<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - MC Nudes - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_26978</guid>
		<title>MC Nudes Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=26978</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/mcnudes.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter MC Nudes&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;MC Nudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-15-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:27am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 88&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5716&quot;&gt;hondaman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5716&quot;&gt;7&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-has some very sexy models&lt;br /&gt;
-interesting layout for site&lt;br /&gt;
-good varitey of body types&lt;br /&gt;
-has an interesting comment feature at bottom of photoset/viedo page
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-as others have said seems to rely on a few models to keep a steady update stream&lt;br /&gt;
-site speed can be terriable&lt;br /&gt;
-some photosets just seem to lack &amp;quot;energy&amp;quot;
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site is great when its better parts show through but fizzles out a bit with its vices come through.(hey that rhymes ha ha) On the upside this site has some really hot models namely Gabrielle a very well endowed hour glass shaped slap yourself in the face and keep your dick from tearing a whole through your underwear goddess of a woman. There are several other nice girls as well. The photo sets that are good are some of the best errotic sets on the net. But then other sets they just dont seem to have good shots one area that they seem to really lack is the ass 'n tits type shot in other words a pic where you can see the models ass,back,shoulders and some boobs let me see the models curves from that angle there where many sets where you did not see this at all or only one pic or so.Another photo set issue is the lack of energy in some sets some of them just lack feeling and in errotic art you need to focus on body shape and model expression and some sets just seem to lack it. The other issue is that it seems that some models have tons of sets and others have few it seems like they use some models often to keep their updates at a regular basis. The site layout is pretty good and has a feature to change the back ground theme  form grayish to a creamy color that is neat but it would be nice if there where a few more themes to choose from. The biggest issue is the sites speed it can be very slow at times I have downloaded vids from the site that where about 250-300mb and they took about 20-30 minutes to come in on other sites files of the same size normaly take 8-10 minutes. And at certin times of day the pages can take some time to load. I have a 1.5mbps connection so I adivse anyone who has a dialup connection to be aware that you may have trouble in this regard. Bottom line &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/&quot;&gt;MC Nudes&lt;/a&gt; has great potential they just need to get a bit more consistant with their quality and really need to get some more servers to improve their sites speed a bit. I hope they improve in these areas if they do then &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/&quot;&gt;MC Nudes&lt;/a&gt; would be one of the best errotic art sites on the net. This is a site that I will prob join again but not for at least 6 months to see if they have imporved or not.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8583&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit MC Nudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=26978&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=26978&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:27:43 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_24923</guid>
		<title>MC Nudes Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24923</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/mcnudes.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter MC Nudes&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;MC Nudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-26-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:55pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 82&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5297&quot;&gt;pjfry&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5297&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Beautiful models&lt;br /&gt;
- Daily updates&lt;br /&gt;
- Photosets are zipped and DL quickly (they claim to have technology that accelerates downloads.  I can't verify, I use a download manager anyway).&lt;br /&gt;
- Artsy and erotic photo shoots&lt;br /&gt;
- Very high res pictures (more recent updates are usually around 4-5000px, earlier updates are usually in the 1-3000px range)&lt;br /&gt;
- Resolution options on photosets (smaller zips range from about 1 - 5MB in size if space is a concern)&lt;br /&gt;
- Classy softcore (no intense masturbation, extreme closeups, gaping, etc.)  This is definitely a pro if that's what you're looking for.  I've signed up for sites before only to find it wasn't what I expected.&lt;br /&gt;
- High def videos&lt;br /&gt;
- Easy to navigate&lt;br /&gt;
- Nice site design
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Not a huge variety of models.  The site relies on regulars to maintain daily updates (a few models have dozens and dozens, the rest only a few).&lt;br /&gt;
- Not many videos&lt;br /&gt;
- Sets can be repetitive after awhile
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					If you're looking for gorgeous softcore models, I recommend &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/&quot;&gt;MC Nudes&lt;/a&gt;.  The models are very attractive, and the photosets are artsy and erotic.  It stands out from other softcore sites in that the models are classy.  Many softcore sites offer the same thing: Women with way too much makeup in pornstar/stripper outfits (not that that's necessarily bad, but it can get old).  Also, if you like your softcore soft, this site is also for you.  As mentioned above, no extreme closeups, gaping, massive toys (none at all as I recall actually), or similar.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8583&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit MC Nudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24923&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=24923&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:55:09 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_15888</guid>
		<title>MC Nudes Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15888</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/mcnudes.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter MC Nudes&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;MC Nudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-06-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:46pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 72&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=763&quot;&gt;DigglerFL&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=763&quot;&gt;14&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Lots of Content&lt;br /&gt;
- Good Quality Images&lt;br /&gt;
- Fast Downloads&lt;br /&gt;
- Nice Layout
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Lousy Photography&lt;br /&gt;
- Disappointing Model Quality&lt;br /&gt;
- Can't download just the photos you like
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					For the price of a full fledged porn site, you can see a bunch of amateur girls who can't pose to save their lives. You'd think in the silicone age a nude photography site would have more women with outstanding boobs; but the pickings are slim. Some of the shoots are so embarrassing that there isn't one decent pose. When shooting nudes, its important to control body lines. Most of the sessions are just a bunch of shots with no apparent plan. Lastly, you have to download the entire tarball in order to get the full-sized images, and then its a pain to find the one you wanted.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8583&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit MC Nudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15888&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=15888&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:46:12 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_14034</guid>
		<title>MC Nudes Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=14034</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/mcnudes.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter MC Nudes&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;MC Nudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-26-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:03am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 78&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=940&quot;&gt;Drooler&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=940&quot;&gt;156&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+All exclusive content&lt;br /&gt;
+Many stunning women, 93 in all&lt;br /&gt;
+Daily photoset updates from March 2005, but still more back to Oct. ‘04. &lt;br /&gt;
+3 sizes: 600, 1200, and 2-5000px (zips or singles) from Feb. 07 (prior to then only 1000’s and very large)&lt;br /&gt;
+Voting on models and photosets&lt;br /&gt;
+Zips at good download speeds&lt;br /&gt;
+78 artsy videos (17 are g/g) in avi (1280x720 by far the best), wmv, qt and ipod&lt;br /&gt;
+Extensive public preview area&lt;br /&gt;
+Very attractive site design&lt;br /&gt;
+Not many g/g pics&lt;br /&gt;
+NO TOYS!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-VERY sluggish when navigating&lt;br /&gt;
-Some photos are way too grainy/have too much noise, some are too dark, and there’s too much “detached” posing.  (It’s “art,” you see.)&lt;br /&gt;
-Photosets vary from only 1 page to 5 or more&lt;br /&gt;
-Model index is disorganized&lt;br /&gt;
-Model search engine OK by hair color or bra size, but by country, name, or age it’s hit or miss.  Example:  The very popular Hungarian blond Britney/Brigitte Hunter is here as “Luisa” from the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
-Video d/l is slow, around 100K
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					#1:  They need to get their page (and video) servers up to speed.  They update at precisely 11 p.m. GMT, and apparently lots of eager droolers (self included) know this.  Sometimes it’s been impossible to log on around this time, and once I finally do, each page load takes the better part of a minute.  Even in off hours, a 35 sec. click ‘n wait is no surprise.  Every time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also wonder about security.  I had a 365-day  membership that ended earlier this year, and just days before it did my access got blocked; it had been hacked and shared.  Their support promptly gave me a new pwd along with some barely veiled allegations.  Did I get hacked or did they?    (If interested, see replies to this review.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About their models:  They’re very selective overall.  Aneta Smrhova, Ariel/&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/piperfawn/&quot;&gt;Piper Fawn&lt;/a&gt;, Ellena, Ivette Blanche, Katy Gold, Klara/&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/zoe/&quot;&gt;Zoe&lt;/a&gt;, Lenka Horokova, Marketa Belonoha, Simi (as Olivia), &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/susanaspears/&quot;&gt;Susana Spears&lt;/a&gt;, Zuzana Zeleznovova, ETC.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the photos are among the finest I’ve seen, but it’s still a crap shoot because others literally made the con’s point above.  Example:  Zuzana in the sauna -- so grainy that the silo ends its life as a double entrendre.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course there’s no hardcore, but asking for hardcore at a site like this is like expecting Twinkies at a hardware store.  Do we ask hardcore sites to go softcore?  See what I’m saying?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I’d certainly go from “might recommend” to “recommend” to lovers of softcore if they’d fix those persistent server problems.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8583&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit MC Nudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=14034&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=14034&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 06:03:44 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_1180</guid>
		<title>MC Nudes Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1180</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/mcnudes.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter MC Nudes&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;MC Nudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-02-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:47am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 97&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=592&quot;&gt;Mayvary&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=592&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					MC-Nudes provide no hardcore but full nude-erotic in an appealing and mind twisting way.&lt;br /&gt;
Extract of the featurelist:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;raquo; daily updated sets and twice a week videos&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;raquo; real HDTV Videos (1280x720 pixels) and imagesets up to 4000 pixels&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;raquo; unique models (amateur and starlets)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;raquo; great usability and design&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;raquo; steady envelopement in technologies and features&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;raquo; backstage &amp;amp; special reports, desktops ...
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&amp;raquo; NO - hardcore or intense masturbastion stuff&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;raquo; NO - trial membership available&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;raquo; NO - more things to criticise
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					MC-Nude provides maximum pleasure to your imaginary visions and is only dedicated to the lovers of the female body. They stay for beauty and quality only. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This site is a must for all who don't need big archives from the ancient times and explicite porn action.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Get your kicks on MC-Nudes and tease your synapses cause the differences come in details.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Follow-Up:&lt;br /&gt;
MCN has finally launched their 100% technically reinvented site. They increased browsing speed and even managed to provide maximum compatiblity on all browsers for MAC and PC even my IPhone!!!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sitestats today: GIRLS: 186; REAL HDV-Movies: 313; IMAGES: 74648&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their HDV-Archive is the largest in the nich&amp;eacute; and for me the best in sensuality.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8583&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit MC Nudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1180&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=1180&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 03:47:06 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_1033</guid>
		<title>MC Nudes Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1033</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/mcnudes.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter MC Nudes&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;MC Nudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-28-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:16pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 90&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=552&quot;&gt;tcman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=552&quot;&gt;6&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-The photo sets are of a very high quality, with resolutions of up to 4000 pixels (although many are only 3000, or 2000 pixels)&lt;br /&gt;
-Good navigation with detailed search options.&lt;br /&gt;
-Some high-definition videos (1280 x 720 pixels)&lt;br /&gt;
-Some well known European glamour models like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/anettakeys/&quot;&gt;Anetta Keys&lt;/a&gt; (Aneta Šmrhov&amp;aacute;) and Mark&amp;eacute;ta Belonoh&amp;aacute;.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-All of the shoots are softcore, but, not limited to Playboy angles ;)&lt;br /&gt;
-A relatively small collection (as of 6 months ago): approximately 20,000 pictures.&lt;br /&gt;
-Photo sets are relatively small: approximately 30 photos each.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Most of the models are slender, European and 24 years of age or younger.  If this is your taste then this site is a must.  Personally, I was stunned by how gorgeous some of the girls presented here are.  Despite the modest collection size, it will keep you busy for at least a month.  So, as long as you aren't looking for hardcore only give it a look.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8583&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit MC Nudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1033&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=1033&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 17:16:24 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>