<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Euro Babes - New Comments</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/eurobabes/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_8392</guid>
		<title>Euro Babes Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=8392</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;

				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eurobabes/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/eurobabes.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Euro Babes&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eurobabes/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Euro Babes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-22-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:34am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=940&quot;&gt;Drooler&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=940&quot;&gt;156&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Anybody been lately?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					I joined this site in Aug. 2004 and was sorely disappointed.  Though it was exclusive stuff, there wasn't much content and the webmastering was lousy.  Thumbs would X out, and the quality was just so-so anyway.  Everything looked like a test shoot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The visitor's pages show some updating since then, but the samples only max at 1024px for pics.  And for every model, they say the same thing:  that they have over 600 pics of her and 1GB of video.  It could be true, but we know what &amp;quot;could be&amp;quot; means.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judging a site now by its condition three years ago isn't fair, but there's scant little more to go on.  TBP doesn't have any reviews, nor does it list any outside reviews.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And TBP has had it listed for two years now, but even the site facts are virtually ziltch.  Seems like a long time to just let a site collect dust on the shelf while lots of other ones get 1st, 2nd, and further reviews over the same time period.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=9168&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Euro Babes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=8392&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=8392&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 06:34:58 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>