 576p
mp4 432p
mpv 320p
Cons:
Huge filesizes, the 720p HD mp4 scenes and they average 5 scenes an episode vary but I found they could be too huge for me sometimes 5gb or more a episode. They do give you and option of avi 576p which seemed around 3/4 of the size of its HD sister. I opted for avi and did tend to preview a scene to see if it was group sex before I download. I have enough girl on boy stuff so unless she was a fav I gave these scenes a miss.
The girls sometimes didn't get naked or have sex which I found annoying on some vids, you go to the hassle of getting a girl there at least tell her to get her clothes off and join in or don't bother turning up. I found some scenes would of benefitted on some behind the scenes direction to tell them to change position or do something else as some scenes drag.
Same guys in nearly every vid, I am not looking at the guys so not a major con but would be good to see them having sex with some other people from the same 3 guys nearly in every vid of the network.
Bottom Line:
Overall I rate the site its get some good stuff and nice to see some of my fav girls in something apart from one on one boy/girl sex hardcore. I've always been a fan or orgies, the more girls the better in my eyes but they can be hard to film and do right, few have managed to create classic orgie movies, focusing on the action can be difficult for the best of camera men/women. Here the camera work sure could be improved but I guess it's all done on the premissis that its a home movie of a group of friends have a sex party and the camera crew is them.
Theres some scenes with little nudity or none at all which does get tiresome and I think the site would be improved to have the option of the highlights on one vid and an edited best of, they go to the hassle of subtitling the movies (which is nice) so they could do it.
I would of though preferred more anal scenes here but I guess not every girl is into anal so they let them be natural and do what they want.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
30-40 women in each episode, though only 10-15 (probably paid) perform BJ's.
The male dancers are excellent at approaching the amateurs who usually refuse but it adds to the fun.
High picture quality in videos.
So few CFNM sites that it is nice to have this one
Cons:
Women stay seated so we cannot see whole bodies.
Only one or two perform sex.
"Party hardcore" and "In the VIP" are much better because the women dance to rock music so we can see whole bodies in movement.
Party hardcore has about 10 women who perform sex in each episode.
Bottom Line:
I do enjoy this CFNM niche but streaming video has too many glitches and not smooth at my cable connection. Very annoying.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Good amount of material with 56 very long parties that consist of multiple scenes
-Very attractive models
-Amateurish feeling with all out hardcore action
-High definition downloads with no limits or DRM on newer videos
-Includes membership to five other sites which are mostly good
-Multiple payment processors available
Cons:
-Sometimes the parties are way too long with no sex action going on
-The other side of the coin to the amateurism also affects this site. There are scenes with no sound, cell phone interference noise, wind blowing on the microphone, awkward camera work and just general messing around
-Download speed can be really bad at busy times but up to 5 mgeabytes per second at good times. Downloads limited to two at the time also preventing you browsing the site while they are on
-Background noise on the scenes, radio usually
-Not everyone at the party takes part in action
Bottom Line:
The theme of this site is very similar to HardFuckTales which I alos reviewed. While that site is dedicated to three on one scenes with not much fooling around going on, this one features bigger groups of people having sex and doing lots of other things too like playing ball, drinking, dancing and partying. These parties last easily three hours or more and total in 6-10 gigabytes at the best resolution. Along with MyPickupGirls this site is where the main amount of content on this network is.
Some of the parties are like films where there are multiple scenes between different participants while others have lots of fooling around and only one all sex clip. There are also often girls on the scene who don't take part in all of it that kind of reduces the overall feeling. They should just have models who do it all.
Models are all young Russian girls. Some are totally unknown while others are easily recognizeable from many subsites on 21Sextury for example. Here however they all go by some bogus names that are so generic that they often have numbers behind them. Girl you might know as Logan is Eva here and Ioana is Anya_7. I've seen the same names used to numbers well over 10. Are they trying to make following the production of these Russian girls this hard on purpose?
The sounds are the weak point of this site. The recording quality can be bad with cell phone interference or sounds can be missing from some scenes completely. Also some irritating background music on the indoors scenes. There's lots of talking and having fun which is all in Russian but they have included subtitles in English which is nice.
I recommend this site if one is into East European
and Russian porn. The other sites you get also are strongly focused on the same theme. Parties can be long and often deviate from the real action but this is as close as it gets to having some reality porn. Certainly beats having some big brother junk running on your TV.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They have a wide selection of teen models to choose from.
-There is a strong emphasis in making the viewer believe that these are regular people having a party that turns into a kind of orgy.
-They have over 50 parties.
-Parties are broken in section because content is over 2hrs long and some over 3hrs.
-All videos come in AVi format with at least standard resolution. Newer videos also include Hi-Def.
-Half of the parties have photosets that can be viewed online or dowloaded in a single zip file.
-The videos are all shot in a wide variety of locations from outside to inside different rooms and apartments.
Cons:
-Upadtes aren't dated so no way of knowing if there is a schedule. They only way I can tell is by looking at the dates of the comments. The older videos are at least 2 yrs old.
-The videos are all over 2hrs long and part of that is taken up with the performers appearing to party with drinking, smoking and talking.
-Dialogue is all in Russian.
-Because the videos are shot in a non studio environment then lighting is a problem. many of the scenes can sometime be a little too dark.
-The problem with shooting orgies is that since there are so many perfomrers on screen having sex then the camera cannot always linger in one place of has to shoot from further away to capture most of the action.
-Many of the girls have the same name so you get such and such name with a number,
Bottom Line:
-I've never been a fan of orgies because the camera can never stay in one place for very long because otherwise you can't see the rest of the action. The other problem is that only long shots allow you to see all the action and then you miss most of it because there's just too much happening on screen.
-If they had just made a kind of party where the girls pick a certain activity and the boys to go with it then we would have had only one scene at a time.
-The location are also a problem. Shooting porn outside is more often a miss rather than a hit. The sun, wind, unexpected outside noises and so forth detract the attention. Shooting insed helps but shooting an orgy means that lighting can only be placed in certain area or it can be seen during the video.
-This site is probably best for people that love any and all things related to orgies and can overlook the problems inherant in tshooting them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-attractive ladies
-interesting group content
-decent bonus material
-navigation is pretty good, they have a model index, rating system, and member comments
-no DRM
-video quality is good (mpeg-4).
-zip downloads of photosets
-download managers worked for me
-exclusive content as far as I can tell
Cons:
-price is a bit high
-scenes are excessively long and large
-download speeds are inconsitent, sometimes poor
-in-browser video player is glitchy
-not a huge site 178 girls in 52 parties
-videos are broken up into pieces, although as one file they would be enormous.
-advertisements on home page
Bottom Line:
This site has decent, unique content, however like some other sites from this company it can be a bit hard to get at. The files sizes are very large, and many parts of some of the scenes are just background and chit-chat. It is very necessary with this site to preview the material before downloading the content, as I have several times downloaded scenes with little to no nudity in them at all, let alone sex.
I think if you have the time and the harddrive space this site is a pretty good site for group sex action with euro ladies. However, I gave the site some demerits for the fact that it takes so long to find material you want to download and to download it.
There are definitely some attractive ladies here, and the video quality is generally good - although the camerawork can get a bit iffy at times.
Considering the bonus content available at the time I joined, this site may be worth considering if you are into group sex with euro ladies, however expect to spend a lot of time sorting through what you want to download - and expect to immediately delete some of the content you do. I'm all for having fun and drinking, however I don't think I need a 50 minute clip of some folks boozing, smoking and chatting. If only they had some better editing and made it easier to get at their material I would recommend this site more highly.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
my first review of anything really. felt compelled to rate this site..a VERY niche site.
many of the women on dancing bear i found attractive. all sorts of different women:
black,blonde,brunette, different body types, lots of variety! some GREAT blowjobs. a bit of hardcore..but with condoms. there ARE downloads but u must use a flash downloader. i found the picture quality fine..not HD, but good.
Cons:
the site is slow overall and downloading individual clips can be difficult. the site was having some intermitten problems playin just clips of full movies. support was good, getting back to me quickly and trying to help. it took longer than it should have but i downloaded everything i wanted. appears to be only 2 updates per month on average.
Bottom Line:
was surprised how much i enjoyed this site and
i haven't seen anything like this on the net.
price is a bit high but the content is reasonable
and as said this type of site is very rare.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
1) This is a rarely explored niche; mostly amateur women having sex with strippers in front of (lots) of other women.
2) Can download the entire collection (and I have)
3) There is always lots of women giving blowjobs, and a number fucking the stippers; occasionally there is even anal. This is a lot further than you typically get with the few "girls at a party" site.
4) Not all of women are amateurs. There are some professionals; occasionally you will see one on one of the sister sites. Most are amateurs, however.
5)The women are on average pretty in a "girl next door" manner, but there is a variety. Some women are smoking hot, and some are truly ugly; I like this as the occasional ugly girl having sex tends to confirm that these are amateurs.
6) Both the video quality and the content has improved in the last two years.
7) access to Orgymaxx's straight sites; good selection of sites in somewhat unusual niches.
8) Recent price reduction was nice.
Cons:
1) The video quality could be better.
2) The direction and camerawork is sometimes odd. The camera (and film) has cut away from two people fucking and/or sucking in order to focus on clothed women dancing; sometimes it is done for coverage, but often it just looks like they want to show us clothed women in a porno site.
Bottom Line:
Overall an excellent site that has become my favorite. I don't stay a member, but I rejoin every four to six months.
The orgymaxx membership is a bonus (it would be perfect if they had an anal/dp focussed site; but that is just me.)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Around 20 or at least 15 scenes/parties where male strippers show up, as far as I could tell (navigation made it hard to see all videos) but each video/scene is divided in multiple video clips (around 10-14 each) and there are multiple women/girls who have sex in each larger scene.
- Each scene has screencaps as well as actual photos (around 400 per scene at 800px × 600px each). Couldn't find any zipped files though.
- The scenes are kinda fun as one stripper is dressed as a bear and never removes his mask. Also the girls, look relatively amateur-ish/ new to porn.
- Supposedly updates every Wednesday, but I couldn't vouch for this as I have only been a member for a week and nothing updated yet.
15
Cons:
- No downloads of videos.
- Quality for streaming videos is "madman" whatever that means in pixels.
- Had trouble streaming many of the videos. The "madman" quality setting makes the videos very slow. They do look pretty good though...
- The whole site feels like a bad jock related joke. I know I complained about this before regarding some of the Porn Pros sites but it's even worse here. Comments like: "OMFG she swallows!" or "Was it as good for you as it was for me?" or the "Madman" streaming option make the whole site have a run by teenagers feel to it. I guess it's okay if you like that but sometimes it can get frustrating.
- The light and camerawork can get a bit frustrating at times. The quality could be improved.
- The navigation was frustrating and the live cam ads were very poorly placed on the home page.
Bottom Line:
Overall I'd give this site a miss. The idea is cool and some of the reactions the girls have to the guy's dick on top of their head made me laugh. Furthermore some of the girls are really cute and the crowd around the stripper could be a real turn-on for people who prefer group sex, nonetheless when you consider the difficulties in streaming the videos, lack of download options, funky navigation, and sometimes frustrating camerawork. It's simply not worth it.
The small amount of content also doesn't help. I felt like the webmasters knew they only had a few videos so they chose to make them streaming because otherwise members would download them in a month and never return.
Also i had a personal problem with the attitude of the people involved in running the website. I like my porn to be funny once in a while but I don't like to feel like I'm watching a bunch of frat boys high-fiving each other. A more mature approach to the site design and the directing of the videos could help improve the overall feel.
Finally, I didn't really enjoy the way the scenes were structured. I realize this might be a very personal thing but I prefer it when a scenes has only a few actors that go all the way. The very design of this site means that the male stripper will be walking around and random ladies will suck on his penis for a few minutes before he moves on. This can be hot but when a cute girl is replaced by one that doesn't do it for me I kinda feel bored...if that makes any sense...
Anyhow, the last two points are rather personal so I will try not to deduct any points from the final score for that. I just wanted to convey that the site was a tad bit disappointing in what it offered.
On the bright side Dancing Bear comes as a bonus in a bunch of other network deals so it may be worth checking out like that; otherwise, unless you have a really big fetish for dudes in bear costumes or sex at a party this is not really worth the membership.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Discounted join price. See below.
-Part of network of 21 sites. However, only 3 or 4 are worth checking out.
-162 videos, 720x480, 2139kbps, averaging about 20 minutes.
-Can download segments as well as whole video. WMV is the only option.
-162 photo sets.
-Genuine amateurs, so attractiveness varies. Very much look like girls you could know.
Cons:
-Videos are very grainy and blurry. I would guess that the originals were shot as low resolution and poor quality, despite being upgraded later.
-Download limit of 12 hours of content, which is less than 4GB. If you go over the limit, you get banned for 6 hours.
-No streaming option for videos.
-No update schedule. The videos are not dated. I saw a review from 2007 that had only 2 fewer videos, so I think it is no longer updating.
-None of my download managers worked.
-Photos are not zipdownloadable. Horrible quality screenshots that are 150x100.
Bottom Line:
If you go to the webpage you can get an idea of what the site is like. If you x to navigate away, you get an offer of half price, $14.95 per month.
The site consists of content that is very similar to the dreamgirls dvd series that now has over 500 titles and has been around since 1995. The similarity is so strong that I suspect that this material is from those videos. However, this site appears not to be updating.
The videos consist of scenes from Mardi Gras in New Orleans, Fantasy Fest, spring break t shirt contests in Key West, and dancing in clubs. The girls are quite natural looking amateurs, with many being quite attractive.
As you would expect with amateurs, you never know how far they will go in exposing themselves. Some go only topless, some completely nude. Occasionally you get a few seconds of lesbian sex or cock sucking, but that is rather rare and not what the site is about.
If you can get into basically just flashing, you will like the content. BUT, the video quality here is really poor and much is virtually unwatchable. The site has a great concept, but not at all well done.
If you like this material, your choices are very limited. You can buy the dreamgirls DVD's, which can be found for about $10 each for 90 minutes. Another alternative is to go to dreamgirlsvod.com for on demand streaming that can get expensive, or sign up at dreamgirlsmembers.com, which is streaming only with no downloads available.
I would like the site to be much bigger than 62 videos and the quality is just too low. Not recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+++ VERY unique idea
++ supposedly amateur girls sucking male strippers in the heat of the party
++ maybe (probably?) there are even REAL amateurs there.
++ action is very hot for supposedly amateur party: stripping, sucking, and up to full sex.
+ decent video quality
+ other OrgyMax sites included
Cons:
-- it unclear how much of the action is staged and how much is "real"
- there are no clear markings when one party ends and another starts; took some time to figure it out.
- price
Bottom Line:
When I first got to PartyHardcore member zone, I was seriously disappointed. The first clip I've got was some action without beginning and without end, just "out of blue". It took some time to realize that every scene is actually splitted into 4 parts, and that it is completely up to me to find out where the whole scene begins and where it ends. I don't have problems with splitting 2-hour-long movie into 4 updates, but guys, you could at least make it clear that these 4 updates are a part of one big scene.
But when I've got past this initial disappointment and understood how PartyHardcore organizes content, things went much better. First of all, it is a REALLY original idea, not to be found anywhere else. It shows a all-girl party with a few male strippers thrown in. Quite obviously, it starts with the stripper guy stripping, but it doesn't end there. Some girls (most likely professional adult models) start sucking the stripper guys and even fucking them, but the most exciting part of the whole thing is that supposedly amateur girls join them too. It is impossible to judge if there are real amateur girls participating in hardcore action, but it indeed looks rather genuine.
Technically videos are of about average to good quality: recent "normal" videos are 640x360 @1.1kbit/s, HD videos are 1280x720 @3Mbit/s, though I'd say HD ones are rather blurry for this kind of size. Recent pictures are suprisingly clear, though not too big in size.
Bottom line: despite outrageously high price, content (and idea) is absolutely unique, so if you're bored from "same old, same old" stuff, and are excited about the idea of real amateur girls having sex during real party, you might want to try it.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
