<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - MC Nudes - New Comments</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_14294</guid>
		<title>MC Nudes Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=14294</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;

				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/mcnudes.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter MC Nudes&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;MC Nudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-31-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;01:26pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=940&quot;&gt;Drooler&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=940&quot;&gt;156&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Late-breaking news&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					Today I see that MCN Nudes has a new look.  They also seem to be up to standardizing all of their galleries in 3 sizes, the two largest being 1200px and 4000px, for all of their content from the beginning of the site's history.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BUT while they've put in the links for those sizes under the thumbnails in the galleries, the pic sizes have NOT changed as far as I've been able to tell, at least not yet.  I went through several of my favorite models, such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/susanaspears/&quot;&gt;Susana Spears&lt;/a&gt; and Marketa Belonoha, and that's what I've found as of the moment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My subscription runs out pretty soon, so I might not be able to revise my review of Dec. 26 in time should real changes in those pic sizes take effect.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So this is an FYI.  I will pass on this &amp;quot;splendid torch&amp;quot; to a future degenerate ...
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8583&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit MC Nudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=14294&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=14294&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:26:51 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_3649</guid>
		<title>MC Nudes Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3649</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;

				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/mcnudes.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter MC Nudes&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/mcnudes/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;MC Nudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-08-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:41pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=940&quot;&gt;Drooler&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=940&quot;&gt;156&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Showing improvement&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					I've been a long-term subscription member of MCN and they are showing improvements.  Zip files of galleries from Feb 19th, 2007 are available in 3 sizes:  really small, 1200px, or large in 2000, 3000,4000, and sometimes even 5000px.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to then, they only have two sizes:  really small or huge.  The zip file sizes display as, for example, 1.87 mb OR 47.9mb!  So adding the medium size was a very good idea, and in any case it's a nice courtesy to the user that they tell you in advance how big the zips are.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 3s and 4s are most common for large size.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My occasional gripes about the site are (as usual) blurriness and lack of light.  Maybe that's 'cause it's &amp;quot;art,&amp;quot; but the turn on happens when the &amp;quot;art&amp;quot; is clear and well lit, if you ask me ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The women on this site are usually lusciously beautiful thanks to the very often highly professional photography.  The archives go back into late 2004.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And two big pluses are that the content is exclusive and there are no blasted toys being licked and shoved in (very tiresome, that).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, it has a really attractive design like none other I've seen.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8583&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit MC Nudes&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3649&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=3649&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 15:41:52 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>