<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Tug Jobs - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/tugjobs/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_9296</guid>
		<title>Tug Jobs Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=9296</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/tugjobs/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/tugjobs.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Tug Jobs&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/tugjobs/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Tug Jobs&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					10-18-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;01:22am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 83&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=384&quot;&gt;roseman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=384&quot;&gt;234&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Exclusive content.&lt;br /&gt;
- High quality photos and vidcaps.&lt;br /&gt;
- Navigation is easy.&lt;br /&gt;
- Multiple download formats for videos.&lt;br /&gt;
- Nice website design.&lt;br /&gt;
- No download limit.&lt;br /&gt;
- Bonus content.&lt;br /&gt;
- Very good looking models.&lt;br /&gt;
- No DRM videos protection.&lt;br /&gt;
- Network access (15+ bonus websites).&lt;br /&gt;
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).&lt;br /&gt;
- Cool scenes and models rating system.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Full length videos can only be downloaded in .wmv format.&lt;br /&gt;
- No ZIP download option for photosets and vidcaps.&lt;br /&gt;
- Updates come slowly (one per week).&lt;br /&gt;
- Monthly subscription price could be lower.&lt;br /&gt;
- Photosets size could be larger.&lt;br /&gt;
- No full trial access option.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/tugjobs/&quot;&gt;TugJobs&lt;/a&gt; is another very good website of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/bangbrosnetwork/&quot;&gt;BangBros Network&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Members can download videos as one minute clips (.wmv, .mpeg format), in parts (.wmv, .mpeg) or as full length movies (only in .wmv format). If you don't want to download them you can use online streaming option. Their quality could be even better and some more download option would be useful. Also, there are high quality photosets and vidcaps available for download but ZIP option is missing and their sizes could be larger.&lt;br /&gt;
Network access (15+ bonus websites access) is included in here as well, so there is lots of content to download from and surely ... variety.&lt;br /&gt;
There is no DRM videos protection or download limit. Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).&lt;br /&gt;
Sadly, there is no full access trial option and monthly subscription price could be lower. Updates are regular but come only once per week. In general lines models are very hot and there is a cool scenes and girls rating system. &lt;br /&gt;
Website design is very good and navigation is quite easy. Content is exclusive and dated. There are come bonus behind the scenes episodes available for download as well.&lt;br /&gt;
If you like such content then you should try this one.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=962&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Tug Jobs&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=9296&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=9296&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:22:35 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_8357</guid>
		<title>Tug Jobs Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=8357</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/tugjobs/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/tugjobs.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Tug Jobs&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/tugjobs/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Tug Jobs&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-21-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:44am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 69&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1648&quot;&gt;jd1961&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1648&quot;&gt;82&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- A Lot Of Material&lt;br /&gt;
- Access To The Whole BB Network&lt;br /&gt;
- The Models Understand The Concept&lt;br /&gt;
- Good Video options&lt;br /&gt;
- Riley Mason Twice
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Producer/Director Doesn't Get Concept&lt;br /&gt;
- Photos Are Low Quality&lt;br /&gt;
- Video Production Poor&lt;br /&gt;
- Plastic Love Dolls Would Be Preferable To Male Porn &amp;quot;Talent&amp;quot;
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					It seems to me that the males in pornoland do their best to ruin adult entertainment. It's epedemic, and this site is a perfect example. The concept of this site is POV handjobs. In other words, the girls are to pretend that they are interacting with the viewer. And the girls are outstanding at it, they always are. they understand this business. The male element do not understand at all. Take the POV genre. If they could only understand how irritating it is to hear them talk to the girl with the camera and microphone right next to them, thus destroying the illusory symbiotic relationship between me and Riley, um the actress! Duh!!! $23.95 for this site, more for their DVD's, all the production costs, and fees for the girls, and these slugs are still acting like these videos are being made for their personal pleasure!! OK, male porn performers are not the brightest bulbs in the lamp, so I place the blame on the producers. Especially in a POV site that should be showcasing the great girls who mean everything to the business. Dear producers: We don't give a $@#&amp;amp;*! about the males! Control them! The camera work in these videos is abysmal. Girls without heads. Too many closeups of body parts. Only amateurs think they have to constantly move the camera. get a tripod! A perfectly simple concept destroyed! Photos aren't worth talking about. Access to the whole Bang Bros. network may salvage this for you. But I swear with Johnny Wadd as my witness- I could do better!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=962&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Tug Jobs&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=8357&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=8357&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 03:44:52 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_5570</guid>
		<title>Tug Jobs Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5570</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/tugjobs/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/tugjobs.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Tug Jobs&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/tugjobs/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Tug Jobs&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-02-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:24pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 79&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=559&quot;&gt;SnowDude&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=559&quot;&gt;214&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Nearly 200 episodes that include two pic sets (caps and real digital shots) and a video, usually between 10 and 20 minutes long&lt;br /&gt;
-Videos can be streamed in browser (WMV) and downloaded in two different formats (WMV &amp;amp; MPEG) with convenient dropdown menus on each girl's page&lt;br /&gt;
-You can choose between one long clip, divided into 4 parts, or 1 minute clips for downloading&lt;br /&gt;
-With your membership you get access to a dozen network sites with tons of content on a variety of niches for under $25 a month
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Although they are described as &amp;quot;high quality&amp;quot;, the digital picture sets are mostly around 600 x 800 at best while the highest resolution on the vieos is 1000k with older ones running about 500k or less&lt;br /&gt;
-Neither the picture sets or the videos can be downloaded as zip files and all clips are only available at one speed&lt;br /&gt;
-The majority of episodes are shot POV style and many don't include blowjobs, which may not appeal to everyone, and most of the girls are pornstars, not amateurs
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					In the handful of reviews I've done for the Bang Brothers network the most consistent aspect of the sites so far has been their inconsistency. Some have shown a bit of flare for the dramatic or done something unique, but other than offering some very average performances this site doesn't really fit those descriptions whatsoever.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's no disputing the fact that you get a large volume of content with almost 200 episodes that have been updated weekly since 2003. In most cases there isn't much of a plot since each video only averages about 15 minutes. That's often the same amount of time for setting up the story on other network sites, but fortunately here they get to the action directly except for a few lame themes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm always hopeful to find some amateur action on network sites since it's rare, but all of the girls here are pros as far as I could tell with little creativity in casting or the performances. There are some sexy girls, don't get me wrong, but I'd like to see some different faces once and awhile.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Compared to other sites on the network, I thought this one was just a bit above average since they do get right to the action. On the downside is the fact that it's so short and the scenes motly go the same way. Basically the girl comes services the cameraman, takes a cumshot in the face or on the breasts, and that's all she wrote. By itself the site doesn't really offer a full meal, but I suppose it serves as an adequate appetizer for the rest of the network.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=962&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Tug Jobs&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5570&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=5570&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 18:24:54 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>