PU - Jaime Hammer - All Activity

RE: atrapat's Review

Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:51:20 PDT

Jaime Hammer (0)

09-08-08 08:51am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To atrapat (110):

Good news. Looks like that $5 drop will get them another $20 from me.

View Thread (9)

RE: atrapat's Review

Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:10:02 PDT

Jaime Hammer (0)

09-08-08 12:10am

REVIEW REPLY by atrapat (110)

To Monahan (37):

JFYI, they have recently lowered the price back to $19.95.

View Thread (9)

RE: atrapat's Review

Sat, 23 Aug 2008 05:57:50 PDT

Jaime Hammer (0)

08-23-08 05:57am

REVIEW REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Monahan (37):

Ahhh ... so you were.
My bad. Sorry for any confusion.

View Thread (9)

RE: atrapat's Review

Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:35:52 PDT

Jaime Hammer (0)

08-22-08 10:35pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To Khan (Staff):

I was correcting williamj's review that mentioned a $19.95 price by pointing out that PU is showing a $24.95 price.

View Thread (9)

RE: atrapat's Review

Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:34:56 PDT

Jaime Hammer (0)

08-22-08 06:34pm

REVIEW REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Monahan (37):

Checking now I'm still seeing the $24.95 price so either you need to get a fresh cookie OR else they are using regional pricing.

View Thread (9)

RE: atrapat's Review

Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:07:49 PDT

Jaime Hammer (0)

08-22-08 03:07pm

REVIEW REPLY by atrapat (110)

To Monahan (37):

Glad that you found my review useful. It was my second review ever but I feel it's still accurate. Ever since I discovered Jaime Hammer's site, what's offered here is what I expect in other solo sites and most fall short for one reason or another. That's why this site stays at the top of my list of reviews.

If you like her personality, let me suggest that you try to make it to one of her webcam chats. As for her major assets, she is currently working mainly for her site so this is almost the only place where you can find her recent pictures and videos. She recently did, though, some pretty awesome sets for Digital Desire, which were being released here even before they were available at DD.

One more detail that, IMHO, sets this site apart is that there was a message board thread asking site members about their opinion prior to raising the price. They also added multimonth membership options then.

View Thread (9)

RE: atrapat's Review

Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:46:45 PDT

Jaime Hammer (0)

08-22-08 11:46am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To atrapat (110):

Looks like the price went up. The PU advertised price is $24.95.

Apart from that your review tells me that this is a great individual model site. There are so many sites out there that are totally dormant and are there only to suck some cash from unwitting horndogs who happen by.

I really like Jaime Hammer for her obvious major assets but also from a personality standpoint.

Your review was very informative and tells me that this site could be a one month deal where I can go in and drain the site in a month's time then sit it out for a year or so before I go back in to update my collection.

Great review. Thanks.

View Thread (9)

RE: atrapat's Review

Sun, 20 Apr 2008 03:46:00 PDT

Jaime Hammer (0)

04-20-08 03:46am

REVIEW REPLY by atrapat (110)

To williamj (9):

Thanks for your interest in my review. I'm a newbie but, the way I see it, the rating of "Excellent - Site is near perfect, best in its class. Highly recommended" is perfectly justifiable in this case.

The key is "best in its class". I've been member to several other American professional Individual Models sites (Porn Stars and published Glamour models alike) and few come close to deliver half as this. You may not like Jaime Hammer's looks or personality (probably not worth joining, then) or expect every adult site to be a gynecology textbook (this site is clearly not one) but the quality of the product and the high degree of involvement of the model with her site is undeniable and way higher than most other similar Individual Models sites.

The cons are not that big. After all, seeing nobody but the website model in an official website is what you join for not to just get "girlfriend" updates of models you are not interested in. Images and videos are currently big enough to fill most screens. HD quality is cool but I don't look for it so I listed them as cons for those who do. Maybe a bit too few images in the galleries but more could become repetitive in a softcore model.

On the other hand, the site is currently clearly misscategorized at PU: it should by no means be in the Porn Stars category but Softcore or Glamour. If you look at it as a Porn Stars site, you will be very disappointed.

Also, the TBP official review is 2 years outdated although I'm in awe that they updated the site facts after my review. For completeness, let me state again that half the galleries (the most recent ones) are available as zip files and that the content is not amateur in any sense.

View Thread (9)

RE: atrapat's Review

Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:12:19 PDT

Jaime Hammer (0)

04-19-08 04:12pm

REVIEW REPLY by williamj (9)

To atrapat (110):

After reading all the Cons and the Bottom Line comment my jaw dropped when I saw you rate it 90? How can you justify such a high score?

View Thread (9)