PU - Karup's PC - All Activity

RE: monty4321's Review

Sun, 04 Dec 2011 03:36:57 PST

Karup's PC (5)

12-04-11 03:36am

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To monty4321 (3):

A solid review there, Monty.

This is one of my favourite sites.

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (1)

RE: Support!!

Thu, 01 Dec 2011 15:30:38 PST

Karup's PC (5)

12-01-11 03:30pm

COMMENT REPLY by Karup (Webmaster)

To greg909 (2):

Hey Greg,

It's definitely a juggling act because for every member that prefers the higher quality/lower compression, there is another member that will hammer us on file sizes or other cause & effect issues related to every decision we have to make.

If you have a moment and an example in mind for each side of the coin, we'd love to hear from you and see what exactly you think is overly compressed and what you think is just right. My e-mail address is (jeff at karups dot com).

Regards,
Jeff

View Thread (8)

RE: Support!!

Thu, 01 Dec 2011 09:48:27 PST

Karup's PC (5)

12-01-11 09:48am

COMMENT REPLY by greg909 (2)

To Karup (Webmaster):

Good to hear. I hope you will also use a low enough compression that it doesn't strip all the fine detail out. This is a problem on many sites where they boast about big sizes, yet the actual detail is no better than smaller sizes due to too much filtering. I look forward to checking the site out in the future.

View Thread (8)

RE: Support!!

Thu, 01 Dec 2011 02:23:02 PST

Karup's PC (5)

12-01-11 02:23am

COMMENT REPLY by Karup (Webmaster)

To greg909 (2):

Hi Greg,

We don't want to give a concrete launch date for the new "super high res" (as we're planning on labeling it) size, but barring any major roadblocks, it should be online within 2-3 weeks. It's definitely a top priority for us right now. Some recent sampling we did came out great and all new photos are being processed in the new super high-res size, along with the 2 smaller resolutions we already offer.

Also, after the new super high res size begins being added for all new updates, we plan on going backward to offer past photosets in the new 3000x size as well. We may not be able to go all the way back, but we should be able to go far enough back to make fans of the high res photos very pleased.

Regards,
Jeff

View Thread (8)

RE: Support!!

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:26:44 PST

Karup's PC (5)

11-30-11 06:26pm

COMMENT REPLY by greg909 (2)

To Karup (Webmaster):

Well it doesn't say what those concerns were. But the biggest concern for most of us is when exactly will Karup increase your images sizes to meet today's expectations (i.e. 3000x2000 or higher)?

View Thread (8)

RE: Support!!

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 03:22:38 PST

Karup's PC (5)

11-30-11 03:22am

COMMENT REPLY by Karup (Webmaster)

To monty4321 (3):

Hey Monty,

It was my/our pleasure and I'm glad we could come through for you. And by the next time you join, you should be even 10x happier as a result of new feature that (at this time) is very close to being launched & implemented. :)

Regards,
Jeff

View Thread (8)

RE: Support!!

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 22:18:12 PST

Karup's PC (5)

11-29-11 10:18pm

COMMENT REPLY by monty4321 (3)

To Karup (Webmaster):

Karups really came through and answered my concerns. Thumbs up to Jeff and Karups.

View Thread (8)

RE: Support!!

Thu, 03 Nov 2011 20:42:33 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

11-03-11 08:42pm

COMMENT REPLY by monty4321 (3)

To Karup (Webmaster):

Oh thank you jeff. I will send it right away.

View Thread (8)

RE: Support!!

Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:20:20 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

11-03-11 03:20pm

COMMENT REPLY by Karup (Webmaster)

To monty4321 (3):

Hi Monty,

Jeff from Karups here. Sorry for the trouble. Can you please forward any of your previous e-mails to me at?

jeff (at) karups dot com

I'll be happy to assist with whatever you need, as well as look into why your e-mails weren't responded to. We're in & out of the support e-mail addresses everyday, so there must be a logical explanation for it.

Regards,
Jeff

View Thread (8)

Karup's PC Comment

Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:06:59 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

11-03-11 03:06pm

COMMENT by monty4321 (3)

Support!!

I sent three emails to support and they still have not responded. Does anyone know how long karups take to respond to emails? It is very frustrating.

Visit Karup's PC - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Pic Sizes and quality?

Wed, 02 Nov 2011 15:50:58 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

11-02-11 03:50pm

COMMENT REPLY by monty4321 (3)

To Denner (227):

So last night i made the dive into karups pc. I signed up for a membership.

Sorry guys but here's my first opinion thus far - buyer's remorse. :C

My two main disappointments are:

1) Pic sizes. Indeed the photos are 1500x1000 which are way too small. I have a 26 inch flat screen monitor.

2) Overall pic quality. Not good. If the quality was good, I can sacrifice the photo's size.

My disappointments are only based on viewing with a 26", so I may be a bit biased. That said, I think the pic sizes and quality are fine for someone using a standard laptop.

View Thread (4)

RE: Pic Sizes and quality?

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:11:17 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-31-11 03:11pm

COMMENT REPLY by monty4321 (3)

To Hooliganzo (0):

thanks guys this was of great help.

View Thread (4)

RE: Pic Sizes and quality?

Wed, 26 Oct 2011 05:58:46 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-26-11 05:58am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To monty4321 (3):

Monty, since I recommended this site on your request let me say this:

Karups PC is like so many major sites with a long background (since 1997):

Newer material is of course much better than what you find from early 2000, before and a little after.
But generally Karup's PC is still getting better and better regarding both vids and pix quality. Though I also get 1500x1000 checking my sets, they're absolutely fine for full screen viewing.

Like vids, like pix you can't only rely on actual size regarding viewing quality....at least in my experience...and this user is considering yet another rejoin.

View Thread (4)

RE: Pic Sizes and quality?

Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:14:54 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-24-11 12:14pm

COMMENT REPLY by Hooliganzo (0)

To monty4321 (3):

Sets after around 2007 offer the 1500x1000 zips. I think it is the bare minimum for good resolutions. I use my tv as a monitor which I run at 1920x1080. Images in full screen at this resolution on a 40 inch tv look good. The older sets look decent between 2004-07. The sets 2003 and before are pretty poor.

If you like to zoom in you can zoom in a little with the 1500 sets and still look good.

View Thread (4)

Karup's PC Comment

Sun, 23 Oct 2011 21:12:51 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-23-11 09:12pm

COMMENT by monty4321 (3)

Pic Sizes and quality?

Does anyone know if the pic sizes are larger now with good detail. I looked at the review on here and it says "1500X1000". That's pretty small for today. I have a pretty decent sized monitor.

Visit Karup's PC - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Exclusive or Not ?

Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:16:49 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-14-11 08:16am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To selphy (15):

I think Capn got a good point.
Generally most of the content appears exclusive to this user.

But it's a bit hard to say precisely - the similar style of vids/sets seems to be originated by Karups - but who gets access later on (licensed ect.) is...yes, like Capn mentions: an open question...

View Thread (6)

RE: Exclusive or Not ?

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 21:53:19 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-13-11 09:53pm

COMMENT REPLY by anyonebutme (14)

To Wittyguy (83):

Yes, you're right, used to be more exclusive in the past, not quite as exclusive anymore.

View Thread (6)

RE: Exclusive or Not ?

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:34:21 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-13-11 06:34am

COMMENT REPLY by pat362 (233)

To selphy (15):

I think wittyguy's estimate on the percenatge of exclusif content is the more accurate one and he's also correct that Karup as the scenes first and either they lease it to other sites or whoever they buy it from sales it to other sites. I know they tag some scenes as being exclusif and those you won't find anywhere else or at least not from officlka sources.

The reality is that many Eastern Europeans sites buy content from the same studio so it's not unusual to see the same scene on more than one site. The advantage of joining a site like teenmegaworld is that they seem to buy the most content from that studio as well as have their own exclusif content.

View Thread (6)

RE: Exclusive or Not ?

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:12:05 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-12-11 04:12pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To selphy (15):

Well, as far as I can tell, Karup's do sponsor a lot of content.

What happens when they are done with it is more of an open question.

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (6)

RE: Exclusive or Not ?

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:49:21 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-12-11 01:49pm

COMMENT REPLY by Wittyguy (83)

To selphy (15):

I would say that it's less than 90%, probably only about 60%. However, in my past experience they usually have the scenes first before the content starts to filter out to other websites as the months go by.

As an aside, the reviewers at TheBestPorn aren't collectors like us so they mainly rely on a websites description of "exclusive content" when they post their facts. Other PU reviewers may miss that as well. However, I don't usually have a beef when the majority of the content is exclusive like Karups.

View Thread (6)

RE: Exclusive or Not ?

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:39:39 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-12-11 12:39pm

COMMENT REPLY by anyonebutme (14)

To selphy (15):

I'd estimate 90+% of the material is exclusive. But it is not 100% exclusive.

View Thread (6)

Karup's PC Comment

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:27:27 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-12-11 12:27pm

COMMENT by selphy (15)

Exclusive or Not ?

Are You sure that the content is exclusive ?
I see in some previews some Teenmegaworld model and a recent scene that is clearly taken from that Company.
So, I ask to the current/previous member: is the review correct when it says "exclusive content" ?

Visit Karup's PC - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: pat362's Review

Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:35:54 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

06-18-11 11:35am

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (233)

To Capn (27):

I try to be impartial with my score when it's not a sites fault that their content didn't appeal to me.

View Thread (2)

RE: pat362's Review

Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:23:57 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

06-18-11 11:23am

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To pat362 (233):

Hi Pat,

Given that it was a site not geared to your preferences, I think you have been very fair in your review.
Yes, the Karup's sites are primarily photoset orientated.

From a personal point of view the thing that tends to downgrade my view of them is that they seem to insist in a lot of fake arousal & 'touchy, feely' at the expense of clear body shots.

Other than that I really like them.

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (2)

RE: Thedebilman666's Review

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 20:08:30 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

06-10-11 08:08pm

REVIEW REPLY by Doctor Blues (0)

To Capn (27):

Agreed. But if you think KPC and ATK are bad, check out Bang Bros or Reality Kings for redundant photos. I don't need to see the same pimple on her butt 18 times.

My rationale for joining (soon) will be that they have this model with an hispanic name who is hard to find who did stuff under Mya on ATK, and I would pay a month's fee just to get her set.

View Thread (2)

RE: Thedebilman666's Review

Sun, 26 Dec 2010 11:12:54 PST

Karup's PC (5)

12-26-10 11:12am

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To Thedebilman666 (6):

Nice review.

They certainly aren't the only ones guilty of slack photoediting though. ATK is much the same with their sites.
They have to get their heads around quality as well as quantity.

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (2)

Karup's PC Comment

Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:49:05 PST

Karup's PC (5)

12-19-10 03:49pm

COMMENT by Drooler (218)

Doing a Few Nice "Comeback" Reposts

Remember Avery Adams? She was at quite a few sites back around 2003-2004, KarupsPC included. This year, they've reposted some of her sets there (now at 1500 pixels). There's one of her in a sudsy bathtub that is especially hot. (And I don't usually go for the sudsy tub scenes.)

Another is "Simona" (aka "Kitty" at LSG). She's like the naughty girl you knew before you knew what a retirement plan was.

It would be great to see them reissue their Evelyn Lory sets, btw. I'm pretty sure that KarupsPC was the first site I saw her at. There's some nice exclusive stuff.

Visit Karup's PC - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Key-logger (in a jpeg image?)

Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:26:29 PST

Karup's PC (5)

11-11-10 04:26pm

COMMENT REPLY by hardog (3)

To Capn (27):

Sorry for crying wolf!

________________________

Just received this...

XZXZ,

"It sounds like a possible case of a false positive. If you would like to send us the zip file in question, we would be happy to scan it and confirm a false positive. You can send the zip file to us at..."

________________________

My apology to Karups! Sorry for impugning your reputation! The zip file in question caused a "false positive" for some reason.

Karups is and has been a safe and reliable source for adult content. Thank you for your understanding in working to clear this up!

View Thread (9)

RE: Key-logger (in a jpeg image?)

Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:10:44 PST

Karup's PC (5)

11-10-10 09:10am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To hardog (3):

Some AV / Security software can be paranoid & flag up false positives.

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (9)

RE: Key-logger (in a jpeg image?)

Wed, 10 Nov 2010 06:22:13 PST

Karup's PC (5)

11-10-10 06:22am

COMMENT REPLY by hardog (3)

To Karup (Webmaster):

Just sent this reply to Brent...'

http://www.spectorsoft.com/products/spectorpro_windows/

Same thing occurs... same three images in Andrea set come up with Spector Pro 2010 8.0.3256 Keylogger . Fresh download of the zip file. New scan of the contents, same spyware hit.

Program used "Macscan".

I'll send you the three images if you want them (however you should be getting the same result by downloading the zip file and opening the zip...

The fact that your antivirus software isn't seeing this only means the culprits have done a job blinding the virus software you're using.

Sorry again!

________

Still waiting to hear from Macscan...

So the question boils down to this... can the "people" who write this type of malware successfully hide it from all the best virus protection software (for Windows) yet a little known "MAC" company called macscan can see it by name and serial number?

Just asking.

View Thread (9)

RE: Key-logger (in a jpeg image?)

Wed, 10 Nov 2010 03:53:37 PST

Karup's PC (5)

11-10-10 03:53am

COMMENT REPLY by Karup (Webmaster)

To hardog (3):

Hi hardog (and others),

I've been reading the exchanges between you and our customer service rep, Brent, so I'm familiar with the situation. I too have tested the images and zips in the site thoroughly. To be specific, I checked it on a desktop of mine that has AVG Internet Security (not the free version of AVG), another desktop that has Webroot Antivirus with Spysweeper, and lastly I checked it on my laptop that has Kaspersky Internet Security on it.

None of our attempts to duplicate your results have succeeded. Each sweep or test that we run comes back stating that no warnings or suspicious files have been found.

Please let us know if you come up with anything else or if there is anything specific you'd like for us to do or look into. Also, if you would like to send us the log file from your anti-virus software, we can have a couple of techs that we work very closely with look at it.

Regards,
Jeff

View Thread (9)

RE: Key-logger (in a jpeg image?)

Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:28:16 PST

Karup's PC (5)

11-09-10 11:28pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To hardog (3):

Well, I was a little surprised at the initial post.
I have always found Karups one of the best in terms of customer care.

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (9)

RE: Key-logger (in a jpeg image?)

Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:04:00 PST

Karup's PC (5)

11-09-10 07:04pm

COMMENT REPLY by hardog (3)

To Capn (27):

I received this message...

The set of Andrea, is an exclusive set from on our trusted photographers. This content comes in a different format and we have to process the content into the JPG format to make it web ready. Last night we also used "Kaspersy Internet Security 2011" which is widely regarded as the best antivirus software, to scan the set/files you mentioned, and they came out perfectly clean.

Can you please let me know what program you are using to scan for malware? And can you send over the log file that produced reporting the warnings you received.

_______

I'm working with the software company in order to respond to the log file request...

If this turns out to be a wild goose chase because of a false-positive I'm going to feel like a dufus. I'm tempted to pull my original post until I know for sure. I hate to impute Karups as they are surely one of the most reputable adult content sites on the internet.

View Thread (9)

RE: Key-logger (in a jpeg image?)

Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:05:01 PST

Karup's PC (5)

11-09-10 09:05am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To hardog (3):

Well at least they are being responsive & responsible by quickly investigating your concerns.

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (9)

RE: Key-logger (in a jpeg image?)

Mon, 08 Nov 2010 18:19:31 PST

Karup's PC (5)

11-08-10 06:19pm

COMMENT REPLY by hardog (3)

To Wittyguy (83):

http://www.pcreview.co.uk/forums/thread-2979331.php

http://www.sophos.com/security/threat-sp...otlight.html#threat2

http://www.softpedia.com/get/Security/Se...eBinder.shtmlhttp://

Karups first reply was "just had a couple guys in the office scan using malwarebytes and Avira Anti virus and we got nothing found in those 3 images."

Second reply was, "We absolutely do not put keylogger programs into your images or zips. That said I am sending your finds onto our tech department to make sure that nothing has been compromised on our side. I just loaded up those images you mentioned, as well as the zip file for them and my scanner did not report anything back.

I will let you know when I hear back."

_______

Apparently the technology to embed malware in zip files, jpgs, pdf, xls, etc has been available for some time now...

:(

View Thread (9)

RE: Key-logger (in a jpeg image?)

Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:06:07 PST

Karup's PC (5)

11-08-10 12:06pm

COMMENT REPLY by Wittyguy (83)

To hardog (3):

That is definitely unusual but something that has happened to me once before (not on Karups though). Most likely occurs when the website buys some goodies from a less than scrupulous middleman (aka - on the cheap) who is looking to really recoup on his investment. Sad to here but it's also a sign of things to come as I think we're going to see more creative ways of slipping viruses and such into our machines.

View Thread (9)

Karup's PC Comment

Sun, 07 Nov 2010 21:10:03 PST

Karup's PC (5)

11-07-10 09:10pm

COMMENT by hardog (3)

Key-logger (in a jpeg image?)

Just received this...

XZXZ,

"It sounds like a possible case of a false positive. If you would like to send us the zip file in question, we would be happy to scan it and confirm a false positive. You can send the zip file to us at..."

My apology to Karups! Sorry for impugning your reputation! The zip file in question caused a "false positive" for some reason.

Karups is and has been a safe and reliable source for adult content. Thank you for your understanding in working to clear this up!

_________

Visit Karup's PC - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Denner's Review

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:10:12 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-31-10 11:10am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To Denner (227):

Thanks, Denner, that sounds good. I have a problem with all those socks and sports gear (none of my fantasies revolves around a Gym!) and blech dresses and jeans with hardly anything worn underneath them.

View Thread (5)

RE: Denner's Review

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 02:29:34 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-31-10 02:29am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To messmer (123):

Thanks, messmer....there is quite a good number of sets/vids with lingerie and/or just cute underwear - and scenes where items are removed gradually. Can't put a percentage on, really - but the good thing is this:
Most models have several sets and 3-4 vids (some more) and generally the girls are wearing different things in each set - and among these there is fine lingerie/or sexy bra and thongs....(and not much stripped socks, thanks you)

View Thread (5)

RE: Denner's Review

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:25:52 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-30-10 02:25pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To Denner (227):

Good review, Denner. Thanks to your observations I've put it under "favorites" meaning I'll consider a subscription once some of my present ones run out. One question, since I'm a lingerie freak, would I find many models in erotic undies to start out with or are they dressed like most seem to be these days: in a top, jeans or jeans skirt and thongs and that's it?

View Thread (5)

RE: Denner's Review

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:37:39 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-26-10 07:37am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To TheSquirrel (30):

Well, squirrel - that navigation is certainly a matter of opinion, grant you that. But as Karup's PC was one of my earlier sites ever to join and been coming back now and then for some time, I maybe learned to like/relate to that navigation - still think it's rather simple - but ok, it's probably mostly a matter of "being used to"...
BTW: I do not find that KPC has more close-ups than others - maybe the opposite, even.

But anyway thanks for the thumbs-up...and appreciate the ping-pong about reviews. We need that here.....

View Thread (5)

RE: Denner's Review

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:17:17 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-25-10 06:17pm

REVIEW REPLY by TheSquirrel (30)

To Denner (227):

Great review Denner. I agree with everything you say with only one exception. The only thing we disagree on is the navigatiion. I find it really irritating and hard.

It's a shame there is a relatively small amount of hardcore compared to softcore, and that the video quality isn't a little better. Drooler also brought up the point about there being too many pussy oriented close ups.

Some of the models are a little average, but a lot do look like amateurs. Like you, I mentioned in my review that I considered the place to have an almost old fashioned kind of feel, and that's not a bad thing at all. Given the state of current porn, I think some of us like a place where they don't abuse or insult the model, have mouthy cameramen, or models with tons of tats and fake breasts. I gave it fewer points than you did but I'm a really mean S.O.B.

View Thread (5)

RE: Back to "The Roots"

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 06:21:53 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-13-10 06:21am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To PinkPanther (44):

Guess I agree with you, PP - about their providers and differences....quit ATK about a month ago - and compared the two I like Karups dealing/providers of HC-vids better than ATK - well, of course I just got started at Karups after being away a long time - so it might be the sense of something new - again.....

View Thread (3)

RE: Back to "The Roots"

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:45:55 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-12-10 05:45pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To Denner (227):

I did a couple of 90 day memberships at Karups PC and Karups HA - one after the other recently. While I find myself more excited by ATK's material, mainly because they accentuate the differences between their content providers more than Karups does, Karups sites are quite solid with lots to enjoy. I believe that I enjoyed Karups PC a tad more than Karups HA, but the fun of HA, having never been a member before, was seeing early work of so many fave babes.

View Thread (3)

RE: Back to "The Roots"

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:09:54 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-12-10 02:09pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To Denner (227):

Yes, I have always liked the Karups sites.

Loads of content. Some patchy. Mostly good.

View Thread (3)

Karup's PC Comment

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:34:12 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

10-12-10 08:34am

COMMENT by Denner (227)

Back to "The Roots"

Just got back as a member again after some years away...
Man, what a paysite!!! - in these days and compared to a lot others.
Not that the pix are so fantastic in resolution, nor the vids.
But a lot better than some years ago.

But foremost: Going through that massive content of well known - and especially not so well known models for just a couple of hours - I'm amazed...vids and sets of girls I've never seen before - and that's the amazing part for this user..thought I knew them all (most). And even if Karups still got a serious problem with modelnames /alias.
Some flaws, of course..........but Karups is a good old site to rely on, it seems...... be back with a review...

Visit Karup's PC - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: TheSquirrel's Review

Sun, 01 Aug 2010 17:07:04 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

08-01-10 05:07pm

REVIEW REPLY by TheSquirrel (30)

To lk2fireone (116):

IK - the least they could have done is send over a couple of lap dancers. Come to think of it the least they could have done is absolutely nothing, which is what they did. Shameful.

Drooler - Yeah it also takes me longer to pee than for one of those newbies to write a 3 line review. But that's age. What can we do about the ever increasing threat of the newbie 3 line review? Suicide bombers, that's what. I'd do it myself but had to take an early retirement. Job was just killing me.

Messmer - The trouble is what we want is now a niche. Everything that isn't what the majority consume (whether they comsume it because they really want it, or because it's foist on them) is a niche. You would think your wanting a simple strip from clothed to nude and sometimes involving lingerie would be simple, or my wanting a simple hardcore set of pics or videos with the same style and class as softcore would be easy to find, but it isn't. I'm probably going to end up doing a wittyguy type rant in the forum. I think Drooler and yourself also noticed something about what was missing in some of the Karups sets. Could have done with more ass and whole body shots, although maybe you have to be a real perv to want a whole body shot.

View Thread (14)

RE: TheSquirrel's Review

Sun, 01 Aug 2010 10:29:15 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

08-01-10 10:29am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Capn (27):

Yeah, they sure are slow. The Jana Cova BTS was like, July 24th. And that was a BTS. It's a shame, 'cause it's a really good site except for the snail's pace of it.

View Thread (14)

RE: TheSquirrel's Review

Sun, 01 Aug 2010 10:10:52 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

08-01-10 10:10am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To TheSquirrel (30):

Nice, comprehensive review, squirrel. Just the way I like 'em. I have not ever subscribed to a Karups site, something always stopped me .. I always thought the sameness (and lack of lingerie :-) ) had a great deal to do with it until I saw some sample bonus sets of theirs in AO30 and now I know what my biggest problem with Karups is: their photographers do not believe in landscape type shots, there is the odd one but it's usually just a close up of a trunk and not a full body shot.

As to my ideal site, I'm afraid I'm still looking. I haven't subscribed to a new site in over a month because I'm tired of poor substitutes (for my taste!).

View Thread (14)

RE: TheSquirrel's Review

Sun, 01 Aug 2010 09:42:12 PDT

Karup's PC (5)

08-01-10 09:42am

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To Drooler (218):

I agree with you on TorridArt.

I just wish they would increase their update rate to something competetive.

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (14)