<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Snatches - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/snatches/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_6436</guid>
		<title>Snatches Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6436</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/snatches/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/snatches.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Snatches&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/snatches/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Snatches&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-26-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;01:20pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1943&quot;&gt;kman1982&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1943&quot;&gt;11&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ The best feature this site has to offer is the quality of the high def videos.  They are presented in 4000kbps and even an ultra high def 8000kbps formats, which really do look the bees knees&lt;br /&gt;
+ Gorgeous European models playing with toys and often whipped cream, with lots of close up shots of their perfect bodies&lt;br /&gt;
+ Excellent quality hi res picture galleries
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- One of the biggest disapointments for me was the extreme lack of updates! - if any! In fact i think site updates have not occured since last year.&lt;br /&gt;
- There is also a distinct lack of content on the site, initially it looks as if there are lots of videos on offer but on a closer inspection only about half of those are presented in hd, that is around 15-20 scenes!  Not good when you've just shelled out $30 for a monthly subscription&lt;br /&gt;
- Each part of each scene has to be downloaded individually
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/snatches/&quot;&gt;snatches.com&lt;/a&gt; as being initially a good site but a site that has not moved forwards, either the site owners have invested money into other paysites or they are just happy to sit back and let punters spend money on a subscription to the site knowing that there won't be any updates.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site is fairly easy to navigate with all videos in one archive and theres no need for search options as there aren't enough videos on the site to warrant it.  Some aspects of design of the site could be made more clear but it's only minor things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quality of what is on there is very impressive, but it's a shame there isn't more of it.  I quite happily cancelled my subscription after just one month, it wouldn't take long to get the best content from the site in this time and then leave because there will be no updates! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also experienced slow transfers and internet activity whilst using the site which was sometimes frustrating, whether the site has been moved to a cheaper, slower server I don't know but it wouldn't surprise me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall the bad points far out way the good, but this site could have been so much more with an increased effort in time and money.  If the site had regular updates and a larger archive of content then I would definetly have rated this site 85-90 easily, but because of these problems it gets a much lower score.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=9036&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Snatches&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6436&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=6436&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:20:43 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_879</guid>
		<title>Snatches Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=879</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/snatches/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/snatches.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Snatches&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/snatches/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Snatches&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-23-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:33pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=310&quot;&gt;OneMan&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=310&quot;&gt;16&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Excellent quality of HiDef Vids.&lt;br /&gt;
Very naughty, lots of close-ups - if you too have a 50&amp;quot; Plasma - you have been warned !!!!!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Very slow site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of all the mayors network, this is the slowest, which, given the fact that the highest quality vids are like 500mb, means it can take 2 hours to download.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am getting speeds at the other sites (eg. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/caseyhays/&quot;&gt;CaseyHays&lt;/a&gt; and Brooke &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/sky/&quot;&gt;Sky&lt;/a&gt;) of around 300kbps, whilst this one is lower than a 100kbps at times, sometimes going up to around 175 kbps which is shared if you try to download multiple files - so if you want the good vids, be prepared to wait !&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not a huge amount of stuff yet
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Only worth admission as part of the entire Mayors Network, or if you really like HiDef close-ups - or if you are a budding medical student - nuff said I think !
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=9036&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Snatches&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=879&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=879&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:33:42 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>