Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/40somethingmag/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_19826 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=19826 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/40somethingmag/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/40somethingmag.jpg" alt="Enter 40 Something Mag" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/40somethingmag/"><b>40 Something Mag</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 05-04-08&nbsp;&nbsp;12:29pm</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2428">messmer</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2428">24</a>)<br> <br> <b>Watermark (Logo) too intrusive!</b><br> <br> I wonder how many lovers of mature women do not subscribe to this site because the water mark is too big, too brash and too destructive to the pictures (placed in the wrong spot). This glaring self-promotion might be tolerable on the first picture of a set but on every single pic? Webmaster, if you are looking .. I would be a subscriber if you ever decided to reduce the logo to a more modest, more unobtrusive size. <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=9543"><b>Visit 40 Something Mag</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=19826">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=19826">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Sun, 04 May 2008 12:29:27 PDT