<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Twink Academy - All Activity</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/twinkacademy/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_44060</guid>
		<title>Twink Academy Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=44060</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/twinkacademy/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/twinkacademy.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Twink Academy&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/twinkacademy/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Twink Academy&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-02-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:01pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=11504&quot;&gt;SFguy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=11504&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pretty Good Site, But...&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					Note that monthly charge listed under Best Porn review does not seem to be in effect anymore. As of 1/10, fee for monthly membership is 20 Euros, or about US $30. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Site has a lot of content, but navigation is awkward, due to their insistence on keeping the boys' boarding school fantasy going. Most members are probably just interested in the photos and the videos, but it can be a bit hard to track them down with all the other silly filler you have to wade through to get to them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, while the photo quality is excellent, the video quality is very poor. &quot;Sponsor&quot; level videos are broken down into very short, very blurry clips, generally shot from what is supposed to be a &quot;spycam&quot; perspective, and only a fraction of them have actual sexual activity in them (with most involving the performers simply dressing and undressing in school uniforms and athletic kits). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bottom line: If pics do it for you, the site is fine and has a good amount of decent-quality content in this niche. But if you're looking for hot, high-quality video content, this isn't the place.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=9195&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Twink Academy&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=44060&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=44060&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 12:01:22 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
