Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/40somethingmag/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_27226 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=27226 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/40somethingmag/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/40somethingmag.jpg" alt="Enter 40 Something Mag" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/40somethingmag/"><b>40 Something Mag</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 11-20-08&nbsp;&nbsp;04:17pm</td> <td> <b>REVIEW = 50</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5766">spacenick</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5766">1</a>)<br> <br> <b>Pros:</b><br> Original Models to the site but... <br><br> <b>Cons:</b><br> Large Watermarks. Site is prone to crash browsers. Downloading must be done at one time and will not resume, better to use a downloading manager over a built-in browser downloader as site will crash browser. Original models but quantity is lacking, the photo's &quot;editors choice&quot; is lacking in quantity and quality. There are a lot of additional content but all of it transfers you to a another site to sign up for other sites. It seems that a lot of content is offered at other sites and only some intro material/content is on this actual site. <br><br> <b>Bottom Line:</b><br> Don't bother. Site is very unfriendly and wants to keep its content &quot;exclusive&quot; by unstable website code and extra-large watermarks. <br><br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=9543"><b>Visit 40 Something Mag</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=27226">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=27226">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:17:11 PST